Married teaching assistant who groomed student walks free from court.

One guess what sex this ‘teaching assistant’ was…

Source: Daily Mail

A married teaching assistant who fell in love with a teenage pupil escaped jail yesterday because their affair stopped short of sex.

Lindsey Jane Collett, 26, had sent the 16-year-old boy saucy text messages and a photograph of herself wearing a bra featuring children’s TV character SpongeBob SquarePants.

The pregnant mother of two had become friendly with the pupil when she was helping him to catch up on coursework, Bridlington magistrates were told.

They began communicating through the social networking website Facebook and met up in a park for a ‘kiss and cuddle’, the court heard.

One text she sent the teenager read: ‘Every time you touch me you turn me on. When I see you I feel light-headed.’ Another told him that she loved him.

Yesterday, Collett sobbed hysterically as she admitted a charge of abusing a position of trust between October and February.

She is still with her husband, who has stood by her throughout.

Passing sentence, magistrate Robin Sunley said the court took into account her guilty plea. Her position at the school would ‘usually make the offence more serious’, he added.

‘However, having listened to the evidence, we consider the physical contact to be minimal.’

The boy, who is now 16, was not in court and cannot be identified for legal reasons.

Magistrates also ruled that the school, in East Yorkshire, should not be named. The court was told that the teenager and the teaching assistant had an inappropriate relationship lasting about four months. Continue reading

Fluoride’s Impact On The Brain

Source: Scientific Blogging

New science indicating fluoride’s dangers to the brain and other organs will be presented by prominent fluoride research scientists during back-to-back conferences of the International Society for Fluoride Research (ISFR) and the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) in Toronto August 7-11, 2008.

Fluoride, added to water supplies to prevent tooth decay, is also in virtually all non-organic foods and beverages. Fluoride’s brain effects were never examined prior to water fluoridation.

Recently, because of health concerns, Health Canada recommended that fluoride levels be lowered in Canadian water supplies (0.7 mg/L) , children’s toothpaste and infant formula but claims that “the weight of evidence does not support a link between fluoride and intelligence quotient deficit.”

“It is hard to believe that any “weight of evidence” analysis could possibly dismiss fluoride’s neurological impacts. There have now been over 40 animal studies which show that fluoride can damage the brain, and no less than 18 studies which show that fluoride lowers IQ in children, and only 2 that don’t. I look forward to reading the full report when it is made available,” says Paul Connett, PhD, FAN Executive Director.

According to ISFR conference organizer, Dr. Hardy Limeback, “Our conference features experts who researched the dangers that fluoride poses to human health. Our keynote speaker, Dr. A.K. Susheela, (Executive Director, Fluorosis Research and Rural Development Foundation, India) probably knows more about fluoride’s toxic effects to the body than any other living scientist. It is important that officials who promote water fluoridation hear what she and others have to say,” says Limeback.

Susheela can also explain to Medical Doctors, often untrained in fluoride toxicology, how to diagnose, treat and reverse early symptoms of fluoride toxicity which mimic arthritis and irritable bowel syndrome. Continue reading

Mother killed 5 year old son to spite ex

Source: Daily Mail

(Extract)

An evil mother driven by rage and jealousy killed her five-year-old son to spite his father, a horrified coroner heard yesterday.

Emma Hart, 27, force-fed Lewis Dangerfield a lethal cocktail of painkillers and antidepressants at their home, then fled to her mother’s flat nearby and ended her own life by slashing her wrists.

In a note to Lewis’s father, Shaun Dangerfield, which she left by the boy’s body, she wrote: ‘I told you I would make you pay, enjoy your life now, nothing is stopping you, ha ha ha. Just remember it’s all your fault.’

Coroner Robin Balmain described the case as the most distressing he had ever dealt with in 25 years of inquests. ‘I can’t imagine something quite so evil as a mother who is prepared to do that.

‘Her actions were simply spite  –  she was prepared to kill her son to spite Mr Dangerfield. I find it difficult to believe how anybody could do that.’

He added that he had heard no evidence to justify any criticism of Mr Dangerfield  –  not even from Hart’s family.

‘He has done everything he possibly could to fulfil his obligations to his little boy.

‘She couldn’t get her way and maybe she was driven by jealousy. She was prepared not only to kill herself but to do something that quite frankly, beggars belief.

He said: ‘Emma Hart left a note which was severely critical of Mr Dangerfield. I have heard no evidence to justify that view.

The coroner added that Hart was driven by ‘rage and hatred if she did not get her own way’ and was prepared to lie about her medical condition to Mr Dangerfield  –  as well as friends and her own family  –  ‘to get control’ over him.

Relatives of Hart, including her mother, father, two brothers and two sisters, were all present at the inquest and frequently broke into tears.

Her mother told the inquest: ‘She is not a horrible person, she was a loving mum.’

Only another women could be so fucking stupid and try defending this evil selfish spiteful piece of shit.

