About Codex Alimentarius: the 5-Minute Tour

From the Natural Solutions Foundation;

These 14 points provide you with understanding about Codex Alimentarius – health freedom threat number one. It also explains what to do about it.

  1. Consumer Protection? Unfortunately Not
    The first step to understanding Codex Alimentarius is to realize that it has absolutely nothing to do with “consumer protection”. That’s propaganda for the sake of getting people and Congress to yield to its implementation.
  2. Says Who?
    Rima E. Laibow, M.D. is a successful natural medicine physician who graduated from Albert Einstein College of Medicine in 1970. Dr. Laibow has studied more than 16,000 pages of Codex Alimentarius documentation. Her conclusion? Codex Alimentarius is a very serious threat to health freedom. We must take it seriously.
  3. Meaning of Name and History of Organization
    “Codex Alimentarius” means “food rules” in Latin. The organization was born in 1962 when the UN established the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) as a “Trade Commission”. It was created to regulate, and thus control, every aspect of how food and nutritional supplements are produced and sold to the consumer. It is solely about trade and the profits of multi-national corporations.
  4. Bolstering Profits of Pharmaceutical Industry
    The more natural health products people use, the fewer drugs they use. Millions are turning to natural health. Big Pharma fears this as it would diminish profits. Codex is designed to protect Big Pharma profits by eliminating natural health products and treatments. Health food stores and wellness companies would be hit hard.
  5. Codex Alimentarius is Unscientific
    Codex is unscientific because it classifies nutrients as toxins and uses “Risk Assessment” to set ultra low so-called “safe upper limits” for them. Risk Assessment is a branch of Toxicology, the science for assessing toxins. The proper science for assessing nutrients is Biochemistry. Codex does not use Biochemistry.
  6. Based on Tyrannical Napoleonic Legal Code
    Codex is based on the Napoleonic Code, dating back to Bonaparte. Under this code, anything not explicitly permitted is automatically forbidden. Under Common Law (our system), something does not have to be explicitly permitted to be legal. The tyrannical Napoleonic Code allows the banning of natural health options by default.
  7. Shrewdly, Slowly Raising Heat
    Codex will go into global effect on December 31, 2009, unless we, the People, take action and avert it. Right now, we are like a frog boiled slowly, the heat raised gradually so we won’t jump out of the water. The media is used to make us believe that Codex is about “consumer protection”. Part of the media strategy is to tarnish the image of natural health options, through for-hire studies.
  8. Beware Codex Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing
    One-time defenders of supplements and nutritional products, such as the National Nutritional Foods Association (NNFA) and Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN), have fallen prey to new pharmaceutical members and are spreading disinformation saying that Codex is “consumer protection”. Their boards used to be run by health freedom fighters.
  9. VMG: Banning Our Supplements
    Codex is made up of many standards for every aspect of food. One of these standards was ratified (approved) in July 2005: the destructive Codex Alimentarius Vitamin and Mineral Guideline (VMG). The VMG can ban all high potency and clinically effective vitamins & minerals. For example, Vitamin C would be restricted to only a few milligrams per dose. Other nutrients, such as amino acids, are also under threat.
  10. DSHEA, Our Best Legal Defense
    The U.S. has a powerful legal tool for health freedom: the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), passed in 1994 after massive grass-roots action. DSHEA scientifically classifies nutritional supplements as food and prevents dosage restrictions; Codex unscientifically classifies them as toxins and sets ultra-low doses. The VMG violates U.S. law because it violates DSHEA. We must unite to protect DSHEA, our best legal defense against Codex.
  11. Congressional Effort Underway to Undermine DSHEA
    The pharmaceutical industry works through irresponsible/corrupt politicians to do their bidding. The path to institute Codex in America is to “influence” Congress to pass laws friendly to drugs and unfriendly to nutritional supplements, so that slowly everyone comes to believe that nutrients are “dangerous”, and drugs are “proper medicine”. Susan Davis (D, CA) and other politicians are helping Big Pharma by supporting bills designed to destroy DSHEA.
  12. U.S. Government Illegally Supports Codex
    The U.S. Codex Office (the U.S. Codex “point of contact”) is unfortunately highly supportive of Codex. So is the rest of the government, including the pharmaceutical-friendly FDA. They should not be. DSHEA and other U.S. law means their support is in direct violation of the laws of the U.S.A.! They are breaking our laws and they know it.
  13. Let’s Enter Coordinal Relationships With Congress
    Congress has the power to keep America Codex-free. It can defeat bills designed to destroy DSHEA, support health freedom bills, and reprimand the U.S. Codex Office and the FDA. Using the Internet we can reach Congress directly to create a lobby of the people, for the people. Families of Congress would suffer too, if Codex is not averted.
  14. Call to Action
    Thanks to the Internet, millions of health conscious Americans can unite to protect health freedom from Codex Alimentarius. We have the power to turn Codex into a blessing if all of us in the natural health community use it to get active, get organized, and stand up for health freedom. Together, we will let Big Pharma know that we see through their deception and will protect our access to natural health care.

Ready to take action now? Click here.

Ready to learn more? Click here.

More information I have come across…

A Nutricidal Codex – By Shannara Johnson

Ever heard of the Codex Alimentarius? If not, don’t be surprised. It’s one of the best-kept “open secrets” of the U.S. government. It’s scheduled to take effect on December 21, 2009, and it may present the greatest disaster for our food supply—and thus for our health—this country has ever seen.

What is the Codex Alimentarius, and how did it come to pass?…

A collection of videos on the subject.

Codex Alimentarius To Be Implimented Dec 31, 2009 & 3 BILLION Deaths

Part 1 is the intro, history, the parent organizations pushing the agenda, and how the sovereignty of countries is subverted.

Part 2 What does Codex do? Who does it serve? Vit&Mineral Guidelines & limits. Common Law vs. the Napoleonic Code of Alimentarius. Nutrients Declared as Poison. Risk Assessment & LD50. Fluoride and its Use. Codex Making Nutrients illegal.

