Gordon Brown pushes New World Order (again)

Mail Online

Gordon Brown has made an overtly religious call for a new world order based on the ‘deep moral sense’ shared by all faiths.

Making the first speech by a serving Prime Minister at St Paul’s Cathedral in London, he quoted scripture as he urged people to unite to forge a new ‘global society’.

The Prime Minister argued that through all faiths, traditions and heritages runs a ‘single powerful modern sense demanding responsibility from all and fairness to all’.

He quoted the Christian doctrine of ‘do to others what you would have them do unto you’ and highlighted similar principles in Judaism, Islam, Hinduism and Sikhism.

‘They each and all reflect a sense that we share the pain of others, and a sense that we believe in something bigger than

ourselves – that we cannot be truly content while others face despair, cannot be completely at ease while others live in fear, cannot be satisfied while others are in sorrow,’ he said.

‘We all feel, regardless of the source of our philosophy, the same deep moral sense that each of us is our brother and sisters’ keeper . . . we cannot and will not pass by on the other side when people are suffering and when we have it within our power to help.’

He went on to suggest the world economy and society should be rebuilt around a Zulu word for hope – themba – which is also an acronym for ‘there must be an alternative’.

Well the alternative of the elite ruling classes, is a totalitarian global socialist dictatorship where the human race is enslaved by technology.

But I don’t think they’re puppets are going to be admitting that soon, although only a few years ago, researchers claiming there is a ‘new world order’ scheme in place where labelled ‘nuts’.

UPDATE: The next day the Mail Online is running the title The trillion dollar question: Will Gordon Brown’s ‘New World Order’ pay off? on its front page.

I think this would be a good time to revisit the New World Order gun edition, and also this picture I took (March 2007) of a local ‘news’ paper.

And for those new to the phrase ‘new world order’ I suggests doing some research. You can begin with The New World Order (NWO) an overview and New World Order doesn’t exist!

In fact, searching for the phrase on this blog pulls up a large number of articles.

Advertisements

UK Govt to give lessons in ‘spotting terrorists’

The Mail Online is running an article regarding the training of members of society in ‘terrorist spotting’, presumably so they can inform our omnipotent protectors, the State.

Sixty thousand British civilians are being trained by the Home Office to spot terrorists, Gordon Brown revealed yesterday.

Huge numbers of staff on rail networks, at shops, public buildings and major sports venues have been picked out by MI5 and the police for the special training – teaching them to watch for ‘suspicious behaviour’ and respond swiftly to an atrocity.

Apart from the fact that a ‘nation of informers’ is reminiscent of other deeply unhealthy societies, this seems like typical big government overkill. People need training in this? In regards to terrorism and Islam, just read the Quran, in chronological order if you want the real context of Mohammed (at the beginning with few believers and many enemies, and the end when he had an army and mucho power). Oh and remember to keep in mind the use of Abrogation.

Regarding terrorists as a whole, terror is defined loosely as the use of terror (fear) for political ends. In the event of multiple groups desiring such, it would only be logical to focus on the one which ‘creates the greatest fear’ and enacts the ‘greatest political change’ as they would, by definition, be the greater terrorist and thus the greatest threat.

The United Kingdom currently has 60 million residents (more like 80 million unofficially). What group has the greatest access to mass media, to the statute making process, the economy, the schools, the borders, the local authority, the courts, the security services etc?

Who is continually telling you to fear? To accept changes in your life which restrict your freedom? To impose more rules and regulations on you and to tell you how to think?

Which one is more likely to kick down your door for no real reason, to steal your children from you and tell them how to think?

Which one is closer to total power over you and your family?

Which one is the greatest threat to your life and liberty?

Considering this, I think it they are pretty easy to spot once you see the signs. You could look here for a start.

Divide and rule, the NuLabour way…

Came across this post from the Devil’s Kitchen, thought I’d share it.

Devil’s Kitchen

It’s one of the oldest strategies in the book: divide and rule. And few governments in living memory have been so adept at it as NuLabour: it has been at the heart of many of their policies. They have divided the peoples of the Union; they have divided, through QUANGOs and censuses emphasising differences, black, brown and white peoples of the Union. Through jealousy they have divided rich and poor.

"Fear not," says the government, "for the state—and only the state—can save you!" And then they proceed to divide some more. Devolved governments (but with little power), harsher sentences for "racist" crimes, and the stealing of more money from "the rich" to hand out as gifts to the poor.

