Quran, an ‘accursed book’


William Ewart Gladstone (1809–1898 ) was Prime Minister of Great Britain four times: 1868–74, 1880–85, 1886 and 1892–94. He called the Qur’an an “accursed book” and once held it up during a session of Parliament, declaring: “So long as there is this book there will be no peace in the world.”

Times have changed a great deal. Now the votaries of the book he saw as such an impediment to peace have triumphed: an Islamic reading room is being set up at the library Gladstone founded near his home in North Wales. In this BBC audio report (thanks to Andrew), Gladstone’s great grandson Christopher Parish and Professor Richard Aldous, head of history at University College Dublin, tie themselves into knots trying to come up with a reason why Gladstone would have approved of this reading room. Gladstone, you see, was a man of his time, but he actually made favorable comments about Muhammad in the margins of a biography of the founder of Islam, and his remarks weren’t as extreme as those of some of his contemporaries…

It doesn’t add up. The text of the Qur’an has not changed from the late 19th century to the early 21st. What has changed is the prevailing attitude toward the book. Now it has become a manifestation of bigotry and hatred to see in the Islamic holy book anything but peace and tolerance. But the text of the book remains the same. If it was an impediment to peace in Gladstone’s day, it is now. If it is an uplifting exhortation to peace and tolerance now, then it was in Gladstone’s day as well.

Yesterday Geert Wilders said: “I view Islam not as a religion, but as a dangerous, totalitarian ideology – equal to communism and fascism. Aren’t I allowed to say so?”

No, he isn’t allowed to say so. If he had been born two hundred years ago, he might have become Prime Minister of the Netherlands. Instead, he is a hunted man. Likewise Gladstone, were he miraculously transported to the House of Commons in 2009, would be excoriated for “hate speech” if he dared to repeat his view of the Qur’an today.

But the Qur’an remains the same. Eventually, Europe and America are going to deal with the implications of that fact, one way or another.

Fascism in the UK

Fascism : The Merging of State and Corporate Power / Interests.

Daily Mail

One in five Lords is undertaking consultancy work in a Parliamentary ‘cottage industry’ potentially worth millions.

The figures can be revealed as four Labour peers are investigated over claims they were ready to take large sums to amend legislation.

One, Lord Taylor of Blackburn, was forced to apologise yesterday after he was revealed in secret recordings to have said that an annual payment of £100,000 was ‘cheap for what I do’.

And Lord Moonie, a former defence minister who is also at the centre of the investigation, is facing questions over his links to a defence industry lobbyist.

As debate rages over whether peers are being unduly influenced by outside interests, the Mail has found that 145 peers out of 743 eligible to sit in the House of Lords are acting as ‘consultants’ or ‘advisers’ to outside interests.

In addition, they are exploiting a Parliamentary loophole which says they do not even have to state how much they are earning.

Industries having their interests represented by Lords include banking, gambling, fast food, surveillance and other security systems, and nuclear power, as well as foreign governments.

Read the rest of the article.

Rothschilds, Illuminati, NWO, Marx, Communism

Watch this video at the Socio-Economics History Blog. Get everybody to watch this video. At one hour long, Jack Otto of Forbidden Knowledge runs through the history of the Rothschilds, the difference between them and real Jews, the banking cartel, Communist social control in Western society (communism isn’t dead at all), the World Wars, Lincoln, Stalin, Lenin, all of it. He nails everything. Everything he says I have already researched elsewhere and it’s great to see it all in one speech and should be required watching.

People NEED to know this info, they will not like to hear it, but tough shit, doesn’t stop it being reality. The lack of strength to deal with this is the real reason why they are getting so far in their gameplan.

London 7/7 Bombings Secret information

Question the mainstream media, question the government. Question everything with critical thinking. It is what you have a brain for.

I do not consent to this Government

PJC Journal

A Cromwell was the cry of the Revolutionaries as they swept towards the Bastille in 1789, we have to fight these tapsters and wastrels in a corrupt Parliament, and reduce their powers over us.

Obama quoted Tom Paine in his speech, let me give you another quote from Tom Paine-

….governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whatever form of government becomes destructive of these ends; it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it.

I no longer consent to this Government, it was elected on a fraudulent electoral manifesto that ensures minority rule of fanatics wedded to the power of the State. Parliament no longer represents or reflects the will of the people. To quote Cromwell- In the Name of God Go.

Until such time as we have a written constitution that guarantees our Liberties and an Electoral system that reflects the diversity of political thought in this country. I do not consent to be ruled by it.

This British Government is one of liars, thieves and traitors. A bunch of sub-human bumbling pondscum who should have never gotten within a mile of Parliament, let alone be employed within it.

I do not consent to this government. Gordon Brown wasn’t even elected, so it is impossible for anyone in this country to have given him consent anyway. No consent means no mandate, no authorisation to act on our behalf. No right to make decisions for Britain.

As the (wealth creating) private sector stumbles, trying to hold itself up under these State-manipulated conditions, the (wealth destroying) public sector continues to expand. More civil servants, more pay rises, more non-jobs. This results in higher taxation for the private sector, coupled with ever increasing regulation from Brussels (via our ‘Health and Safety Directorate’, which is essentially an EU proxy) it is obvious to see that this is a war on our economy and our society. Such is the desired ends of the Frankfurt subversion of Political Correctness.