Pt 3 Milk, Bovine Harmone, Global Mandate that every Dairy Cow in the world be treated W/ Monsanto’s Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone. Every Animal Used for food on the planet MUST be treated with subclinical antibiotics! Irradiated Organic Food, New Organic standards, Limits on Industrial Chemicals in Food, Viewing & Searching The Codex Alimentarius Website “walk through”, Persistent Organic Pollutants, Removal of Foods w/ Illegal Poisons at borders declared Trade Violation, 3 billion deaths, Wealthy Retain access to “clean food,” Food Regulations as Legal Mandated Toxicity & Undernutrition.

Codex Alimentarius (Food Rules): The Global Control of Food

Codex is made up of many standards for every aspect of food. One of these standards was ratified in July 2005: the destructive Codex Alimentarius Vitamin and Mineral Guideline (VMG). The VMG can ban all high potency and clinically effective vitamins & minerals. For example, Vitamin C would be restricted to only a few milligrams per dose. Other nutrients, such as amino acids, are also under threat.

Codex Alimentarius allows high levels of 7 of the 9 most toxic pesticides in the world, in our food. These compounds are so toxic that the Stockholm Convention (PDF) was created to eliminate them from the planet! Codex, however, allows them in your food along with 206 other toxic pesticides.

Is it the end of the world or not, fascists?

I am working on quite a bit article at the moment, so in the meantime, I’ll post this link, from Devils Kitchen.

Via Counting Cats, I find this piece of shit website—complete with countdown clock—which maintains that we have only 100 months (well, 94 months now) to save the planet.

We have 100 months to save the planet. When the clock stops ticking we could be beyond the climate’s ‘tipping point’, the point of no return.

Or, of course, equally we may not be. Since the world’s scientists have absolutely failed to show that the Earth’s climate is reliant on positive feedbacks to the extent that there actually could be a “tipping point”, I think that I shall call “bullshit”.

Of course, I entirely endorse Nick M’s view of this too.

I propose a wager with these criminal charlatans and miserable chicken lickens. If the sky hasn’t fallen within their 100 months (down to 94 now) and reached the fabled “run-away” tipping point of no return then Monbiot, Gore and Porritt and all their thieving scumbag acolytes should do the decent thing and make their own leaps of faith off Beachy Head. Seems only fair. They afterall have been asking the entire planet to make a leap of faith and pay for it ourselves. They want the world to gamble it all and I think they should be prepared to cover that bet.

Damn straight.

Read the rest here.

One in ten men could be victims of paternity fraud

Daily Mail

There was never going to be a good time. But when the truth finally emerged, it couldn’t have been at a more inopportune moment. Mark Webb was driving to work at eight in the morning when his wife Lydia rang.

‘I was in the fast lane of the M4 heading towards Reading,’ he recalls. ‘I picked up the call on the hands-free and said, “Hi, what’s the problem?” because Lydia wouldn’t normally call so early.

She said, “I’ve got something I need to tell you. You’re not the father of Elspeth. Dave Mottram is.” ’

It was a shattering revelation and one that set in motion an extraordinary chain of events.

For what might have been a painful but private matter became very public when Mark took his now ex-wife and her lover to court in a bid to claim compensation for the 17 years he had spent bringing up Elspeth, believing her to be his daughter.

Mark’s claim failed and ten days ago the Court of Appeal refused him permission to appeal against the ruling. Since then the ‘paternity fraud’ case has sparked a passionate debate about the rights of fathers.

In last week’s Mail on Sunday, Lydia defended her actions while Mr Mottram has also had his say, claiming he did not know that Elspeth was his daughter. Yet throughout, and for all the conjecture and comment, Mark remained silent.

Now, in an exclusive interview, the 47-year-old production manager for an engineering company explains why he took the controversial and much-criticised decision to try to recoup the money he had spent bringing up Elspeth.

Read the full article.

Economic warfare serves a one world government agenda

According to the Guardian, Iceland is to be fast-tracked into the EU, due to the economic shitstorm they find themselves in.

Iceland will be put on a fast track to joining the European Union to rescue the small Arctic state from financial collapse amid rising expectations that it will apply for membership within months, senior policy-makers in Brussels and Reykjavik have told the Guardian.

Olli Rehn, the European commissioner in charge of enlargement, said: “The EU prefers two countries joining at the same time rather than individually. If Iceland applies shortly and the negotiations are rapid, Croatia and Iceland could join the EU in parallel. On Iceland, I hope I will be busier. It is one of the oldest democracies in the world and its strategic and economic positions would be an asset to the EU.”

Well it is important for the supranational dictatorship to swallow all of the remaining democracies in the region, seeing as the EU is about as democratic as the former Soviet Union, one can see where this is heading. Iceland had successfully stayed out of the Eurozone until now. The EU’s economy is contracting also and will drag member states (formally nation states) down with it. Funny how a bit of deliberate economic warfare and a little help from the Financial Oligarchy’s useful idiots can cause such a rapid change in events for a nation. But that isn’t all (my emphasis).

The conservative government in Reykjavik, in power for 18 years, collapsed this week, the first government to fall as a result of the financial meltdown which has wrecked the Icelandic currency, the krona, wiped out savings and pensions, required a massive IMF bailout, sparked unprecedented riots in Reykjavik, and forced the formation of a caretaker centre-left government until new elections can be held, probably on 9 May.

EU membership will be a central theme of the election campaign, with the social democrats – the senior partner in the coalition interim government with the anti-EU Left Greens – pushing to join the EU and to swap the krona for the single European currency as soon as possible.

Although the people rioting against the government because of economic mismanagement is expected, such events, if encouraged and directed, can be used to generate particular responses. In the Greek riots at the end of 2008, there have been reports of police dressed as rioters (agent provocateurs) put there to encourage violence and property damage. We also know that the ex-Italian President is on the record saying: “Provocateur Riots Then “Beat The Shit Out Of Protesters”

Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga has offered a solution to the Italian government in dealing with widespread demonstrations by students and teachers over a cut in state funding of education – use agent provocateurs to start riots and then have the police “beat the shit out of the protesters”.

