chicks

One for the wenches…

WenchOver at The Guardian a lady writes about the phenomenon of ‘LADS’, as she puts it. Her complaints are regarding an online magazine where guys take the piss and call members of the opposite sex various names, like slut, wench, bitch etc. Now apart from the fact she name drops literally all of the magazines’ accounts (publicity cough) she (gently) berates these guys for being so disrespectful and laments that the site / community as she states in her byline:

sends a message to young girls that their role is clearly delineated – you’re worthless.

The irony of talking about feminism (she writes for a femrag called Vagenda) while assuming that guys are responsible for the esteem of these girls is typically insular, but the double standard of women claiming to be ‘independent / just as good as / better than‘ men when it suits them, only to expertly feign innocence, rocking one of their feet on its toe while playing with their hair when they don’t like the consequences of something is ancient man-knowledge, just like it is ancient woman-knowledge that it’ll most probably work on men. And they’re right. Grr. This takes a much darker turn when women lie about rape, but let’s keep this on a lighter note. She continues;

Those little feminist-baiting scamps are well-known for their lax grasp of the term sexual consent, not to mention their constant assertions that all women are “wenches” and “slags”.

Saying they have a lax grasp of the term implies they’re rapists, surely? I’m sure they know what sexual consent is. I would go so far to say, if they actually caught a guy raping a girl, they would probably beat the shit out of him. They’re just lads, not grooming-gang rapists, for that you’ll have to look to our imported Muslims (which funnily enough, feminists don’t seem to touch).

Also, many women are slags. Vacuous, fame worshipping talentless meat sacks. You just have to look at the billions of photos they take of themselves and their SELF imposed objectification, with their cleavage shots, gallons of makeup and bum-in-the-mirror shots. (Not that I’m complaining about that last one). This includes so-called celebrity women who are climbing over each other to act sluttier than the next publicity whore. Who are they pandering to? They’re already rich and famous. Oh right, they’re competing with EACH OTHER. Women responsible for the issues of women? Well I never!

Back to feminism. Women want to be treated equally to men do they not? If they are going to roll in men’s circles and peek into men’s communities they better toughen up and learn to give as good as they get. Not just roll over and cry, because you just encourage them as they smell blood (but not in a nasty vicious way like girls do to each other when bullying in the playground). So just take the jest like a man woman! The writer should listen to how (male) best mates talk to each other, about each other. Shit, she has no idea…

Now I would post an example but a: men already know and b: women don’t need to know. (Plus not telling them winds them up even more).

Any guy with a few notches under his belt knows that a woman is unlikely to be impressed with his ability to draw a giant knob in the sand using a supercar, let alone appreciate being called a “student slut” who he’d “do up the arse” to a chorus of “LAD!” from his mates.

Well if the guy has a supercar she will put up with it because that’s what wenches do, she’ll probably even take it up the arse if he’s rich enough. These guys are just saying what guys can think. Don’t fret, I’ve heard what women say about men and believe me they don’t slouch there!

She goes on to ask if this misogyny is just a phase. First, a definition;

Misogyny (pron.: /mɪˈsɒdʒɪni/) is the hatred or dislike of women or girls.

And now, a question;

Would you create / join / contribute to a website dedicated to talking about / looking at pictures of / having sex with something you hate or dislike? That isn’t logical. But then she is female (feminist), even if she is a bit of a babe. I’d probably do her…

Oh sorry I’m objectifying.

She goes on to attempt to categorise this male behaviour (as if women don’t objectify men), not realising that this is a male thing full stop. It doesn’t belong to ‘middle class males’ or ‘maybe some working class’. Not all men talk about women like that but we do communicate about them in encrypted ways…

… Ever seen some hot wench in your office bending over and you catch a glance and then look around, only to see another guy look and then make eye contact at you? Then you both smile /snigger, do the man-nod and walk on?

Of course you have. If a bunch of guys outside a pub all watch some stunner strut by and afterwards you all just nod quietly to each other and sip your pint?

Indeed.

It’s normal. It’s in our DNA. What she doesn’t realise it that those ‘lads’ on that site are simply fascinated by women. So much so that they created an entire website about it. If any of these women actually tried to code a website they would begin to appreciate how much affection that actually entails. (Not the coding, which is mildly creative but mostly boring, I mean the motivation to do it).

Now, just because they aren’t fitting her and her ilks’ definition of how men should talk is utterly irrelevant. They don’t give a shit what women think, and they should they? They’re speaking with each other, they set the rules. That’s what happens when MGOTW. In a way this website is evidence of my interest in them. I do actually find women interesting, not in a study-breakthrough-in-science type of way, but in a ‘WTF how does that even make sense?’ way.

Of course, the other argument is that if women don’t like such sites, just don’t visit them. But although they won’t admit it, women are also fascinated by men, even feminists. We can’t get enough of each other.

I very much doubt those guys actually speak like that to women. You can just imagine them all cracking jokes about women to each other but as soon as a real woman talks to them they’d be on their best behaviour and she’ll probably have the dude around her little finger before he knows what hit him. But that’s what separates the LAD from the MAN.

As always, the problem with feminists is that they want women to have respect without having to earn it, but in this environment created by feminism, this new age of equaliteeeeee, men have simply put women in the same group that men put other men in and being men, the rules are simple and effective.

Earn my attention. Earn my respect. Earn my loyalty and then, and only then, will we have your back. And as long as you keep it up, we’ll have your back forever.

But seeing as you happen to be a hot chick, a few more pictures of DAT ASS wouldn’t go amiss…

x

phoenix3

A Phoenix of Liberty Rises

I’m back. It’s been a few years. I’ve been here and there, compiled even more research and have much to put on here for you. Conclusions I have reached that I have to share. I will be going to places I maybe shouldn’t be going to, but I’ll keep pushing it until you tell me to stop.

It’s going to be a little while until I hit my stride, I have lots of comments to approve, spam to clear, templates to reset, links to gather, I need to organise.

I’ll give you more personal thoughts in coming posts.

Thanks for reading.

And as far as the system is concerned? THIS IS WAR.

The Effect of Eugenics Propaganda: Decline of Civilization

Infowars

Carolyn Harris
Infowars
December 12, 2008

According to a study led by David Schmitt, a professor of psychology at Bradley University, Illinois, Britons lead the western world in casual sex. The number of ‘one-night stands’ by both men and women are up and they are “the most promiscuous in the world.” While some praise this behavior as being “sexually free” it does have devastating consequences for human civilization. Consider the recent headline, “Drunken one-night stands over New Year will bring a record number of abortions” among teenagers.