The goal of these one world government types is to eventually dissolve Britain into the EU. To destroy Britain as a nation, the national institutions must be infiltrated and manipulated, the economy ransacked, the education system and the media controlled, the nuclear family taken apart, with the resultant rise in crime and social disorder blamed as a Hegelian argument for ever more laws and regulations.

And this cycle is supposed to continue until there is nothing ‘British’ left. Just look at the new coinage. Why redesign the currency? What was wrong with the old design? Well, for one it is synonymous with British identity, so it had to be changed. Apparently it no longer identified with ‘modern Britain’, which is supposed to be seen a merely another state in the socialist dictatorship of the EU, hence the coins having the Royal Arms broken up and spread across them like so. When viewing individual coins, one gets the impression (subconscious or otherwise) that the coin, an unit of a sovereign currency, being just a part of ‘something bigger’.

That’s my opinion anyway.

There is no doubt in my mind however, that this is all contrived. The promotion of Islam in Britain is also part of the plan to create division and social chaos. Destabilise the region, then re-arrange society and the state in the chaos into what they want, which I guarantee will not be in the interests of individual liberty.

Ordo ab chao.

Fuck this government, I want FREEDOM.

BBC Newsnight – Warming up President Obama’s inaugural speech?

What should the BBC do if the new US President’s references to global warming in his inaugural speech don’t quite come up to expectations?

It would seem that someone at the BBC had taken the trouble to splice the tape so that half a sentence from paragraph 16 of the inauguration speech was joined on to half a sentence from paragraph 22, and this apparently continuous sound bite was completed by returning to paragraph 16 again to lift another complete sentence.

Read the full post (with audio links) at Harmless Sky. Nice to know where your licence see is going.

More badly behaved women…

Daily Mail

Paternity fraud case, 17 years the bitch lied to the man, letting him pay for a child that wasn’t his. Not only deception but adultery. An ‘inveterate liar’, the Judge called her. Still, the case the man put forth for reimbursement was thrown out at Appeals. Imagine how fast and hard the misandric state would stamp on any man found to have children and not be paying for them!

The judge, sitting with Lord Justice Aikens and Mr Justice Bennett, said: ‘This whole case can be categorised as a misfortune to all those engaged in it. I would not wish to be the one to extend their misfortunes further.’

Horseshit. They know that  women are given preferential treatment in the courtroom, so they won’t even give the man a chance. Hell, we have a whole ‘child support agency’ designed primarily to force men to pay for children, even if it isn’t his. Woman puts hand in fire, state makes sure man’s hand gets burnt. Feminist equality for you.

Now Lily Allen, some girl who sort of sung a few songs, says this:

‘I just want to marry someone rich’

Her career may be ticking along nicely, but it seems Lily Allen’s ambition is beginning to wane.

The pop singer is instead setting her sights on bagging a wealthy husband.

The 23-year-old revealed her plans to artist and friend Damien Hirst in Interview magazine, in which she also appears in a smouldering photoshoot.

She said: ‘I just hope I can stay famous enough for a little bit so someone rich will marry me. That’s all I really care about these days.’

Join the club.

Lily was most recently linked to millionaire art dealer Jay Jopling, 45, and sparked rumours of an engagement when she wore a large ring on her wedding finger during a romantic holiday in St Barts earlier this month.

A source revealed: ‘Lily had been on a mission to get Jay for more than four months.’

She is obviously concerned about having more orgasms

Western women make me sick. Not for what they want, but for the duplicity in their actions. Deceit is a common weapon in the females arsenal, being as they are, amoral. This amorality inherent in women enables advertisers to sell them endless shit, enables the state to bribe them and tyrants to control them. Marx knew of their ‘qualities’, conspiring to recruit them as weapons against the only obstacle to global communism government, Men.

And, feminism was born.

It seems these days, that children are the property of women, but the responsibility of men. Not emotionally, just financially. Back in the day when they were the property of men things were different. Women couldn’t leave with the children. If they left, they would be on their own. Where they belong. This shift of power to women is part of the destruction of the family, repeated by bankers, feminists, fascists, the UN, think tanks etc. Like controlled demolition, one has to take out the core infrastructure to ensure that it collapses in a predictable way. One can then build a new structure in its place.

That is what is meant by a New World Order.

By the way, only a woman can do this attempting a three-point-turn!

Don’t let MP’s keep their expenses secret from us!

In regards to this post on the Libertarian Party UK blog., on the subject of MP’s to vote on keeping their taxpayer funded expenses secret. There is also a Facebook group campaign regarding it.

Dear ****,

Re: Members of Parliament published expenses

I am sure that you will agree with me that one of things that causes such lack of confidence in MP’s is the constant attempts by Members of the House of Commons to claim for expenses at charge to the hard pressed taxpayer and then not to publish their expense accounts in full.

Personally I fail to understand why my employer and the HMRC require all expenditure to be properly receipted, yet members feel that they should not supply receipts for expenditure under £25 and have a special exemption under the Freedom of Information Act to cover their expenses.

Following the commendable example of Douglas Carswell MP, who has made a public declaration that he will publish his expenses in full upto April 2009, could you please inform me if you will also be declaring your expenses.

If you feel that is not something that you want to do, can you explain on what grounds you do not wish to follow Mr Carswell’s example.