Cossiga, former Italian President, Prime Minister, Minister of the Interior, and one of the founders of the Operation GLADIO covert intelligence unit, encouraged Silvio Berlusconi and current Minister of the Interior Robert Maroni to “do what I did when I was Minister of the Interior,” namely infiltrate what so far have been relatively peaceful demonstrations, radicalize them, start riots, then engender public support for a heavy-handed police response.

Problem-reaction-solution. Thesis+Antithesis=Synthesis. This could have easily been the case with the Iceland riots and now as a result of the government being dissolved, ministers are coming out of the woodwork claiming that “The krona is dead. We need a new currency. The only serious option is the euro.”

Though deeply indebted and in dire straits, the Icelandic economy is minuscule compared with the main EU member states and therefore unlikely to prove a destabilising force. Iceland has already secured a multibillion pound IMF loan and is unlikely to prove a drain on the EU budget.

In other words, Iceland is truly up shit creek. And the same thing is being planned for Britain. These constant bailouts are not supposed to help the economy, they are supposed to devalue the Pound with the plan to force Britain into the Euro. These bailouts also help the biggest companies avoid the contraction of the money supply, which results in lenders calling in loans. People losing their homes, smaller businesses going under etc. The same technique is being used in the United States. If you want to help the people, scrap the Income Tax and reduce public spending. But the opposite is happening.

From the Telegraph;

Jose Manuel Barroso, the commission president, said that his conversations with British politicians persuaded him that “the people who matter in Britain” are now thinking about euro membership in the wake of global economic and financial turmoil.

And this isn’t all. The EU, which is a socialist dictatorship has its eyes set on more British assets. Redistribution of wealth is the M.O. of communism to widen the gap between the ruling classes and everyone else.

The only thing that will stop this is action from the people who really matter.

Us.

I wish we had global warming…

Daily Mail

Bitterly cold winds from Russia will sweep across the UK from Sunday night, sending  the mercury plunging and making this winter the chilliest for 13 years.

The reasonably high temperatures of the last two weeks will come to an end at the weekend when freezing air and winds from Russia will come in.

Hmm…

James Hansen’s Former NASA Supervisor Declares Himself a Skeptic – Says Hansen ‘Embarrassed NASA’

Washington DC, Jan 27th 2009: NASA warming scientist James Hansen, one of former Vice-President Al Gore’s closest allies in the promotion of man-made global warming fears, is being publicly rebuked by his former supervisor at NASA.

Retired senior NASA atmospheric scientist, Dr. John S. Theon, the former supervisor of James Hansen, NASA’s vocal man-made global warming fear soothsayer, has now publicly declared himself a skeptic and declared that Hansen “embarrassed NASA” with his alarming climate claims and said Hansen was “was never muzzled.” Theon joins the rapidly growing ranks of international scientists abandoning the promotion of man-made global warming fears.

Oh, and there’s this.

Devils Kitchen

As the planet’s climate grows ever warmer and we are bombarded with more and more scare stories – in the past 24 hours alone, we have had polar bears in the Thames, Emperor penguins dying out by the year 2100, and a warning that it is already too late to reverse climate change before the year 3000, for fuck’s sake – we can at least console ourselves with the knowledge that the cosmos seems determined to mock the apostles of this new doomsday cult.

Spare a thought, for example, for Al Gore, whose trip to Washington tomorrow to testify before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on the “urgent need” to combat global warming (though if it’s irreversible, where’s the fucking urgency?) is under threat from – yep, you guessed it – a severe winter storm warning in the capital. (h/t to Bishop Hill for that snippet.)

For more.

Quran, an ‘accursed book’

JihadWatch

William Ewart Gladstone (1809–1898 ) was Prime Minister of Great Britain four times: 1868–74, 1880–85, 1886 and 1892–94. He called the Qur’an an “accursed book” and once held it up during a session of Parliament, declaring: “So long as there is this book there will be no peace in the world.”

Times have changed a great deal. Now the votaries of the book he saw as such an impediment to peace have triumphed: an Islamic reading room is being set up at the library Gladstone founded near his home in North Wales. In this BBC audio report (thanks to Andrew), Gladstone’s great grandson Christopher Parish and Professor Richard Aldous, head of history at University College Dublin, tie themselves into knots trying to come up with a reason why Gladstone would have approved of this reading room. Gladstone, you see, was a man of his time, but he actually made favorable comments about Muhammad in the margins of a biography of the founder of Islam, and his remarks weren’t as extreme as those of some of his contemporaries…

It doesn’t add up. The text of the Qur’an has not changed from the late 19th century to the early 21st. What has changed is the prevailing attitude toward the book. Now it has become a manifestation of bigotry and hatred to see in the Islamic holy book anything but peace and tolerance. But the text of the book remains the same. If it was an impediment to peace in Gladstone’s day, it is now. If it is an uplifting exhortation to peace and tolerance now, then it was in Gladstone’s day as well.

Yesterday Geert Wilders said: “I view Islam not as a religion, but as a dangerous, totalitarian ideology – equal to communism and fascism. Aren’t I allowed to say so?”

No, he isn’t allowed to say so. If he had been born two hundred years ago, he might have become Prime Minister of the Netherlands. Instead, he is a hunted man. Likewise Gladstone, were he miraculously transported to the House of Commons in 2009, would be excoriated for “hate speech” if he dared to repeat his view of the Qur’an today.

But the Qur’an remains the same. Eventually, Europe and America are going to deal with the implications of that fact, one way or another.

Fascism in the UK

Fascism : The Merging of State and Corporate Power / Interests.

Daily Mail

One in five Lords is undertaking consultancy work in a Parliamentary ‘cottage industry’ potentially worth millions.

The figures can be revealed as four Labour peers are investigated over claims they were ready to take large sums to amend legislation.

One, Lord Taylor of Blackburn, was forced to apologise yesterday after he was revealed in secret recordings to have said that an annual payment of £100,000 was ‘cheap for what I do’.

And Lord Moonie, a former defence minister who is also at the centre of the investigation, is facing questions over his links to a defence industry lobbyist.

