‘Politically incorrect’ to be superior to your competition

Everyone is ‘equal’ under communism, didn’t ya know…

Daily Mail

For generations of young footballers, being soundly thrashed by a rival team has been a tough, if character-building, rite of passage.

But the days of double-digit goal tallies may be numbered.

Some officials want the Football Association to introduce a so-called ‘mercy rule’ in youth soccer.

An import from the United Socialist States, the rule means that if one team achieves a certain goal advantage over another the match is declared over, thus sparing the losers further humiliation.

Supporters claim such a move would prevent youngsters from becoming prematurely disillusioned with the beautiful game.

But critics insist it will also deprive them of a vital life skill: Dealing with utter defeat.

Equality, Marx-style

Equality, Marx-style

But that is what the state wants, a generation of people incapable of dealing with anything. That way you’ll run to the state for help with everything, thus putting them in the position of your ‘keeper’. Everyone who lives in the real world knows that getting your butt whooped at a game is a humiliating experience (especially if it is playing Soul Calibur 2 and its by your bloody girlfriend who just button bashes and Perfects you, and then goes on about it for ages and ages and bloody ages, telling all your mates about it and… well nevermind). Just makes you want to get even. In the game I mean.

The Mid Lincolnshire League is calling on the FA to bring in rules which would mean that if a nine-goal gap opened up between teams, then the game would stop.

Ron Westerman, chairman of the Mid Lincs Youth League, in which more than 6,000 children aged up to 13 play in 400 teams, said: ‘We’d not be taking away victory or defeat, merely lessening its severity. Scorelines of 25-0 don’t do anyone any favours, especially at age eight to ten.

‘We’ve asked the FA to consider bringing this in nationwide, but at the moment it’s just one of many things up for consultation.’

Come on. Who only wants to beat the other team a little bit? You want to crush their morale, shatter their confidence, and generally let them know that they suck. That’s the FUN!

The rule already operates unofficially in Devon’s Pioneer youth league. Now both counties want the FA to adopt the idea more widely, saying it will encourage more youngsters to enjoy the game.

But sceptics believe such measures merely provide a politically correct comfort blanket for children against the realities of the wider world.

Robert Whelan, deputy director of think-tank Civitas, said: ‘We’re being over-protective with youngsters but doing them no favours. It’s a symptom of a society that wants to protect the young from anything unpleasant at all costs.

Molly coddling it’s called. It encourages infantilism and dependence on the entity doing the nannying. Reminds me of those ‘eaters’ who live to feed their significant other, fattening them up like you wouldn’t believe so they become completely incapable of doing things for themselves.

‘But the fact is that life can sometimes be unpleasant and you don’t always win – and sometimes you lose by a big margin.

‘Life throws down challenges to you, and sometimes it lays you flat on your back, but you have to learn to pick yourself up again, and you won’t develop that spirit if no one ever allows you to lose.’

Indeed. But that spirit would be tantamount to competition wouldn’t it, and we know the state doesn’t like that.

Tory MP Julian Brazier described the idea as ‘terribly sad’, adding: ‘How can you really appreciate a fantastic win, if you’ve never experienced a crushing defeat?’

But Devon FA chief executive Paul Morrison said: ‘People talk about defeats being character building, but children are more vulnerable these days and we don’t want to put them off playing the game because they are thrashed.

No they bloody aren’t. It is the adults that are more vunerable, and projecting that nonsense onto the children. Defeat is part and parcel of life. Typical socialist agenda, drag down the highest achievers, using the others’ feelings as an excuse, and with no trailblazers to set the bar, how much damage do you think that will do to the development of these kids.

‘A women’s team I know lost 42-0 one Saturday, and within three weeks they’d disbanded. These days it should be about enjoyment and player development, rather than winning at all costs.’

Obviously these women couldn’t handle defeat, that’s their problem (42-nil HAHAHAHA) not the rest of the football league. What next? Teams that get hammered taking the better team to court and seeking damages for ‘hurt self-esteem?’

Fucking pussies.

Who has attacked our freedoms more?

Terrorism is the systematic use of terror (imposing fear), especially as a means of coercion.

Common definitions of terrorism refer only to those acts which (1) are intended to create fear (terror), (2) are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a materialistic goal or a lone attack), and (3) deliberately target (or disregard the safety of) non-combatants. Some definitions also include acts of unlawful violence or war.

Which one of these has been worse for Britain and YOU.