The brilliant bit about this tactic, as applied by NuLabour, is that it encourages people to think of each other group not as fellow human beings, but as people below or different from them. "They aren’t a person like I am, they are just a toff/darkie/Muslim/Scot/Sassenach/Taff/idiot, etc."

And so people get angry and demand solutions, they demand concessions for their own particular group and guess what?—the state can help you, friend, for the state is the friend of everyone. The state is the righter of all wrongs, the great arbiter, the generous donor of largesse. And as each group is appeased so the jealousy and resentment of the others are inflamed and they demand special treatment for themselves and more shoddy treatment for "those others".

And so it is that the government have been able to put through some disgusting laws, by aiming them at groups that the other groups dislike. 42 days detention without trial?—well, it’ll only apply to terrorists, and they’re all Muslims or at the very least darkies, eh?

The scrapping of double jeopardy, habeas corpus and trial by jury?—well, that’ll only apply to the eeevil criminals (no matter that they have yet to be proven such). Oh, and the darkies, of course. And the poor.

The confiscation of your assets before you are even found guilty, or reversing the burden of proof for the confiscation of assets? Well, that’ll only apply to drugdealers and the like.

And none of these people are really human, are they? Not like me.
And that’s how they get us; that’s how they pass those laws. And, they say that they won’t use them except in the most exceptional circumstances, and only against those people who aren’t really human.

Read the full article here.

Femnuts storm beauty pageant, throw stink bombs

Ugly girls protesting at pretty girls. LOL

Smart and hot? Yes please.

Protesters caused havoc at an American-style beauty pageant for university students last night after they stormed the stage and set off stink-bombs.

While contestants for Miss University London posed with winning smiles and in dazzling dresses, more than 100 critics gathered outside chanting and holding banners.

Police said a total of eight protesters were arrested after they chained the entrance to the Crystal nightclub in London with two bicycle locks, preventing anyone from getting in or out.

Condemned as degrading and misogynist, the event, now in its third year, has been compared to an American-style beauty pageant.

Misogyny apparently means “contempt or hatred of women or girls.” How does a competition celebrating University girls equal contempt? Just roll out the standard accusations. And note how the little tyrants want to dictate to the girls taking part…

Ugly femmies having a go. Note the two captain save-a-ho’s in the middle, trying to get some femsex lol.

Ruby Buckley, 19, women’s officer at LSE, said that Miss University London was an out-of-date concept and had no place in a modern, forward-thinking country.

‘We all want to be judged for our intellectual merit, not our bodies,’ she said.

‘Those girls taking part should know that they are worth more than this.’

And I suppose the way they do that is letting these feminists dictate to them how they should live as opposed to actually respecting these women as individuals and realising it’s NONE OF THEIR DAMN BUSINESS. They can do what they like.

Christian Emile, 22, owner of 121 Entertainment, said: ‘It brings people together from all the different universities. Feminism is supposed to be about choice for women.

‘So they should be allowed to do whatever they want.’

Well that is how feminism sells itself, but all scams need a hard sell. The truth is that feminism is tyrannical just like its parent ideology, socialism. You don’t need to be a ‘feminist’ to be ‘for freedom’, just be yourself. Anyone who claims to fight tyranny by imposing their own is an arsehole who should be kicked in the naughty bits.

You’re free to do as we tell you – Bill Hicks.

A woman who deceives men into having children

Daily Mail

As a 31-year-old woman, she might be expected to have developed a more mature attitude to pregnancy and childbearing. The reality is anything but. Because Angelica, who claims to be ‘addicted to having babies’, readily admits to tricking three hapless men in succession into fathering half her brood of illegitimate daughters.

For all those women out there who have struggled to conceive children, Angelica’s story makes for bitter reading. But Angelica is proud of her achievements. She plans to tell her children the truth about their conceptions, seemingly with little understanding of the effects such knowledge could have on them.

This is because it isn’t about the kids, it’s about her.

Defiantly, she says: ‘I’ll tell them I wanted a baby, but that I didn’t tell their fathers I was trying to get pregnant. When they realise that I was prepared to lie to conceive them, they’ll know they were really wanted and much-loved babies.’

Or how manipulative and selfish their mother is.

It’s a very odd version of what love and parenting is all about. And the more Angelica talks, the clearer it becomes that she is creating baby after baby to fulfil her own deep-seated and alarming need for love and attention.