Let’s see what he says, if anything…

Another attack on home schooling

Another dialectic to push an agenda. Just like state sanctioned covert hacking of your computer, ‘for the children, terrorists etc’. The tyrannical socialist state cannot stand any part of society that it doesn’t control, especially when it comes to the next generation.

Daily Mail

Parents who educate their children at home could be using it to cover up abuse, neglect and forced marriage, the Children’s Minister has claimed.

Baroness Delyth Morgan said home schooling could be masking a range of evils including sexual exploitation and domestic servitude.

Her controversial comments immediately provoked fury from home schooling groups who branded them ‘offensive’.

Baroness Morgan remark came as she ordered a review of how the estimated 55,000 children who are taught at home or have dropped out from school are treated.

It is in response to local authorities’ and children’s charities’ anxiety about their ability to properly support and monitor those who are home schooled.

Control, control, control.

But yesterday’s launch appears to have been completely overshadowed by Baroness Morgan’s comments.

She said: ‘Parents are able, quite rightly, to choose whether they want to educate children at home, and a very small number do. I’m sure, the vast majority do a good job.

‘However, there are concerns that some children are not receiving the education they need.

Well, how about starting your investigation into the hordes of children leaving state school incapable of reading or writing?

‘And in some extreme cases, home education could be used as a cover for abuse. We cannot allow this to happen and are committed to doing all we can to help ensure children are safe, wherever they are educated.’

‘Think of the children’ is the mantra of fascists. What next, tracking children 24/7 using microchips? For their protection, of course.

The review will investigate how home education is supported and monitored and how concerns about the welfare and education of a child are dealt with.

Among its explicit aims is to ‘consider what evidence there is to support claims that home education could be used as a ‘cover’ for child abuse such as neglect, forced marriage, sexual exploitation or domestic servitude’.

Last night Ann Newstead, spokesman for the charity Education Otherwise, a charity for parents who home school their children, said claims that children were safer in the hands of the state than parents was ‘offensive’ and ‘not born out by an increasing number of families in the UK’.

Not if you model your ideology on Stalin, or Hitler. They knew the importance of the state using the ‘education system‘ to indoctrinate the youth.

Annette Taberner, member of EO’s policy group said ‘no other community would be expected to suffer the prejudice and discrimination which our community has to endure. Our community will be infuriated by these latest statements.’

Currently the responsibility for the home schooling of a child rests solely with the parents and no authority has the power to inspect the quality of the learning.

Councils are not obliged to monitor it and parents don’t have to answer any questions about what they are teaching.

Parents do not even have to register their child as home educated, but they must notify the school if they intend to withdraw their child from formal education in order to teach them at home. The school will then tell the local authority.

Among the options for the Elective Home Education Review are tighter monitoring although ministers stressed there are no plans to change the rights of parents to teach their children at home.

The EHER is being led by Graham Badman, former director of children’s services at Kent county council.

Mr Badman said: ‘Legislation affords every parent the right to choose to educate their child at home but with those rights go responsibilities, not least being to secure a suitable education.

‘By the same token, local authorities are charged with ensuring that all children are safe, well and receiving an education that is both enjoyable and allows for the expression of all aptitudes and abilities.’

Aww, the state is ‘thinking of your children’.

Women have more orgasms with rich men: study

Hahahaha, hohohoho, teehehehehehe!

Daily Mail

Money can’t buy you love – but it can lead to better sex, scientists say.

A controversial study claims that a woman finds lovemaking more fulfilling if her partner is wealthy.

The finding adds to the evidence that for many females, money, status and success remain a key ingredient in sexual attraction.

The link between money and sex, and the apparent sexual attraction of fabulously wealthy men, has been debated since the dawn of civilisation.

It isn’t a debate. It’s an established fact!

It was famously celebrated by the spoof chat show host Mrs Merton, when she asked Debbie McGee ‘what first attracted you to the millionaire Paul Daniels?’ and is discussed every time a young female model marries a far older, but richer businessman, pop star or actor.

The Chinese Health and Family Life Survey includes information on the sex lives, income, education and other personal details on 5,000 people across China, based on interviews and questionnaires.  Among these were 1,534 women with husbands and boyfriends.

Dr Pollet found that 121 of these women reported always having orgasms during sex, 408 said they ‘often’ had orgasms, 762 ‘sometimes’ had orgasms while 243 had them rarely or never.

The researchers found several factors influenced the women’s enjoyment of sex. However, one of the biggest turned out to be the income of their partner.

Who would have known

‘We found that increasing partner income had a highly positive effect on women’s self-reported frequency of orgasms,’ Dr Pollet said in  the journal Evolution and Human Behaviour.

Now how is this for some serious man-hating femcrap.

Although many people find the idea that women enjoy sex more with rich partners offensive, some biologists argue that the instinct makes evolutionary sense.

Women have to invest so much time and personal risk into each baby, it is crucial that they get the most successful and healthy partner so they can to improve the chances of their own DNA being passed on.

A man, in contrast, can father hundreds, or even thousands, of babies in a lifetime and so invests less in each child.

Well yeah, women need to hunt men for money, because men just don’t care about children!

How’s this. Women prostitute themselves because they are just all whores.

