OFFICAL: IPCC computer model is WRONG

Ground-breaking admission by member of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change: major contributing factor to the balance of the climate not taken into account.

It would appear that, as many of us right-thinking people have known for some time, global warming caused by CO2 output is, at best, sensationalist fantasy.

It seems that everal facts have now come to light that debunk the idea that we’re killing the environment with CO2 emissions:

The predicted tropospheric hotspots that had been predicted by the IPCC failed to appear. When climatologist Dr David Evans and Christopher Monckton found an error in the way that the IPCC had interpreted the Stefan-Boltzmann equation and applied a revised (corrected) factor to the workings, they discovered that the temperature rise was as little as a third of what the World’s government think tank had predicted.

The IPCC’s computer models, used to predict the effects of global warming, it appears, failed to accurately predict the influence that water vapour has on the temperature of the earth. At the global climate change summit in Bali late last year, Dr Roy Spencer presented a paper to the IPCC, saying that rather than CO2 driving the formation of water vapour, which then drives up temperatures as a greenhouse gas, water vapour actually washes excess CO2 out of the atmosphere, dampening and balancing its affect as a greenhouse gas. This discovery was made thanks to weather satellites that showed water vapour forms a lot lower in the atmosphere than was initially suggested. Shock horror, the finely balanced system that is the global ecosystem is able to keep itself in balance… who’d have thought it?!

Apparently the lead author of the IPCC chapter on feedback (the word used to describe what effect – negative or positive – a gas has on the temperature) has written to Dr Spencer, agreeing that he is right.

CO2 output has a point of diminishing returns anyway, apparently the common analogy is painting over a window: the first layer of paint has a big impact on the amount of light let through, while each subsequent layer has a less obvious impact. Meaning that, even without the dampening effect of water vapour, a ‘tipping point’ so often spoken about by alarmists like Al Gore, is actually a scientific impossibility.

Read the rest and download the reports, here.

How they ‘failed’ to account for water vapour is anyone’s guess. It isn’t like you can miss it.

Water vapor constitutes Earth’s most significant greenhouse gas, accounting for about 95% of Earth’s greenhouse effect (4). Interestingly, many “facts and figures’ regarding global warming completely ignore the powerful effects of water vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold.

Water vapor is 99.999% of natural origin. Other atmospheric greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and miscellaneous other gases (CFC’s, etc.), are also mostly of natural origin (except for the latter, which is mostly anthropogenic).

Human activites contribute slightly to greenhouse gas concentrations through farming, manufacturing, power generation, and transportation. However, these emissions are so dwarfed in comparison to emissions from natural sources we can do nothing about, that even the most costly efforts to limit human emissions would have a very small– perhaps undetectable– effect on global climate.

From Global Warming: A closer look at the numbers

As usual, the politicians rely on the people’s ignorance (and corporate media complicitiy) to push their agenda, using a theory that requires complete suspension of logic to believe it.

Put all of the computer models to one side for a brief moment and think.

Just think for yourself.

Water vapour accounts for over 95% of the greenhouse effect, as it states above. Humans’ contribution to that is about 0.001%.

CO2 accounts for about 3%. Of that total, humans contribute 0.117%. That’s 0.117% of 3% remember.

Just how much of the “Greenhouse Effect” is caused by human activity?

It is about 0.28%, if water vapor is taken into account– about 5.53%, if not.

In other words, to TOTAL contribution to global warming by humans is less that 0.3%

Now think about the sacrifices these governments are demanding from the worlds people. Additional taxation on production, on travel, on families etc.

These tax schemes that are being dictated to the people will result in vast wealth extraction. Organisations such as the UN, the governments and the banksters look to receive trillions from the people and smaller businesses (large corporations are seemingly looking for exemption). This is when they are not just passing the cost down to the consumer anyway. So no matter who they tax, the cost is passed to you, the evil carbon dioxide emitting useless eater. The CO2 scare story is also being used to push for bigger government and less individual rights and freedoms. How do you like the sound of your thermostat being controlled remotely? How about a nice baby tax? Oh to hell with it, lets tax em’ all for BREATHING!

Some are even advocating for near zero carbon output. For you of course. The elites could continue on as usual while the rest of humanity collapses as food prices skyrocket and the cost of living soars while currencies fall. The The Haig-Kissinger Depopulation Policy or Kissingers’ National Security Study Memorandum 200 doesn’t look so far fetched now, does it?

Remember, when they are talking about depopulating the planet by 95%, they are talking about ‘useless eaters’ like you. This is a war against YOU.

For more information, visit my post, Global Warming?