Which is about as narcissistic as you can get. Similar to when a woman deliberately indoctrinates the children against the father to hurt him (with no concern whatsoever with the damage she does to them by attacking their father constantly).

Further along…

Then, surprise, surprise, Angelica decided to use her partner as an unwitting sperm donor. She says: ‘I thought he was nice-looking and would make a good dad, so I stopped taking the Pill. I just thought: “It’s my body and I want a baby, so I’ll have one.”

Why don’t they say this when it comes to child support payments.

‘I didn’t feel bad. I knew if I asked him whether he wanted a baby, he’d probably panic and say no, because he was too young. So I decided to go ahead and make the decision myself.

‘I thought Oliver would eventually be delighted he was going to be a father. It took me a couple of months to conceive and I proudly presented him with the positive pregnancy test.

‘He looked stunned and said: “How did that happen?” I shrugged and said: “The Pill can fail, you know.” I didn’t dare tell him I had deliberately become pregnant.

You would be surprised how often this happens. It would seem in this situation, the biggest mistake a man can make is trusting the woman.

The full article is here.

Feminist says one thing – reality says another

From everybodys favourite Marxist scumbag.

Another Fabian trying to turn men and women against each other

Another Fabian trying to turn men and women against each other

Daily Mail

Harriet Harman was caught up in a row today over whether women will suffer most in the recession.

The Equality Minister claimed in the Commons yesterday that women were worrying more than men about the economic crisis.

As usual from a feminist, she makes a claim about women’s ‘feelings’ and states it like an actual fact. The ONS begs to differ however;

But her views were undermined today by figures from the Office for National Statistics and a Cambridge University study.

The ONS claimed the economic downturn ‘impacted less’ on working women than on men. It stressed that estimates showed fewer women than men had lost their job.

The redundancy rate for women was 6.6 in 1,000 employees in the three months to December, compared with 13.6 for men.

Who needs ‘feelings’ when you have facts.

Ms Harman vowed in the debate in Parliament that women would not be allowed to become the ‘victims of the recession’.

We are all affected by a recession (unless you work in the public sector). This sexist totalitarian pig needs to stop trying to destroy the nations’ males (a vital part of destroying any country) and do the honourable thing.

Throw herself off of a bloody cliff.

Promotion of selfish, immoral and destructive lifestyles via the print media

Daily Mail

How does the boast ‘I breastfeed my puppy’ strike you? Or ‘I had sex with my car’? As some kind of sick joke, I would suspect. Unless, perhaps, you are an avid reader of Closer magazine, in which case you would know they are the real-life confessions of everyday folk, who might include that nice girl next door with the new dog or the chap down the road who spends a lot of time polishing his motor.

For 30 years I lived, breathed – and defended – women’s magazines. For 13 of those years, I worked on Cosmopolitan, and for the last five of those years, from the mid-Eighties, I was that magazine’s editor.

So it could be that the words pot, kettle and black spring to mind when I say that I am shocked, bewildered and disgusted by what has happened to women’s magazines since the days when the weeklies were the cosy end of the market, all about knitting patterns and 50 ways with leftovers.

You could accuse me of hypocrisy. You might tell me I am out of touch with the interests, needs and desires of younger women. You could tell me that I’m one of the architects of the problem. But you can’t take away the fact that as I browsed the magazines at WH Smith at Waterloo station this week, I felt an overwhelming wave of nausea.

First to assault my eyes was Closer, with the coverline: ‘Incest Mum Shock: Sex with my son sets me on fire.’ This is the magazine that also proudly claims on its cover: The UK’s No 1 Celeb and Real Life Mag.

Taking a look at Bella, I was horrified by what appeared to be career advice: ‘Why I want my daughter to be a hooker like me!’

Next up to offend was That’s Life! with a picture of something large and disturbing protruding from a man’s bottom, with the coverline: ‘What was sticking out of his bum?’

For a fraction of a second I was tempted to look inside and find out what exactly was sticking out of this man’s backside, but I stopped myself. It’s revolting. Why would I care?

Indeed. From what I know of Fabianism, third way thinking and the desire from the Left to destroy western society, this just looks like feedback loop.

The media promotes disgusting, ridiculous, amoral and immoral, narcissistic, superficial, consumer lifestyles in order to influence the idiots who devour such nonsense. It is a form of peer pressure-induced control also, as (especially women) are inclined to subscribe to it, in order to not risk being ‘left out’ of  the depravity.