More ‘professional’ women stripping for credibility

Ah feminism. I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning. There really isn’t anything new to see here. It’s the same old story of women who feel the need to objectify themselves with the intent of giving more ‘credibility’ to their profession. Why do women believe that to gain respect from a group, they must paradoxically objectify themselves? Maybe it’s because posing is easier than hard work. Female logic sure is a strange thing.

Source: Daily Mail

As she reclines in a skimpy camisole, the look is definitely sexy rather than sporty.

But Johanna Head still wants to be known more for her golf shots than her camera shots.

She is a great British hope at the Women’s Open which started yesterday at Sunningdale in Berkshire  –  and is being billed as one of golf ‘s answers to former tennis starlet Anna Kournikova.

Which would explain her modelling at the first opportunity. Anna Kournikova made much more money posing than playing anyway.

Ahead of the tournament, the 35-year- old from Ascot signed up for a glamorous photoshoot with several other female golfers in an attempt to change the face of the ‘dowdy’ sport.

It’s golf, not oil wrestling. What makes them think they can change the face of a sport just by getting pictures taken? How special do girls think they are these days? I’m sure fans of the sport would appreciate it much more if these girls just got down to business and played amazing golf, on the level that the men play it.

Yeah, I laughed too.

Fellow team member Kim Hall said: ‘I would rather be known for my golf, but it’s a bonus when you are considered attractive. Nobody in the group wants to be Kournikova. We’re in the limelight so we’re going to do that playing golf, not standing around looking glamorous.’

Say no more. I won’t add pictures. Visit the Daily Mail if you must have a butchers.

Wife poisons husband THREE times, poor woman.

Seems like stories of women poisoning their boyfriends/ husbands pops up every week.

Source: Daily Mail

A businesswoman tried to poison her husband on three occasions in an attempt to make him confess to having an affair.

Linda Lees, 45, twice put poison in his takeaway after their 23-year marriage collapsed.

Detectives say Mrs Lees suspected the 43-year-old Navy avionics lecturer of being unfaithful, and administered a toxin to try to coax him into admitting his infidelity.

She is said to have made the repeated attempts, despite having a long-term affair with a neighbour herself.

Police, who said Mr Lees had been having an affair, are still waiting to find out what drugs she used in the last attack.

How do they know?

But they believe they may have been those prescribed for her own depression. They are investigating if she may also have used the date rape drug GHB.

At Truro Crown Court, Lees – the manager of a car rental company – admitted administering a noxious substance with intent to injure her husband, who is based in
Portsmouth, on three occasions.

The first was at her home in Cornwall when he visited for a weekend in March.

The second was at a restaurant in Exeter, where they met to try to save their marriage the next month.

On that occasion Mrs Lees went to the toilet and stopped a waiter to ask if she could put a ring into her husband’s food as a surprise. But she then slipped poison into it and calmly watched as he ate his meal. Finally, she poisoned him again ten days ago after Mr Lees travelled to their marital home in Helston.

They had been due to spend a last weekend together walking the Cornish coast.

The pair ordered a Chinese takeaway and again Lees put drugs into it. She then took him for a drive.

By the time they returned, he was severely drowsy. He drank from a bottle of water in the car – but his wife had placed another strong dose of drugs in it. Mr Lees managed to escape the car and let himself into the house.

Lees left him there semi-conscious and went to her lover to confess to the poisoning before returning to the garage, where she tried to take her own life. Continue reading

Wives to be let off for murdering their husbands in cold blood

Hot on the heels of my earlier scribblings regarding what actually constitutes ‘abuse’ for the self interested feminists and abuse industry.

Source: Daily Mail

I hate this evil feminist bitch.

I hate this evil feminist bitch.

Women who kill abusive partners in cold blood could escape a murder conviction if they prove they feared more violence.

Under a major government review, they will be punished for the lesser offence of manslaughter, sparing them a mandatory life sentence.

Women’s groups had long campaigned for changes to the law to protect victims of domestic violence who hit back in desperation.

As long as they’re women, hitting men.

But the proposed new partial defence for killers who feel ‘seriously wronged’ by ‘words and conduct’ took experts completely by surprise.

They must establish only that they were responding to a ‘slow burn’ of abuse.

The change sweeps aside the existing requirement in any defence of provocation that they killed on the spur of the moment after a ‘sudden’ loss of control.

In cases where a husband kills, the existing ‘partial defence’ of provocation if a wife was having an affair is scrapped altogether.

The Ministry of Justice said this was in response to long-standing concerns that the centuries- old measure impacts differently on men and women.

In the first major changes to homicide laws in 50 years, ministers have ruled that other categories of killer, as well as domestic violence victims, should be offered new partial defences of provocation.

They include those ‘seriously wronged’ by an insult.

Beneficiaries of this change may include those who strike out after long and bitter disputes with neighbours, or victims of a serious crime who are taunted at a later date by the attacker.

Instead of receiving a mandatory life sentence for murder, they too could escape with a manslaughter conviction.

Note that this is the complete opposite to equality. This is just giving women who are so inclined, a government mandate to kill their husbands, as long as they can cook up a good textbook story about abuse, which as we know can be almost anything women say it is.