Terror stalks the land

Your lost liberties – listed

DNA samples from 1.1milion children held on register as Labour ‘plots database by stealth’

Blair’s ‘frenzied law making’ : a new offence for every day spent in office

Lisbon Treaty Treason

Show me your papers – Now official British policy

Welcome to Soviet Britain

Stalin’s Britain – citizens to spy on each other for the state

UK – Endemic surveillance state

Marching towards a police state

Labour ‘plots database by stealth’

Daily Mail

DNA samples taken from 1.1million children are being held on an ever expanding government database.

The figures, revealed yesterday, show that 1.09million DNA profiles of people aged under 18 were held on the database with 337,000 under 16.

The Metropolitan Police has added the largest number of profiles to the register including 117,000 boys and 33,000 girls.

The new figures come as it was claimed ministers are sneaking  sweeping powers to collect and retain more DNA samples.

The Tories said the Government was attempting to give itself a ‘blank cheque’ to store swabs and fingerprints of criminals and those cleared of wrongdoing.

They claim Labour is trying to expand the amount of biometric data they store without subjecting the controversial plan to full Parliamentary scrutiny.

Jacqui Smith has been forced to reassess the UK’s national database after European judges said it was unlawful for police to keep the records of innocent citizens.

Nearly one million people who were arrested for recordable offences but later acquitted or not charged hoped to have their samples deleted as a result of last December’s ruling.

The Home Secretary announced that she would publish a response to the court’s decision that holding swabs indefinitely was a breach of human rights.

The details of about 4.5million people are held on the database yet one in five – including 40,000 children – has never been charged with an offence.

But we are all all guilty till proven innocent now aren’t we? This is how the police can throw people in a cell based on an allegation, and no actual proof.

Japan Society of Energy and Resources: Climate science is ‘ancient astrology’

The Register

Exclusive Japanese scientists have made a dramatic break with the UN and Western-backed hypothesis of climate change in a new report from its Energy Commission.

Three of the five researchers disagree with the UN’s IPCC view that recent warming is primarily the consequence of man-made industrial emissions of greenhouse gases. Remarkably, the subtle and nuanced language typical in such reports has been set aside.

One of the five contributors compares computer climate modelling to ancient astrology. Others castigate the paucity of the US ground temperature data set used to support the hypothesis, and declare that the unambiguous warming trend from the mid-part of the 20th Century has ceased.

The report by Japan Society of Energy and Resources (JSER) is astonishing rebuke to international pressure, and a vote of confidence in Japan’s native marine and astronomical research. Publicly-funded science in the West uniformly backs the hypothesis that industrial influence is primarily responsible for climate change, although fissures have appeared recently. Only one of the five top Japanese scientists commissioned here concurs with the man-made global warming hypothesis.

JSER is the academic society representing scientists from the energy and resource fields, and acts as a government advisory panel. The report appeared last month but has received curiously little attention. So The Register commissioned a translation of the document – the first to appear in the West in any form. Below you’ll find some of the key findings – but first, a summary.

Read the full article here

20,000 doses of contaminated meningitis C vaccine recalled

Oh yeah, just blindly trust the government, right? EDIT: The original article now says 60,000 recalled.

Daily Mail

Safety fears over contaminated batches of meningitis C vaccine tonight led to thousands of doses being recalled.

The alert was sounded after tests found traces of the bug Staphylococcus aureus – which can potentially cause blood poisoning – in supplies of vaccine sent to the UK.

Up to 20,000 doses, delivered to GP surgeries and health clinics in the last month are affected, but it is not yet known how many have been given to babies.

The vaccine, sold under the trade name Menjugate, was manufactured and packed by Novartis in Italy.

About 60,000 doses are being recalled, of which one-third had already been distributed to GPs.

Government health chiefs said the recall was a ‘precautionary measure’ and no adverse reactions have been recorded in children in Britain.

This reminds me of when Bayer sold millions of dollars worth of an injectable blood-clotting medicine — Factor VIII concentrate, intended for hemophiliacs — to Asian, Latin American, and some European countries in the mid-1980s, although they knew that it was tainted with AIDS.

That is the problem with vaccines, apart from the fact that it is a completely unnatural way to build immunity. Any poisons or toxic substances introduced into the vaccine will definitely be introduced into the recipients, and there are a million ways of distorting the criteria for connecting reactions to vaccines so ‘officially’ the number would be low.