Are people  so fucking vapid that they find these things more interesting than understanding the global power structure, the nature of money and what freedom is?

The high-maintenance man

Daily Mail

Following the divorce of Madonna and Guy Ritchie, estimates have suggested the film director was awarded
£45 million from his ex-wife’s £200 million fortune, including a country pile and a London pub.

It’s set to be the latest in a long line of table-turning settlements where high-grossing women are forced to hand over hard-earned cash to less-successful husbands. Think Kate Winslet and first husband Jim Threapleton – who received £500,000; and Vanessa Feltz, who was ordered to pay her surgeon ex £1.5 million (after he cheated on her). But these pale in significance next to the £20 million Anne Robinson was reported to have paid her ex – who is also her ex-manager – after 27 years of marriage.

And it’s not just celebrities who are feeling the pinch. Britain’s leading divorce lawyers are seeing a surge in such cases, with Northern law firm Pannone noting a 300 per cent increase in husbands trying to claim their wives’ assets in the past two years. This equates to around 120 cases in the past year alone.

‘This is an upward trend, mostly with professional women divorcing lower-paid men,’ confirms Fiona Wood, a partner at the company. ‘Many women are taken unawares. The husband may have earned £20,000 a year, but the court will account for the fact that her £200,000 wage gave him expensive holidays and a nice car, so he’ll be awarded enough to retain that standard of living.’

LOL

It’s all about the comments, here’s a sample;

“But is it fair”.

Of course it is. It’s called “equality”.

It’s what you wanted. Now you have got it – live with it.

Unless of course, women thought it was “equality when it’s convenient…. and privilege when it ain’t.”

In which case, tough luck. – Chris, Wokingham, England

No Ma’am has new posts!

The excellent blooger Rob Fedders has some new posts up on his blog, No Ma’am.

If you haven’t visited it before, now would be a good time to start. It’s a great place to learn about Marxism, the dialectical principle (Hegel) and the truth about feminism, among other things.

ENJOY!

Single mothers = uber-chav = social breakdown = drain on the taxpayer

Although single mothers don’t automatically mean filthy ignorant feral underclass scum offspring, the vast majority of filthy ignorant feral underclass scum offspring spawn from single mothers.

Daily Mail

A deputy head who sat on a Government taskforce aimed at improving behaviour in schools yesterday condemned a generation of modern parents as ‘uber-chavs’.

Ralph Surman said the parents of today’s pupils were themselves the children of the ‘first big generation of single mothers’ from the 1980s.

He claimed they – and in turn their children – have been left with no social skills or work ethic and may be impossible to educate.

Thanks the socialists in power. They are obviously trying to breed out intelligence and productivity in the British, maybe because they are trying to achieve this?

Mr Surman spoke out in response to figures unearthed by the Conservative Party, which show that the number of 16 to 24-year-olds who are not in education, employment or training – known as NEETs – is rising across Britain.

‘We must talk about a class of uber-chavs,’ he said.

‘They are not doing anything productive and are costing taxpayers a fortune.

‘It is very difficult, almost impossible, to take these people now and provide basic social and work ethic skills.

‘The offspring of the first big generation of single mothers were children in the 1980s.

‘Now they are adults with their own children and the problems are leading to higher crime rates and low participation in the labour force.’

Of course they are. The massive rise of out of wedlock births, divorces (most of which are initiated by women) and the automatic right of women to get custody leads to this.

But Norman Wells, from the Family Education Trust, said that, while many single mothers do an ‘excellent job’ raising their children, ‘we cannot close our eyes to the evidence which shows that, on average, children fare better in terms of health, education and future career prospects when they are brought up by a mother and father who are committed to each other for life in marriage’.

Official figures obtained by the Tories last month showed that the number of people aged 16 to 24 not in employment, education or training had leapt by 94,000 to 850,000 between 2003 and 2007.

Naturally. This has been documented here and here. Destroying marriage was an important plank of the feminist Harridan Harman (and is an important part of Marxism).

More info.

Half of single mothers ‘do not want to work’.

The Labour government’s anti-family tax system

Family Being Replaced with Feral Gangs In Socialist Britain

Attack on nuclear family leads to chaos

Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, February 9, 2009

A fierce fire consumed all 44 floors of a skyscraper in Beijing today, shooting 30 foot flames into the air, but unlike the similarly-sized 47-story WTC 7, which suffered limited fires across just eight floors, the building in China did not collapse.