Essentially, this means that if a woman ‘feels’ wronged, she can kill you, if you ‘feel’ wronged, you cannot kill her. The ‘crime of passion’ motive has been strengthened for women and taken away from men. This represents laws for certain groups. This is illegal. Continue reading

Through the Eyes of a Woman

Quickly scouting through my daily list of news (lol) sites, I saw this article. I clicked on it because of the apparent contradiction between the article title and the picture.

Lineker in love: Gary and Danielle can’t hide their love as they cuddle in the street

First, I read the title, then looked at the picture, which is the below:

I thought, ‘that looks like a woman grabbing onto a rich, famous guy’. But I’m a cynical bastard.

I then read the first sentence of the article.

Gary Lineker can’t hide his love for model girlfriend Danielle Bux as the couple cuddled each other tightly in a London street.

Then I looked at the picture again. Now I’m no expert on body language, but that sentence and that picture do not mesh in my feeble little Man-mind. I thought to myself ‘this must have been written by a woman’, and obviously I was right.

It continues;

The couple clearly couldn’t wait until they got home to show their affection, as they wrapped their arms tightly around each other while strolling on London’s Kings Road.

Reminds me how women live on another planet. Although a planet of hugs and romance is infinitely better than the sick NWO world feminists desire, where males are enslaved and culled, etc.

This obviously isn’t a serious article, I’ll do that later when I get back from the pub (priorities.) However, as a man, I must say I laughed when I saw the look on the man’s face while he is out shopping with his chickadee.

How many men know that look LOL.

By the way, has anyone seen that ‘TV programme’ called Sweet 16? I saw an episode the other day. F*ck me, I didn’t know girls that age could be such arseholes. Why do the fathers let their daughters get away with that shit?

Top Rocket Scientist: No Evidence CO2 Causes Global Warming

Oh dear. The house of carbon cards continues to fall…

Source: Prisonplanet

The campaign to force people to accept that “the debate is over” and that man-made CO2 emissions are driving climate change is in deep trouble, with another top global warming advocate – rocket scientist and carbon accounting expert Dr. Richard Evans – completely reversing his position.

Evans was a consultant to the Australian Greenhouse Office from 1999 to 2005 and he wrote the carbon accounting model (FullCAM) that measures Australia’s compliance with the Kyoto Protocol.

In an article for The Australian newspaper, Evans highlights why he was so keen to jump on board the man-made explanation without there being any clear conclusion as to what was driving temperature increases in the period from the end of the 70’s to 1998.

“The evidence was not conclusive, but why wait until we were certain when it appeared we needed to act quickly?” writes Evans. “Soon government and the scientific community were working together and lots of science research jobs were created. We scientists had political support, the ear of government, big budgets, and we felt fairly important and useful (well, I did anyway). It was great. We were working to save the planet.”

“But since 1999 new evidence has seriously weakened the case that carbon emissions are the main cause of global warming, and by 2007 the evidence was pretty conclusive that carbon played only a minor role and was not the main cause of the recent global warming,” he concludes.

Evans points out that the “greenhouse signature” that would indicate CO2 emissions are driving temperature increases – “a hot spot about 10km up in the atmosphere over the tropics” – which would be evident if climate change was man-made, is simply non-existent.

“If there is no hot spot then an increased greenhouse effect is not the cause of global warming. So we know for sure that carbon emissions are not a significant cause of the global warming,” he writes.

Read the rest of the article at Prisonplanet.

Added to the Global Warming? page.

Family Being Replaced with Feral Gangs In Socialist Britain

This could not be more obvious.

Relaxing the divorce rules to cater to feminists, claiming marriage was oppressive, along with the ridiculous guarantee of the woman asset-stripping the man contributed to the huge explosion in divorces. On top of that, the Socialists/ Feminists in Government have created a tax system that actually rewards single mothers more than married families.

Now everyone knows that broken families lead to unsocialised children with much greater chance of being involved in drug abuse, crime, gangs, violence and whatnot. The majority of criminals are from single parent (mother) families. The government is literally bribing these women to become single mothers, while at the same time punishing couples for staying married.

Why? With them knowing that the nuclear family has always been the fundamental building block to a strong, independent society, these Socialists/ Feminists realised that such a unit presents an obstacle to them achieving their Marxist goals. Or do people still think everything just randomly, accidentally, incompetently just happens to fall towards Marxism? Let’s see;

Whoops a daisy! Another decision that attacks the family! I’m sure they didn’t mean it! Silly government policies, let’s just leave them to it, I’m sure they’re realise they made a boo boo…

Whoops a daisy! Another decision that attacks the family! I’m sure they didn’t mean it! Silly government policies, let’s just leave them to it, I’m sure they’re realise they made a boo boo…

Whoops a daisy! Another decision that attacks the family! I’m sure they didn’t mean it! Silly government policies, let’s just leave them to it, I’m sure they’re realise they made a boo boo…

No, I don’t think so.