As debate rages over whether peers are being unduly influenced by outside interests, the Mail has found that 145 peers out of 743 eligible to sit in the House of Lords are acting as ‘consultants’ or ‘advisers’ to outside interests.

In addition, they are exploiting a Parliamentary loophole which says they do not even have to state how much they are earning.

Industries having their interests represented by Lords include banking, gambling, fast food, surveillance and other security systems, and nuclear power, as well as foreign governments.

Read the rest of the article.

Rothschilds, Illuminati, NWO, Marx, Communism

Watch this video at the Socio-Economics History Blog. Get everybody to watch this video. At one hour long, Jack Otto of Forbidden Knowledge runs through the history of the Rothschilds, the difference between them and real Jews, the banking cartel, Communist social control in Western society (communism isn’t dead at all), the World Wars, Lincoln, Stalin, Lenin, all of it. He nails everything. Everything he says I have already researched elsewhere and it’s great to see it all in one speech and should be required watching.

People NEED to know this info, they will not like to hear it, but tough shit, doesn’t stop it being reality. The lack of strength to deal with this is the real reason why they are getting so far in their gameplan.

London 7/7 Bombings Secret information

Question the mainstream media, question the government. Question everything with critical thinking. It is what you have a brain for.

I do not consent to this Government

PJC Journal

A Cromwell was the cry of the Revolutionaries as they swept towards the Bastille in 1789, we have to fight these tapsters and wastrels in a corrupt Parliament, and reduce their powers over us.

Obama quoted Tom Paine in his speech, let me give you another quote from Tom Paine-

….governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whatever form of government becomes destructive of these ends; it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it.

I no longer consent to this Government, it was elected on a fraudulent electoral manifesto that ensures minority rule of fanatics wedded to the power of the State. Parliament no longer represents or reflects the will of the people. To quote Cromwell- In the Name of God Go.

Until such time as we have a written constitution that guarantees our Liberties and an Electoral system that reflects the diversity of political thought in this country. I do not consent to be ruled by it.

This British Government is one of liars, thieves and traitors. A bunch of sub-human bumbling pondscum who should have never gotten within a mile of Parliament, let alone be employed within it.

I do not consent to this government. Gordon Brown wasn’t even elected, so it is impossible for anyone in this country to have given him consent anyway. No consent means no mandate, no authorisation to act on our behalf. No right to make decisions for Britain.

As the (wealth creating) private sector stumbles, trying to hold itself up under these State-manipulated conditions, the (wealth destroying) public sector continues to expand. More civil servants, more pay rises, more non-jobs. This results in higher taxation for the private sector, coupled with ever increasing regulation from Brussels (via our ‘Health and Safety Directorate’, which is essentially an EU proxy) it is obvious to see that this is a war on our economy and our society. Such is the desired ends of the Frankfurt subversion of Political Correctness.

The goal of these one world government types is to eventually dissolve Britain into the EU. To destroy Britain as a nation, the national institutions must be infiltrated and manipulated, the economy ransacked, the education system and the media controlled, the nuclear family taken apart, with the resultant rise in crime and social disorder blamed as a Hegelian argument for ever more laws and regulations.

And this cycle is supposed to continue until there is nothing ‘British’ left. Just look at the new coinage. Why redesign the currency? What was wrong with the old design? Well, for one it is synonymous with British identity, so it had to be changed. Apparently it no longer identified with ‘modern Britain’, which is supposed to be seen a merely another state in the socialist dictatorship of the EU, hence the coins having the Royal Arms broken up and spread across them like so. When viewing individual coins, one gets the impression (subconscious or otherwise) that the coin, an unit of a sovereign currency, being just a part of ‘something bigger’.

That’s my opinion anyway.

There is no doubt in my mind however, that this is all contrived. The promotion of Islam in Britain is also part of the plan to create division and social chaos. Destabilise the region, then re-arrange society and the state in the chaos into what they want, which I guarantee will not be in the interests of individual liberty.

Ordo ab chao.

Fuck this government, I want FREEDOM.

BBC Newsnight – Warming up President Obama’s inaugural speech?

What should the BBC do if the new US President’s references to global warming in his inaugural speech don’t quite come up to expectations?

It would seem that someone at the BBC had taken the trouble to splice the tape so that half a sentence from paragraph 16 of the inauguration speech was joined on to half a sentence from paragraph 22, and this apparently continuous sound bite was completed by returning to paragraph 16 again to lift another complete sentence.

Read the full post (with audio links) at Harmless Sky. Nice to know where your licence see is going.

More badly behaved women…

Daily Mail

Paternity fraud case, 17 years the bitch lied to the man, letting him pay for a child that wasn’t his. Not only deception but adultery. An ‘inveterate liar’, the Judge called her. Still, the case the man put forth for reimbursement was thrown out at Appeals. Imagine how fast and hard the misandric state would stamp on any man found to have children and not be paying for them!

The judge, sitting with Lord Justice Aikens and Mr Justice Bennett, said: ‘This whole case can be categorised as a misfortune to all those engaged in it. I would not wish to be the one to extend their misfortunes further.’

Horseshit. They know that  women are given preferential treatment in the courtroom, so they won’t even give the man a chance. Hell, we have a whole ‘child support agency’ designed primarily to force men to pay for children, even if it isn’t his. Woman puts hand in fire, state makes sure man’s hand gets burnt. Feminist equality for you.

Now Lily Allen, some girl who sort of sung a few songs, says this:

‘I just want to marry someone rich’

Her career may be ticking along nicely, but it seems Lily Allen’s ambition is beginning to wane.

The pop singer is instead setting her sights on bagging a wealthy husband.

The 23-year-old revealed her plans to artist and friend Damien Hirst in Interview magazine, in which she also appears in a smouldering photoshoot.

She said: ‘I just hope I can stay famous enough for a little bit so someone rich will marry me. That’s all I really care about these days.’

Join the club.

Lily was most recently linked to millionaire art dealer Jay Jopling, 45, and sparked rumours of an engagement when she wore a large ring on her wedding finger during a romantic holiday in St Barts earlier this month.

