…and just uses the ‘fight for women’s rights’ as a proxy to wage war on men.
Feminism had a lot to say back in the day (before I was born I might add.) When you look at its foundational beliefs everything they push on society via government (men’s taxes) revolves about a few constants:
1. Men cannot be victims. Women cannot be perpetrators.
2. Women have been oppressed, are still oppressed and the only thing that can save them is feminism.
3. Women are exploited by patriarchal constructs like capitalism.
4. Women are equal (or superior) to men in every way.
Feminism is an ideology. Like communism. In fact, the feminists got their ideas about destroying the family, capitalism etc from Karl Marx.
“Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism.” - Catharine A. MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (First Harvard University Press, 1989), p.10
The whole ‘rising up’ of these so called empowered women or wimmin (they don’t like the word ‘women’ because it contains the word ‘men’) was only made possible by corporate sponsorship. The main benefactors were the Rockefeller banking cartel. Source. Also, corporate interests were integrated into the feminist campaigns. Tobacco companies, at the instruction of Edward Bernaise, paid women to join the women’s marches while smoking cigarettes, to associate ‘empowerment’ with buying their product. Women, being easily led, fell for it of course. Source. The CIA had a big part to play in its proliferation in the media also. Source.
Why would the Rockfellers fund feminism? Well, they wanted women in the workplace. That’s another half of the population they could tax. Their children would have to go into state run schools, they could then be ‘taught’ whatever is necessary to keep them dependent on consumerism and loyal to the state. The nuclear family would take a nose dive. It had nothing to do with ‘empowering women’. In fact, it did the opposite.
“Destroy the family, you destroy the country.” – V.I. Lenin
So, feminism is now rampant. Like political correctness, it actually does the opposite of what it claims to do. It claims to give women rights, but only by attacking men’s rights. Anything catering to women is seen as ‘empowering, girl power’ or some other slogan, anything catering to men is sexist.
Men’s clubs? Sexist! Women’s clubs? Empowering! Q.
The flavour of the day though, is ‘pay discrimination’. I have written about this already and so have many others. The feminist M.O. is always the same. Portray women as victims of something, blame men as oppressing women (because they’re men of course), lobby for law to change to stop it. Reality is conveniently avoided.
Feminists claim women are being discriminated against because they earn less during their lifetime. Single mothers often don’t make much money! Oh noes!
Feminism told women they can be whatever they want to be. They also told women that being in a nuclear family is oppression, heterosexual intercourse is oppression, having babies is oppression (Rockefeller also funded The Pill) indeed, as some ‘leading’ feminist write:
“We can’t destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage.” – Robin Morgan (ed), Sisterhood is Powerful, 1970, p.537
“No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” – Interview with Simone de Beauvoir, “Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma,” Saturday Review, June 14, 1975, p.18
As a result of being able to do what they want, they went into the workplace. They were free to take what jobs they were qualified (and wanted) to do. Their choices reflect what their priorities are, which are different to those of men. Men generally choose jobs because of pay. Women choose jobs because of flexibility, safety and convenience. They make less money because they jobs they choose pay less. Simple isn’t it?
No it isn’t. Feminists refuse to accept that women’s choices put them in that position. So they blame the economy. The reports they release always ignore the choices of jobs, the hours taken off, the sick days called in and such. Why? Well their agenda is portraying women as victims, so they must synthesise a distorted reality to push that agenda. They pretend everything else is equal. How can they do this?
“Our culture, including all that we are taught in schools and universities, is so infused with patriarchal thinking that it must be torn up root and branch if genuine change is to occur. Everything must go – even the allegedly universal disciplines of logic, mathematics and science, and the intellectual values of objectivity, clarity and precision on which the former depend.” — Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge, Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women’s Studies, (New York Basic Books, 1994), p.116
Logic and objectivity aren’t in the feminist play book, they can’t allow them to be because it would undermine all of the lies they use to push their agenda. They are using women as a weapon to try and communise society. Consider the issue of porn/ lads mags/ dress. Feminists exclaimed that being with the same man is oppressive, women have the right to take charge of their own sexuality! To use it for themselves! (The idea behind that was to destroy relationships, the precursor to the family.)
So, women were ‘freed’ from relationships. They no longer experienced the stigma of being ‘of low morality’ as Richard Blackwood used to put it. So what did these women CHOOSE to do? Why, they went into the sex industry. They used their bodies to make money. They exploited themselves for cash. They sent pictures into to NUTS and Maxim in the hope of getting a job.
Feminists didn’t like that, so they attack the industry (well, the men in it), conveniently ignoring the choices women made, and somehow blaming men for ‘forcing’ women to cue up around the block for porn auditions, FHM shoots and such. (Some of the biggest production houses in the porn industry are women, like Jenna Jameson, Jill Kelly etc, but the feminists’ reality ignores them. They must still be exploited by men, somewhere, somehow.)