This has no end in sight either. 45 per cent of new marriages are doomed to end in divorce, and Married parents ‘in the minority by 2031’. Also see Single mother gets £100 more in tax credits a week than working couples.

With this comes the inevitable breakdown of society and without even including the cultural warfare of Islam, massive third world immigration and the destruction of Britain’s wealth and productivity by the EU. Such reverse colonisation is additionally promoted by the government via the tax system; Multiple wives will mean multiple benefits.

The issue of broken families is beginning to come to the fore, only, as usual, when the issue becomes impossible to ignore or make excuses for. In this case, it is because kids are now getting murdered on a regular basis. By other kids.

Labour’s tax system punishes couples for being married, so this would logically lead to Families in meltdown, which would lead to Gangs replacing family life for ‘very angry feral youth’.

An obvious point is that when you prevent the People to bear arms to defend themselves, the only groups who will still have arms are criminals. This essentially is giving criminals free reign. Something else the government will not rush to stop, for two reasons;

1. The rise in weapon related crime (from feral brats, as a consequences of the States’ own policies) initially gave the government the excuse to step up their disarmament of the British Public (against our Bill of Rights.) Tyranny must always try to disarm the public. An armed People are much harder to take control of.

2. A destabilised nation is much easier to break apart and destroy, such is the goal of the Socialsts/ Feminists in power.

It should be noted, that removing the People’s Right to Bear Arms does nothing except put them at the mercy of criminals and tyrants, who have an annoying habit of not following the law (or changing the law to suit their agenda.) It is also an intrusion on the Right of an individual human being to defend themselves from threats.

The governments’ Socialist Human Rights Act, along with the self-perpetuating child abuse industry have essentially put the standing and authority of children above that of parents and other adults. Instead of treating children as children, they decided that they are actually ‘little adults’. With such social engineering comes policy such as; Government Permission Needed For Adults To Be With Children, and Adults being charged for assault when stopping youth crime.

Why Feminism is a Fraud… and Feminism labeled a ’society killer’ should go some way to explaining this.

I hope you can see that this is a blatant attempt to break the bond between parents and children and replace the family with the State, something else which is to be expected with Socialism/ Communism. The resulting social chaos can conveniently be used by the State as an excuse to expand power and control over the People.

And so Tyranny grows…

Woman stabs pregnant woman to death, cuts baby from womb

Source: Daily Mail

Amazingly, the newborn infant survived the attack and is being treated in hospital in Spokane, Washington.

A 23-year-old woman has been arrested.

The 27-year-old victim, named in court documents as Araceli Camacho Gomez, had her hands and feet bound with yarn.

She suffered ‘massive trauma to her stomach area’ late on Friday night.

A postmortem showed she died of the chest wounds, but had other wounds ‘consistent with the cutting of the body to remove an unborn child’.

Her body was found early on Saturday in a park in the city of Kennewick.

A woman, Phiengchai Sisouvanh Synhavong, has been arrested in connection with the murder.

What. The. Hell? Is this a case of baby rabies?

She is accused of trying to pass the infant boy off as her own in calls made on Friday night to emergency dispatchers.

She is being held without bail, with another court appearance scheduled Wednesday.

Court documents say gloves soaked in blood, a boxcutter, bloody paper towels, yarn, baby bottle and baby socks were among some of the items found in Sisouvanh Synhavong’s purse.

This evil bitch then tried to pass the baby off as her own!

Court documents allege that Sisouvanh Synhavong called 911 at 11:04 p.m. Friday saying she was by JC Penney, had just given birth and that she thought the baby had died.

The call ended, but the woman called again a few minutes later.

Dispatchers were able to trace the calls, and she was found in a parking lot with the baby, holding what appeared to be an umbilical cord.

Not insane, ‘mentally ill’, crazy or such psychopolitical nonsense. She is plain Evil and Nasty. I hope she gets what she deserves. I won’t post a pic here, if you want to see the human version of Majin Boo visit the Daily Mail.

Happy Father’s Day

To all the Dad’s out there, wanna wish you all a good Father’s Day. Contrary to the scumbag feminists and communist liberal government minions, Dad’s are much needed and much loved, more now than ever.

Tyrants throughout the ages have always understood and appreciated the power of men in society, especially men with families. They knew that fathers really don’t take kindly to having their family attacked by anyone, people in the street to government.

Marx knew that the key to destroying civilisation was to take men away from their families. Governments know that separating a man from his children removes that natural protective barrier that Dad puts up. It is almost impossible to brainwash the next generation with Dad’s still in the picture. That is why the State seeks to remove men from their families. Fatherless families are responsible for almost all of societies ills.

I don’t care what anybody says, or how ‘un-pc’ it is, but as a general rule, single mothers don’t cut the mustard the way the compliment pandering media and feminists would have you believe.

