Feminist at the End of Her Rope

Two articles by Henry Makow for your attention.

Feminist at the End of Her Rope

What better example of stupid, self-defeating behavior than the latest advice of  a veteran feminist?

In an article entitled “Marry Him” (Atlantic Monthly, March 2008)  Lori Gottlieb advises her sisters to “settle”–marry anything  in sight…and fast.  This kind of abject surrender, while satisfying in an “I told you so” way, is also sad.

Millions of women who outsourced their common sense and trusted the media, their teachers, their leaders and their society are now high-and-dry. They were told they could have it all but most can’t.

There are three times as many single women in their 30’s now than there were in the 1970’s. By the time these women have established their careers, many are too hard bitten and used, and the good men are all gone.

They are the victims of the most evil, most successful, social engineering program in history. It was  designed to turn out exactly as it has: give them career instead of family. But until feminists acknowledge that they are victims of a cruel hoax, they won’t be able to salvage whatever is left.

I’ll elaborate on this theme later but first Ill give you a taste of the wisdom of a woman who defines “pathetic.”

Now for the second article.

How the Rockefellers Re-Engineered Women

Feminism is an excellent example of how the Rockefeller mega cartel uses the awesome power of the mass media  (i.e. propaganda.) to control society.

In 40 short years, many women have lost touch with their natural loving instincts. Consequently, the family is in disarray, sexual depravity is rampant and birth rates have plummeted.

I will expand on the Rockefeller’s role, but first we need to remember that for a woman, love is an instinctive act of self-sacrifice.

She gives herself to her husband and children and is fulfilled by seeing them thrive and  receiving their love, respect and gratitude.

A woman makes this supreme sacrifice to only one man who will cherish her and provide for his family. Men instinctively want to fulfill this responsibility. This is the essence of the heterosexual contract (i.e. marriage): female power in exchange for male power expressed as love. Sex is the symbol of this exclusive bond. Marriage and family may not be for everyone but it is the natural path for most.

Feminism has trained women to reject this model as “an old fashioned, oppressive stereotype” even though it reflects their natural instincts.

On Thursday a British writer reported overhearing two young women:

“All men are useless these days,” one said. “Yeah,” said the other. “The trouble is that they haven’t risen to the challenge of feminism. They don’t understand that we need them to be more masculine, and instead they have just copped out.”

That’s their logic? If women are less feminine, men will be more masculine? Men aren’t designed to fight with women. They need to be affirmed by a woman’s acquiescence and faith. When women constantly challenge them, men will “cop out” of marriage and family.

Now that love and marriage have been “discredited,” women have nothing left to exchange for love but sex. Thus, many are unnaturally obsessed with appearance and pathetically give their bodies to all and sundry.

Permanent love is not based on a woman’s sex appeal, or personality or achievements. Ultimately, it is based on self-sacrifice. We love the people who love us.


8 thoughts on “Feminist at the End of Her Rope

  1. Oh for heaven’s sakes GO! Go overseas and exploit 3rd world poverty, if you really think that’ll work. Bring her home, treat her like the maid and selfless breeder you think you’re entitled to, and then spend your declining years as a bitter lump of a man because one day she woke up and realized, “Sh*t! I’m the maid! I have no life!” and left your ass.

    Frankly if I were you I’d just skip it. Instead, treat human beings as individuals (instead of as services and commodities you rent or buy) and you’ll be much happier, not to mention more attractive to the right kinds of women.

    Also: Don’t presume single/childfree women are unhappy hags. Believe it or not they’re generally active and dynamic, educated and well traveled, and HAPPY. The unhappy, bitter, underemployed women looking to inject meaning into their otherwise pointless lives by getting married/pregnant are positively mental.

    Happiness studies consistently reveal that on a happiness scale married women (esp women w/small children) are less happy than single women without children. Married men are the happiest of all. It rather turns the conventional wisdom on its head, don’t you think?

  2. As the reality of the Fraud of Feminism is coming home to roost, like the proverbial Chickens coming home to roost. Women are now faced with the reality that the Titanic has hit an Iceberg and they need to find a Lifeboat fast (meaning a Male Companion). Too bad for them, the reality is that Men prefer younger, Fertile, less embittered, less angry Women.

    So the advice from the Author of the Atlantic Monthly article is a sound strategy. Find a Sucker who will take you, any halfway decent, Sexually deprived Beta male. Until a Bigger Better Deal comes along. Then dump his ass and go for Mr. Big.

    This is what Heather Mills did. She was engaged to be Married. Just days before she was to tie the knot she meets Moneybags Sir Paul McCartney.

    She dumps the lesser Male. Men are disposable anyway, and latches on McCartney. She was smart enough to “Spawn An Annuity”, aka. Have Beatrice. And to claim Adult Support, (Child Support). With it the need for two nannies, Cook, Secretary, Security Staff, Personal Trainer ( Sport Sex Friend with Benefits) etc.