A source revealed: ‘Lily had been on a mission to get Jay for more than four months.’

She is obviously concerned about having more orgasms

Western women make me sick. Not for what they want, but for the duplicity in their actions. Deceit is a common weapon in the females arsenal, being as they are, amoral. This amorality inherent in women enables advertisers to sell them endless shit, enables the state to bribe them and tyrants to control them. Marx knew of their ‘qualities’, conspiring to recruit them as weapons against the only obstacle to global communism government, Men.

And, feminism was born.

It seems these days, that children are the property of women, but the responsibility of men. Not emotionally, just financially. Back in the day when they were the property of men things were different. Women couldn’t leave with the children. If they left, they would be on their own. Where they belong. This shift of power to women is part of the destruction of the family, repeated by bankers, feminists, fascists, the UN, think tanks etc. Like controlled demolition, one has to take out the core infrastructure to ensure that it collapses in a predictable way. One can then build a new structure in its place.

That is what is meant by a New World Order.

By the way, only a woman can do this attempting a three-point-turn!

Don’t let MP’s keep their expenses secret from us!

In regards to this post on the Libertarian Party UK blog., on the subject of MP’s to vote on keeping their taxpayer funded expenses secret. There is also a Facebook group campaign regarding it.

Dear ****,

Re: Members of Parliament published expenses

I am sure that you will agree with me that one of things that causes such lack of confidence in MP’s is the constant attempts by Members of the House of Commons to claim for expenses at charge to the hard pressed taxpayer and then not to publish their expense accounts in full.

Personally I fail to understand why my employer and the HMRC require all expenditure to be properly receipted, yet members feel that they should not supply receipts for expenditure under £25 and have a special exemption under the Freedom of Information Act to cover their expenses.

Following the commendable example of Douglas Carswell MP, who has made a public declaration that he will publish his expenses in full upto April 2009, could you please inform me if you will also be declaring your expenses.

If you feel that is not something that you want to do, can you explain on what grounds you do not wish to follow Mr Carswell’s example.

Let’s see what he says, if anything…

Another attack on home schooling

Another dialectic to push an agenda. Just like state sanctioned covert hacking of your computer, ‘for the children, terrorists etc’. The tyrannical socialist state cannot stand any part of society that it doesn’t control, especially when it comes to the next generation.

Daily Mail

Parents who educate their children at home could be using it to cover up abuse, neglect and forced marriage, the Children’s Minister has claimed.

Baroness Delyth Morgan said home schooling could be masking a range of evils including sexual exploitation and domestic servitude.

Her controversial comments immediately provoked fury from home schooling groups who branded them ‘offensive’.

Baroness Morgan remark came as she ordered a review of how the estimated 55,000 children who are taught at home or have dropped out from school are treated.

It is in response to local authorities’ and children’s charities’ anxiety about their ability to properly support and monitor those who are home schooled.

Control, control, control.

But yesterday’s launch appears to have been completely overshadowed by Baroness Morgan’s comments.

She said: ‘Parents are able, quite rightly, to choose whether they want to educate children at home, and a very small number do. I’m sure, the vast majority do a good job.

‘However, there are concerns that some children are not receiving the education they need.

Well, how about starting your investigation into the hordes of children leaving state school incapable of reading or writing?

‘And in some extreme cases, home education could be used as a cover for abuse. We cannot allow this to happen and are committed to doing all we can to help ensure children are safe, wherever they are educated.’

‘Think of the children’ is the mantra of fascists. What next, tracking children 24/7 using microchips? For their protection, of course.

The review will investigate how home education is supported and monitored and how concerns about the welfare and education of a child are dealt with.

Among its explicit aims is to ‘consider what evidence there is to support claims that home education could be used as a ‘cover’ for child abuse such as neglect, forced marriage, sexual exploitation or domestic servitude’.

Last night Ann Newstead, spokesman for the charity Education Otherwise, a charity for parents who home school their children, said claims that children were safer in the hands of the state than parents was ‘offensive’ and ‘not born out by an increasing number of families in the UK’.

Not if you model your ideology on Stalin, or Hitler. They knew the importance of the state using the ‘education system‘ to indoctrinate the youth.

Annette Taberner, member of EO’s policy group said ‘no other community would be expected to suffer the prejudice and discrimination which our community has to endure. Our community will be infuriated by these latest statements.’

Currently the responsibility for the home schooling of a child rests solely with the parents and no authority has the power to inspect the quality of the learning.

Councils are not obliged to monitor it and parents don’t have to answer any questions about what they are teaching.

Parents do not even have to register their child as home educated, but they must notify the school if they intend to withdraw their child from formal education in order to teach them at home. The school will then tell the local authority.

Among the options for the Elective Home Education Review are tighter monitoring although ministers stressed there are no plans to change the rights of parents to teach their children at home.

The EHER is being led by Graham Badman, former director of children’s services at Kent county council.

Mr Badman said: ‘Legislation affords every parent the right to choose to educate their child at home but with those rights go responsibilities, not least being to secure a suitable education.

‘By the same token, local authorities are charged with ensuring that all children are safe, well and receiving an education that is both enjoyable and allows for the expression of all aptitudes and abilities.’

Aww, the state is ‘thinking of your children’.

Women have more orgasms with rich men: study

Hahahaha, hohohoho, teehehehehehe!

Daily Mail

Money can’t buy you love – but it can lead to better sex, scientists say.

A controversial study claims that a woman finds lovemaking more fulfilling if her partner is wealthy.

The finding adds to the evidence that for many females, money, status and success remain a key ingredient in sexual attraction.

The link between money and sex, and the apparent sexual attraction of fabulously wealthy men, has been debated since the dawn of civilisation.

It isn’t a debate. It’s an established fact!

It was famously celebrated by the spoof chat show host Mrs Merton, when she asked Debbie McGee ‘what first attracted you to the millionaire Paul Daniels?’ and is discussed every time a young female model marries a far older, but richer businessman, pop star or actor.

The Chinese Health and Family Life Survey includes information on the sex lives, income, education and other personal details on 5,000 people across China, based on interviews and questionnaires.  Among these were 1,534 women with husbands and boyfriends.

