Girls + Alcohol + Feminism = Record number of Abortions

More disastrous consequences of the government/ feminists war on families…

Drunken New Year one-night stands will bring record number of abortions

Drunken one-night stands over New Year will bring a record number of abortions among teenagers. A lethal mix of binge drinking and unprotected casual sex will also mean a sharp increase in sexually-transmitted diseases.

The warning from the Marie Stopes International organisation, which carries out around one in three UK abortions, comes as Ministers admit their £138million drive to reduce teenage pregnancies is failing.

It is no surprise that this is happening at the same time the nuclear family is being destroyed.

A target of halving the rate by 2010 now looks well out of reach.

There are fears that some girls see a termination as just another form of contraception.

Well how else would you explain almost 1 billion abortions worldwide since 1920?

Abortion in Britain has already reached record levels, with more than 200,000 each year. Nearly one in five are on girls under 18.

Labour’s liberal licensing laws, which made alcohol widely available into the early hours, are further fuelling casual sex.

The Marie Stopes group said it carried out 6,000 abortions last February, the peak month for young women who become pregnant over Christmas and New Year.

The figure was 13 per cent up on 2006, and a similar increase is expected this year.

Spokesman Steve Kerridge said: “When alcohol is involved inhibitions come down. It’s not just unplanned pregnancies but rampant rates of sexually transmitted infections. It’s very difficult to get that message out there.

“Many women tell us that they have used a condom, but mistakes happen, particularly when alcohol is involved.”

Well that depends on what a ‘mistake’ is. I strongly doubt all of those abortions are because a condom broke…

Leading doctors said the organisation was right. Professor Ian Gilmore, president of the Royal College of Physicians, said: “Binge drinking is a matter for both sexes but sadly it is the women that end up holding the baby – or having the abortion,”

It is not ‘sad’ they ‘end up’ holding the baby. It is a consequence of sex without using protection. These women are choosing to behave like this because they know they can just kill the foetus if they do not want it and be rendered exempt from social criticism, as any criticism of women these days just means you are a sexist pig.

The Marie Stopes group has launched a £15 “festive family planning” pack at its clinics containing a morning-after pill, two condoms, two “spikeys” – luminous plastic lids to stop drinks being spiked – and a sexual health guide.

Drink spiking is very very rare. Most of the time these girls just drink too much and end up acting like a slut or just acting terribly un-feminine. In the morning it is much easier to blame someone or something else for that behaviour. Anything but take responsibility.

The number of youngsters becoming pregnant has actually risen, despite the fall in the rate, because there are now more teenage girls. Ministers have promised to review the policy and have called for greater efforts by parents to prevent their daughters becoming pregnant.

But there has as yet been no change to the main tactic of trying to teach teenagers that sex can lead to pregnancy and disease and to persuade them to use contraception.

Critics say the Government’s approach simply encourages teenagers to engage freely in sex.

Great, more ignorant consumerist slaves for the corporatist state. Breed those serfs, girls!

Jim Dobbin, Labour MP for Heywood and Middleton, said: “For there to be a perceived increase in abortion at this time of year, it has to be drink or drug related.

“But it’s not just drink. The government’s sexual education programme isn’t working and hasn’t been working for a long time.

“I think it backfires by encouraging youngsters to take part in sexual activity, rather than discourage them.

“There really needs to be a move back to instil in youngsters a feeling of restraint, and to think before they have sex.

“They need to respect their boyfriends and girlfriends and try to encourage them not to have sex outside marriage.”

All these things girls were instilled with from the family. Now women are ‘liberated’ from the family, society is collapsing as it always does when it adopts the hateful backwards big government ideology.

The number of abortions has risen steadily every year since it was legalised in 1968. Just 23,641 abortions were carried out in that year.

In 2006, the most recent year for which figures are available, there were 201,173, up from 194,353 the previous year.

Girls under 19 were the age group most likely to have an abortion – with 35 under-19s out of every 1,000 having an abortion.

All hail the wonders of fatherless families. No discipline, respect, understanding of the relationship between action and consequence and life skills leads to a society of feral brats running around causing havoc. The government pretends to be doing something about it, but in reality they actively encourage this situation. Using public funds to do so.

Why are they even legal anyway? What good does it do? All it has done is encourage casual sex which cheapens the act and erodes strong relationships, creates a society that has little regard for life and encourages women to behave badly and rewards their selfishness at the taxpayers’ expense. It also contributes greatly to the critical situation of birth rates being below replacement levels. The ‘solution’ by the government is to import immigrants to keep the numbers up. This is about as healthy for a country and culture as an incompatible blood transfusion is for a patient. But if the goal is the end of independent nations and the inception of a communist supra-national government it works wonderfully!

If these women do decide to keep the baby however, women are entitled to more taxpayer funding if they are not married or in a relationship with a man. This encourages the single mother family, which is a lot more dependent on the government and a lot easier to control.

Quick solution to the unplanned pregnancy epidemic?

Take away taxpayers’ unwanted funding of abortions, make them illegal again and see how quickly these ‘unplanned’ pregnancies figures start dropping. In wonder words, force women to accept the consequences of their actions.