While many “liberated” women say that they can separate sex and emotional attachment like men can and that casual sex is no big deal, testimonials do not bear this out. Besides the physical consequences of sexually-transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies, the emotional toll is not something that is casual – it may be consciously ignored, but it is deep and long-lasting The elite know that the more sexual partners one has, the less able they are to maintain a long-term monogamous relationship like marriage. This is an insidious way to undermine the natural bonds that form marriages and create children.

And the ubiquitous sexual messages we encounter are no accident. Contained in television, movies, music, general advertisements and even now in virtual worlds, to which the public is retreating from this increasingly upsetting real-life world, these ever-present reminders of the cult of youth, beauty and sex are targeted at the young.

And the youth are absorbing those messages and putting them into practice as the results of this study show:

“Twenty-one percent of girls and 18% of boys said they have posted nude or partially nude pictures of themselves online. Forty-nine percent of teens and young adults have sent sexually suggestive text messages or e-mails of themselves. Fifteen percent of teens who sent sexually suggestive content said they have done so with someone they only know online.”

With more and more children being raised online, and coupled with the intensive mandatory sex education at public schools, they are subjected to more degrading influences and less direct family input than ever before. The deleterious effects of utilizing their unprecedented freedom online, participating in virtual worlds where anything is acceptable with no consequences, these children are literally becoming unable to form and maintain even simple friendships with actual peers they encounter in their real lives.

All of these contribute to the planned decline of civilization and the institution of . The social engineers have cleverly devised a top-down approach to tearing apart the nuclear family due to its threat to their plans for their New World Order. It is imperative to achieving their plans that the youth and young adults are inculcated with the ideas that procreating is selfish, greedy and inconvenient. They are taught from a very young age by teachers cumchange agents” to believe that human life is not as valuable as flora and fauna, that cultural morés and morals are “outdated and outmoded” and therefore should be discarded in favor of new “liberated” thinking of secular humanism, which espouses the belief that there is no concrete “right and wrong” therefore anything is justifiable with enough rationalization.

Marie Stopes, friend of fellow eugenicist Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, created the first birth control clinic in Britain and advocated “’sterilization of those totally unfit for parenthood be made an immediate possibility, indeed made compulsory.’ And in The Control of Parenthood, (1920)… wrote that were she in charge, she would ‘legislate compulsory sterilization of the insane, feebleminded… revolutionaries… half castes.’ She opposed the marriage of her own son merely because his bride-to-be wore glasses. And upon her death a large portion of her fortune was bequeathed to the Eugenics Society.” Marie Stopes International carries out one out of every three abortions in the UK, and promotes “voluntary sterilization.”

Most people instinctively recoil at the prospect of either voluntary or state-imposed sterilization, but sadly there are many who have been so brainwashed that they have aborted their pregnancies because having children is not “eco-friendly” and many others who have been voluntarily sterilized because of outright selfishness (”it would hamper my lifestyle and I wouldn’t be able to do the things I want to do”), others being “repulsed by… the idea of being pregnant and having a child” or just total lack of any maternal instinct.

This is a source of joy to the eugenicists and population control/reduction proponents because their mildly coercive population control via “education” and constant propaganda is working so well in the western world. The rampant promiscuity and resultant high divorce rate, astronomically increased infanticide, children’s lack of ability to form even the most basic relationship – friendship, legions of children being raised less by parents and more by teachers (e.g., the State) all accomplish the population reduction plan quite nicely without having to resort to bloodshed, except of course for the infants that are aborted.

But, as Bertrand Russell stated, “I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others, which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full… The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s.”

We who value Freedom must resist the New World Order by educating ourselves and others, and refusing to participate in eugenics and voluntary population control.

Brothel’s booming in London

Horray! Now if London females weren’t stuck up, selfish, self-righteous tramps maybe there wouldn’t be such a booming market for this service. So view this article as an indicator to the quality of women in London, which, like the air quality, is atrocious!

Source: BBC

(Extract)

London’s brothel industry has spread to “every corner” of the city, according to a charity’s report.

Brothels in the city offer sex for as little as £15, and some are charging £10 extra for unprotected intercourse, the Poppy Project in Southwark found.

Free market capitalism at its finest. Big fat LOL. See, all those feminist ball-breaker bitches aren’t very attractive. Easier to just have sex with a whore and be done with all the nagging and girl-power bullshit.

Its report said 85% of brothels in the city operated in residential areas and researchers posing as sex buyers found brothels in all 33 London boroughs.

Westminster had the highest number with 71, compared with eight in Southwark.

The study was compiled by the Poppy Project, which provides education about prostitution and helps victims of sex trafficking.

Westminster, where all the politicians work and next to the City. Who would have thought.

Together the brothels generated between £50m and £130m a year, the researchers estimated.

Now check this out. Obviously, beeing the BBC, they have to start trying to paint women as victims in this. The next paragraph is headed ‘Underage girls’ although there is no proof of it.

The average age of the women was 21. Several places offered “very, very young girls” but did not admit to having underage girls available. Continue reading

A ‘feminist’ email from YouTube

Hi all, I recently received an email from an irate fan, attacking me for the usual anti-feminist stance. After I stopped laughing, I thought I’d post it with my response here. Enjoy 🙂

It is as follows;

femaleempowerment18

YOU ARE PATHETIC

PERSONAL SACRIFICES??? WHAT DO U THINK WOMEN DO WHEN THEY HAVE CHILDREN AND SUBJECT THEIR BODIES TO ALL OF THAT SHIT??? WE DONT HAVE TO DO IT BUT WE DO CUZ WE DONT NEED MEN WE HAVE ENOUGH SPERM BANKS TO KEEP THE WORLD GOING FOR A VERY LONG TIME…

A WOMAN CAN BE UPSET …AND IF SHE IS IT’S BECAUSE SHE’S ON HER RAG

SHE CANT EXPLORE HER SEXUALLITY WITHOUT BEING CALLED A WHORE

WOMEN TO THIS DAY ONLY GET PAID 70 CENTS TO EVERY DOLLAR A MAN MAKES AND MY ECON TEACHER SAID WE’VE COME A LONG WAY AND YA WE HAVE BUT THIS COUNTRY IS SUPPOSED TO BE FREE AND EQUAL BUT I GUESS THAT ONLY APPLIES TO PEOPLE WITH DICKS…

WE SUPPOSEDLY CANT PLAY SPORTS CUZ WE CANT BENCH PRESS 300 LBS

WERE STILL TODAY SUPPOSED TO WAIT ON MEN HAND AND FOOT…IN ALL OF THE LAUNDRY AND DISH SOAP COMMERCIALS YOU NEVER SEE A MAN DOING THE FUCKING LAUNDRY OR DISHES IN THE COMMERCIALS

YA ITS TRADITION OR WHATEVER BUT ONLY BECAUSE WOMEN WERE CENSORED FOR THEIR STRENGTHS….

