Harriet (femscum) Harman still wants to discriminate against white men

I touched upon this scheme from this liberal Marxo-feminist in an earlier post, It should not be illegal to discriminate against white men. Today on the BBC website is another article about her continued push for this most disgusting proposal.

There is no such thing as positive discrimination. It is all discrimination. Remember, this is straight out of Communism, the States’ desire to ‘equalise’ the (Collectivist) groups in employment. White men in Britain must be completely undermined in order to be able to complete the State’s takeover of the country. Notice how there is no similar campaign to discriminate against other groups in the case of white men being the minority. By the way, society is not composed of groups, it is composed of individuals. Using groups is the Collectivist method to ‘divide and conquer’.


Harriet Harman has defended plans to make it legal for firms to discriminate in favour of female and ethnic minorities job candidates.

The equalities minister said firms should be able to choose a woman over a man of equal ability if they want to.

In favour of female and ethnic minorities means anyone but white men. There are more women of working age in Britain than men. So technically men are the minority, not that it matters. Who does the State see as the threat eh?

The new Equalities Bill will also force employers to disclose salary structures in a bid to close the gender pay gap.

The plans, which will be adopted first across England then Wales and Scotland, will also ban all age discrimination.

We all know about the Gender Pay GapTM LIE. It does however offer a suitable Dialectic for the State to continue to expand its powers into the lives of private businesses.

Ms Harman said she wanted a more “open and diverse” economy with companies not just choosing from “a pool of friends of friends”.

Tackled on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme about whether the proposals would lead to discrimination against white men, she said companies would not be forced to use positive discrimination.

What the hell has the ‘make up’ of the economy got to do with a politician? In a free society you employ who you bloody like and make your own decisions. It just goes to show how the State is socially engineering a Communist ideal by enforcing whatever it thinks is ‘fair’.

But she added: “They might think we don’t want an all male team.

“We’ve got a new post coming up, we’ve got equally qualified men and women going for it, we are going to pick the woman because we want to have a more balanced top team.

Yeah, until she gets pregnant or something.

“The law at the moment is not clear and we are clarifying and saying if you want to do it, you can, and it makes it much more open.”

Ms Harman will set out the proposals in the Commons later.

Age discrimination in the workplace has been illegal since 2006, but the new legislation will tackle more widespread forms of age-related prejudice.

The Bill aims to close the gender pay gap by forcing firms to “publish their gender pay gap”.

Again, who gets paid what is none of the States’ business.

Female part-time workers still earned 40% less per hour than their full-time male counterparts, Ms Harman told Today.

“Do we think she is 40% less intelligent, less committed, less hard-working, less qualified? It’s not the case. It’s entrenched discrimination. It’s allowed to persist because it’s all swept under the carpet.”

Oh fuck off. If a business ever chose to employ a man over a woman, I’m sure there are very good reasons for doing so, as Sir Alan Sugar explains to us. A business is supposed to employ whomever they think will be best for the job and for the business. The State is essentially saying your business should serve the interests of ‘equality’ and not capitalism.

The Bill will also seek to stop pensioners being denied NHS treatment because of their age.

Ms Harman said doctors will still be able to refuse treatment if they believe there are sound clinical reason for doing so.

But she added: “Everybody should be treated as individuals and not just discriminated against across the board because of their age.”

I wonder if the men will still be denied treatment?

Age discrimination will also be outlawed in the provision of goods and services, such as holidays and insurance.

It is likely organisations and companies will be given time to review and, if necessary, change their practices before the new law would be enforced.

Other age distinctions, such as free bus passes and holidays for the over-50s or 18-to-30s, will be exempt.

A sickening power grab by the Police State over fundamental freedoms, as always, under the guise of protecting one ‘group’ from another ‘group’. The real enemy of the State are two ‘groups’. White men and the middle class. Why the middle class? Well generally they tend to run the means of production, like farmers and tend to know their rights and have the financial ability to fight for them. Release a few weaponised diseases and pile on the EU regulations and disenfranchise them. The government can centralise production using taxpayer money in response (preferably with corporate partnership, as is the case with Corporate Fascism.) It is plainly obvious what is going on.

“Feminism is just Communism with tits” – FM Watkins

Harriet Harman should be thrown off a cliff.

13 thoughts on “Harriet (femscum) Harman still wants to discriminate against white men

  1. I co;7dn&#821lut agree more – very inspiring and spiritual place. I hope you guys are settling into your new life and loving the new type of adventure you have embarked on!

  2. Pingback: Govt - we’ll discriminate in favour of minority groups in recession « End of Men

  3. Pingback: One third of whites claim they are victims of racism « Free Britain

  4. The point is that Brussels has any right to do anything. It shouldn’t have. Funny how those who seek to defend the EU by saying our sovereignty is intact find themselves running to the EU to help them because their own government is more or less powerless.

    This, on the other hand, is probably sanctioned by the socialists in power purely because of the potential weakening of the financial and political power of ‘white men’. A demographic that the State, in its quest for totalitarianism views as the enemy. Typical of these spineless left wing Marxists.

  5. I have no doubt that evolution would have evened out irregularities between the sexes,both pro and con,but this government has erased proper education for boys thus ensuring that in years to come girls will be the higher educated and thus take most of the top jobs.That’s long term.Short term is
    that this government is actually legislating for
    female superiority now,can’t wait to get rid of men can they?
    What are Brussels going to do?

    • hi terri,i didnt bake macha cheesecake but i made the Japanese Souffle Cheesecake which is quite similar with the macha chec.eeake.s. it should b soft, light and sinful when eat it 😛 ( in my blog i named it as baked cheese cake) i will try your macha cheesecake soon 🙂 by tht time i can share my baking results.

  6. She is the worst of scum. A rabid feminist in a position of power. She will, being a spineless liberal moron, attack the strongest demographic in Britain in order to enforce the Communist form of ‘equality’. Yes, our government is infested with Marxo-socialists. Have to think of a campaign to bring this to peoples attention!

    “Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism.” – Catharine A. MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State (First Harvard University Press, 1989), p.10

  7. I was outraged too when i read this, but the BBC seems to have ammended the page at 13.02 to read:

    “She said firms should be able to choose a woman over a man of equal ability if they wanted to – or vice versa.”

    Three words makes all the difference!

  8. It appears that her desire to combat racism and sexism could actually make the problem worse…that is, worse for those she is trying to protect. Thus the nature of liberals…

Leave a Reply to Jenn Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s