Families in meltdown, judge says

The effects of fatherless families is well documented, on the page Discrimination Against Men, the following is stated;

Mother headed households tend to produce the majority of our criminals, and of our drug users. This is one of the principle reasons for the surge in crime rate both here and in the US. The rising crime rate has tracked the increase in the number of fatherless families. Many studies have found that that the presence of the biological father is a powerful protector against delinquency.

The study ‘Experiments in Living: The Fatherless Family” documents the effects carefully, it is definitely worth a read.

In the event of separation, we all know the reality of child custody. The idea that the children suddenly start not wanting to see their father tends to be down more to the mother manipulating the children against their dad. This is called ‘Parental Alienation Syndrome’. I personally know of many many example where women will use the children as an emotional battering ram to hurt their ex-boyfriend/ husband, disobey court visitation orders (with no repercussions) and generally do their best to keep the children’s father way from them, regardless of the detrimental effects this will have on the children. It goes to show how little these ‘mothers’ think, by attacking the children’s father they are attacking part of the children. But they don’t care, as long as they get what they want right?

Extracts from Justice 4 my father, says daughter of rooftop protester;

But then as Lisa points out, brushes with the law are nothing new to her 49-year-old father. During the decade he spent fighting for full access to his three daughters after his wife walked out and took them with her, the driving instructor faced 133 court appearances before 33 different judges, two stints in jail and went on a hunger strike.

The irony is that Mark’s case is now resolved: Lisa, his eldest, now lives with him. So does his 17-year-old daughter. Another daughter, aged 15, lives nearby with her mother, but visits at least twice a week. He now has everything he fought for.

I think this is more common than people realise. Once the kids meet their dad again and notice he isn’t the fire breathing psychopath their manipulative mum made him out to be, they end up wanting to get away from her. After his wife just upped and left, this happened;

‘She told me that she deeply regretted what she had done and asked if I would take her back,’ said Mark. ‘I refused. I was too hurt and angry. The following day, she changed her telephone number and from then on she refused even to answer the door to me, let alone let the children see me.’

Life soon became a round of court appearances. At first, Mark was granted unrestricted access. But at the same time his wife applied to have his visits reduced, saying it was ‘ confusing’ for the girls to see him.

The Family Court agreed and cut his access from three times a week to once a week and finally to once a fortnight.

A year after they separated, the couple divorced. And that year, 1996, Mark returned to court in a bid to see more of his daughters. This time, he asked if they could come and live with him. His wife retaliated by saying that seeing him was unsettling the girls. The judge’s response was astonishing by any standards: he severed all Mark’s rights of access.

‘I was devastated,’ he said. ‘But I couldn’t let that stop me being a father to them.’ To show he cared, he stood on the street and waved to them when their mother drove them to school each morning. His ex-wife took out an injunction to stop him.

The secret Family Courts seem all too happy to limit access to fathers, maybe it is part of their feminist ‘retraining’. His daughter was manipulated by her mother, but this story has a happier ending then most in this situation;

In the end, it was Lisa, not the courts, who resolved the situation-Over the years, she admits, she had given up on her father.

‘We thought he didn’t love us any more,’ she says.

When her father was jailed, it served only to reinforce what she says were her mother’s words: ‘I told you he was a bad man.’

Mum’s hate for dad seemed to run so deep, to keep her happy and get the social workers off my back, I told them all I never wanted to see him again. Turning love to hate seemed easier.’

Over the years, she occasionally saw her father on TV. ‘One day, I caught him being interviewed along with some other dads who were also banned from seeing their children,’ she says.

‘As I listened to them all talk about how all they wanted was to be allowed to be fathers to their own kids, I felt a pang for my own dad and what we’d lost.’

On March 21, 2001, she telephoned her father out of the blue, saying that she and her youngest sister were at a bus stop with their bags packed and wanted to come and live with him.

‘Seeing Lisa again for the first time in six years was incredible,’ recalled Mark, who has written a book, Family Court Hell, about his experiences.

It took that man an epic amount of work to see his own children, such is the enthusiasm of our disgusting anti-nuclear family socialist Social Services and Marxo-feminist scum in denigrating the positive effects of fathers. I went through similar situations with my dad and my ex-mum (bitch), but I’m not going to go into it, this blog isn’t about me or about how the CPS refuse to prosecute my ex-stepmum (feminist idiot) for abuse even though there are 5 written statements confirming it occured over a period of about 15 years with two generations of kids. ‘Not enough evidence’ apparently. I wonder how much evidence it would take to get a man in court for ‘abuse?’

Anyway, enough about that, this post is to show Dad’s we care, even if we don’t say it all the time, or if you make mistakes (or we do), it doesn’t matter. I’m so glad I wasn’t brought up by a woman… Fuck me that’s a scary thought lol.

A Father’s Day Moment: Only a Dad, But the Best of Men


In other news, I’ll be away for a week, finally getting a break away from the UK. I’ll return back to business, and with a new project I’ve been mulling over, hot on the heel’s of Irelands’ No vote and the ensuring shitstorm it is kicking up with that eternal enemy of the Totalitarian State, the People.

IRELAND SAYS NO TO LISBON TREATY!!