They also hate the nuclear family with a passion. (Naturally, they label it oppressive, blame men for oppressing, tell women to reject the family to empower them, the same old story.)
“[The nuclear family is] a cornerstone of woman’s oppression: it enforces women’s dependence on men, it enforces heterosexuality and it imposes the prevailing masculine and feminine character structures on the next generation.” — Alison Jaggar, Feminist Politics and Human Nature
Feminists also assume all men are criminals, sex offenders, rapists etc. Evil barbaric creatures that should be enslaved. Men are separated from children on planes because of feminist BS. Source. Men are attacked for walking in the park with their daughters. Source. Boys are failed in feminised schools. Source. Inventing stories to demonise men. Source. and so on…
“All men are rapists and that’s all they are” — Marilyn French, Authoress.
In reality, there is no pay discrimination, women want to be photographed in lingerie, women like attention, women want families, women don’t want to work in high-risk jobs (95% of work related deaths are men.)
Currently, most women (and men) will defend feminism because they’re brainwashed and they don’t know any better. Women defend it because of the benefits it gives them. Men defend it because they’re trying to curry favour with women.
I don’t defend it because I’ve done the research. I hate it. Feminists can kiss my arse.
In reality, feminism is a war on men and boys, and it works by acting like it is about women. Until people reject feminism (vocally) it will continue to destroy the family, destroy populations and destroy the bonds between men and women.
And if we lose that, nothing else will matter. Except the global eugenics/ depopulation agenda.
One final thought. Although feminists portray women as equal to men, they will not hesitate to portray them as helpless victims (hence unequal, and in need of new laws) when it suits their agenda.
Further reading.Feminism: The Six Frauds
This is just great. I joined a feminist website the other day — and they banned me within the span of twelve hours. For them, freedom of speech only goes one way. After they kicked me off, the moderator went back and altered — censored — my posts, then declared the thread closed. And the patriarchy is the only group interested in power? Please!
Thanks for the comment John, you are absolutely right about the socialism of Hitler, and the parallels with today’s (New) Labour. Same thing with Obama.
With have a generation or two who have grown up under state tyranny, socialism, communism. They don’t actually know what freedom is.
Funny how I didn’t learn anything I know now from the Marxist indoctrination camps, otherwise known as schools.
No Bill of Rights, Magna Carta, Monetary (fractional reserve, fiat currency etc). No truth about the banking establishment, the EEC > EU being the brainchild of Nazi’s as a Plan B to destroy Britain incase the war failed. No explanation of Marxist thinking.
Just lots of ‘teaching’ about how you are an evil polluter, creating CO2 and hurting the Earth, how you should snitch on your parents to the state and how you should worship the EU and turn your back on Britain. Embrace globalism and the new world order.
It strikes me that the feminist movement more closely resembles the Marxist-both are Jewish creations. The number of shrieking Jewesses has always been extraordinarily high in it since inception. Moreover, these Jewesses are completely silent about what goes on in Israel, where there is a vast sex slave trade of women kidnapped in Eastern Europe. Moreover, in Israel a state board determines whether a Jewess can have an abortion. The criteria are whether the woman has the financial resources to care for the child and the Jewish state’s need for a higher birthrate, not the convenience of the individual Jewess. There are other interesting practices as well, such as the fact that the Jewess cannot get a divorce without the husband’s permission.
Since you are anti-socialist, a position which I share, it is worth while remembering that it was precisely the British socialists, the Labour Party, who were the main sponsors of the Jewish “national home” during the days of the Mandate, 1923-1948. Indeed, this British Labour Party included a famous plank in its 1944 platform that “the Arabs should be encouraged to move out, as the Jews move in”. I assure you that I am no supporter of Adolf Hitler and his social system, although these days it is entirely forgotten that Hitler was indeed a socialist-and a genuine one. As Mr. Goldberg points out, the economics of Hitler’s Germany were entirely leftist. Corporations were heavily taxed and regulated. The Nazis had all kinds of social programs similar to those of New Deal America. Indeed, in the early years of the New Deal and the Third Reich, many Germans referred to the New Deal as “National Socialism for Americans”.
In Nazi Germany, abortion for German women was illegal (although the Nazis made an exception for Jewish women wanting abortions). The Nazis and the Italian fascists also made determined efforts to increase the birth rates of their respective countries. It is currently the practice among political leftists to equate German National Socialism with Jewish National Socialism in Palestine. But after the Second World War when the mandate was crumbling, there were a number of English conservatives who advanced the analogy as well. I think in particular of MP Beamish and Sir Edward Spears, who headed the Conservative opposition while working with the various Arab Offices in London.