Dr Pollet found that 121 of these women reported always having orgasms during sex, 408 said they ‘often’ had orgasms, 762 ‘sometimes’ had orgasms while 243 had them rarely or never.

The researchers found several factors influenced the women’s enjoyment of sex. However, one of the biggest turned out to be the income of their partner.

Who would have known

‘We found that increasing partner income had a highly positive effect on women’s self-reported frequency of orgasms,’ Dr Pollet said in  the journal Evolution and Human Behaviour.

Now how is this for some serious man-hating femcrap.

Although many people find the idea that women enjoy sex more with rich partners offensive, some biologists argue that the instinct makes evolutionary sense.

Women have to invest so much time and personal risk into each baby, it is crucial that they get the most successful and healthy partner so they can to improve the chances of their own DNA being passed on.

A man, in contrast, can father hundreds, or even thousands, of babies in a lifetime and so invests less in each child.

Well yeah, women need to hunt men for money, because men just don’t care about children!

How’s this. Women prostitute themselves because they are just all whores.

No, broad derogatory remarks attacking an entire gender could be called sexism. Unless it is aimed at men of course. Who cares about them anyway…

Anti-androgens found in British rivers

Daily Mail

The cocktail of gender-bending chemicals entering rivers and streams is more potent and harmful than anyone realised, it has been revealed.

Scientists have found an entirely new class of chemicals that is changing male fish into females – and which could be contributing to the soaring rate of infertility and defects in men.

They have yet to find the source of the chemicals, known as anti-androgens, but believe they could come from pesticides, industrial pollution or pharmaceutical drugs.

Until now it was assumed that the most serious gender bending man-made chemicals were those that mimicked the female sex hormone oestrogen.

The new pollutants, which were discovered in more than 30 rivers, work by blocking male sex hormones such as testosterone. In animal tests they have shown to cause low sperm counts and genital deformities.

Professor Charles Tyler, of Exeter University who was involved in the study, said the mix of anti-androgens and oestrogen mimicking chemicals was a ‘double whammy’ for wildlife – and possibly humans.

‘There are likely to be many reasons behind the rise in male fertility problems in humans, but these findings could reveal one, previously unknown, factor,’ he said.

‘Anti-androgens can induce a lot of conditions we see in humans, such as low fertility and an increase in genital deformities, very readily.’

People could be exposed to anti-androgens in pesticides on food, through airborne pollution or from drugs. The findings come from a three-year study at Exeter and Brunel Universities.

Scientists looked at samples of water from 30 sites near sewage outlets and at 1,500 fish. Genetically engineered yeast cells can be used in a laboratory to determine levels of anti-androgens. The researchers were astonished at what they found.

Male fish exposed to the highest levels of anti-androgens were most likely to be ‘feminised’ – and have egg cells in their testes.

Dr Susan Jobling of Brunel University, said: ‘We have identified a new group of chemicals, but do not know where they are coming from. A principal aim of our work is now to identify the source of these pollutants and work with regulators and industry to test the effects of a mixture of these chemicals.’

Don’t forget the War on Males. There is more to this. Consider the environmental impact of mercury vapour-lightbulbs being disposed of incorrectly, which WILL happen, although if they break in your house, you and your family will end up breathing most of it in.

Quangos ‘spend more than £1bn on spin in a year’

Daily Mail

State agencies, boards, commissions and quangos spent more than £1billion on spin last year, new evidence has indicated.

The huge amounts of public money lavished on attempts to sway opinion were revealed by freedom of information requests.

State-run organisations admitted raising their spending on ‘communications’  –  much of it devoted to lobbying and public relations puffs  –  by almost a quarter in 2008.

The 32 public bodies which answered questions from the Tax-Payers’ Alliance together paid out more than £50million on ‘ communications’ staff and the material they produced

If all 1,162 unelected and unaccountable Government-funded organisations were spending at the same rate, the cost to the taxpayer would have reached almost £2billion. Communications budgets are certain to have passed the £1billion point.

The bills were disclosed at a time when recession is eating deeply into private sector jobs.

But the public sector gravy train rolls on. The inefficient, bloated, useless, unnecessary jobsworths continue to cream it off at the expense of the private sector. Billions stolen from hard working people without their consent ‘for the greater good’ right. Bullshit. One cannot be too surprised however, this pull-the-ladder-up attitude comes straight from the top.

MPs were accused of a ‘new level of arrogance’ last night as they launched a bid to keep secret full details of how they spend millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money.

And they will further mock voters with a new rulebook allowing them to carry on squandering cash on furniture and home improvements.

With households and businesses cutting costs, the moves will be seen as more evidence that elected representatives are hopelessly out of touch.

No, they just don’t give a shit. This is what happens in socialist states. The ever increasing power available to them in these positions, coupled with the ever decreasing accountibility means it is INEVITABLE that corrupt, tyrannical, totalitarian self serving scum will be attracted to these positions. There are two reasons for this. 1. Self serving, tyrannical scum are always looking for a situation where they can exercise such desires. Positions of power allow this. 2. Peer behaviour leads to a culture of corruption. Everyone around them is on the take, so they are more attracted to it because of this.

This is one of the major reasons why power is supposed to be decentralised. Imagine how evil and corrupt the scum will be in a global fascist dictatorship? The principle of individual freedom is the critical issue because self-ownership means self-sovereignty.

What is more likely to encourage greed and corruption? A small, limited, efficient, transparent, accountable state where they come second fiddle to the individual sovereignty of the citizen. Or one where the 670 or so MPs have power over the 80 million people in this country?

The centralisation of power always leads to this and it always leads to the power trying to centralise ever more from the country. To do that they must achieve dominion over the sovereignty of the citizens, essentially enslaving them through law, taxation and propaganda.

Nothing will change with the usual political parties. It is a rigged game. You are presented with these three ‘options’ because they are the ones vetted by the cartel behind the government, who also control the mainstream media. It is like a room with three doors, which all just so happen to lead to the same room on the other side. Any ‘choice’ you have is actually an illusion, as the outcome, the major policies and decisions will be the same, and by ‘choosing’ one of the sanctioned options you are giving them a mandate to continue the tyranny and police state agenda.