EUObserver

Across Ireland, voters have strongly voted No to the Lisbon Treaty, which looks all but certainly set for defeat.

Nationwide, based on unofficial tallies of seven out of 43 constituencies declared, the No is leading the Yes side 57.6 percent to 42.4 percent.

Dermot Ahern, the Irish justice minister, speaking on RTE television, said: “We’re in uncharted waters here.”

“The results are quite clear,” he added, “I don’t see how they can be overturned [from where they are at this point].”

Declan Ganley, the millionaire businessman and founder of Libertas, the centre-right anti-Treaty group campaigning around tax harmonisation issues and against European ‘red tape’, said: “It’s a great day for the Irish people and a great day for Irish democracy.”

“The Irish people have shown enormous courage and wisdom. They have given a resounding meassage that comes atop the votes against the constitution in France and the Netherlands.

“We are bringing democracy into the heart of the European Union,” he added, speaking to reporters in the courtyard of Dublin Castle, where the central vote count is being held. “This is democracy in action, and the third time Irish citizens have said ‘No’ to this formula.”

This is precisely why the corrupt governments of the other 26 members of the EU refused to give their respective People a referendum on the EUCCP Lisbon Treaty and the majority have already ratified it (in Britain the ratification is an Act of Treason). For an overview of the Treaty’s clauses and ramifications, please visit my earlier post Why Ireland Should Vote No To the Lisbon Treaty.

Barring vote tampering, it looks like end result will be definitely be NO. The Daily Mail reports the following;

Irish voters appeared to have rejected the Lisbon Treaty this afternoon, throwing the European Union into crisis.

To shock across the continent,  the country’s Justice Minister Dermot Ahern conceded today that the vote appeared to have been won by opponents of the controversial treaty.

‘It looks like this will be a “no” vote,’ Mr Ahern said on live television.

“At the end of the day, for a myriad of reasons, the people have spoken.”

The result, if correct, would deal a devastating blow to the controversial treaty and have major ramifications for the rest of Europe.

Ireland is the only EU country to have held a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, though 18 of the 27 members states have already ratified it.

We should use this intelligent and wise result from the Irish People to spread the truth about the Lisbon Treaty to those who do not know the facts. Time to step up the dissemination of information about the waste, the corruption, the Communist ideal’s and the dictatorship that is the real Face of the European Dream.

No doubt the EU will try its hardest to accelerate its progress and its plans for abolishing the sovereignty of member nations. The BBC mentions;

The BBC’s Oana Lungescu in Brussels says EU leaders are bracing for defeat but are expected to press on with the treaty, which is meant to streamline decision-making in the now expanded EU.

People have to realise that their respective governments do not act in their best interests or in the interests of their Laws. This has been decades in the planning and implementing and we are now in the final stages of their endgame for the European Superstate;

Former Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovksy, who personally saw secret documents in 1992 which outlined a conspiracy to turn the European Union into a Socialist dictatorship;

The Soviet files outlined a plan from the mid-1980’s onwards to hijack the European Union and turn it into what Bukovksy calls the EUSSR, a totalitarian federal superstate with no accountability or direct representation.

There would have been no more Treaties after Lisbon, none would have been necessary as it would have finalised the transfer of all sovereign powers of all nations to Brussels.

That is why Brussels commanded our heads of State to ratify it without a public vote.

That is why Brussels refused to let member States publish the Lisbon Treaty until it is ratified.

That is why Brussels redesigned the Treaty with the specific intention of covering up the original Constitution while keeping all of its changes.

And that is why we, the People must STOP IT. Our governments are firmly in the grip of the EU which is obvious by their actions and inactions. We need to get active and pressure our governments like never before.

They have abused their power too much, for too long.

Today however, the score definitely reads;

Ireland 1 – 0 Tyranny.

🙂

Josef Fritzl, (the man who locked his daughter in the cellar for 24 years), innundated with love letters

Cellar monster Josef Fritzl has been sent hundreds of love letters from lonely women offering him romance.

Some of the women have said that Fritzl, who locked his daughter Elisabeth in a cellar for 24 years and fathered her children, is ‘good at heart’ and misunderstood.

Fritzl has so far received a mountain of 200 love letters.

Those writing to the 73-year-old former electrician believe that he wanted to keep his daughter out of trouble and so kept her prisoner for most of her life.

Fritzl fathered seven children through his daughter and he is now in Austria’s Sankt Poelten prison where he has also received a mountain of hate mail.

So far he has received a total of 5,000 letters.

Elisabeth, 42, is recovering in a psychiatric clinic. Three of her children were kept prisoner in the dungeon with her.

He is due in court again on Friday – when he will almost certainly be sent back to jail to await trial.

Prosecutor Gerhard Sedlacek has said that Fritzl did not have an accomplice.

From the start, investigators have said there was no sign that Fritzl had help – even though many have been baffled how he managed to keep his daughter and their children hidden for so long.