Anyway, back to the feminists. They are odious creatures, Jewish or otherwise. I compliment you on your well-reasoned exposes. They are some of the best on the internet. Keep hammering on the truth. Someone has to do it. The liars of the kept media never will.
Maybe Robert, how about this:
http://fathersforlife.org/feminism/quotes1.htm
It seems digusting and ridiculous when it the roles are reversed John, which feminism was, is and always will be.
The best way to refute feminism is to simply reverse the role of the genders. Here goes.
Let us visualize America in the 1950’s as it once was. (I live in the States.) Women work to support men who stay home and raise the children. Women give men everything in divorce court (the house, the car, all her money). Women pay massive child support and alimony to automatic custody fathers. Women die by the thousands in Korea and Vietnam while men stay home and drink tea with the boys. Women go down with the ship so that men and children can climb on the lifeboats. Women work themselves into heart attacks at work so that men can outlive women by eight years and inherit 80% of all the wealth in the country. Men have it made.
In 1963 a closet Jewish communist, Betty Friedan, publishes a book, “The Male Mystique”, arguing that the average male suburban house husband is really living in a camoflauged Auschwitz concentration camp. Men should liberate themselves from this female oppression and demand careers and high paying jobs in addition to “men and children” first. Women display the balls that men lack and call it all bullshit. They make clear to men that men have too much already and that men are not going to have all the jobs, too. Moreover, men should be paid less because they do not have to work to support the opposite sex like women do.
And that is the crock-of-s— called male feminism.
“All men are rapists and that’s all they are” — Marilyn French, Authoress.
Nonsense. This is quoted wrongly. It was a character in one of French’s novels that said it and this does in no way reflect French’s personal opinion.
I am a woman and I was lied too. My mother left my father and raised us with neglect. She has the highest degree but the family is a wreck. I sold my soul for ‘love’, I didn’t know what it was! I have always been submissive and craved my husbands arms, but that branded me as weak so I entered the world unarmed. My INSTINCTS to submit were used against me while I feigned emotional detachment. I was never allowed too say I needed a man. But at the same time my educated mother envied the ‘weak’ women who had to listen to a man. I was raised to marry for money, but that men were useless. I married a sexy blue collar worker who has me and dinner and thank god he loves my kids ( who are in bed) when he comes home. I love the structure, I love the focus he gives me. When I was single, I was always terrified and constantly felt used . I cannot admit this to my friends ( who are jealous of the softness of my life but would never let a man rule over them). It isn’t always easy for me, he is controlling but patience usually works best for me to get what I want. I mean want as in extra things that I end up getting because I am a “good wife”.
Feminism ruined my life. I grew up believing I could do anything a man could do. I did leave my childrens father because he is and alcoholic beat us and would not work. But if I had been cared for as a young women I would have realized how important a partner is in the first place, especially a suitable one. I was strong but worn out and depressed. I hated men but needed one…and other women LOOKED DOWN on me. I was scared to get an apartment alone with my kids, there was no safety for me and I didn’t realize I needed it until after I was a mother. The 250 dollar check the state gave me was useless! I was forced into doing ugly things…It was a mess. I do believe that matriarchy is changing things for the worse, but I won’t admit that to a woman. Just the other day a single woman looked on as I got a cool new phone from my Hubby, hers was cheap and she was sucking on a coffee demanding correct prices after taxes. She looked at me with contempt, I don’t know why…I earned it with all the work I do at home for my family. How could she be mad when she earned every bit of what she bought as well??
[...] Not state ‘discipline’, family discipline. Bankers didn’t like that, so they conspired to fund feminism to undermine everyone else’s [...]
I see the last comment was made almost two months ago, so this may not get a lot of viewership. Be that as it may, I disagree. Men are not emasculated and afraid to criticize women, they have merely been bludgeoned into not expressing their views. We at this site have officially declared political correctness dead and buried.
Steven. You make a lot of good points. I have thought about falling into the hate trap frequently, sometimes I just let rip and get ‘emotional’ about it. Imagine that!
I try to stay balanced though. This isn’t just about women mind you, men have a lot to answer for, for allowing it to perpetuate also. Societies policy makers are riddled with self-interested social engineering scum. The problem is the corporate government’s reach into society. I’m not claiming to have all the answers, but keeping the statists out of peoples’ lives is a good start.
One of the reasons societies of old were so strong is precisely because of the freedom society had. Government stood the hell out of the way, like it should, and people organised themselves into the units that were best for them. The nuclear family being an essential part.
I have no lenience with women’s bad behaviour though, (and men’s) and will pull them up on it if I have the time on this blog. On top of everything else, these women do have to take responsibility for their actions, because in the end of the day, they are the ones acting in that way down here, in the real world.
Men are now emasculated too, scared to criticise women, along with everyone else. Part of the feminist ideologies’ creation of the female immunity.