WHY DOES THERE HAVE TO BE A MORE DOMINANT GENDER IT[S BULLSHIT DONT SAY IT’S JUST THE WAY IT IS BECAUSE THATS A BULLSHIT ANSWER FROM SOMEONE WHO DOESNT HAVE AN ANSWER

YOU MUST BE GAY BECAUSE NO WOMAN IN HER RIGHT MIND WOULD RAISE SOMEONE LIKE YOU HAVE FUN GETTING AND RECIEVING POOPY DICK….

And my response.. Continue reading

Sienna Miller in desperate bid to win back billionaire oil heir lover

I guess she doesn’t realise her sh*t stinks after all. This behaviour reminds of the twisted self-interested morality of such women. What is right or wrong is not defined by social rules and expectations (external things), but by what she does and does not want (internal).

Source: Daily Mail

(Extract)

Looks like Miller Time is over lol

Looks like Miller Time is over lol

Sienna Miller is said to be ‘devastated’ after her married lover ran home to his wife and four children.

Sienna, 26, has been furiously calling and texting oil fortune heir Balthazar Getty after learning he had returned to Los Angeles to attempt a reconciliation with his wife, Rosetta.

A source said: ‘Sienna and Balthazar were in New York for a few days together and then he told her he was going to LA to work and see his kids. But the reality is he is desperately trying to get back with his wife.

‘He realises he’s made a terrible mistake. He is trying to keep Sienna at arm’s length and hasn’t told her it is over yet so she is going frantic.

‘She has been calling and texting him constantly and is planning to go to LA herself as she believes she can win him back if they have a face-to-face meeting.

‘She’s devastated that he has distanced himself from her both emotionally and geographically.’

Obviously this Sienna Miller has absolutely no regard nor respect for the family of this man. That doesn’t matter. It is about what she wants. That wife and children? Mere obstacles in the pursuit of a billionaire.

According to a producer friend of 33-year-old Getty – a former drug addict and alcoholic who is receiving counselling – he has definitely dropped Sienna.

The producer said: ‘Balthazar and Sienna seemed infatuated with each other when they were in New York last week but I heard the reason the whole Sienna fling happened was because he fell off the wagon.

Very rich man, fallen back onto drugs, so possibly vunerable. Sounds like MILLER TIME!

‘As soon as Balthy arrived back in LA on Monday he started pleading with his wife to take him back. He told me he’d gone to their house but she wouldn’t let him in. He stood outside crying.’

The producer said: ‘He came back to a hotel and was on the phone to Rosetta on and off for two hours, crying and constantly calling and she finally agreed to let him back in the house.

‘In his mind he has definitely dropped Sienna but he’s in a very confused state at the moment. His biggest fear is losing his kids.’ Continue reading

More ‘professional’ women stripping for credibility

Ah feminism. I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning. There really isn’t anything new to see here. It’s the same old story of women who feel the need to objectify themselves with the intent of giving more ‘credibility’ to their profession. Why do women believe that to gain respect from a group, they must paradoxically objectify themselves? Maybe it’s because posing is easier than hard work. Female logic sure is a strange thing.

Source: Daily Mail

As she reclines in a skimpy camisole, the look is definitely sexy rather than sporty.

But Johanna Head still wants to be known more for her golf shots than her camera shots.

She is a great British hope at the Women’s Open which started yesterday at Sunningdale in Berkshire  –  and is being billed as one of golf ‘s answers to former tennis starlet Anna Kournikova.

Which would explain her modelling at the first opportunity. Anna Kournikova made much more money posing than playing anyway.

Ahead of the tournament, the 35-year- old from Ascot signed up for a glamorous photoshoot with several other female golfers in an attempt to change the face of the ‘dowdy’ sport.

It’s golf, not oil wrestling. What makes them think they can change the face of a sport just by getting pictures taken? How special do girls think they are these days? I’m sure fans of the sport would appreciate it much more if these girls just got down to business and played amazing golf, on the level that the men play it.

Yeah, I laughed too.

Fellow team member Kim Hall said: ‘I would rather be known for my golf, but it’s a bonus when you are considered attractive. Nobody in the group wants to be Kournikova. We’re in the limelight so we’re going to do that playing golf, not standing around looking glamorous.’

Say no more. I won’t add pictures. Visit the Daily Mail if you must have a butchers.

Sienna Miller discovers that her sh*t stinks

Terrible, a selfish little woman experiencing accountability. She did it for the lulz?

Source: Daily Mail

(Extract)

I prefer other womens men myself...

I prefer other women's men myself...

Just a fortnight ago, she was pictured frolicking topless on a yacht with her new multi-millionaire actor boyfriend, but Sienna Miller has spent the past week in hiding after being snubbed by friends on both sides of the Atlantic.

For those who don’t know, she dumped former boyfriend Rhys Ifans, slept about and eventually ran off with married multi-millionaire family man, Balthazar Getty, causing untold grief and upset to his family, although he isn’t exactly innocent either.

The 26-year-old actress, who has been nicknamed ‘Sluttyienna’ and ‘Serial Miller’ because of her increasingly long list of lovers, has fled to New York – where her father, banker Ed Miller, lives – to escape the backlash over her affair with Balthazar Getty, 33, I can report.

Sources close to the GI Joe star say she has been ‘stunned’ by the fallout since her affair with the married father of four was revealed.

What is there to be surprised about? She targeted a married man. She’s been sleeping around with men like she’s on commission. People call her a slut, because she’s acting like a slut. I guess these little princesses aren’t used to being criticised for anything. Stunned. Idiot.

Sienna has told friends she plans to keep a low profile for the rest of this summer.

Run rabbit run. Continue reading

Through the Eyes of a Woman

Quickly scouting through my daily list of news (lol) sites, I saw this article. I clicked on it because of the apparent contradiction between the article title and the picture.

Lineker in love: Gary and Danielle can’t hide their love as they cuddle in the street

First, I read the title, then looked at the picture, which is the below:

I thought, ‘that looks like a woman grabbing onto a rich, famous guy’. But I’m a cynical bastard.

I then read the first sentence of the article.

Gary Lineker can’t hide his love for model girlfriend Danielle Bux as the couple cuddled each other tightly in a London street.

Then I looked at the picture again. Now I’m no expert on body language, but that sentence and that picture do not mesh in my feeble little Man-mind. I thought to myself ‘this must have been written by a woman’, and obviously I was right.

It continues;

The couple clearly couldn’t wait until they got home to show their affection, as they wrapped their arms tightly around each other while strolling on London’s Kings Road.