No, broad derogatory remarks attacking an entire gender could be called sexism. Unless it is aimed at men of course. Who cares about them anyway…

Anti-androgens found in British rivers

Daily Mail

The cocktail of gender-bending chemicals entering rivers and streams is more potent and harmful than anyone realised, it has been revealed.

Scientists have found an entirely new class of chemicals that is changing male fish into females – and which could be contributing to the soaring rate of infertility and defects in men.

They have yet to find the source of the chemicals, known as anti-androgens, but believe they could come from pesticides, industrial pollution or pharmaceutical drugs.

Until now it was assumed that the most serious gender bending man-made chemicals were those that mimicked the female sex hormone oestrogen.

The new pollutants, which were discovered in more than 30 rivers, work by blocking male sex hormones such as testosterone. In animal tests they have shown to cause low sperm counts and genital deformities.

Professor Charles Tyler, of Exeter University who was involved in the study, said the mix of anti-androgens and oestrogen mimicking chemicals was a ‘double whammy’ for wildlife – and possibly humans.

‘There are likely to be many reasons behind the rise in male fertility problems in humans, but these findings could reveal one, previously unknown, factor,’ he said.

‘Anti-androgens can induce a lot of conditions we see in humans, such as low fertility and an increase in genital deformities, very readily.’

People could be exposed to anti-androgens in pesticides on food, through airborne pollution or from drugs. The findings come from a three-year study at Exeter and Brunel Universities.

Scientists looked at samples of water from 30 sites near sewage outlets and at 1,500 fish. Genetically engineered yeast cells can be used in a laboratory to determine levels of anti-androgens. The researchers were astonished at what they found.

Male fish exposed to the highest levels of anti-androgens were most likely to be ‘feminised’ – and have egg cells in their testes.

Dr Susan Jobling of Brunel University, said: ‘We have identified a new group of chemicals, but do not know where they are coming from. A principal aim of our work is now to identify the source of these pollutants and work with regulators and industry to test the effects of a mixture of these chemicals.’

Don’t forget the War on Males. There is more to this. Consider the environmental impact of mercury vapour-lightbulbs being disposed of incorrectly, which WILL happen, although if they break in your house, you and your family will end up breathing most of it in.

Quangos ‘spend more than £1bn on spin in a year’

Daily Mail

State agencies, boards, commissions and quangos spent more than £1billion on spin last year, new evidence has indicated.

The huge amounts of public money lavished on attempts to sway opinion were revealed by freedom of information requests.

State-run organisations admitted raising their spending on ‘communications’  –  much of it devoted to lobbying and public relations puffs  –  by almost a quarter in 2008.

The 32 public bodies which answered questions from the Tax-Payers’ Alliance together paid out more than £50million on ‘ communications’ staff and the material they produced

If all 1,162 unelected and unaccountable Government-funded organisations were spending at the same rate, the cost to the taxpayer would have reached almost £2billion. Communications budgets are certain to have passed the £1billion point.

The bills were disclosed at a time when recession is eating deeply into private sector jobs.

But the public sector gravy train rolls on. The inefficient, bloated, useless, unnecessary jobsworths continue to cream it off at the expense of the private sector. Billions stolen from hard working people without their consent ‘for the greater good’ right. Bullshit. One cannot be too surprised however, this pull-the-ladder-up attitude comes straight from the top.

MPs were accused of a ‘new level of arrogance’ last night as they launched a bid to keep secret full details of how they spend millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money.

And they will further mock voters with a new rulebook allowing them to carry on squandering cash on furniture and home improvements.

With households and businesses cutting costs, the moves will be seen as more evidence that elected representatives are hopelessly out of touch.

No, they just don’t give a shit. This is what happens in socialist states. The ever increasing power available to them in these positions, coupled with the ever decreasing accountibility means it is INEVITABLE that corrupt, tyrannical, totalitarian self serving scum will be attracted to these positions. There are two reasons for this. 1. Self serving, tyrannical scum are always looking for a situation where they can exercise such desires. Positions of power allow this. 2. Peer behaviour leads to a culture of corruption. Everyone around them is on the take, so they are more attracted to it because of this.

This is one of the major reasons why power is supposed to be decentralised. Imagine how evil and corrupt the scum will be in a global fascist dictatorship? The principle of individual freedom is the critical issue because self-ownership means self-sovereignty.

What is more likely to encourage greed and corruption? A small, limited, efficient, transparent, accountable state where they come second fiddle to the individual sovereignty of the citizen. Or one where the 670 or so MPs have power over the 80 million people in this country?

The centralisation of power always leads to this and it always leads to the power trying to centralise ever more from the country. To do that they must achieve dominion over the sovereignty of the citizens, essentially enslaving them through law, taxation and propaganda.

Nothing will change with the usual political parties. It is a rigged game. You are presented with these three ‘options’ because they are the ones vetted by the cartel behind the government, who also control the mainstream media. It is like a room with three doors, which all just so happen to lead to the same room on the other side. Any ‘choice’ you have is actually an illusion, as the outcome, the major policies and decisions will be the same, and by ‘choosing’ one of the sanctioned options you are giving them a mandate to continue the tyranny and police state agenda.

When you define true choice by outcome and not option, those three doors collapse into one. This gives you three real choices. Go through that door, don’t do anything, or kick the fucking wall in on the other side and see what happens.