    If you have a surplus of Lemons make Lemonade. Until you can sell the surplus. Women have screwed the pooch. Men are wising up to their options. And Women are trying desperately to shut them off. Hence the passage of IMBRA. Shut off the opportunity to meet Non Feminized, more Attractive Foreign Women.

    Its a great scam if you can run it.

  3. I rather believe the bad advice she touts is all about creating a situation whereby women can proclaim widespread victimhood again. Imagine hordes of women marrying some creep because he happens to be on-hand, and he treats her badly. The femmies can then point to ill treatment in significant numbers, thereby re-starting the demonizing of men in general all over again. It isn’t like women would admit to putting forth such a bad idea anyway, and nobody is likely to remember this article.

    Victimhood is the hammer that the feministas wield to gain political power and influence. They will do anything to keep it alive.

  4. true, movements are often, OFTEN, nazi-like in nature and that’s a good way to describe feminism, but men need to have their own type of movement now. The time has come. Women have been running around recklessly transforming our society into a misandry fest and if men don’t do something about it… Well this blog’s title may become more true than we currently think it is.

  5. I have to agree and disagree Rob.
    I think the one mistake in this whole argument is to assume all women are the same. Feminists make similar generalizations about men.

    Stupid people lacking individuality buy into social movements. Thats a fact.
    Intelligent people generally are able to form there own identity and do not buy into social movements.

    Our complaint isn’t against all women, our complaint is against the stupid women who fall for this propaganda and social engineering.

    Intelligent women know that family is the most important aspect of life, and generally are capable of maintaining a family. They can look past the present, to the future. Smart women plan ahead, and I doubt any smart women would want to be a single childless hag. Smart people plan ahead, thats why they do better than dumb dumbs.

    Dumb dumbs don’t plan ahead, they fuck around, get all sorts of STD’s and waste there money on clothes and booze. Thats what dumb men and women do. They follow social trends and do what TV tells them to do.

    Social engineering only works on stupid people, thats why historically the smart people are the first to be executed. They realize whats going on and try to warn the idiots.

    Now education and intelligence are two different things these days. I know lots of educated women who are stupid as fuck, they are not intelligent. They have psych degree’s or a PhD, but couldn’t screw in a light bulb. Thanks to feminist education, intelligence doesn’t matter. All that matters is your ability to remember the propaganda and spew it back on a test.

    Stupid women used to be great for a husband. He could keep her out of trouble, tell her what to do, and make sure she was OK. Not so anymore, the stupid women watch TV and don’t listen to the husband anymore. She gets her stupid head filled with all sorts of propaganda and does what TV tells her to do.

  6. I think that Makow is only partially correct.

    I think that the traits we have seen in women are not a “result” of feminism, but rather, feminism has removed the veil that hid what was beneath all along.

    I don’t think there is any going back now. Too many men have seen what lies beneath the “feminine mystique.” It is not pretty, and its shit definitely stinks.

    For thousands of years, older women reigned in younger women’s natural inclinations, so men wouldn’t catch on to the scam before they got suckered into marrying a woman. But, read through all the old literature from 100 years ago and earlier to the beginning of time, and you can see that women have always been the way they currently are, and they have been making men miserable FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS!

    Why would Socrates, Cato the Elder, Buddha, Matheolus, Tolstoy, Bax, Weininger, Schopenhauer, Hegel, Freud, Wilde, the Bible, and many, many others – too many to list, all say virtually the INDENTICAL things that the MRM has been noting, if feminism “created” this situation? Not so, women were always like this.

    The mystique is gone, and women can no longer expect men to come back to them and give a shit about them. If it ever happens again that men will slave their whole life away for a shrill, spiteful, ungrateful woman, it will definitely be many, many generations in the future, when the foul stench of women’s true nature has again been artificially covered up with the perfume of “feminine mystique.”

    Like Zenpriest says, “you can’t change a pickle back into a cucumber.”

    Thank you, feminism! I could have been married. I am truly greatful for having my eyes opened – now I can get on with what I want. It is now truly about ME! “Me, me, me, me, me, me, ME!” I have to admit, modern woman made a catchy tune there. I like it!

  7. it’s the price all women pay for even vaguely believing they can carry the burdens men bare. When they inevitably can’t, they whine about how men should be more manly and treat them like the weak princess darling she is. Men have to face the reality that they can’t win with women and just sit back, pop a beer, and watch women stumble over themselves…

  8. That’s the price some women pay for the choices they make. However, it is unrealistic to expect women to marry in their early 20’s these days. Many of those marriages don’t last. A woman has to make sure that she has her own economic security blanket before marriage and very few have that at 20-24.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s