I’m confused, maybe this case appeals to these women’s sense of ‘being cared for’ or something. Somehow I couldn’t image if this was a woman (doing this to her son), that there would be hundreds of men writing her love letters… Utter madness.

‘Security’ at airport stop man from boarding – because of T-Shirt

BBC

A man wearing a T-shirt depicting a cartoon character holding a gun was stopped from boarding a flight by the security at Heathrow’s Terminal 5.

Brad Jayakody, from Bayswater, central London, said he was “stumped” at the objection to his Transformers T-shirt.

Mr Jayakody said he had to change before boarding as security officers objected to the gun, held by the cartoon character.

Airport operator BAA said it was investigating the incident.

Mr Jayakody said the incident happened a few weeks ago, when he was challenged by an official during a pre-flight security check.

And to think there are people who believe this sort of stuff is still for their ‘security’ and scoff at those speaking of a Police State.

“He says, ‘we won’t be able to let you through because your T-shirt has got a gun on it’,” Mr Jayakody said.

“I was like, ‘What are you talking about?’.

“[The official’s] supervisor comes over and goes ‘sorry we can’t let you through and you’ve a gun on your T-shirt’,” he said.

Mr Jayakody said he had to strip and change his T-shirt there before he was allowed to board his flight.

“I was just looking for someone with a bit of common sense,” he said.

“It’s a cartoon robot – what threat is it to security or offensive to anyone at all?”

A BAA spokesman said there was no record of the incident and no “formal complaint” had been made.

“If a T-shirt had a rude word or a bomb on it, for example, a passenger may be asked to remove it,” he said.

“We are investigating what happened to see if it came under this category.

“If it’s offensive, we don’t want other passengers upset.”

A Transformers T-shirt. They would not let him on the plane because it may offend someone? That is rubbish. This is a perfect example of the application of Collectivist methodology in order to remove our freedoms.

By claiming it would offend an arbitrarily set group, one individual can control the behaviour of/ restrict the actions of many. This is also only applied top-down. That is, if I find the governments policies offensive or the behaviour of stupid security guards at airports offensive, that can be ignored. The same way the government can focus on a knife stabbing in Britain to force through laws making buying swords illegal, or try to ban firearms for 300 million people because a kid shot up a school (Imagine how far he would have gotten if the students were armed also). On top of this, I’m sure more people will find the actions of the guard offensive than would find the T-shirt offensive. It’s Transformers – Terrorists in Disguise I guess.

So, what if someone is killed with a spoon? What if someone is drowned? Ban spoons and lakes? The government can mix and match events to further their agenda which always involves more controls over your freedom and behaviour under the guise of ‘protecting you’. Which obviously means they think you cannot protect yourself. You silly child!

If I wore a Legend of the Over-fiend T-shirt would that make me a demi-god demon-rapist? It is totally pathetic. Can you imagine a society where the State engages huge amounts of taxpayers money and time engineering peoples behaviour around the possibility it may offend ‘someone else?’

Hopefully these reports will force more sheep to think for themselves about what is going on. For more background on this ridiculous behaviour (and to see it in context of the police state), read the article on Infowars.net by Steve Watson.

Photo-fit image of the potential terrorist seen in the wild.

Girls arguing over a boy ‘blew up houses’

Could probably do as an addendum to Another reason men are avoiding women…

Note it isn’t a fact, but a theory. Still, the mere fact that this could have been done (by girls) warrants a mention in my book.

A gang of teenage girls may have blown up a house with a home-made liquid bomb, which killed a man in a neighbouring property, after arguing with another girl about a love rival.

Purple liquid was poured through the letterbox of the Victorian house before the an explosion destroyed three houses.

Their intended victim, Charlotte Anderson, was caught in the blast and was rushed to intensive care suffering with severe burns.

Amazing. I guess this is what amounts to ‘girl power’ these days…

Ten hours earlier Miss Anderson had phoned police to say a gang of girls aged 16 and 17 was causing trouble outside her home, in Harrow. They were directing abuse, about a boy, at Miss Anderson’s ground floor flat.

Miss Anderson was pulled from her wrecked flat by a neighbour and she was rushed to hospital, where her condition was described as “non life-threatening”.

Scotland Yard launched a murder investigation and is hunting the girl gang.

What on Earth is wrong with these females? Now for the obligatory attack of the Internet.

A police source said the liquid could have been made using a “recipe” found on the internet

Moving on…

DCI Colin Sutton said: “Our major line of inquiry is that this liquid caused the explosion and that the explosion was an attempt to murder this young woman.”

Girls are Sugar and Spice and All Things Nice.

It would seem we should take great care when it comes to what sort of young ladies we should permit our sons to consort with.

– M Young, London

Indeed, M Young. I’ve just come up with a saying;

Women are other women’s worst enemy because they truly know what women are like.

FMWatkins

1,300 women have had at least FIVE abortions

As campaigners claimed that termination had become just another form of contraception, figures showed that about 1,300 women had at least their fifth last year.

Almost 950 of those having a termination had already had four. Almost 200 had already had five, 110 had had six before – and 54 seven or more.