This government is riddled with private interest groups, plotting and scheming, sucking the blood and effort of the people and directly benefiting from this orchestrated social chaos. We are running out of time to save this sovereign nation before the parasites devour the host.

For the health of Rome, the senate must be bled. – Commodus, Gladiator.

Advertisements

19 thoughts on “Girls + Alcohol + Feminism = Record number of Abortions

  1. Pingback: Record numbers of women are having two or more abortions - UK « End of Men

  2. All of you are being so mysogynic. all you talk about is how women bear all the responsibility and all of them are whores. I won’t deny that a lot of women are whores, but not all of them are drunk whores trying to get pregnant for the thrill of it. There are also men who manipulate women into having sex and hope the women get pregnant just so the man can have the primitive satisfaction of his accomplishment. You are ignorant to assume men should have no responsibility and the fact that so many of you support the view that men share no responsibility just shows how unwilling you are to accept any responsibility yourself. You just deny the possibility that there are any situations where the man could possibly have any fault because your egos couldn’t take it.

  3. Pingback: Families in meltdown, judge says « End of Men

  4. Pingback: 1,300 women have had at least FIVE abortions « End of Men

  5. “There are fears that some girls see a termination as just another form of contraception.” (from original article)

    Hmmm… well, on the ‘bright’ side, that’s only going to work 2-4 times, then a woman’s going to be unlikely to ever carry a pregnancy to term.

    “Well that depends on what a ‘mistake’ is. I strongly doubt all of those abortions are because a condom broke…” (from fmwatkins’ post)

    Some people definitely don’t bother. Others simply don’t realise that contraceptive measures really aren’t that ‘safe’, and that at least in at least 1% – probably more like 5% – of times they’re having sex, there’s a chance of sperm meeting egg.

    “Drink spiking is very very rare.” (from fmwatkins’ post)

    Do you have any statistics on this somewhere on your site? I’d be interested in having a look.

    “If these women do decide to keep the baby however, women are entitled to more taxpayer funding if they are not married or in a relationship with a man. This encourages the single mother family, which is a lot more dependent on the government and a lot easier to control.” (from fmwatkins’ post)

    Men are also entitled to these benefits. At least in Australia they are.

    As feminists say:

    “No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” — Interview with Simone de Beauvoir, “Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma,” Saturday Review, June 14, 1975, p.18 (from fmwatkins’ comment)

    Well, no, that’s as ONE feminist says. Sure, there are lots more feminists saying similar things. But there are even more that uphold equal rights for both genders (full-time, part-time or occasional parenting) – who consider themselves ‘masculinists’ as well as feminists.

    I’m sure more men act like arses. Difference is, they can’t get pregnant. Unfortunately for the equalists amongst you, men and women are DIFFERENT. Women get drunk, open their legs and can get pregnant, therefore her social responsibility isn’t equal to that of the man. She controls reproduction, he doesn’t.” (from fmwatkins’ comment)

    Responsibility doesn’t get assigned based on who’s stuck with the consequences. Responsibility is assigned based on which people have the choices. Woman’s choice? Have sex or not. Use contraceptive or not. Man’s choice? Have sex or not. Use contraceptive or not. If either one chooses not to have sex – lo and behold, no baby. And surely you’re not implying that men have no control of their sexuality.

    “Those taxpayers are often men forced to pay for women’s mistakes and taking on the burden for women sleeping with the wrong guy and getting impregnated.” (from fmwatkins’ comment)

    Often, but by no means always. I doubt you could even say ‘most of the time’, considering that while men are typically more highly paid when they’re working, in many countries (not sure where you are?) more men are listed as unemployed and receiving unemployment benefits (taxpayer-funded) than women.

    “Enough with trying to push all responsibility for everything on men. Bunch of infantile females running around screeching ‘independent woman’ one moment and ‘men should do xyz for us’ the next.” (from fmwatkins’ comment)

    I don’t see how talking about shared responsibility equals pushing all responsibility onto men?

    “Feminists speak of having babies as ‘oppressive’ and that women shouldn’t be allowed to stay home with their children. Really. Women should go out and work ‘because staying out of the boring shitty workplace is oppression, and being with your friends and kids is really bad!’ These sort of stupid ideals of feminists go on, and on and on.”

    I’ve got to admit, looking after a baby 24/7 can feel pretty darn oppressive occasionally. But hubby and I share the parenting, so we both get changes of scenery (go to paid work) and time out from parenting. *shrug* I don’t see the big deal. I don’t see why some men (not including anyone here, unless you want to be included!) consider it unnatural for a woman to not enjoy fulltime parenting, yet consider it unnatural for a man to be a fulltime parent. Doesn’t that manage the impressive feat of being sexist against men AND women at the same time? 🙂

  6. What is interesting is how many women are drunks on a regular basis. It seems you cannot suppress Human Biology. And Women still want to have Sex with Men. Only when they do not exercise any restraints and have no reason to do so. They often have unintended consequences to their flirtations and adventures.