Men and women do naturally complement each other, it’s no surprise, we’ve been together evolving on Earth for a very long time. That was the goal of the bankers. To break that bond so they could control the women (and therefore the next generation) while marginalising the men.
This has now been going on for generations. This isn’t the beginning, this is almost at the end.
Feminism encourages women’s narcissism. This alienates men who loathe women for it. Women believe that their selfishness is actually ‘girl power’ so they refuse to see it otherwise. Men get even more pissed off. Etc.
The problem is women are being protected from the consequences of their actions by the government.
If it stayed limited and cancelled all of these bullshit laws and allow people the freedom to think and speak, these things would quickly repair themselves.
That’s what I think, none of this will make any difference while the governments do what they do.
I started out blogging about feminism, but quickly moved beyond it when my research went deeper. Still, I’ll keep calling people on their bullshit.
Thanks for the comment Steven
When you know that feminism was created by Rockefeller and his foundations, when you realize that the feminist movement, Ms. Magazine, Gloria Steinem was created by the CIA, when you realize the feminist media has been heavily funded into reality… you can’t blame it all on women so harshly. One fact, most elections are won by the person who spends the most money. Money buys perception of truth, in this age of psychologically-honed advertising. We have all fallen victim to propaganda at one point or another in our lives. Most feminists have been with an asshole of a man, or watched it in a friend or family member, and broke down and came to the “answer” that was given to them to explain it all away. Most people take the first answer that gets them out of their cognitive dissonance, because most people can’t stand not to KNOW “the answer” to something. Some of us are coming up with a NEW version of “the answer” about how it’s all women’s fault actually.
Some of the vitriol towards women in these comments is perpetuating “the gender war” too. It’s doing Rockefeller’s work, too. The big boys do their thing by divide and conquer, play sides off against each other and stand back to watch them tear each other to pieces, stepping in at the end with your “solution.” Ordo ab Chao.
We have to unlearn the indoctrinated “fact” that there is no difference between men and women. It’s killing both of us. Men and women are supposed to compliment each other, not copy each other, and that includes our flaws. In the healthy relationships I’ve observed, men help center women and bring them down to earth, and women help inspire men and give them a reason to be brave and improve their situation in life. Plus, women give children.
Unbounded logic/reason (the male principle) will destroy the world just as surely as unbounded emotion/desire (the female principle) will. The eugenics/depopulation agenda is 100% rational. That doesn’t make it right.
Also, remember that the “Playboy” culture sprang up in the 1950s, no doubt funded by the same people, to create a new class of shallow, chauvenistic, sex-desperate males for the then-upcoming feminist movement to rebel against.
To the person who thinks that “feminism” goes back to the dawn of man: feminism could not exist in any culture without a mass media to promote the idea by shoving it into books, movies, TV shows, music, art, commercials, and so on. Repetition is how you make a new idea stick.
Mark, what the hell are you on about?
You are afraid to be more? You mention “the foundation days of femenism”. Excuse us all, but I am certain that femenist roots go back to the “days”, or rather eons when we were six inch mamals scurrying about under dinosaur feet. I have a hidden momma inside who is very adept at managing real BIG problems. Get with the gang, dear.
Yeah Some Dude. Every guy I know knows about women are about. Got wonderful people like Heather Mills for the big time attention, just in case a few blokes didn’t want to believe it.
The schools, funnily enough, are dominated by female teachers. Women are known to try and feminise things, workplace, boyfriends home etc. Their teaching style isn’t appropriate for boys because they focus on stupid shit like talking about your feelings and ‘its the trying that counts’ and not ‘these are the facts’ and ‘be the best.’
Women are definitely ME creatures. I did a post called FMW Hypothesis which I have begun to bring some logical structure to their attitudes, which reminds me I need to do Part 2 lol.
[...] protect his familyHPV Vaccine Gardasil 2Elizabeth: The Golden AgeFeminism labeled a ’society killer’Why Feminism is a Fraud…HPV Vaccine GardasilVideo [...]
What’s worse is there’s a serious misinformation and brainwashing regimen in schools to teach children women are “to be respected” “treated like princesses” “treated as equals” and boys are naturally given NONE of the same kind of respect. Why? Because women don’t give a damn about men. And that’s why feminism will fail even more than it has. It’s about me me me, what I can get, not about US US US how we can work together for a better future. We’ll wake the hell up all of us and realize things have gone to hell but it’ll be too late…
[...] privateofficerbreakingnews wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt…and just uses the ‘fight for women’s rights’ as a proxy to wage war on men. Feminism had a lot to say back in the day (before I was born I might add.) When you look at its foundational beliefs everything they push on society via … [...]
[...] Feminism is a Fraud… fmwatkins placed an interesting blog post on Why Feminism is a Fraudâ¦Here’s a brief [...]