I bet you can guess which choice the establishment want you to take.

I bet you can guess which choice I am going to take.

Freedom isn’t a right, it is a priviledge. In fact so are rights.  These unelected rulers are fighting to prevent you from even thinking about taking your freedom back. Using your money. By stealing your time.

What can you do? Well, first of all, start by looking at other political options. I will explain more aspects of this subject and more in later posts.

Thanks for reading.

Virginity auction update

This is what she pretends to be...

This is what she pretends to be...

You may remember an earlier post regarding this very same tart, by Henry Makow, called Auctioning Her Virginity Is Natural Step For Feminist. A short quote from that post:

Feminism, with its hidden lesbian agenda, is brainwashing and social engineering. It was fostered by the financial elite in order to destabilize family en route to creating a totalitarian state. The destruction of the family was a plank in the Communist Manifesto, which was financed by these same bankers.

Young women today are lost souls, betrayed by their society to think their only value lies in sex appeal and career. They are willing to have promiscuous sex to assuage their sense of worthlessness. This only undermines their chance of marital success.

Long story short, this women studies grad decided to sell her virginity to the highest bidder when seeing her older sister whore herself out for a few weeks and collect lots of money for it while doing her own studies.

What you may not know is what the bids on her complete sexual inexperience have now reached.

Daily Mail

But this is who she is...

But this is who she is...

Natalie Dylan obviously values her virginity so highly, that not even £2.5m is good enough as she prepares to auction off her chastity for millions of pounds.

The 22-year-old student from California is being chased by a record 10,000 besotted men all keen to spend a massive sum for one night of passion.

‘It’s shocking that men will pay so much for someone’s virginity, which isn’t even prized so highly anymore.

‘I think it’s become some kind of competition between all these men.

‘It’s like a contest they all want to win,’ added Natalie, who is from San Diego in the U.S.

The student already has a degree in Women’s Studies and planned the virginity auction to raise enough funds for a masters course in Family and Marriage therapy.

Well, nothing illicits respect about relationships more than selling your virginity to the highest random bidder.

‘I’ve had two serious boyfriends, and of course we were intimate in some ways, but they were nice guys and were patient with me.

‘Back then I just wanted to wait until I was sure about someone before going all the way with them.

‘Things didn’t work out with either of my boyfriends and so the losing my virginity just never happened.’

The cheques bounced, in other words.

Natalie began researching prostitution for her own degree course, as well as how virginity was prized in different cultures.

‘I looked at other cases of where women had been paid for their virginity and realised that men were willing to pay large sums in return,’ she said.

Knowing her sister had been treated well by the legal brothel The Bunny Ranch in Nevada, USA, Natalie decided to look into working there, but for just one evening.

‘I’m really proud of her,’ said Avia. ‘I understand fully why she’s doing this, and I don’t know why anyone would criticise her for it.

However Natalie admits she’s still concerned about the prospect of spending a night with a stranger.

‘I’ve been getting to know the men who are bidding and I’m having email conversations with them,’ she said.

‘I’ve had such a range of messages, from weirdos who say they love me, to those who get really graphically sexual about what they want to do to me.

‘I’m also getting lots of polite requests from rich businessmen.

‘I get some men who are obviously looking for a girlfriend but I try and make it clear that this is a one-night-only offer.

Until she gets married, then its the big payday! Day, after day, after day, after day…

‘I know that a lot of people will condemn me for this because it’s so taboo but I really don’t have a problem with that,’ she added.

Natalie said she is prepared to undergo a medical hymen examination to prove her chastity and has already passed two lie detector tests.

Wow, quality control for the meat I suppose, have you make sure you are getting what you paid for. Which he won’t, regardless of what she does.

‘My study is completely authentic in that I truly am auctioning my virginity,’ Natalie said.

Yeah you just keep justifying it you deluded WHORE lol.

‘But I am not being sold into this. I’m not being taken advantage of in any way.

‘I think me and the person I do it with will both profit greatly from the deal,’  she added.

Wow. Gold plated, bullet proof narcissism from a leading member of the ‘new woman’. She will definitely profit from one of the most stupid men who ever lived but it definitely will not be mutually beneficial. Unless he is a virgin too. Imagine how many professional whores that could buy! He could be sleeping with a new, fresh, dirty slut every day of the year lol.

But some idiot is going to sleep with a women studies grad. That is what truly disgusts me.

How much money would you pay to have sex with a girl who has never done it? How much would you pay for a carpenter who has never held a tool? I know what is going to happen as well. This sort of self-absorbed bitch will just lay there, expecting him to do everything, and expecting him to appreciate the HONOUR of her goddess-like company. Talk about up her own arse. Somewhere I’m sure she won’t let him go, because she’s a LADY of course! Fuck me, I don’t know how women manage to live with double standards all the time. How selfish do you have to be, to think that the rules you wish to impose of others, should not apply to you?

LOL. I hope I get to see a picture of the prick who pays for this, because no matter how bad I rip the girl now, he is going to get it!

The coming horror of ‘Eco-bulbs’ or (CFL)

I recently came across an article on the Daily Mail site regarding a Labour peer who just happens to own shares in a firm who recycles the new ‘eco-friendly’ lightbulbs the enviro-fascist government is currently forcing into all homes.