Just try telling that to families whose children have been damaged by them. Remember, people don’t live longer because of vaccines, they live longer because of healthy eating, sanitation and living conditions. But if everyone thought like that Big Pharma wouldn’t make the billions they do then, would they?

Summer of rage ‘fears’ – UK

Something that doesn’t exist is being promoted via the media. Why? Well for me, it is just another problem-reaction-solution. Get protests going, get agent provocateurs involved to escalate the situation, bring the Army onto British soil and use the Civil Contingencies Act to cancel elections and establish a dictatorship. Note the propaganda in this piece.

Yahoo

More than a third of voters believe the Army will have to be brought in to deal with a “summer of rage” on British streets as the recession bites, a poll showed.

They never polled me. Where did this poll come from?

The widespread fear of serious unrest was disclosed as a senior police officer warned activists were planning unrest and could find rioters easier to recruit because of the credit crunch.

Superintendent David Hartshorn, who heads the Metropolitan Police’s public order branch, said known activists were planning a return to the streets centred on April’s G20 summit of world leaders in London.

And intelligence shows they may be able to call on more “footsoldiers” than normal due to the unprecedented conditions – which have led to youth violence in Greece and mass protests elsewhere in Europe.

Um, yes, where they had cops dressed up as ‘activists’ and burn and smash stuff up. Allegedly this has happened in the UK recently, and here is a quote from the former Italian president regarding dealing with student protests; “use agent provocateurs to start riots and then have the police “beat the shit out of the protesters”

YouGov polling for Prospect magazine found 37% thought such “serious social unrest in several British cities” was certain or likely – although a slim majority (51%) disagreed.

That isn’t a slim majority, and we have no details regarding numbers polled, their loyalties etc, so the poll doesn’t really mean much, it does however offer an opportunity to sway public opinion by claiming to represent it

And a clear majority (64%) also favoured forcing the under-25s to do a year of full-time, modestly-paid community service such as working with the sick and elderly or helping with environmental projects.

Riiiight, like Obama’s youth core? No that isn’t socialist at all is it.

Labour MP Frank Field told Prospect the main political parties should join forces to develop the idea. He said: “The time has come to look at this idea. A new bipartisan commission should be established to look into how it could be done, perhaps led by figures as respected as David Blunkett or David Davis.”

Although the biggest support for a compulsory scheme was among the older generations, a majority of 18-30 year olds (52%) also gave it their backing.

So… They want to take taxpayers money, and expand the state even more by employing the young to serve the government. Fuck off.

Gordon Brown‘s spokesman said: “The Prime Minister’s view on this is that of course he understands people’s concerns and he also understands that people are angry, for example about the behaviour of some of the banks. That’s why he is absolutely determined that the Government does everything possible to deal with those concerns and help people and businesses get through what is a global recession.”

Yes but people are mainly pissed off at the government, at these greedy self centered wankers and their complete lack of care for the People or the principles of freedom. The actions of the government has precipitated this disgusting state of affairs, the goal of which has always been to destroy Britain as a sovereign nation, permanently, as per the instruction of their Bilderberger masters and their plans for a one world socialist dictatorship government. Remember, this wasn’t incompetence or whatever excuses they want to spew. It was calculated.

Children receive 32 immunisations before they reach four – UK

And people think that is good for children’s developing immune systems…

My emphasis.

Daily Mail

Children are being given the wrong vaccinations and repeat doses of jabs they have already had due to mix-ups at GPs’ surgeries.

Nearly 1,000 safety incidents involving child immunisations were reported in a single year.

Of those studied in detail, more than a third involved babies and children given a different vaccine to the one they were supposed to have.

Other blunders included delays to children having important vaccinations, infants given drugs that were out of date and allergic reactions.

Well no big deal, they aren’t their kids are they…

It is said all of the incidents could have been avoided if doctors or nurses had checked medical records or drug details thoroughly.

Last night campaigners said these mistakes were the ‘tip of the iceberg’ and expressed fears of a ‘vaccine overload’ from Britain’s growing childhood immunisation schedule.

A report by the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA), the watchdog which monitors NHS errors, looked at 949 incidents involving jabs reported in 2007. A detailed study was made of 138 of these cases, picked at random. Eight caused children ‘moderate harm’.

In 36 per cent of cases a child was given the wrong vaccination. If the sample is representative, it means that hundreds are given the wrong immunisation every year. And, as the reporting of incidents by medical professionals is voluntary, the true number could be much higher.