Reminds me how women live on another planet. Although a planet of hugs and romance is infinitely better than the sick NWO world feminists desire, where males are enslaved and culled, etc.

This obviously isn’t a serious article, I’ll do that later when I get back from the pub (priorities.) However, as a man, I must say I laughed when I saw the look on the man’s face while he is out shopping with his chickadee.

How many men know that look LOL.

By the way, has anyone seen that ‘TV programme’ called Sweet 16? I saw an episode the other day. F*ck me, I didn’t know girls that age could be such arseholes. Why do the fathers let their daughters get away with that shit?

British Women Arrested In Blowjob Competition

Seriously, they did. They were on holiday…

Source: Reuters

Nine British women were facing prostitution charges after being arrested at the weekend for taking part in an oral sex competition in the Greek holiday island of Zakynthos, police said on Monday.

Six British and six Greek men, including two bar owners, were also charged in the incident, which took place at Laganas beach in the south of the Ionian island, which lies off the west coast of mainland Greece, police said.

The women, who came to the popular resort on holiday, had been paid to take part in the competition, which was video recorded and was to be posted on the Internet, police said.

The men were charged with encouraging obscene behaviour.

Naturally they assumed it was the men’s idea, and What The F*ck, it was going to be put online and they still did it? Maybe they were the mothers of these girls, hoping for a bit of fame and all that. I wonder if they were all doing it, what the competition was? Which one could get a strangers’ sperm in their mouth the fastest?

The prostitution charge makes sense though. They were getting paid for sex. Now I wonder how many other women could be charged with that in this day and age…

The Girls Who ‘Aspire’ To Be Glamour Models?

Don’t look to these empowered females to help us change the world… A culture of children who aspire, not to be adults of intelligence and substance that can add to the knowledge of humanity, the fight for freedom or the richness of art.

They just want to be ‘famous’, whatever that is.

Source: Daily Mail

(Extracts)

Yes, they are both 13 years old.

Most people find it hard to believe that Amy Lewis is 13. At first glance, it’s not hard to see why. The excessively coiffed hair, the spray tan, the false eyelashes, the make-up, the talon-like acrylic nails, all speak of someone far older.

Amy, of course, is rather pleased with this state of affairs. Her idol is glamour model and reality TV star Jordan (real name Katie Price) a pneumatic-chested mother-of-three who, as we shall see, has developed a grip on the minds of the nation’s young teenage girls.

Charity administrator’s daughter Natalie Halls is just 14, but as she says of Jordan: ‘She’s really pretty, she’s got a handsome husband, three kids, loads of houses and money  –  that’s why I want to be like her.

‘She’s got the perfect life  –  a career in modelling and on TV, plus books and other things. And she’s always in magazines looking pretty.’

So how did it come to this? That an entire generation of intelligent young women, watched happily by their mothers, are modelling themselves on a woman who has made a career out of a pair of inflated breasts, a ruthlessly stagemanaged career in soft porn and a tumultuous and highly sexual relationship with her husband, singer Peter Andre  –  not to mention her forays into the literary world.

Social commentators say that self-made multimillionaire Katie Price, who has successfully marketed herself as a brand, is viewed by many young women as a feminist icon.

No, really? So ‘girl power’ actually leads to women CHOOSING to turn themselves into sex objects for money.

Take, for example, this extract from her novel, Crystal: ‘Crystal didn’t care that he might think she was easy or a slag. She just wanted him and it felt so right.’

Or from her latest novel, Angel Uncovered, which is published today: ‘She kissed him hard, digging her nails into his back. “Go on,” she said, “**** me. Then you’ll have what you want and I can go to sleep.” ‘

These, it is safe to say, are exactly the kinds of book which are going to be devoured by teenagers who have also pored over her two best-selling autobiographies.

Speaking with a candour that fails to mask her naivety, 13-year-old Amy says: ‘I think that to be successful these days you have to make yourself stand out, and having a boob job and wearing lots of make-up and sexy clothes gets you noticed. I quite enjoy school, but I’d like to leave and start modelling as soon as I can.’

It is clear, too, that, bombarded by celebrity images in magazines and on television, young girls are being indoctrinated from a young age.

‘I have been mad about clothes, hair and make-up from the age of eight,’ says Amy, who has had a boyfriend for the past nine months.

‘I read OK! and Heat magazine and I model the way I look on the celebrities in there. I put on lots of make-up, have my hair done by Mum at least once a month and Mum also pays for me to have spray tans. I also have my acrylic nails done every month, and Mum gives me facials.

‘When I am getting ready to go out, I spend loads of time on my face and hair, getting my look just right. I also love to put on false eyelashes, and I know that I turn heads when I walk down the street. Often, people are really amazed that I am only 13.

‘I am desperate to have a boob job like Jordan, and both Mum and I are saving up. I have read all of Jordan’s books, and I love her style.

‘My ultimate aim is to be a glamour model, which is why I want a breast enlargement. I don’t think I am too young to look the way I do.’

The story only gets worse. Why do these mothers allow their daughters to behave in such ways? Simple, they are using their daughters to try and live a different lifestyle through. This ‘career’ choice revolves simply around themselves. Attention, money, attention. Oh, and attention. They want to be in magazines and have other girls bitching about them. They want the paps to follow them around. They look up to the celebrities the media gives them. The Paris Hilton’s and Jordan’s of society are trumpeted by corporate media as the ‘new woman’, the same way that spineless effeminate males are pushed as the ‘new man’. No accident I’m sure. The power of the media to define identity is one of the reasons that these girls aspire to such mediocrity. If the media wasn’t a cancerous pile of crap, desperately trying to keep the population mindlessly consuming and following the party line then maybe these children would aspire to be mathematicians, engineers, philosphers, artists.

I hate television, I hate the corporate media, I hate empty headed people. Like automatons, willing to be programmed by the media when those in power wish for them to behave differently.

Fuck em, I hope they go to the FEMA Camps.

Television: Opiate of the Masses

(Continued) Rise of the Gold-digger

An article in the Daily Mail appears today, written by a woman (you will see why that is important later) talking about the ‘Rise of the gold-digger’.

Gold-digger

Like it’s something new! She tries her best to view this kind of woman in the tiny minority, but men with experience know better. Extracts from the article below;

When did it become acceptable to be a gold-digger?

Erm, when feminism campaigned to free women from the ‘oppressive regime’ of socially acceptable behaviour.

After all, isn’t a woman who sleeps with a man for money – or at least for extensive use of his credit card – called something else?

But then, ‘prostitute’ doesn’t have quite the same glamorous, diamond-encrusted platinum ring to it, does it?