“The fire was burning from the ground floor to the top floor of the large building, the flames reflecting in the glass facade of the main CCTV tower next to the hotel and cultural center,” reports the New York Times.

“The 241-room Mandarin Oriental hotel in the building was due to open this year. Flames were spotted around 7:45 p.m. and within 20 minutes the fire had spread throughout the building, dominating that part of the city.”

“Hundreds of firefighting vehicles and police blocked off all approaches to the building – which was also set to house a luxury hotel due to be opened in 2009 – with flames appearing to leap 20 to 30 feet into the air,” adds The London Times.

Compare images of WTC 7 with those of the skyscraper fire in Beijing. Note that the Beijing skyscraper appears to be leaning due to the unorthodox design of the building – it did not suffer any kind of collapse.

To read the full article (with images) click here.

Headteacher forced out for trying to axe separate assemblies for Muslims

Daily Mail

A primary school headteacher has resigned after Muslim parents protested over plans to scrap separate faith assemblies for their children.

Soon after taking over at the school Julia Robinson told staff she wanted to hold assemblies for all pupils, which would encompass all faiths.

To be expected in this so called multi-cultural society, no? Encouraging different cultures and faiths to interact, for the sake of ‘community cohesion.’

Mrs Robinson was accused of being racist and following the complaints she was away from her post for most of last year.

She was due to make a phased return to her duties this term. But again there were protests from some parents when they heard she would be coming back.

It isn’t possible to be racist towards a religion, because religion isn’t a race.

A member of staff who asked not to be named said: ‘The headteacher inherited the separate assemblies when she started the job and she took careful advice from the authority on what to do about them.

‘But when she tried to stop them, feeling they did nothing to promote inclusiveness, she was accused of being a racist.

She she is right. It does nothing to promote inclusiveness, but I suppose these Muslim parents can’t stand the idea of their superior children having to sit near kaffirs. Who knows, they may actually make friends with kids from different cultures!

This incident serves as the true nature of cultural Marxism (multi-culturalism). In reality it is a one way street. Politically protected groups are given superior rights over others and accusatory statements are made, not because they are true (in this case it isn’t technically possible) but because this group wishes to impose their views on everyone else. It would seem that only non-British traditions, culture, beliefs, language, identity are given this sort of preferential treatment by the state.

One would think the government is trying to destroy Britain.

Ten years in jail for photographing a police officer – UK

Libertarian Party UK Blog

From the middle of this month you can go to jail for ten years for Photographing a Policeman , I will repeat that for you. Ten years in jail for taking a photgraph of a copper. So if a photojournalist takes a photograph of a demonstrator being beaten with a baton, or running them down with a horse, the photographer will be arrested.

Gang of youths caught trying to slow roast puppies

Daily Mail

A gang of children aged as young as 10 were caught trying to roast a pair of puppies over a bonfire.

Passerby Melanie Johnson spotted them kicking the pups and holding them over the fire on a canal bank.

The youngsters fled, abandoning the dogs, when she challenged them.

Ms Johnson, 32, took the puppies home, then passed them on to an RSPCA centre where staff treated the dogs and are now looking to find them new homes.

She said: ‘I just could not believe the cruelty being shown by these kids. If I hadn’t turned up, I think they would have burned the dogs alive.

‘I heard yelping and saw a group of children standing around a small bonfire. I ran over the bridge to them and saw one of the pups being kicked and the other being held over the fire.

‘Most of the kids were aged 12, 13 or older. But some were as young at 10.’

I would like to catch these little wastes of space and roast them over a slow fire, see how they like it.

I see this article as another indictment of the collapse of society. The lack of empathy, of civilised behaviour of these feral, unsocialised, rabid animals hardly qualifies them as human beings. They of course, scattered away like fucking rats when an adult turned up.

What pieces of shit.

Greater Manchester Police have not made any arrests in connection with the incident and a source said it would be extremely difficult to identify the culprits.

Well why would they? Over 4 million CCTV camera’s  in this socialist police state shithole. Funny how they never seem to actually do anything, apart from conditioning people to accept being constantly watched.

I hope they all get run over by a train. Twice.

Muslim ‘Lord’ threatens Parliament, Islamification of UK Police

From Cranmer.