In 23 per cent of incidents there were errors in documenting the vaccine, while there were delays in 17 per cent of cases. Other problems included incorrect storage of the jabs or out-of-date vaccines having to be thrown away.

GP Dr Richard Halvorsen, of the Babyjabs clinic in Central London, said: ‘These cases are probably the tip of the iceberg. It’s worrying when children are getting the wrong vaccines at the wrong times but it’s an inevitable consequence of the vaccination schedule, which is one of the most complex in the world.

‘Of course things are going to go wrong – it’s a recipe for mistakes.’

Children receive 32 immunisations before they reach four. And the Government is now discussing whether also to give chickenpox and flu jabs. The most controversial vaccine is combined measles, mumps and rubella (MMR).

Jackie Fletcher, of campaign group Justice, Action, Basic Support (JABS), said: ‘Children are sometimes given MMR when they go to get their pre-school booster for diphtheria, tetanus and whooping cough, even if parents have explicitly said they do not want them to have it. To think mistakes occur time and time again is horrendous.

Previously healthy Jodie Marchant, who is now 17, was left severely brain-damaged and with a gut disorder after being given seven vaccines in a single jab at 14 months. Her parents, Bill and Pat, from Southampton, had requested that she was given only MMR.

A claim for damages failed because there was not enough research into the vaccines. The Marchants are now suing their GP practice. Mr Marchant, 68, said: ‘To think so many other children suffer vaccine mix-ups is appalling.’

Not enough research to sue, but enough to inject into millions of children? That is fucking insane, and people wonder why parents are more and more reluctant to get their children shot up with this shit.

The NPSA said new packaging guidelines for jabs would ‘eradicate’ errors.

The Department of Health said: ‘Staff are trained to administer vaccines safely, follow the childhood immunisation schedule and to record it all.’

Horseshit. There is more to the vaccination program than they tell the serfs…

Promotion of selfish, immoral and destructive lifestyles via the print media

Daily Mail

How does the boast ‘I breastfeed my puppy’ strike you? Or ‘I had sex with my car’? As some kind of sick joke, I would suspect. Unless, perhaps, you are an avid reader of Closer magazine, in which case you would know they are the real-life confessions of everyday folk, who might include that nice girl next door with the new dog or the chap down the road who spends a lot of time polishing his motor.

For 30 years I lived, breathed – and defended – women’s magazines. For 13 of those years, I worked on Cosmopolitan, and for the last five of those years, from the mid-Eighties, I was that magazine’s editor.

So it could be that the words pot, kettle and black spring to mind when I say that I am shocked, bewildered and disgusted by what has happened to women’s magazines since the days when the weeklies were the cosy end of the market, all about knitting patterns and 50 ways with leftovers.

You could accuse me of hypocrisy. You might tell me I am out of touch with the interests, needs and desires of younger women. You could tell me that I’m one of the architects of the problem. But you can’t take away the fact that as I browsed the magazines at WH Smith at Waterloo station this week, I felt an overwhelming wave of nausea.

First to assault my eyes was Closer, with the coverline: ‘Incest Mum Shock: Sex with my son sets me on fire.’ This is the magazine that also proudly claims on its cover: The UK’s No 1 Celeb and Real Life Mag.

Taking a look at Bella, I was horrified by what appeared to be career advice: ‘Why I want my daughter to be a hooker like me!’

Next up to offend was That’s Life! with a picture of something large and disturbing protruding from a man’s bottom, with the coverline: ‘What was sticking out of his bum?’

For a fraction of a second I was tempted to look inside and find out what exactly was sticking out of this man’s backside, but I stopped myself. It’s revolting. Why would I care?

Indeed. From what I know of Fabianism, third way thinking and the desire from the Left to destroy western society, this just looks like feedback loop.

The media promotes disgusting, ridiculous, amoral and immoral, narcissistic, superficial, consumer lifestyles in order to influence the idiots who devour such nonsense. It is a form of peer pressure-induced control also, as (especially women) are inclined to subscribe to it, in order to not risk being ‘left out’ of  the depravity.

Are people  so fucking vapid that they find these things more interesting than understanding the global power structure, the nature of money and what freedom is?

The tax on civilisation coming…

NY Times

WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency is expected to act for the first time to regulate carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that scientists blame for the warming of the planet, according to top Obama administration officials.