When you define true choice by outcome and not option, those three doors collapse into one. This gives you three real choices. Go through that door, don’t do anything, or kick the fucking wall in on the other side and see what happens.

I bet you can guess which choice the establishment want you to take.

I bet you can guess which choice I am going to take.

Freedom isn’t a right, it is a priviledge. In fact so are rights.  These unelected rulers are fighting to prevent you from even thinking about taking your freedom back. Using your money. By stealing your time.

What can you do? Well, first of all, start by looking at other political options. I will explain more aspects of this subject and more in later posts.

Thanks for reading.

Virginity auction update

This is what she pretends to be...

This is what she pretends to be...

You may remember an earlier post regarding this very same tart, by Henry Makow, called Auctioning Her Virginity Is Natural Step For Feminist. A short quote from that post:

Feminism, with its hidden lesbian agenda, is brainwashing and social engineering. It was fostered by the financial elite in order to destabilize family en route to creating a totalitarian state. The destruction of the family was a plank in the Communist Manifesto, which was financed by these same bankers.

Young women today are lost souls, betrayed by their society to think their only value lies in sex appeal and career. They are willing to have promiscuous sex to assuage their sense of worthlessness. This only undermines their chance of marital success.

Long story short, this women studies grad decided to sell her virginity to the highest bidder when seeing her older sister whore herself out for a few weeks and collect lots of money for it while doing her own studies.

What you may not know is what the bids on her complete sexual inexperience have now reached.

Daily Mail

But this is who she is...

But this is who she is...

Natalie Dylan obviously values her virginity so highly, that not even £2.5m is good enough as she prepares to auction off her chastity for millions of pounds.

The 22-year-old student from California is being chased by a record 10,000 besotted men all keen to spend a massive sum for one night of passion.

‘It’s shocking that men will pay so much for someone’s virginity, which isn’t even prized so highly anymore.

‘I think it’s become some kind of competition between all these men.

‘It’s like a contest they all want to win,’ added Natalie, who is from San Diego in the U.S.

The student already has a degree in Women’s Studies and planned the virginity auction to raise enough funds for a masters course in Family and Marriage therapy.

Well, nothing illicits respect about relationships more than selling your virginity to the highest random bidder.

‘I’ve had two serious boyfriends, and of course we were intimate in some ways, but they were nice guys and were patient with me.

‘Back then I just wanted to wait until I was sure about someone before going all the way with them.

‘Things didn’t work out with either of my boyfriends and so the losing my virginity just never happened.’

The cheques bounced, in other words.

Natalie began researching prostitution for her own degree course, as well as how virginity was prized in different cultures.

‘I looked at other cases of where women had been paid for their virginity and realised that men were willing to pay large sums in return,’ she said.

Knowing her sister had been treated well by the legal brothel The Bunny Ranch in Nevada, USA, Natalie decided to look into working there, but for just one evening.

‘I’m really proud of her,’ said Avia. ‘I understand fully why she’s doing this, and I don’t know why anyone would criticise her for it.

However Natalie admits she’s still concerned about the prospect of spending a night with a stranger.

‘I’ve been getting to know the men who are bidding and I’m having email conversations with them,’ she said.

‘I’ve had such a range of messages, from weirdos who say they love me, to those who get really graphically sexual about what they want to do to me.

‘I’m also getting lots of polite requests from rich businessmen.

‘I get some men who are obviously looking for a girlfriend but I try and make it clear that this is a one-night-only offer.

Until she gets married, then its the big payday! Day, after day, after day, after day…

‘I know that a lot of people will condemn me for this because it’s so taboo but I really don’t have a problem with that,’ she added.

Natalie said she is prepared to undergo a medical hymen examination to prove her chastity and has already passed two lie detector tests.

Wow, quality control for the meat I suppose, have you make sure you are getting what you paid for. Which he won’t, regardless of what she does.

‘My study is completely authentic in that I truly am auctioning my virginity,’ Natalie said.

Yeah you just keep justifying it you deluded WHORE lol.

‘But I am not being sold into this. I’m not being taken advantage of in any way.

‘I think me and the person I do it with will both profit greatly from the deal,’  she added.

Wow. Gold plated, bullet proof narcissism from a leading member of the ‘new woman’. She will definitely profit from one of the most stupid men who ever lived but it definitely will not be mutually beneficial. Unless he is a virgin too. Imagine how many professional whores that could buy! He could be sleeping with a new, fresh, dirty slut every day of the year lol.

But some idiot is going to sleep with a women studies grad. That is what truly disgusts me.

How much money would you pay to have sex with a girl who has never done it? How much would you pay for a carpenter who has never held a tool? I know what is going to happen as well. This sort of self-absorbed bitch will just lay there, expecting him to do everything, and expecting him to appreciate the HONOUR of her goddess-like company. Talk about up her own arse. Somewhere I’m sure she won’t let him go, because she’s a LADY of course! Fuck me, I don’t know how women manage to live with double standards all the time. How selfish do you have to be, to think that the rules you wish to impose of others, should not apply to you?

LOL. I hope I get to see a picture of the prick who pays for this, because no matter how bad I rip the girl now, he is going to get it!

The coming horror of ‘Eco-bulbs’ or (CFL)

I recently came across an article on the Daily Mail site regarding a Labour peer who just happens to own shares in a firm who recycles the new ‘eco-friendly’ lightbulbs the enviro-fascist government is currently forcing into all homes.

Lord Barnett, who was Treasury Chief Secretary in the Seventies and later vice-chairman of the BBC, is a major investor in a company that stands to reap massive profits as the new-style bulbs are recycled.

Why must these bulbs be recycled in this way (as opposed to normal bulbs)? Well it is because the new ‘environmentally friendly’ bulbs contain mercury, one of the most toxic substances on Earth.