No it does not, and that is precisely why we must do our best to call these women exactly that. Well to be fair, prostitutes are better than these women. At least with them you know what is going on upfront.

How depressing and how insulting to the millions of women who don’t live their lives according to these mercenary rules.

While we are the majority, the sad fact is, we are all judged as a result of movies like this.

It makes us all look cheap. Priceless cannot be blamed alone.

The message it delivers is one that has been subtly gaining currency in recent times and not just on film.

Well it is the fact that it has become so widespread that it made it into film in the first place, and although it may be insulting to the women who do not behave in that way, it does not stop it existing. Just because it offends a few women, does not mean it should not be publicised.

There is also, of course, the whole WAG phenomenon, predicated almost entirely on a cynical pact between rich, bored, badly behaved men (Ashley Cole comes to mind) and the women who want to live off them.

The gaggle of wannabe WAGs hovering outside any nightclub frequented by Premier League footballers is proof that there is an increasing number of women who believe that far from having their own life and their own job, the notion of being a human leech is to some degree a preferable career.

Well get used to it, it has been happening for decades.

As evidence that bleeding a man dry is on the up, there is now a fashion label called Golddigga and even websites such as www.golddiggers.uk.com, devoted to ways of hooking a rich guy.

Click on www.sugardaddyforme.com and the deal being struck is clear.

A glamorous-looking young woman appears on the screen. ‘Attractive, ambitious, insatiable,’ it reads.

In other words, she’s offering sex on tap. When the picture of the tastefully greying man floats into view, it says: ‘Affluent, caring, generous.’

Yet, we’re not supposed to call these women prostitutes. That would be rude.

Like I said, these predatory females are below prostitutes. I shall explain their psychological make-up at the end of this article.

Of course, it is still only a tiny percentage of women that would dream of behaving like this; it’s just that percentage – which is rising – think what they do is so acceptable. Listen to Sophie Sharp, a dancer from Bromley in Kent, who says: ‘I’ve always been into expensive clothes and accessories and think nothing of paying £400 for a dress.

But on my earnings it was hard to afford everything I wanted.’ Well, um, yes it would be. Still, Sophie’s solution was not to visit Primark but to get herself a sugar daddy instead. ‘My friends told me to go to Chinawhite (the fashionable club in London),’ she reveals.

It may be a small percentage that are so openly gold-diggers, but what of the women who think in a similar way but keep it quiet? Of women who are not so extreme, but are still motivated to date the man with more money rather than less (notice I haven’t mentioned any other factors) and watch the number of women included rise dramatically.

Would 75% be a tiny minority? Moving on;

So she put on her best low-cut black frock and, hey presto, she’d hooked herself a Dubai businessman. ‘I didn’t find him attractive,’ she admits.

Even so, she accepted his offer to take her shopping.

A total of £2,500 later, she says, he flew back to Dubai with nothing more than a chaste peck on the cheek in return, to which it’s tempting to say, is a likely story.

Yeah yeah nothing new to those in the know.

In Sophie’s world, being a golddigger is par for the course. All Sophie’s friends are doing the same.

Another light into the ‘minds’ of these females here.

Rachel MacLynn is head of global membership for millionaires-only networking service Seventy Thirty.

‘There are gold-diggers everywhere in London and other British cities. I’m constantly approached by young women,’ she says.

‘They are desperate for me to match them with our millionaire members.

They are like lice, and as the complient media (in its quest to undermine society) glamourises the lifestyles of these lying manipulative whores, it just sells this behaviour to other females, who sit there watching, secreting wishing to be able to shop all day and be in magazines (so much for fighting the New World Order eh, ladies?)

Or what about Natalie Parker, 24, who’s studying French and Spanish at university in Southampton? Her parents – a property developer and a housewife – live in a four-bedroom, four-bathroom house with a gym and a pool in Spain.

‘I’ve always dated wealthy men, even though I’ve not really been attracted to them,’ Natalie muses.

So, has she ever had to offer sex with a sugar daddy to secure a lavish gift?

‘Some of these men do want more at the end of the night,’ she concedes, without actually answering the question.

Now for the inevitable attack on the men. Of course they must be blamed for this in some way, men are always at fault;

It is worth saying that the men are not blameless in this unpleasant sex for designer clothes/ jewellery/breast implants transaction. A man who buys a woman is no better than the woman who agrees to sell herself. It all reduces human interaction to the level of a business deal.

Successful men will attract these bitches. That’s life. Don’t blame men for being successful. Blame the women for choosing to pursue the money man. What of the men who do not find such behaviour acceptable? Simple for women, they just pretend they love him and keep up the pretense long enough to fleece the fella.

Still, it is the women’s attitudes that are so shocking. It’s as if feminism never happened. Did it ever occur to Sophie or Heather or all the other young women who now aspire to be golddiggers, that they could work to provide a life for themselves rather than just expect a guy to buy it for them?

No, they are behaving like this precisely because feminism happened. Feminism wanted license for women to behave as they wish, free from the restrictions of acceptable behaviour and free from responsibilities (men can pick up the tab).

Looking further ahead, do these girls know the sort of deal they are doing? They are not only throwing away any moral sense, but also their independence, control of their own lives and self-respect.

They never had any of these things to begin with. Such concepts are imbued in people by society and peer groups. Once upon a time women (like men) had such imprinting, but that resulted in strong relationships, strong families, low crime and high productivity. You can’t have Order from Chaos without Chaos. Hence Marxo-Feminism. The author seems to have some sort of sense though, which explains why she find gold-digger behaviour so strange;

I didn’t take the gold-digger route because I think it is wrong. It is insulting to men and it cheapens women. Every woman who does it polishes an image of womankind that the rest of us then have to try to argue against.

It makes us all look as if we are for sale for the price of a pair of Gucci shoes. I have lost count of the number of conversations I have had with men where they have said that basically all a woman is interested in is how much money they have and the size of their car.

Maybe not Gucci shoes, but restaurant dinners, rent and paid for holidays? I would say, from my experience and the combined experience of all the guys I know, and the ones I’ve met on my travels, that the majority of women behave, in differing levels, as gold-diggers. But with women perceiving themselves as princesses, what else would they expect but to be treated as such?

When I explain that I have never dated a man for his money, nor have any of my girlfriends, that we have jobs and homes of our own and we wouldn’t dream of expecting a boyfriend to provide either, they look at me with disbelief.

The image of womanhood that the gold-digger propagates is one of a greedily acquisitive airhead. She never reads a book or a newspaper, but knows the ticket price for the latest designer handbag.

She is a parasite, useless to anyone but themselves. Don’t count on her campaigning against the Lisbon Treaty.

Consumption replaces affection.

Not quite. Consumption replacing humanity would be more accurate.