The environmental agency is under order from the Supreme Court to make a determination whether carbon dioxide is a pollutant that endangers public health and welfare, an order that the Bush administration essentially ignored despite near-unanimous belief among agency experts that research points inexorably to such a finding.

Carbon dioxide ‘as pollutant’, the agenda the globalists have been pushing for decades to help consolidate global power in the hands of their international organisations (global government) for a gas that exists in trace amounts in the atmosphere;

Composition

78.08% Nitrogen (N2)
20.95% Oxygen (O2)
0.93% Argon
0.038% Carbon dioxide
About 1% water vapor (varies with climate)

…which is a vital component of photosynthesis;

In plants, algae and cyanobacteria photosynthesis uses carbon dioxide and water, releasing oxygen as a waste product. Photosynthesis is crucially important for life on Earth, since as well as it maintaining the normal level of oxygen in the atmosphere, nearly all life either depends on it directly as a source of energy, or indirectly as the ultimate source of the energy in their food.

… who’s increase in the atmosphere, could explain the blooming biomass;

The results surprised Steven Running of the University of Montana and Ramakrishna Nemani of NASA, scientists involved in analyzing the NASA satellite data. They found that over a period of almost two decades, the Earth as a whole became more bountiful by a whopping 6.2%. About 25% of the Earth’s vegetated landmass — almost 110 million square kilometres — enjoyed significant increases and only 7% showed significant declines. When the satellite data zooms in, it finds that each square metre of land, on average, now produces almost 500 grams of greenery per year.

Why the increase? Their 2004 study, and other more recent ones, point to the warming of the planet and the presence of CO2, a gas indispensable to plant life. CO2 is nature’s fertilizer, bathing the biota with its life-giving nutrients. Plants take the carbon from CO2 to bulk themselves up — carbon is the building block of life — and release the oxygen, which along with the plants, then sustain animal life. As summarized in a report last month, released along with a petition signed by 32,000 U. S. scientists who vouched for the benefits of CO2: “Higher CO2 enables plants to grow faster and larger and to live in drier climates. Plants provide food for animals, which are thereby also enhanced. The extent and diversity of plant and animal life have both increased substantially during the past half-century.”

… but does not correspond to the fact the planet doesn’t seem to be warming;

Top UN scientists have been forced to admit that natural weather occurrences are having a far greater effect on climate change than CO2 emissions as a continued cooling trend means there has been no global warming since 1998.

… and the global warming scientists’ own predictions are wrong

I have written a number of times about the “global warming accelerating” meme.  The evidence is nearly irrefutable that over the last 10 years, for whatever reason, the pace of global warming has decelerated (click below to enlarge)

This is simply a fact, though of course it does not necessarily “prove” that the theory of catastrophic anthropogenic global warming is incorrect.  Current results continue to be fairly consistent with my personal theory, that man-made CO2 may add 0.5-1C to global temperatures over the next century (below alarmist estimates), but that this warming may be swamped at times by natural climactic fluctuations that alarmists tend to under-estimate.

… and so on.

In fact, the science is so far from settled that it cannot be anything other than another motive for these Bilderberg/ global government puppets to push for carbon (life) taxation. Which would be the same as taxing any other completely natural gas. Like oxygen, but I guess that wouldn’t sell so well, to the unthinking masses. Even with predictions of global cooling for the next three decades;

Now a decade later, the global climate has not warmed 1F as forecast by the IPCC but has cooled slightly until 2007-08 when global temperatures turned sharply downward.  In 2008, NASA satellite imagery confirmed that the Pacific Ocean had switched from the warm mode it had been in since 1977 to its cool mode, similar to that of the 1945-1977 global cooling period. The shift strongly suggests that the next several decades will be cooler, not warmer as predicted by the IPCC.

Global warming (i.e, the warming since 1977) is over.  The minute increase of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere (0.008%) was not the cause of the warming- it was a continuation of natural cycles that occurred over the past 500 years.

… and the UN IPCC reports have been proven to be wrong, even deliberately distorted;

Christopher Monckton, who once advised Margaret Thatcher, demonstrates via 30 equations that computer models used by the UN’s climate panel (IPCC) were pre-programmed with overstated values for the three variables whose product is “climate sensitivity” (temperature increase in response to greenhouse-gas increase), resulting in a 500-2000% overstatement of CO2’s effect on temperature in the IPCC’s latest climate assessment report, published in 2007.