Breaking one of these bulbs in your home technically qualifies that area as a toxic waste site. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has issued guidance in the event one of these ‘eco’ bulbs breaks, which will release mercury vapour into your home, and incase you are wondering…

..there is no safe level of mercury, and no one has actually shown that there is a safe level. I would say mercury is a very toxic substance… – Dr Lars Friberg, Former Chief Adviser to the World Health Organization on Mercury safety.

The mainstream excuse for this pushing of this product is to reduce CO2 emissions by lower energy consumption and ‘waste’ through heat etc.

CO2, a naturally occuring gas that exists in trace levels in the atmosphere is essential for plant life. The 0.038% of the atmosphere that contains CO2 represents the planets total outgassing, not just man-made which is again, a trace of the above percentage, but I have written about this here: I will declare Carbon Dioxide a pollutant: Obama. Those useful idiots pushing for global centralisation of power in the name of ‘stopping global warming’ fail to mention that there hasnt been any global warming since 1998. Polar bear numbers are at an all time high and there has been a record increase in sea ice, which is now back to 1979 levels. On top of that many are predicting cooling for years to come. Quite simply, CO2 exists in trace quanitites, and is less of a greenhouse gas than methane, and a gas called nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), used during the construction of solar panels, among other things, is 17,000 times more potent than CO2.

But let’s focus on mercury, otherwise we will be here all day.

By forcing people to buy these new bulbs, the proto-global government is forcing one of the worlds most toxic elements into your home, an element that is toxic to all life and will now help you save the planet (by potentially poisoning and killing yourselves), and with your own money too! Sounds like the thinking of the anti-human elitists to me.

I wanted to a) find out what the ‘acceptable’ level of mercury exposure was, and b) how much mercury is in each bulb.

After a bit of digging, I found a document called ‘Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) for Hazardous Substances’, published by the Department of Health and Human Services (US). Fluoride is listed in it by the way. According to this document, which defines the MRLs as “an estimate of the daily human exposure to a hazardous substance that is likely to be without appreciable risk of adverse noncancer health effects over a specified duration of exposure.”

The minimum risk for mercury exposure is 0.0002 mg per m3. That is, twenty thousandth of one milligram per cubic metre.

Fine, now how much mercury does one of these new fangled bulbs contain? According to the Health Protection Agency (haha), “Nowadays, the typical amount is around 4 milligrams per lamp – just enough to cover the tip of a ball point pen and just enough to last the expected life-time of the lamp.”

So, 4 milligrams per lamp. Back to the first Daily Mail article we see this;

‘There are 20 million households in the country. That means between 700 million and 800 million lights will need replacing and will have to be recycled.’

So one may not think that a broken bulb in the home is a big deal, even if that bulb can release 40,000 times the maximum acceptable amount of mercury into your locality. How many people will put all of these CFL’s into a special bag and take them down to the controlled recycling environment? What will happen to all of that mercury when dumped in landfills? We cannot even be sure that councils in the UK will recycle the bulbs, as they haven’t been doing the same for all the other materials suitable for recycling. Doesn’t 3,200 kilogrammes of one of the worlds most toxic substances, mercury, being put into the environment sound healthier than CO2, a naturally occuring gas? How does mercury poisoning of the water supply sound? Good!

I didn’t fucking think so, but I suppose CO2 doesn’t have quite the same effect on the brain, on child and fetal development, on reducing sperm count and countless other negative effects which can be easily researched online, but the following statement warrants mention:

All forms of mercury are toxic to the fetus, but methylmercury most readily passes through the placenta. Even with an asymptomatic patient, maternal exposure can lead to spontaneous abortion or retardation.

This doesn’t even touch on all of the other issues this kind of light can generate in people;

dermatologist Dr John Hawk, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that some people already find it difficult to tolerate the fluorescent-strip lighting that is widely used in schools and offices, which works in the same way as the eco-friendly bulbs.

He said: “Fluorescent lights seem to have some sort of ionising characteristic where they affect the air around them.

“This does affect a certain number of people, probably tens of thousands, in Britain, whose ailments flare up just by being close to them.

Why has the government forced these bulbs on the population? If we had ‘free market capitalism’ (which we don’t) these two families of products could compete openly, but the state deems it necessary to impose their sick agenda on the people without their consent. There is nothing FREE about being FORCED to do anything. It is like ‘compulsory volunteering‘. This in itself should have your spidey-senses tingling. I suppose the unelected scum do not believe you are capable of making these decisions for yourself, I am under the impression that this is part of a larger agenda of 1. funding a new industry 2. released neurotoxins into the general public 3. providing the health ‘industry’ with many sick serfs for decades to come, 4. attack fertility (population control) 5. condition nations to accept rulings from supranational agencies.

By the way, there are ways of cleaning the emissions of coal-powered plants of CO2, mercury etc. Would be better to clean it there than to distribute it to 20 million plus locations than collect it at the source?

Maybe I’m being stupid, but this whole issue makes me fucking sick. More fascism from the elites and more ignorance and apathy from the public. Remember, concern yourself first with the EFFECTs of their proposals, ignore the EXCUSES. These bastards will say anything to make you go along with their agenda, and people will believe it because it’s easier than realising they are pathetic slaves and thus have to DO something about it.

Mercury

The New World Order (NWO) An Overview

Educate Yourself

There is a worldwide conspiracy being orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group of genetically-related individuals (at least at the highest echelons) which include many of the world’s wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate elite, as well as members of the so-called Black Nobility of Europe (dominated by the British Crown) whose goal is to create a One World (fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda. Their intention is to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet and to dramatically reduce the world’s population by 5.5 Billion people. While the name New World Order is a term frequently used today when referring to this group, it’s more useful to identify the principal organizations, institutions, and individuals who make up this vast interlocking spiderweb of elite conspirators.

In 1992, Dr John Coleman published  Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300. With laudable scholarship and meticulous research, Dr Coleman identifies the players and carefully details the Illuminati agenda of worldwide domination and control. On page 161 of the Conspirators Hierarchy, Dr Coleman accurately summarizes the intent and purpose of the Committee of 300 as follows:

“A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.

There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of  laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simple be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited.”

Read the full article here.