Lord Ahmed is a repugnant individual. Not only in appearance, but in association, character and morality. And to hear that he has threatened jihad on the House of Lords if their lordships should fail to meet his demands only serves to intensify Cranmer’s loathing of the man.

It appears that a member of the House of Lords had invited the Dutch politician, Geert Wilders, to a private meeting in the Palace of Westminster. She had intended to invite her colleagues in the Lords to a private viewing of his ‘documentary’ Fitna, followed by discussion and debate in true parliamentary fashion. This is, after all, a liberal democracy, and their lordships enjoy the rights of freedom of expression and freedom of association, not to mention certain parliamentary privileges for the protection of their function in the legislature.

Read the rest here.

From the Opinionator.

When I first saw the title of the below news article – I thought that this MUST be a joke – surely not serious. But, to my dismay, the article is true – Police in (the once) Great Britain have dhimmified-up enough so that they now offer a HIJAB UNIFORM for female muslim police.

Sughra Ahmed says “”There may also be women who are already with the force who do not wear the scarf but choose to later. Again, this will be positive for them.” ——–Oh let’s be sure we encourage hijab wearing — plus you can be sure those muslim women who have chosen to not wear the veil will soon receive “pressure” from the Islamo-Sharia-police to do so. (Despite his prior comment)

For in-depth discussion of Muslim women and the veil – go to HERE

Read the rest here.

I can tell you know, this is making me fucking sick. Parliament should have kicked that pompous litte prick out of the country, let alone the House. What a bunch of pussified spineless cunts!!! This is supposed to the global home of Freedom (which is of course why the socialists are so determined to destroy it).

The first duty of any Muslim is to Islam so how the fuck can he be a Lord, let alone occupy any position of central political power? If you look at any Muslim-based group, you will see in their charters that they must always seek to promote and protect Islam. Britain will never be Islamic, and anyone who thinks it will can just go fuck yourselves. All of you. As far as I’m concerned, the real Britain (not the Fabian shithole it is now) represents individual liberty, equality under law and THAT’S IT. And for all of your politically correctness arsemunching spineless wankers, Islam is not about tolerance. It is a fascist political ideology. It isn’t a religion. And if Mohammed is a ‘prophet’ then Jesus is the Devil, because only a fucking evil cunt would advocate the killing, subjugation and enslavement of others, the demand that others sacrificed their lives for him, that supposedly got his ‘revelations’ not from god, but from Gabriel, a lesser being, who personally beheaded hundreds of Jews, raped, pillaged and murdered like the filthy 7th century barbarian that he was, and his sociopathic unthinking followers.

I’ve been studying Islam for ages, what a bunch of evil nasty cunts. I also know of the deals the EU has done with Islamic nations, to ‘guarantee’ respect for the fascist belief system (along with immigration), labelling the analysis and criticism of a fucking STORY, hate speech. Not surprising considering the EU is fascist too. Easy way to destabilise western nations for the NWO. Use Islam to attack western society, and enslave and destroy Islam later.

People need to get clued up. Britain is being attacked with every trick in the book, so it the United States and most of the western world. Why? Because the global government see the end in sight and actually believe they can have a one world socialist dictatorship in their lifetimes.

Well fuck them all.

About Codex Alimentarius: the 5-Minute Tour

From the Natural Solutions Foundation;

These 14 points provide you with understanding about Codex Alimentarius – health freedom threat number one. It also explains what to do about it.