.. and yes, even the IPCC admit it themselves;

Ground-breaking admission by member of the Intergovernmental Panel for Climate Change: major contributing factor to the balance of the climate not taken into account.

It would appear that, as many of us right-thinking people have known for some time, global warming caused by CO2 output is, at best, sensationalist fantasy.

We have top rocket scientists saying no evidence CO2 causes warming, even the United States military says it: Army: Sun, Not Man, Is Causing Climate Change, other scientists have released studies completely contradicting the UN reports;

Three top scientists have once again contradicted the claim that a “consensus” exists about man-made global warming with research that indicates CO2 emissions actually cool the atmosphere, in addition to another peer-reviewed paper that documents how the IPCC overstated CO2’s effect on temperature by as much as 2000 per cent.

Professor George Chilingar and Leonid Khilyuk of the University of Southern California, and Oleg Sorokhtin of the Institute of Oceanology of the Russian Academy of Sciences have released a study that they claim completely contradicts the link between CO2 and global temperature increases.

.. and we have large numbers of scientists openly disagreeing with the official THEORY;

The Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine (OISM) will announce that more than 31,000 scientists have signed a petition rejecting claims of human-caused global warming. The purpose of OISM’s Petition Project is to demonstrate that the claim of “settled science” and an overwhelming “consensus” in favor of the hypothesis of human-caused global warming and consequent climate damage is wrong. No such consensus or settled science exists. As indicated by the petition text and signatory list, a very large number of American scientists reject this hypothesis.

… and the Manhattan Declaration;

We, the scientists and researchers in climate and related fields, economists, policymakers, and business leaders, assembled at Times Square, New York City, participating in the 2008 International Conference on Climate Change,

Resolving that scientific questions should be evaluated solely by the scientific method;

Affirming that global climate has always changed and always will, independent of the actions of humans, and that carbon dioxide (CO2) is not a pollutant but rather a necessity for all life;

Recognising that the causes and extent of recently-observed climatic change are the subject of intense debates in the climate science community and that oft-repeated assertions of a supposed ‘consensus’ among climate experts are false;

Affirming that attempts by governments to legislate costly regulations on industry and individual citizens to encourage CO2 emission reduction will slow development while having no appreciable impact on the future trajectory of global climate change.  Such policies will markedly diminish future prosperity and so reduce the ability of societies to adapt to inevitable climate change, thereby increasing, not decreasing human suffering;

Noting that warmer weather is generally less harmful to life on Earth than colder:

… the media has been reporting sensationalist climate nonsense for a century, and still have no idea what they are talking about. The science is not settled, and pushing policies based on dodgy theories with holes so big you could push Al Gores’ electricity bills through, should be illuminating for people. Why are they doing this? Why are they pushing this environmental agenda?

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.” [Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in “A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind”, by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5.]

The state can watch you, but you can’t watch the state…

Daily Mail

For rank hypocrisy, look no further than the Government’s inconceivable decision to make it a criminal offence – punishable with a jail term of up to 10 years –  to take a picture of a policeman.

Everywhere we go, the police – under instruction from Ministers – are watching our every move.

There are more than four million CCTV cameras in the UK, the largest number in the world. Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras follow our every car journey, and officers are now routinely deployed at major public gatherings with cameras on their helmets.

Police are even beginning to insist that pubs – as a condition of being granted a licence – install CCTV cameras to watch their regulars having a drink.

Our movements are also being tracked using our genetic fingerprints, long after we have left the scene. Hundreds of thousands of people never convicted of any offence now have their DNA stored on the Government’s Big Brother database – the largest in the world.

Yet do the police (or at least their Government masters) mind us watching them in return? Absolutely not. That would never do.

The Prevention of Terrorism Act 2000 has been used to stop a staggering 62,584 people at railway stations. Another 87,000 were questioned under separate ‘stop and search’ and ‘stop and account’ legislation.

One schoolboy was even held as a terror suspect for taking photographs of a railway station during a school geography field trip.

Of course, we should not be surprised that the defence for this latest draconian step is counter-terrorism.

Remember, throughout HISTORY, governments have used fear as a pretext for imposing the worst kind of tyranny/ slavery on the population. That is what is happening, nothing less, and if you want more information, read Ian Parker-Joseph’s blog.

Police State: New secret Stasi department set up by ACPO

Section 44 statistics

Gestapo and SOCA – how similar?