Her diamante sandals may be lovely and sparkly, but she tarnishes all of us.

Right, what motivates a woman to not only behave in such a superficial way, but also promote it proudly? What will society think? Her friends and family?

The truth is, she doesn’t care.

Marx said ‘all truth is relative’. Funny, it seems he figured out how women view the world. To these women, there is no right or wrong, there are only wants and needs. The process of evaluating and committing actions operates backwards with these women.

What they desire is right and the methods to achieve it are acceptable because the end result is them acquiring what they desire. It really is that simple. Whereas men generally view the world (with all its rules) as external concepts which he navigates, these women seem to view the world as an extension of them. (exceptions would be psychopaths like Tony Blair).

In other words, reality (with all its rules) changes in relation to their desires. These gold-diggers do not view their actions as wrong because ‘truth is relative’ to them. They want it therefore it is right and it is right because they want it.

No wonder feminism was so successful. It essentially told women that the only thing that is ‘wrong’ or ‘bad’ is not getting what you want.

The Problem With Women Today

Today’s male role models are Pathetic

Ever since feminism took its banker-funded place in the middle of society, women (and the media, pandering to them) have been busy trying to redefine men and masculinity.

That old chestnut ‘a real man would…’ tends to be used by a woman or metrosexual twit when they want to control your behaviour or thoughts. It is usually followed closely by them recommending an action that benefits them, and not you.

This article is preceded by the one about female role models, which are obviously worse. Judging by my research these ‘men’s mags’ aren’t far behind.

I was mainly prompted to write this article from a comment by Reality Seeker, and this article in the Daily Mail.

The return of real men: Ladies, get ready to meet Mr Retrosexual

Once, men were simply men. But then feminists decided they were chauvinist pigs who didn’t spend enough time doing the dishes. So along came the guilt-ridden New Man, swiftly followed by sensitive, moisturising Metrosexual Man. Of course, women soon missed the whiff of testosterone and were calling for the return of Real Men. Now a new book, The Retrosexual Manual: How To Be A Real Man, has been published. David Thomas tip-toes through the unashamedly macho details. . .

So now men need books to be told how to be men apparently. Nice way of making money I guess, and going by the extracts of this book from the article, it is obviously meant to be taken as a comedy. Obviously.

If most men are like the ‘real man’ described below, we are truly fucked.

Remember, you have a number of qualities, almost all deriving from your testosterone, which women can’t help but admire. For example:

1. Your mind is uncluttered. Consider the female brain, filled as it is with multiple anxieties about its owner’s hair, figure, health, diet, clothes, shoes, emotions, digestive transit, sex life, competitive female friendships, multi-tasking duties as a worker/lover/ wife/mother/whatever.

Instead, your mind is focused on the important things in life: sex, beer, football. Women secretly envy a mind like that.

2. You can make decisions on your own. You don’t need to talk it over for hours with all your friends, or consult a horoscope, or worry about feng shui.

3. You have strong arms which come in handy whenever bottles need opening, cases need carrying, or a girl just feels like gazing at a strong, muscular limb.

4. You do not clutter up the bathroom. No woman wants a man who owns more beauty products than she does. A man who showers, shaves, then gets out of the way is ideal.

Maybe this is marketed towards women (like almost everything else). Important things in life are sex, beer, football. Acquiring knowledge, fighting tyranny and working to make the world a better place are obviously soooo-twentieth century. Nowadays we should all just be consumers, oh and live our lives around pleasing modern women! (Point 4 and 5).

Hmm, being a man, you also have no idea how to treat women. The following points can be condensed by yours truly. Treat her as her deserves to be treated. Let’s see what a ‘real man’ is supposed to do.

1. When on a date, you pay – even if she offers. Don’t stand for any nonsense about going Dutch. And pay in cash – retrosexuals don’t use credit cards.

2. You open doors for women, and you stand for pregnant women on a bus, train or Tube. You do this because you are a man, and you’re proud of it.

3. You do not cook anything more sophisticated than Pot Noodles or baked beans. Cooking is her job. But when you have a Sunday roast – and you do, obviously – you carve with manly precision and flair.

4. Women like to talk, bless them. So don’t try to stop her getting her feelings off her chest, however daft they might be. There’s no need to actually listen, however. Nor does she expect, or even want you to express an opinion of your own. A nod of the head, roughly every 90 seconds, combined with a concerned frown, or a cheery laugh, where appropriate, is perfectly sufficient.

5. Of course, you want to have sex. Afterwards, however, it is important to avoid saying ‘I love you’ or ‘I’m sorry, that’s never happened before’.

6. She may be interested in commitment. You are not. It is vitally important that you never even acknowledge the possibility that you are in a relationship. The moment she uses a sentence that includes words such as ‘wedding’, ‘children’, or ‘meet my parents’, make your excuses and leave.

7. No woman ever comes between you and live TV football. Only a very special woman will come between you and the edited highlights on Match Of The Day.

8. There is no woman on Earth for whom you will go to see Sex And The City – The Movie.

Sorry for wasting the few minutes of your time that it took to read points 1 to 7 (I agree with 8.) But this is what we are dealing with. Feel free to visit the article to read the rest. It doesn’t get any better. Firstly, this article comes across as nothing more than a silly little marketing ploy in order to sell books that are written to appeal to women who then buy them as presents for the males in their life, just like businesses market to children in order to get parents to part with their money. Secondly, the many attempts at redefining men over the decades all have something in common:

They all involve a move towards consumerism and materialism. Making men more feminine makes it easier to control them, instil fear and make money from them (including selling debt).

The number one website for Men’s Lifestyle is FHM.com

Funnily enough, I couldn’t find anything about tyranny, the Lisbon Treaty, our Bill of Rights, the nature of Fiat Currency, Cheap Credit = Expensive Debt, Marxism, Collectivism, The Dialectic etc on its many colourful pages. I guess these things just aren’t important eh. These lads mags are consumer bibles. Like little boys, obsessed with girls bodies (which I guess is better than their brains these days).

Of course, a few generations of broken homes where the boys are raised by single mothers has helped, as young men look about for a male role model to fill the vacuum left by feminism and find corporations and big government!

We are seeing an almost textbook example of the application of various psychopolitical mechanisms on our society.

The realm of defamation and degradation, of the psychopolitician, is Man himself. By attacking the character and morals of Man himself, and by bringing about,through contamination of youth, a general degraded feeling, command of the populace is facilitated to a very marked degree – The Soviet Art of Brain Washing

Our of sight, out of mind… Make Man feel like his species is animalistic, collectivist and devoid of hope and who will stop our enemies from conquering us? Not people like this.