  1. Consumer Protection? Unfortunately Not
    The first step to understanding Codex Alimentarius is to realize that it has absolutely nothing to do with “consumer protection”. That’s propaganda for the sake of getting people and Congress to yield to its implementation.
  2. Says Who?
    Rima E. Laibow, M.D. is a successful natural medicine physician who graduated from Albert Einstein College of Medicine in 1970. Dr. Laibow has studied more than 16,000 pages of Codex Alimentarius documentation. Her conclusion? Codex Alimentarius is a very serious threat to health freedom. We must take it seriously.
  3. Meaning of Name and History of Organization
    “Codex Alimentarius” means “food rules” in Latin. The organization was born in 1962 when the UN established the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) as a “Trade Commission”. It was created to regulate, and thus control, every aspect of how food and nutritional supplements are produced and sold to the consumer. It is solely about trade and the profits of multi-national corporations.
  4. Bolstering Profits of Pharmaceutical Industry
    The more natural health products people use, the fewer drugs they use. Millions are turning to natural health. Big Pharma fears this as it would diminish profits. Codex is designed to protect Big Pharma profits by eliminating natural health products and treatments. Health food stores and wellness companies would be hit hard.
  5. Codex Alimentarius is Unscientific
    Codex is unscientific because it classifies nutrients as toxins and uses “Risk Assessment” to set ultra low so-called “safe upper limits” for them. Risk Assessment is a branch of Toxicology, the science for assessing toxins. The proper science for assessing nutrients is Biochemistry. Codex does not use Biochemistry.
  6. Based on Tyrannical Napoleonic Legal Code
    Codex is based on the Napoleonic Code, dating back to Bonaparte. Under this code, anything not explicitly permitted is automatically forbidden. Under Common Law (our system), something does not have to be explicitly permitted to be legal. The tyrannical Napoleonic Code allows the banning of natural health options by default.
  7. Shrewdly, Slowly Raising Heat
    Codex will go into global effect on December 31, 2009, unless we, the People, take action and avert it. Right now, we are like a frog boiled slowly, the heat raised gradually so we won’t jump out of the water. The media is used to make us believe that Codex is about “consumer protection”. Part of the media strategy is to tarnish the image of natural health options, through for-hire studies.
  8. Beware Codex Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing
    One-time defenders of supplements and nutritional products, such as the National Nutritional Foods Association (NNFA) and Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN), have fallen prey to new pharmaceutical members and are spreading disinformation saying that Codex is “consumer protection”. Their boards used to be run by health freedom fighters.
  9. VMG: Banning Our Supplements
    Codex is made up of many standards for every aspect of food. One of these standards was ratified (approved) in July 2005: the destructive Codex Alimentarius Vitamin and Mineral Guideline (VMG). The VMG can ban all high potency and clinically effective vitamins & minerals. For example, Vitamin C would be restricted to only a few milligrams per dose. Other nutrients, such as amino acids, are also under threat.
  10. DSHEA, Our Best Legal Defense
    The U.S. has a powerful legal tool for health freedom: the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), passed in 1994 after massive grass-roots action. DSHEA scientifically classifies nutritional supplements as food and prevents dosage restrictions; Codex unscientifically classifies them as toxins and sets ultra-low doses. The VMG violates U.S. law because it violates DSHEA. We must unite to protect DSHEA, our best legal defense against Codex.
  11. Congressional Effort Underway to Undermine DSHEA
    The pharmaceutical industry works through irresponsible/corrupt politicians to do their bidding. The path to institute Codex in America is to “influence” Congress to pass laws friendly to drugs and unfriendly to nutritional supplements, so that slowly everyone comes to believe that nutrients are “dangerous”, and drugs are “proper medicine”. Susan Davis (D, CA) and other politicians are helping Big Pharma by supporting bills designed to destroy DSHEA.
  12. U.S. Government Illegally Supports Codex
    The U.S. Codex Office (the U.S. Codex “point of contact”) is unfortunately highly supportive of Codex. So is the rest of the government, including the pharmaceutical-friendly FDA. They should not be. DSHEA and other U.S. law means their support is in direct violation of the laws of the U.S.A.! They are breaking our laws and they know it.
  13. Let’s Enter Coordinal Relationships With Congress
    Congress has the power to keep America Codex-free. It can defeat bills designed to destroy DSHEA, support health freedom bills, and reprimand the U.S. Codex Office and the FDA. Using the Internet we can reach Congress directly to create a lobby of the people, for the people. Families of Congress would suffer too, if Codex is not averted.
  14. Call to Action
    Thanks to the Internet, millions of health conscious Americans can unite to protect health freedom from Codex Alimentarius. We have the power to turn Codex into a blessing if all of us in the natural health community use it to get active, get organized, and stand up for health freedom. Together, we will let Big Pharma know that we see through their deception and will protect our access to natural health care.

Ready to take action now? Click here.

Ready to learn more? Click here.

More information I have come across…

A Nutricidal Codex – By Shannara Johnson

Ever heard of the Codex Alimentarius? If not, don’t be surprised. It’s one of the best-kept “open secrets” of the U.S. government. It’s scheduled to take effect on December 21, 2009, and it may present the greatest disaster for our food supply—and thus for our health—this country has ever seen.

What is the Codex Alimentarius, and how did it come to pass?…

A collection of videos on the subject.