Search Gestapo…

This is not a joke. This is deadly serious…

‘Govt using fear to create police state’

BBC

A former head of MI5 has accused the government of exploiting the fear of terrorism and trying to bring in laws that restrict civil liberties.

In an interview in a Spanish newspaper, published in the Daily Telegraph, Dame Stella Rimington, 73, also accuses the US of “tortures”.

The Home Office said it was vital to strike a right balance between privacy, protection and sharing personal data.

It said any policies which impact on privacy must be “proportionate”.

Dame Stella, who stood down as the director general of the security service in 1996, has previously been critical of the government’s policies, including its attempts to extend pre-charge detention for terror suspects to 42 days and the controversial plan to introduce ID cards.

“It would be better that the government recognised that there are risks, rather than frightening people in order to be able to pass laws which restrict civil liberties, precisely one of the objects of terrorism – that we live in fear and under a police state,” she told the Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia.

No Ma’am has new posts!

The excellent blooger Rob Fedders has some new posts up on his blog, No Ma’am.

If you haven’t visited it before, now would be a good time to start. It’s a great place to learn about Marxism, the dialectical principle (Hegel) and the truth about feminism, among other things.

ENJOY!

Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, February 9, 2009

A fierce fire consumed all 44 floors of a skyscraper in Beijing today, shooting 30 foot flames into the air, but unlike the similarly-sized 47-story WTC 7, which suffered limited fires across just eight floors, the building in China did not collapse.

“The fire was burning from the ground floor to the top floor of the large building, the flames reflecting in the glass facade of the main CCTV tower next to the hotel and cultural center,” reports the New York Times.

“The 241-room Mandarin Oriental hotel in the building was due to open this year. Flames were spotted around 7:45 p.m. and within 20 minutes the fire had spread throughout the building, dominating that part of the city.”

“Hundreds of firefighting vehicles and police blocked off all approaches to the building – which was also set to house a luxury hotel due to be opened in 2009 – with flames appearing to leap 20 to 30 feet into the air,” adds The London Times.

Compare images of WTC 7 with those of the skyscraper fire in Beijing. Note that the Beijing skyscraper appears to be leaning due to the unorthodox design of the building – it did not suffer any kind of collapse.

To read the full article (with images) click here.

Headteacher forced out for trying to axe separate assemblies for Muslims

Daily Mail

A primary school headteacher has resigned after Muslim parents protested over plans to scrap separate faith assemblies for their children.

Soon after taking over at the school Julia Robinson told staff she wanted to hold assemblies for all pupils, which would encompass all faiths.

To be expected in this so called multi-cultural society, no? Encouraging different cultures and faiths to interact, for the sake of ‘community cohesion.’

Mrs Robinson was accused of being racist and following the complaints she was away from her post for most of last year.

She was due to make a phased return to her duties this term. But again there were protests from some parents when they heard she would be coming back.

It isn’t possible to be racist towards a religion, because religion isn’t a race.

A member of staff who asked not to be named said: ‘The headteacher inherited the separate assemblies when she started the job and she took careful advice from the authority on what to do about them.

‘But when she tried to stop them, feeling they did nothing to promote inclusiveness, she was accused of being a racist.

She she is right. It does nothing to promote inclusiveness, but I suppose these Muslim parents can’t stand the idea of their superior children having to sit near kaffirs. Who knows, they may actually make friends with kids from different cultures!

This incident serves as the true nature of cultural Marxism (multi-culturalism). In reality it is a one way street. Politically protected groups are given superior rights over others and accusatory statements are made, not because they are true (in this case it isn’t technically possible) but because this group wishes to impose their views on everyone else. It would seem that only non-British traditions, culture, beliefs, language, identity are given this sort of preferential treatment by the state.

One would think the government is trying to destroy Britain.

Ten years in jail for photographing a police officer – UK

Libertarian Party UK Blog

From the middle of this month you can go to jail for ten years for Photographing a Policeman , I will repeat that for you. Ten years in jail for taking a photgraph of a copper. So if a photojournalist takes a photograph of a demonstrator being beaten with a baton, or running them down with a horse, the photographer will be arrested.

Gang of youths caught trying to slow roast puppies

Daily Mail

A gang of children aged as young as 10 were caught trying to roast a pair of puppies over a bonfire.

Passerby Melanie Johnson spotted them kicking the pups and holding them over the fire on a canal bank.

The youngsters fled, abandoning the dogs, when she challenged them.

