Multiple false rape accuser finally jailed.

Elizabeth Jones, 22, admitted she lied about the latest rape allegation because she “did not like” the man she accused of attacking her, Southampton Crown Court was told.

Her latest victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was arrested and questioned for nine hours before being released without charge.

After a judge jailed her for 16 months, it emerged today that she made her first complaint in 2004 aged just 13 before alleging other men had attacked her over the next nine years.

Another disgusting bitch acting without impunity, mollycoddled by the misandric state who always views the female as the ‘victim’ regardless of the circumstances. And why not? Men are all evil right?

Even after all of those nasty lies, she only gets jailed for 16 months. In a comfy community centre prison. She’ll do half that. 

Do you know what the going rate is for a rape conviction for a man? Well, the sentencing guidelines suggest you begin from at least five years. (It’s on page 23).

I guess we’re not equal after all. What’s that? You’re expecting feminists to come out of the woodwork demanding equal sentencing?

LOL

Advertisements

Jailed: The ‘evil’ 21-year-old who seduced soldier and then accused him of rape

A judge branded a woman who falsely accused a soldier of raping her after a one-night stand as “wicked” and “evil” yesterday as he jailed her for a year.

A year. What is the average prison time for a man who is found guilty of rape? How does seven years sound? (Pg 13, paragraph A3).

Hell, she has already put the victim through hell for longer than that.

Judge Hall told Lang her allegations had blighted her victim’s life for 15 months.

Let’s see how this panned out. Continue reading

News Round Up

Hello all.

First up is a piece about some ‘unmarried’ mother in the BBC. Well, she likes to use them term. A comment left is more enlightening than the article. I didn’t write the title.

Meet the Credit Crunch Crumpet

Gosh. Stephanie Flanders, the economics editor of Newsnight, has just told me that she rather likes being recognised as ‘that bird off the telly who does numbers’. I’m confused. Isn’t Carol Vorderman the bird off the telly who does numbers? Surely there can’t be room on British TV for two women who can count?

Yeah yeah.

Here is the comment, which I feel hits the nail on the head.

“Disastrous for her career”?

I doubt it.

The BBC exists to provide careers for privileged people like Flanders. As you say “there is no shortage of Oxbridge graduates who all know each other.” And we know what that means.

She generously concedes that “we might have concluded that it could have been done differently.”

“Might”, “Could”? Actually Steph, Littlejohn wasn’t “partly” right, he was completely right. Feministas like you do not represent ordinary women -who are beginning to get the message that women like Flanders are using their positions of influence to make life worse for them.

Take for example the way in which feminists like Flanders are undermining marriage and forcing men into a “marriage strike” because of the divorce rip-off industry and the biassed family courts. Most women are against this.

And by the way, if she has a “partner” is she a single mother or not? She seems unwilling to relinquish the favoured status of this victim client group.

– Chris, Wokingham England

Along the lines of marketing skanky immoral crap to kids like this pole dancing toy, comes another barrel scraper. Continue reading

Women’s Aid – The definition of DV. Part 1

I visited this website recently for some research into an article I was writing. I was interested to know how these ‘charities’ market themselves to people.

These days I tend to view these organisations more like corporations. Nothing particularly noble about them. They exist, they get money, they need more victims so they can ask for more money, because dwindling victims means less money. Simple really.

Now we should all know by now that domestic violence affects both men and women. That is to say, they can both be perpetrators in equal amounts. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.

Now you would think Women’s Aid would cater to women, fair enough, every bloody organisation in the country caters to the poor victimised little helpless things. It goes one better though, it’s tag line is ‘until women and children are safe’. You see, women and children are seen as one, inseparable unit, men are superfluous. Man is a evil brute lurking in the shadows outside of the house with the poor woman inside trying to protect HER child from HIM.

We all know the standard politically correct myth.

That tag line also, by exclusion, presents a subtle statement regarding men. Men don’t need to be made safe because obviouslythey’re not in danger as they’re the ones committing all the ‘violence’.

Remember men and women are victims in equal amounts. Keep that in mind always. Because this site chooses to represent one half (or less) of the victims. Not only that, but it markets itself in a way which presumes men are very rarely victims.

Lets quickly look at the page titled ‘About Domestic Violence‘.

They call female victims of domestic violence ‘survivors’. They don’t call male victims anything because, well, they’re irrelevant. I could be wrong but Continue reading