Lord Barnett, who was Treasury Chief Secretary in the Seventies and later vice-chairman of the BBC, is a major investor in a company that stands to reap massive profits as the new-style bulbs are recycled.

Why must these bulbs be recycled in this way (as opposed to normal bulbs)? Well it is because the new ‘environmentally friendly’ bulbs contain mercury, one of the most toxic substances on Earth.

Breaking one of these bulbs in your home technically qualifies that area as a toxic waste site. The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has issued guidance in the event one of these ‘eco’ bulbs breaks, which will release mercury vapour into your home, and incase you are wondering…

..there is no safe level of mercury, and no one has actually shown that there is a safe level. I would say mercury is a very toxic substance… – Dr Lars Friberg, Former Chief Adviser to the World Health Organization on Mercury safety.

The mainstream excuse for this pushing of this product is to reduce CO2 emissions by lower energy consumption and ‘waste’ through heat etc.

CO2, a naturally occuring gas that exists in trace levels in the atmosphere is essential for plant life. The 0.038% of the atmosphere that contains CO2 represents the planets total outgassing, not just man-made which is again, a trace of the above percentage, but I have written about this here: I will declare Carbon Dioxide a pollutant: Obama. Those useful idiots pushing for global centralisation of power in the name of ‘stopping global warming’ fail to mention that there hasnt been any global warming since 1998. Polar bear numbers are at an all time high and there has been a record increase in sea ice, which is now back to 1979 levels. On top of that many are predicting cooling for years to come. Quite simply, CO2 exists in trace quanitites, and is less of a greenhouse gas than methane, and a gas called nitrogen trifluoride (NF3), used during the construction of solar panels, among other things, is 17,000 times more potent than CO2.

But let’s focus on mercury, otherwise we will be here all day.

By forcing people to buy these new bulbs, the proto-global government is forcing one of the worlds most toxic elements into your home, an element that is toxic to all life and will now help you save the planet (by potentially poisoning and killing yourselves), and with your own money too! Sounds like the thinking of the anti-human elitists to me.

I wanted to a) find out what the ‘acceptable’ level of mercury exposure was, and b) how much mercury is in each bulb.

After a bit of digging, I found a document called ‘Minimal Risk Levels (MRLs) for Hazardous Substances’, published by the Department of Health and Human Services (US). Fluoride is listed in it by the way. According to this document, which defines the MRLs as “an estimate of the daily human exposure to a hazardous substance that is likely to be without appreciable risk of adverse noncancer health effects over a specified duration of exposure.”

The minimum risk for mercury exposure is 0.0002 mg per m3. That is, twenty thousandth of one milligram per cubic metre.

Fine, now how much mercury does one of these new fangled bulbs contain? According to the Health Protection Agency (haha), “Nowadays, the typical amount is around 4 milligrams per lamp – just enough to cover the tip of a ball point pen and just enough to last the expected life-time of the lamp.”

So, 4 milligrams per lamp. Back to the first Daily Mail article we see this;

‘There are 20 million households in the country. That means between 700 million and 800 million lights will need replacing and will have to be recycled.’

So one may not think that a broken bulb in the home is a big deal, even if that bulb can release 40,000 times the maximum acceptable amount of mercury into your locality. How many people will put all of these CFL’s into a special bag and take them down to the controlled recycling environment? What will happen to all of that mercury when dumped in landfills? We cannot even be sure that councils in the UK will recycle the bulbs, as they haven’t been doing the same for all the other materials suitable for recycling. Doesn’t 3,200 kilogrammes of one of the worlds most toxic substances, mercury, being put into the environment sound healthier than CO2, a naturally occuring gas? How does mercury poisoning of the water supply sound? Good!

I didn’t fucking think so, but I suppose CO2 doesn’t have quite the same effect on the brain, on child and fetal development, on reducing sperm count and countless other negative effects which can be easily researched online, but the following statement warrants mention:

All forms of mercury are toxic to the fetus, but methylmercury most readily passes through the placenta. Even with an asymptomatic patient, maternal exposure can lead to spontaneous abortion or retardation.

This doesn’t even touch on all of the other issues this kind of light can generate in people;

dermatologist Dr John Hawk, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that some people already find it difficult to tolerate the fluorescent-strip lighting that is widely used in schools and offices, which works in the same way as the eco-friendly bulbs.

He said: “Fluorescent lights seem to have some sort of ionising characteristic where they affect the air around them.

“This does affect a certain number of people, probably tens of thousands, in Britain, whose ailments flare up just by being close to them.

Why has the government forced these bulbs on the population? If we had ‘free market capitalism’ (which we don’t) these two families of products could compete openly, but the state deems it necessary to impose their sick agenda on the people without their consent. There is nothing FREE about being FORCED to do anything. It is like ‘compulsory volunteering‘. This in itself should have your spidey-senses tingling. I suppose the unelected scum do not believe you are capable of making these decisions for yourself, I am under the impression that this is part of a larger agenda of 1. funding a new industry 2. released neurotoxins into the general public 3. providing the health ‘industry’ with many sick serfs for decades to come, 4. attack fertility (population control) 5. condition nations to accept rulings from supranational agencies.

By the way, there are ways of cleaning the emissions of coal-powered plants of CO2, mercury etc. Would be better to clean it there than to distribute it to 20 million plus locations than collect it at the source?