Of course, part of the speaking out against such psychological warface (such as with this blog) must be dealt with accordingly, from the above document;

The populace must be brought into the belief that every individual within it who rebels in any way, shape, or form against the efforts and activities to enslave the whole, must be considered to be a deranged person whose eccentricities are neurotic and insane, and who must have at once the treatment of a psychopolitician.

The lack of good, strong male and female role models is part of the plan to undermine the resistance of a people. It also makes lots of money. It perpetuates bad behaviour and reliance on media. This enhances the effectiveness of the psychopolitical campaign. Further degraded and mentally shattered, the sheep consume in the hopes of it improving their lives, the reality of which is getting worse due to the tyranny and Treason of our government. This makes even MORE money. Money that can pumped into creating better adverts and subverting more leading figures to corporate fascism. And so on and so forth…

Today’s female role models are Pathetic

When I grow up, I want to be a whore! Parading my boundless ignorance in front of the public like the town idiot in the hopes of acquiring material possessions and a rich guy who I can then trade sex for more money and attention with!

Feminism just keeps getting better and better doesn’t it?

There was a show called The Weakest Link on the other day. It was a special for charity. The ‘contestants’ were all WAGS. These are the females the media throws on the front page at every opportunity, and the females that other females choose to idolise and look up to. Here they are:

Lined up were Alex Best, ex-wife of a deceased football drunk; Charley Uchea, a Big Brother contestant, whose cousin is a footballer; Danielle Lloyd, Teddy Sheringham’s ex; Linsey Dawn McKenzie, who married footballer Mark Williams; Amii Grove, who dates footballer Jermaine Pennant; and Michelle Marsh, Lucy Pinder, Cassie Sumner and Lauren Pope  –  who are still looking for their princely footballer and kissing a lot of frogs on the way.

Let’s get the first part out of the way. These girls are thick. For me, (and countless girls it seems) these women represent the far end of the majority of post-feminist females. It is easier to tart yourself up and try and bag a rich guy than earn it yourself. Essentially exchanging their sex for money. How empowering. Sound familiar?

The nine women were as pink and transparent as a set of highly buffed acrylic false nails.

Sweet girls, but with ‘desperate to hook rich footballer’ stamped all over their decolletage and, no doubt, their St Tropez tans.

Such is the desire to be a celebrity that even girls so intellectually challenged they think ‘hello’ is spelled with an exclamation mark are prepared to put themselves forward on a national TV quiz show to be humiliated.

This society, thoroughly undermined by Marxism has now collapsed into rampant fame seeking and materialism. From a disciplinarian, moral and intellectual point of view, British culture and life is rapidly collapsing in a way never before seen. These women seem to be proud that they know nothing. Proud that they are prostitutes. Doing anything to get attention. Thinking only of themselves and the narrow world they occupy.

I am only partly disgusted by them. People like them are a logical consequence of the social engineering inflicted on this society by collectivist liberal globalists.

My issues are twofold. Firstly, the media rewards their terrible ineptitude at everything of importance with full page spreads. Women read about them in girl mags and bitch about them in their nice little air-conditioned offices (while secretly wishing it was them on the magazines with the rich boyfriend). These idiots can make a good living (probably better than you) by objectifying themselves. Turn yourself into a sex object. Get paid, just like this other idiot!

Secondly, girls look up to them. Why? Don’t they have the personal integrity to realise that their entire lives will amount to nothing? Or do these girls not care about learning about the world, protecting their nation’s sovereignty and fighting tyranny?

LOL. Sorry, I couldn’t help it.

Maybe this is partly psychopolitics. The media are helping to erode a nations identity of itself by focusing on people of particular stupidity. The way they focus on knife stabbings. In a nation of about 60 million people one would think the media could report of things a little more positive. Maybe focusing on the Lisbon Treaty and its attack on Britain’s sovereignty. Maybe the media is just reflecting the reversal of societies ‘progress’ back on itself. Maybe the increasing crime, feral kids, breakdown of families, single motherhood, rampant consumerism, narcissism, state dependence and complete apathy and lack of desire to fight and protect one another is another symptom of society moving towards a Matriarchy, where female ‘qualities’ drive society.

Makes sense. There are more women of voting age than men. Therefore you could say women may actually control the vote. Women overwhelming vote for bigger government, ‘feeling safe’ and more benefits at the small cost of the destruction of the country and a higher burden on men.

Fuck the matriarchy. People need to start lighting the fires again! We need a revolution and we need one soon, before speaking out against tyranny becomes illegal.

News Round Up

I’m sure everyone has heard of the psy op Rich List, a publication from the Sunday Times, released each year listing the moderately wealthy of the country. I say moderately because the real wealth will never be on there. You know who I mean. The first line is…

A little-known model has entered the ranks of Britain’s super-rich…

How?

… by marrying into a £5.6billion fortune.

Ah. Let’s look at the top 10 ‘Richest’ Women.

Kirsty Bertarelli – Married a rich guy.

Lady Green – Married a rich guy.

Charlene de Carvalho – Inherited it and married a rich guy.

Kirsten Rausing – Family inheritance.

Slavica Ecclestone – Married a rich guy.

Baroness Howard de Walden – Family wealth.

Lady Grantchester – Family wealth.

Hourieh Perama – Married a wealth medical student, but still did most of it herself.

Ruth Parasol – Earnt it together with her hubby.

Ann Gloag – Earnt it with her bro.

Three out of ten did it themselves (more or less). Girl power at its finest. Speaking of girl power, how about 50,000 volts?

Taser parties – for all your zapping needs

The Arizona entrepreneur deployed her sales patter and folksy western charm as she praised the merits of the palm-sized C2 stun gun – available for $350 in a variety of fashionable colours, including the best-selling “hot pink”.

Hmm.

The U.N. has declared: “TASER electronic stun guns are a form of torture that can kill.

The problem isn’t people having devices for self-defence, it’s the false sense of safety that a taser creates. This encourages people (like cops) to use it on a whim because they have been told it is acceptable (and doesn’t kill, although it obviously does).

For insurance and practical reasons, Miss Shafman does not allow live target practice (nor does she permit guests to wash down the sandwiches with alcohol that might affect their judgment). Instead, the women lined up to blast away at the outline of a bad guy on aluminium foil.

Oh really. Wouldn’t want someone dying at the party would they, not a good selling point. Also, alcohol is not allowed at these parties, as opposed to at any other time these women are out. One drinks leads to another, man dies. It is also a charming way of attracting their perfect man…

What women REALLY want

Her boyfriend may not have a clue but today’s young woman knows exactly what she wants.

To be specific, she’d like to marry a man called James, who earns at least £25,000, by the time she’s 25.