At the same time, 61,904 women in England and Wales were having their second abortion last year – up from 58,740 in 2004.

It is thought that they could influence the first major Parliamentary vote on abortion since 1990, which is expected within weeks.

Tory backbencher Mark Pritchard, whose Parliamentary questions prompted the release of the figures, said they were disturbing.

“They clearly reveal some women are tempted to use abortion as an alternative form of contraception.

“The Government needs to put in place an urgent action plan to reduce such incidents.”

Pressure has increased on the Government to review the law following concern at a rise in terminations.

More than 200,000 abortions take place each year in England and Wales, up from 175,000 in 2002.

One in ten women in their late twenties to early thirties has had one.

This is what happens when you separate consequences from actions. The financial cost is picked up by the taxpayer and it is forced by feminism/ media to be socially acceptable. Being able to commit actions and avoid consequence is a form of power. Power corrupts. These women are allowing these situations precisely because they believe the consequences will be handled by others (the state). In other words they think they can ‘get away with it‘. Continue reading

Abortion; Legal if women want it = Illegal if men want it.

What’s wrong with this picture?

Jail for man who slipped abortion drugs into wife’s sandwiches in bid to kill his unborn baby

Found via AntiMisandry.

In summary, the woman was 11 weeks pregnant. He didn’t want it, he tried to get it aborted with pills he was feeding her. She did want it.

A husband hid abortion pills in a sandwich and gave it to his wife in a desperate bid to kill their unborn child, a court heard yesterday.

Yesterday, the businessman was jailed for three years and nine months at the Old Bailey after admitting the rare offence of administering a poison with intent to cause miscarriage.

Isn’t that what happens when women willingly take pills to induce a chemical abortion?

“He tried to terminate our baby, end his child’s life before it had even begun and that’s the cruellest thing imaginable.

Yesterday, the businessman was jailed for three years and nine months at the Old Bailey after admitting the rare offence of administering a poison with intent to cause miscarriage.

I’m not a fan of abortion myself, so her having a baby is obviously good.But my opinion is irrelevant. The question I have regards the application of the law. Continue reading

Another man falsely accused of rape – To ‘teach him a lesson’.

Another false rape claim. The case was thrown out after less than three hours’ deliberation.

The jury had heard that Mr Gillett’s accuser, the daughter of a well-known personality, had twice left the room on the night of the incident, but returned.

Two students in a nearby room testified that they had not heard her calling for help, even though their door and Mr Gillett’s were left ajar throughout the alleged ordeal.

Another student revealed he had shared a bed with the slightly-built blonde on two occasions, weeks before the alleged sexual assault.

She later told a friend the man had sexually assaulted her but she never made a formal complaint – even when interviewed about her allegations involving Mr Gillett.

Remember, this actually went all the way to the Crown Prosecution Service, who is supposed to decide whether a case has sufficient evidence to justify a court case. It would seem the mere words of a woman, even if they contradict reality, would suffice. Anything to prop up the falling rape conviction statistics… Continue reading

Woman who falsely cried rape FIVE times – Gets SUSPENDED sentence.

A binge-drinking woman who acused five innocent men of rape walked free from court.

Tracy Brooks, 26, wasted massive amounts of police time when she made two false allegations against two friends within the space of a month last summer.

Crime number one. Wasting police time.

The men were arrested, questioned, held for hours in custody and faced the prospect of a lengthy prison sentence if her claims were believed.

Crime number two. False claims of rape.

But weeks later she came clean and told detectives the allegations were false.

Several years ago Brooks, a self-confessed binge-drinker, falsely accused three other men of rape in separate incidents, Newcastle Crown Court was told.

In 2001 and 2002, she made complaints against two former boyfriends and in 2004 she told police she had been raped by a friend’s boyfriend.

But the judge said he could not take these incidents into account in passing sentence because she had never been formally cautioned or charged in relation to them.

Instead, Brooks, of North Shields, North Tyneside, was given a 32-week suspended prison sentence and a three-month night-time curfew. She had admitted two charges of perverting the course of justice.

Crime number three. Perjury. Continue reading

Right to choose

Something I see all the time (now that I have figured it out) is one of the schema’s in which these filthy idiots like feminists, politicians and other lowlife pond scum operate is using wordplay. They do it all the bloody time. For example, Bush’s War on of Terror. Illegal Immigrant Reform Amnesty, Equal Opportunity Outcome and a Woman’s Right To Choose Kill.

Language is one of the most powerful tools of human manipulation there is. Orwell recognised it in his novel, 1984 (among many other things) and he introduced it with ‘Newspeak’. As an aside, newspeak has been partially realised with political correctness. The ability to control the people’s language means controlling their ability to communicate. With a concerted effort to dumb down society, language becomes an even more powerful tool to control the masses. Replace the phrase Government Control with Government Protection and all of a sudden it doesn’t sound too bad. The international bankers that run the world are experts at this little trick. The United Nations is their central point for their plans for the One World Government (Novus Ordu Seclorum). Continue reading