Two Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers Debunk CO2 Myth

Source: Prisonplanet

(Extract)

Three top scientists have once again contradicted the claim that a “consensus” exists about man-made global warming with research that indicates CO2 emissions actually cool the atmosphere, in addition to another peer-reviewed paper that documents how the IPCC overstated CO2’s effect on temperature by as much as 2000 per cent.

Professor George Chilingar and Leonid Khilyuk of the University of Southern California, and Oleg Sorokhtin of the Institute of Oceanology of the Russian Academy of Sciences have released a study that they claim completely contradicts the link between CO2 and global temperature increases.

“The writers investigated the effect of CO2 emission on the temperature of atmosphere. Computations based on the adiabatic theory of greenhouse effect show that increasing CO2 concentration in the atmosphere results in cooling rather than warming of the Earth’s atmosphere,” states the preamble to the paper.

Although they have had to rebrand their dialectic as ‘climate change’ because the temperature has been dropping since 1998 (whoops) more and more evidence is coming out contradicting the man-made (read: man’s fault ergo, tax his arse into poverty) reasons for global temperature fluctuations.

This scam is been the cover story for a whole host of regulations and power grabs from our States; higher taxes, using farmland to grow inefficient biofuels, thus pushing up food prices (which was the idea), create whole new taxes, raise the cost of energy etc. All related to the CO2 part of the scam. When you don’t have talking heads calling for a tax on babies or on breathing, you have a global elite pushing for a massive rise in the cost of living, to pauperize the people. They say it’s for the environment, I call bullshit. It’s a power grab. Like I said, C02 isn’t a pollutant any more than water vapour is.

‘Security’ at airport stop man from boarding – because of T-Shirt

BBC

A man wearing a T-shirt depicting a cartoon character holding a gun was stopped from boarding a flight by the security at Heathrow’s Terminal 5.

Brad Jayakody, from Bayswater, central London, said he was “stumped” at the objection to his Transformers T-shirt.

Mr Jayakody said he had to change before boarding as security officers objected to the gun, held by the cartoon character.

Airport operator BAA said it was investigating the incident.

Mr Jayakody said the incident happened a few weeks ago, when he was challenged by an official during a pre-flight security check.

And to think there are people who believe this sort of stuff is still for their ‘security’ and scoff at those speaking of a Police State.

“He says, ‘we won’t be able to let you through because your T-shirt has got a gun on it’,” Mr Jayakody said.

“I was like, ‘What are you talking about?’.

“[The official’s] supervisor comes over and goes ‘sorry we can’t let you through and you’ve a gun on your T-shirt’,” he said.

Mr Jayakody said he had to strip and change his T-shirt there before he was allowed to board his flight.

“I was just looking for someone with a bit of common sense,” he said.

“It’s a cartoon robot – what threat is it to security or offensive to anyone at all?”

A BAA spokesman said there was no record of the incident and no “formal complaint” had been made.

“If a T-shirt had a rude word or a bomb on it, for example, a passenger may be asked to remove it,” he said.

“We are investigating what happened to see if it came under this category.

“If it’s offensive, we don’t want other passengers upset.”

A Transformers T-shirt. They would not let him on the plane because it may offend someone? That is rubbish. This is a perfect example of the application of Collectivist methodology in order to remove our freedoms.

By claiming it would offend an arbitrarily set group, one individual can control the behaviour of/ restrict the actions of many. This is also only applied top-down. That is, if I find the governments policies offensive or the behaviour of stupid security guards at airports offensive, that can be ignored. The same way the government can focus on a knife stabbing in Britain to force through laws making buying swords illegal, or try to ban firearms for 300 million people because a kid shot up a school (Imagine how far he would have gotten if the students were armed also). On top of this, I’m sure more people will find the actions of the guard offensive than would find the T-shirt offensive. It’s Transformers – Terrorists in Disguise I guess.

So, what if someone is killed with a spoon? What if someone is drowned? Ban spoons and lakes? The government can mix and match events to further their agenda which always involves more controls over your freedom and behaviour under the guise of ‘protecting you’. Which obviously means they think you cannot protect yourself. You silly child!

If I wore a Legend of the Over-fiend T-shirt would that make me a demi-god demon-rapist? It is totally pathetic. Can you imagine a society where the State engages huge amounts of taxpayers money and time engineering peoples behaviour around the possibility it may offend ‘someone else?’

Hopefully these reports will force more sheep to think for themselves about what is going on. For more background on this ridiculous behaviour (and to see it in context of the police state), read the article on Infowars.net by Steve Watson.

Photo-fit image of the potential terrorist seen in the wild.