Codex Alimentarius To Be Implimented Dec 31, 2009 & 3 BILLION Deaths

Part 1 is the intro, history, the parent organizations pushing the agenda, and how the sovereignty of countries is subverted.

Part 2 What does Codex do? Who does it serve? Vit&Mineral Guidelines & limits. Common Law vs. the Napoleonic Code of Alimentarius. Nutrients Declared as Poison. Risk Assessment & LD50. Fluoride and its Use. Codex Making Nutrients illegal.

Pt 3 Milk, Bovine Harmone, Global Mandate that every Dairy Cow in the world be treated W/ Monsanto’s Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone. Every Animal Used for food on the planet MUST be treated with subclinical antibiotics! Irradiated Organic Food, New Organic standards, Limits on Industrial Chemicals in Food, Viewing & Searching The Codex Alimentarius Website “walk through”, Persistent Organic Pollutants, Removal of Foods w/ Illegal Poisons at borders declared Trade Violation, 3 billion deaths, Wealthy Retain access to “clean food,” Food Regulations as Legal Mandated Toxicity & Undernutrition.

Codex Alimentarius (Food Rules): The Global Control of Food

Codex is made up of many standards for every aspect of food. One of these standards was ratified in July 2005: the destructive Codex Alimentarius Vitamin and Mineral Guideline (VMG). The VMG can ban all high potency and clinically effective vitamins & minerals. For example, Vitamin C would be restricted to only a few milligrams per dose. Other nutrients, such as amino acids, are also under threat.

Codex Alimentarius allows high levels of 7 of the 9 most toxic pesticides in the world, in our food. These compounds are so toxic that the Stockholm Convention (PDF) was created to eliminate them from the planet! Codex, however, allows them in your food along with 206 other toxic pesticides.

Is it the end of the world or not, fascists?

I am working on quite a bit article at the moment, so in the meantime, I’ll post this link, from Devils Kitchen.

Via Counting Cats, I find this piece of shit website—complete with countdown clock—which maintains that we have only 100 months (well, 94 months now) to save the planet.

We have 100 months to save the planet. When the clock stops ticking we could be beyond the climate’s ‘tipping point’, the point of no return.

Or, of course, equally we may not be. Since the world’s scientists have absolutely failed to show that the Earth’s climate is reliant on positive feedbacks to the extent that there actually could be a “tipping point”, I think that I shall call “bullshit”.

Of course, I entirely endorse Nick M’s view of this too.

I propose a wager with these criminal charlatans and miserable chicken lickens. If the sky hasn’t fallen within their 100 months (down to 94 now) and reached the fabled “run-away” tipping point of no return then Monbiot, Gore and Porritt and all their thieving scumbag acolytes should do the decent thing and make their own leaps of faith off Beachy Head. Seems only fair. They afterall have been asking the entire planet to make a leap of faith and pay for it ourselves. They want the world to gamble it all and I think they should be prepared to cover that bet.

Damn straight.

Read the rest here.

One in ten men could be victims of paternity fraud

Daily Mail

There was never going to be a good time. But when the truth finally emerged, it couldn’t have been at a more inopportune moment. Mark Webb was driving to work at eight in the morning when his wife Lydia rang.

‘I was in the fast lane of the M4 heading towards Reading,’ he recalls. ‘I picked up the call on the hands-free and said, “Hi, what’s the problem?” because Lydia wouldn’t normally call so early.

She said, “I’ve got something I need to tell you. You’re not the father of Elspeth. Dave Mottram is.” ’

It was a shattering revelation and one that set in motion an extraordinary chain of events.

For what might have been a painful but private matter became very public when Mark took his now ex-wife and her lover to court in a bid to claim compensation for the 17 years he had spent bringing up Elspeth, believing her to be his daughter.

Mark’s claim failed and ten days ago the Court of Appeal refused him permission to appeal against the ruling. Since then the ‘paternity fraud’ case has sparked a passionate debate about the rights of fathers.

In last week’s Mail on Sunday, Lydia defended her actions while Mr Mottram has also had his say, claiming he did not know that Elspeth was his daughter. Yet throughout, and for all the conjecture and comment, Mark remained silent.

Now, in an exclusive interview, the 47-year-old production manager for an engineering company explains why he took the controversial and much-criticised decision to try to recoup the money he had spent bringing up Elspeth.

Read the full article.