Perhaps it doesn’t sound like much to ask. But according to a poll, eight out of ten women worry that they will never find their soulmate.

Sorry, but don’t expect to find sympathy from men. It because of the attitude of these women and the laws pushed by feminist politicians that has led to this situation.

While the survey showed that young women notch up as many sexual conquests as men, the survey found that they are really looking for a “romantic, hard-working man who is not afraid to commit”.

Bullshit. What they want is EVERYTHING. This article is saying something else. Women by 25 are starting to realise that their whoring about doesn’t seem to be getting them anywhere. Those men who are ignored by these young women end up going off and earning lots of dosh, partially because their energy and dedication isn’t wasted on self-entitled post-feminist tabloid loving emotional trainwrecks. These women start learning the error of their ways by 25.

Lisa Smosarski, editor of More magazine, which commissioned the survey, said: “The idea that women want an endless string of serial relationships which never end in commitment is way off the mark.

“By the age of 25, what young women really want is a soulmate with a view to marriage.

Well by then, the men they suddenly decide they want are busy shagging 20 year olds. The article then goes on to (somehow) blame this on men.

“Unfortunately, men have had it so good for so long they’ve become commitment-phobic, drifting from one long-term relationship into another.

“However, young women today have watched their mothers’ floundering relationship history and realised that getting a man to commit is important for their future happiness and family security. Young women are starting to expect far more from men.”

Men can be commitment-phobic. They fear marriage. Why? One of the comments sums it up nicely;

I’m pleased to see that women are looking for hard-working men who will commit in a relationship. Unfortunately, they will become increasingly difficult to find. If a man is stupid enough to marry, then with the law as it stands he could lose his home, half his pension and be required to financially support his children whilst being denied any significant access to them if the marriage breaks up. Even if he doesn’t marry, the law is now moving to establish the same discriminatory practices against men who are co-habiting with their partners. Faced with this, it is a mystery why any man would want a long term relationship with a woman. If his partner decides to run off with somebody else, the man is financially ruined and usually denied access to any of his children. So, I would advise my two sons against any long term relationships. The law is against you. And I speak as a man who has been very happily married to the same fantastic woman for the last 35 years.

– Ordinaryguy, Wolverhampton, UK

Although more women seem to be settling down in their thirties or later, those polled thought 25 was the “perfect age” to get married, preferably to a man who earns £25,000 or more.

LOL.

Eight out of ten said they would prefer to marry a “good, all-round, hard-working bloke” than the glitz and glamour of a “celebrity-style relationship”.

How hard will these women be willing to work I wonder? They probably have difficulty thinking about that between demanding xyz from a man, before divorcing him and taking everything off him anyway. They’re problem with celebrity relationships is the attention the man would be getting from other, younger, prettier, more fertile women.

Let’s see an article about what men want. Not that anyone seems to fucking care these days.

Emerging Hotties of 2008

I feel like pissing off feminists. You know those ‘men make women into sexual objects and therefore oppress them’ crowd. I’m also tired of reading the narcissistic ramblings of those haggard, crusty, old, weak, socialist scum hiding under the banner of ‘Women’s Rights’ but are much more interested in ‘Re-shaping Society to suit out Communist Goals’.

But seriously, the right women are as great as the bitches are evil. Good women are now in the minority, so don’t hold your breath in regards to finding a decent one. Concentrate on honing your mind and your abilities, at least then you know you’re investing in something that will definitely benefit you.

Anyways, it’s the weekend and I’m tired of ranting. I want to prove something.

That men adore women.

Also, as you look through the list, try and explain how they are ‘oppressed’ by these images. Feel free to look over them again to try and clarify your thoughts LOL. Gemma Atkinson and Odette Yustman will do nicely. And Jessica Lucas. And Kate Mara… Anything but this.

COED Presents: Emerging Hotties of 2008

By the way, I suggest watching Shooter if you can. It’s a class movie.

Have a good weekend, folks.

Sláinte!

Some relief

Hi all. Found this video, and I’m posting it because 1. It’s good, and 2. It breaks up the tone of this site a bit, which I’ll be the first to admit, is a bit depressing.

The Predator Rap – 6 min 30 secs

Is is me or was everything better in the 80’s? Better cartoons, movies, prices were low(er), music was great, society wasn’t demonising men so much, etc.

Oh, and two links regarding male role models and boys’ development.

Male teachers: role models in the classroom

Missing male.

Enjoy the vid.

Ashley Alexandra Dupre does Girls Gone Wild

Or should I say, did Girls Gone Wild… Say, like 4 years ago?

LOS ANGELES, California (AP) — Stop that $1 million check: It turns out the call girl linked to Eliot Spitzer had already shed her clothes for “Girls Gone Wild” as an 18-year-old while partying in Miami, Florida, the video company’s founder said Tuesday.

I’m sure this is what the feminists wanted when they campaigned for women’s sexual ‘freedom’…

Joe Francis reached out to Ashley Alexandra Dupre, now 22, with an offer of $1 million to appear in a non-nude spread for his company’s new magazine, plus a chance to join the “Girls Gone Wild” tour bus, his company announced Tuesday.

But then they decided to see if she might have been on Girls Gone Wild previously. What are the odds… Continue reading

Mills awarded £24.3m settlement

Heather Mills has been awarded £24.3m in her divorce settlement with estranged husband Sir Paul McCartney.Speaking outside London’s High Court, Ms Mills said she was “glad it’s over” and “it was an incredible result to secure mine and my daughter’s future”.

I always wonder how women like her justify that kind of payment. More importantly, how they can refer to their daughter as mine.

The settlement will also see the former Beatle pay their four-year-old daughter Beatrice’s nanny and school fees and will pay Beatrice £35,000 a year.

Why aren’t they both contributing 50/ 50? Or does this hark back to the days of man, the provider? Somewhat different to the ‘equality’ women want today. Or is it only equality when it suits them, ‘traditionally treated’ when it suits them. As long as they can take as much as possible from others.

Speaking of taking, Queen of the Golddiggers was looking for a fair bit more than what she was finally awarded. Continue reading

Ever wonder what a $4000 hooker looks like?

… The kind that city governors get their career’s destroyed over?

I haven’t wondered either, but just in case some of you want to know, they look like this.

I take it that’s $1000 a finger, and even with earning $4000 an hour, she can’t resist that weird pout girls do in photos. What is the point of that anyway? The question is, would you pay $4000?Here is her Myspace page where she states;

‘I am all about my music, and my music is all about me… It flows from what I’ve been through, what I’ve seen and how I feel’.

Well, if you are going to sell your body, might at well make the most of it.

I’m more surprised a man was willing to pay that price. That’s what happens when you think with your dick and not your head.