Maybe I’m being stupid, but this whole issue makes me fucking sick. More fascism from the elites and more ignorance and apathy from the public. Remember, concern yourself first with the EFFECTs of their proposals, ignore the EXCUSES. These bastards will say anything to make you go along with their agenda, and people will believe it because it’s easier than realising they are pathetic slaves and thus have to DO something about it.


The New World Order (NWO) An Overview

Educate Yourself

There is a worldwide conspiracy being orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group of genetically-related individuals (at least at the highest echelons) which include many of the world’s wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate elite, as well as members of the so-called Black Nobility of Europe (dominated by the British Crown) whose goal is to create a One World (fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda. Their intention is to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet and to dramatically reduce the world’s population by 5.5 Billion people. While the name New World Order is a term frequently used today when referring to this group, it’s more useful to identify the principal organizations, institutions, and individuals who make up this vast interlocking spiderweb of elite conspirators.

In 1992, Dr John Coleman published  Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300. With laudable scholarship and meticulous research, Dr Coleman identifies the players and carefully details the Illuminati agenda of worldwide domination and control. On page 161 of the Conspirators Hierarchy, Dr Coleman accurately summarizes the intent and purpose of the Committee of 300 as follows:

“A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.

There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of  laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simple be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited.”

Read the full article here.

In Lies We Trust: The CIA, Hollywood and Bioterrorism – Official Release

This feature length documentary about medical madness, cloaked in bioterrorism preparedness, will awaken the brain dead. It exposes health officials, directed by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), for conducting a “War of Terror” that is killing millions of unwitting Americans. This urgent life-saving DVD comes without copyright restrictions.

William Cooper – Behold a Pale Horse

A presentation by former military intelligence officer and world renowned lecturer and writer, William Cooper. It is over four hours long. I haven’t watched the whole thing yet, but I am posting it anyway. Talks about many many subjects.

Beware the liberal fascists

Daily Mail

His controversial book Liberal Fascism has already divided his own country. Now, as American political columnist JONAH GOLDBERG’s bestseller is published in Britain, he explains why he believes that – contrary to conventional wisdom – fascism and left-wing philosophy are inextricably linked …

Hallelujah! The Bush nightmare is over. The dark night of American fascism is giving way to the dawn of hope, the Age of Obama. The forces of truth will once again prevail and the crypto-Nazis will be banished to their caves.

That pretty much captures a large segment of current liberal conventional wisdom on both sides of the Atlantic.

Over the course of his presidency, President George W. Bush and his supporters have been called fascists and Nazis thousands of times in books, articles, documentaries and by legions of poster-wielding ‘progressive’ youths with open-toed shoes and closed minds.

Of course, this shouldn’t surprise anyone. For more than 70 years the Left has hurled the F-word at anyone who gets in its way – Stalin invented this tactic to de-legitimise socialist opponents, including Leon Trotsky, assassinated for leading a ‘fascist coup’.

As early as 1946, George Orwell wrote that: ‘The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies “something not desirable”.’

I am The One

I am The One

Today, a better working definition of a fascist might simply be a conservative who’s winning an argument. But what if fascism means something more than ‘bad’. What if fascism was not, and is not, a Right-wing phenomenon at all?

For instance, what were the motivating passions of fascism? For starters, there was the cult of unity. The Nazis mastered the spectacle of the crowd to project an aura of unity, equality and common purpose. Submitting yourself to the movement was sold as a cleansing, redemptive, fundamentally spiritual experience.

Such spectacles were made possible by the cult of personality, the faith that a great leader would rise from among ‘us’ and bring everyone together. Well, where have we recently seen enormous rallies of ecstatic followers?

According to The New York Times, Barack Obama’s own recruiters were trained not to talk about issues, but to ‘testify’ about how they ‘came to Obama’ the way one might normally talk about coming to Jesus.

‘We are the ones we’ve been waiting for,’ Obama told mesmerised crowds. ‘Unity is the great need of the hour,’ he insisted. We need unity, he explained, ‘not because it sounds pleasant or because it makes us feel good, but because it’s the only way we can overcome the essential [empathy] deficit that exists in this country’.

Or as his wife, Michelle, put it: ‘We need a leader who’s going to touch our souls because, you see, our souls are broken.’

It’s worth noting that in the Anglo-American tradition, unity is not, in fact, the highest political value. That’s why we have constitutions, separation of powers and independent courts. The hero in the Anglo-American tradition is not the mob, but the man who stands up to it.

And yet the cult of unity remains seductive, particularly in chaotic democracies. One way it manifests itself is in the myth of the Third Way, one of Tony Blair’s enthusiasms.

It’s ironic how the Left is always ready to brand a conservative who steps off the politically correct reservation as a fascist, but sees nothing wrong with embracing concepts that fit neatly within the fascist wheelhouse.

Italian Fascism and German National Socialism were both sold as a Third Way that would bypass all hard choices. ‘Neither Right nor Left!’ was a central fascist slogan.

The trouble with the Third Way is its core assumption that any hard choice is a ‘false choice’.

Economic growth and environmental regulations, socialised medicine and medical innovation, none of these things is at odds with one another so long as the right enlightened geniuses are in power.

Read the full article

Sea Ice back to 1979 levels

Nature is a bitch, even to one world government fascists.