Ms Johnson, 32, took the puppies home, then passed them on to an RSPCA centre where staff treated the dogs and are now looking to find them new homes.

She said: ‘I just could not believe the cruelty being shown by these kids. If I hadn’t turned up, I think they would have burned the dogs alive.

‘I heard yelping and saw a group of children standing around a small bonfire. I ran over the bridge to them and saw one of the pups being kicked and the other being held over the fire.

‘Most of the kids were aged 12, 13 or older. But some were as young at 10.’

I would like to catch these little wastes of space and roast them over a slow fire, see how they like it.

I see this article as another indictment of the collapse of society. The lack of empathy, of civilised behaviour of these feral, unsocialised, rabid animals hardly qualifies them as human beings. They of course, scattered away like fucking rats when an adult turned up.

What pieces of shit.

Greater Manchester Police have not made any arrests in connection with the incident and a source said it would be extremely difficult to identify the culprits.

Well why would they? Over 4 million CCTV camera’s  in this socialist police state shithole. Funny how they never seem to actually do anything, apart from conditioning people to accept being constantly watched.

I hope they all get run over by a train. Twice.

Muslim ‘Lord’ threatens Parliament, Islamification of UK Police

From Cranmer.

Lord Ahmed is a repugnant individual. Not only in appearance, but in association, character and morality. And to hear that he has threatened jihad on the House of Lords if their lordships should fail to meet his demands only serves to intensify Cranmer’s loathing of the man.

It appears that a member of the House of Lords had invited the Dutch politician, Geert Wilders, to a private meeting in the Palace of Westminster. She had intended to invite her colleagues in the Lords to a private viewing of his ‘documentary’ Fitna, followed by discussion and debate in true parliamentary fashion. This is, after all, a liberal democracy, and their lordships enjoy the rights of freedom of expression and freedom of association, not to mention certain parliamentary privileges for the protection of their function in the legislature.

Read the rest here.

From the Opinionator.

When I first saw the title of the below news article – I thought that this MUST be a joke – surely not serious. But, to my dismay, the article is true – Police in (the once) Great Britain have dhimmified-up enough so that they now offer a HIJAB UNIFORM for female muslim police.

Sughra Ahmed says “”There may also be women who are already with the force who do not wear the scarf but choose to later. Again, this will be positive for them.” ——–Oh let’s be sure we encourage hijab wearing — plus you can be sure those muslim women who have chosen to not wear the veil will soon receive “pressure” from the Islamo-Sharia-police to do so. (Despite his prior comment)

For in-depth discussion of Muslim women and the veil – go to HERE

Read the rest here.

I can tell you know, this is making me fucking sick. Parliament should have kicked that pompous litte prick out of the country, let alone the House. What a bunch of pussified spineless cunts!!! This is supposed to the global home of Freedom (which is of course why the socialists are so determined to destroy it).

The first duty of any Muslim is to Islam so how the fuck can he be a Lord, let alone occupy any position of central political power? If you look at any Muslim-based group, you will see in their charters that they must always seek to promote and protect Islam. Britain will never be Islamic, and anyone who thinks it will can just go fuck yourselves. All of you. As far as I’m concerned, the real Britain (not the Fabian shithole it is now) represents individual liberty, equality under law and THAT’S IT. And for all of your politically correctness arsemunching spineless wankers, Islam is not about tolerance. It is a fascist political ideology. It isn’t a religion. And if Mohammed is a ‘prophet’ then Jesus is the Devil, because only a fucking evil cunt would advocate the killing, subjugation and enslavement of others, the demand that others sacrificed their lives for him, that supposedly got his ‘revelations’ not from god, but from Gabriel, a lesser being, who personally beheaded hundreds of Jews, raped, pillaged and murdered like the filthy 7th century barbarian that he was, and his sociopathic unthinking followers.

I’ve been studying Islam for ages, what a bunch of evil nasty cunts. I also know of the deals the EU has done with Islamic nations, to ‘guarantee’ respect for the fascist belief system (along with immigration), labelling the analysis and criticism of a fucking STORY, hate speech. Not surprising considering the EU is fascist too. Easy way to destabilise western nations for the NWO. Use Islam to attack western society, and enslave and destroy Islam later.

People need to get clued up. Britain is being attacked with every trick in the book, so it the United States and most of the western world. Why? Because the global government see the end in sight and actually believe they can have a one world socialist dictatorship in their lifetimes.

Well fuck them all.