Rapid growth spurt leaves amount of ice at levels seen 29 years ago.
Thanks to a rapid rebound in recent months, global sea ice levels now equal those seen 29 years ago, when the year 1979 also drew to a close.

Ice levels had been tracking lower throughout much of 2008, but rapidly recovered in the last quarter. In fact, the rate of increase from September onward is the fastest rate of change on record, either upwards or downwards.

The data is being reported by the University of Illinois’s Arctic Climate Research Center, and is derived from satellite observations of the Northern and Southern hemisphere polar regions.

Which just so happens to be a hell of a lot more respectable than surface measurements, as the surface stations can be located in less than optimal positions.

Each year, millions of square kilometers of sea ice melt and refreeze. However, the mean ice anomaly — defined as the seasonally-adjusted difference between the current value and the average from 1979-2000, varies much more slowly. That anomaly now stands at just under zero, a value identical to one recorded at the end of 1979, the year satellite record-keeping began.

Sea ice is floating and, unlike the massive ice sheets anchored to bedrock in Greenland and Antarctica, doesn’t affect ocean levels. However, due to its transient nature, sea ice responds much faster to changes in temperature or precipitation and is therefore a useful barometer of changing conditions.

Earlier this year, predictions were rife that the North Pole could melt entirely in 2008. Instead, the Arctic ice saw a substantial recovery. Bill Chapman, a researcher with the UIUC’s Arctic Center, tells DailyTech this was due in part to colder temperatures in the region. Chapman says wind patterns have also been weaker this year. Strong winds can slow ice formation as well as forcing ice into warmer waters where it will melt.

Why were predictions so wrong? Researchers had expected the newer sea ice, which is thinner, to be less resilient and melt easier. Instead, the thinner ice had less snow cover to insulate it from the bitterly cold air, and therefore grew much faster than expected, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center.

In May, concerns over disappearing sea ice led the U.S. to officially list the polar bear a threatened species, over objections from experts who claimed the animal’s numbers were increasing.

Yeah well the new world order posse don’t have time for facts if they do not fit their agenda, but this is hardly new.

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.” [Mikhail Gorbachev, quoted in “A Special Report: The Wildlands Project Unleashes Its War On Mankind”, by Marilyn Brannan, Associate Editor, Monetary & Economic Review, 1996, p. 5.]

This what is known as the ‘problem’ part of the Hegelian Dialectic. These socialists/ crypto-communists cannot impose their ‘solution’ on you if you do not accept their ‘problem’ as being something they need to solve. In the 70’s, after a cold spell, they tried this but packaged it as ‘global cooling’.

An article by Newsweek in 1975 is revealing. When reading, trying changing ‘cooling’ for ‘warming’ to realise just how close these propaganda pieces are.

The Cooling World – Newsweek

Further info regarding the history of corporate media ‘coverage’ of the climate can be found in this BMI special report.

Their agenda rolls on, and the mainstream media do their very best to pretend their isn’t widespread scientific opposition, like the Manhattan Declaration on Climate Change.

State sanctioned hacking of your computer

‘For your safety and protection’ BULLSHIT.

Times Online

THE Home Office has quietly adopted a new plan to allow police across Britain routinely to hack into people’s personal computers without a warrant.

The move, which follows a decision by the European Union’s council of ministers in Brussels, has angered civil liberties groups and opposition MPs. They described it as a sinister extension of the surveillance state which drives “a coach and horses” through privacy laws.

The hacking is known as “remote searching”. It allows police or MI5 officers who may be hundreds of miles away to examine covertly the hard drive of someone’s PC at his home, office or hotel room.

Material gathered in this way includes the content of all e-mails, web-browsing habits and instant messaging.

Under the Brussels edict, police across the EU have been given the green light to expand the implementation of a rarely used power involving warrantless intrusive surveillance of private property. The strategy will allow French, German and other EU forces to ask British officers to hack into someone’s UK computer and pass over any material gleaned.

So I suppose the recent Brussels legislation allowing foreign governments to charge you for crimes in Britain can apply to this too. You have no privacy. Access to personal computers without your permission (or knowledge) is like installing a camera in your home. What next, secretly activating the mic and webcams to spy on you? Why not, they already do it with your mobile phone. FBI taps cell phone mic as eavesdropping tool. Oh wait a minute!

He said the authorities could break into a suspect’s home or office and insert a “key-logging” device into an individual’s computer. This would collect and, if necessary, transmit details of all the suspect’s keystrokes. “It’s just like putting a secret camera in someone’s living room,” he said.

Like credit card details, passwords, everything. I’m sure knowing this makes you feel safer, right? Especially since you don’t know where that information could end up. We all know how good the state is at protecting the data of citizens

Police might also send an e-mail to a suspect’s computer. The message would include an attachment that contained a virus or “malware”. If the attachment was opened, the remote search facility would be covertly activated. Alternatively, police could park outside a suspect’s home and hack into his or her hard drive using the wireless network.

I thought this was illegal. I guess this is what happens when the people allow the state to grant itself powers without consequence. Their excuses for this behaviour is just that, excuses. Serial killers have excuses, I’m sure people don’t let them off because of that, do they? This is digusting!

One more thing, this is yet another directive from our unelected, unaccountable rulers in Brussels. Fuck the EU and FUCK these fascist PIGS.