    My Oldest daughter who is married and has three sons. Told me her best friend had sex with over 100 men before she was 21. Who wants to be sloppy 100ths?? Wow talk about a lack of self respect or self control??? Have you seen the front page of the Drudge report? About Binge Drinking in the UK?? The same thing is happening here.

  7. Fmwatkins states feminists don’t represent women; I don’t think they represent all women, but women have clung to feminists memes and have wielded myths and punishments about men out of brutish nature. Feminism appeals to female selfishness and superiority, and when something goes wrong, it’s a convenient tool to scapegoat others without much merit.

    This is a good point I agree with and never touched upon. Women choose to subscribe to the feminist mantra because of the benefits they receive from it. Once they start experiencing a negative backlash from men regarding feminism, they quickly change their tune to ‘reject feminism’. True mercenary behaviour I’m sure you’ll agree.

    Other groups do this also. Hide behind their ‘protected group’ status in order to manipulate situations to their benefit.

    But back to the article . . . women wanted to party hard like men (although many men give up the party scene or tamper off), and now that the consequences are steep—acquired STDs, unwanted pregnancies, alcohol-related diseases, flattened pocketbooks,and hollow one night or brief liaisons . . . so really, who wanted the endless joy ride—sans responsibility—to begin with now?

    Let us not forget, in my experience, these days the majority of violence at bars and clubs is initiated by women. Women fighting usually, but also women fighting each other using stupid men as proxies. Bouncers, security, bar owners will admit to this.

  8. I don’t dismiss women’s accountability in creating the grave problems we are seeing now. Feminists have blamed men for so many evils underneath the sun—it’s backfiring, including with the spotlighting what women are doing to men out of entitlement and selfishness.

    “Having worked in a public environment among alcohol consumption, I truly have witnessed more males acting like **ses than women “acting like sluts.””

    Apparently someone here hasn’t spent as much time in bars and lounges as I have. I work within strolling distance of more than one of them, and work beside one myself. For years. There’s a lot of foolish female behavior there, and women will often rationalize it one way or another.

    “Let’s not forget the male’s part in this, and the fact that a “single parent” always involves one side scampering off (usually the male) into unrestrained oblivion, also burdening the “taxpayers” to finance rearing the innocent young.”

    Those taxpayers are often men forced to pay for women’s mistakes and taking on the burden for women sleeping with the wrong guy and getting impregnated. Women are still the gatekeepers of sex, unless you’re an alpha male that gets women knocking on your door 24/7. Meanwhile, the good men are holding up the machinery of society and get little or no credit for it. It’s invisible, and expected by us from women who take everything about for granted.

    But aside from that for now, I’m not saying someone else doesn’t benefit from all of this; obviously, psychotherapists, the pharmaceutical industry, divorce court lawyers, politicians, and feminists in academia have quite a stake in perpetuating men’s miseries in Western society. There’s nothing conspiracy theorist about how denying men more rights (which many didn’t have to begin with) and penalizing men more and more with inane laws to criminalize human behavior fuels political careers and deepens pocket books. I roll my eyes at the idea feminists truly believe women are exploited, when men are far more, even at the threat of a lawsuit or jail time. Which they will bear the brunt of more than women, usually.

    Women can and often do invent their own problems, many of them more than you might think, and believe one personal or social savior should come along with a safety net and rescue them. If women wanted things to be different, the face of this nation would look far different. What you see is often what women have desired by their own manufacture or design; demanding proof is absurd because it’s quite obvious. Women have reproductive choice and men have little or none; in Michigan alone a woman can do just about anything to claim her offspring, kill it off (abortion), or give it up, and men have to bow to consensus when the State backs women via enforcing anti-male bias in laws that expect men to pay up and still support a woman’s decision no matter what. The list could go on and on.

    I could even state the very politically incorrect sentiment that the sex that has more power in reproductive choice (women, of course) by extension, should be the one that ultimately ponies up for it, on purpose or on accident. But that’s too harsh for most to take; there’s always someone, usually a man, that has to foot the bill. If not, still blame men by default. Why not; feminists have been doing that for decades.

    Fmwatkins states feminists don’t represent women; I don’t think they represent all women, but women have clung to feminists memes and have wielded myths and punishments about men out of brutish nature. Feminism appeals to female selfishness and superiority, and when something goes wrong, it’s a convenient tool to scapegoat others without much merit.

    Most feminists radicals are too extreme from many to accept; there is a continual rumble of the concept that masculinity is faulty and either should die off or even be eradicated. Not every woman is prepared to embrace such a nasty paradigm (at least not yet, thankfully) despite incessant resentment Western women seem to have against so many men. Just read any dating forum with a significant amount of women ranting about men, if you don’t believe me.

    Women wanted men to protect them in one capacity or another in the past, so most men responded because they felt that was the right thing to do. Then women wanted “freedom” from the restrictions of what they felt confining, such as home, hearth, and childbearing, and despite what feminists say, men where often backing that as well. True freedoms comes with tremendous responsibility, and despite the cries that men are all pigs and not living up to being real men (i.e. supporting women and their options), I don’t think a good chunk of them realize what true latitude entails, and the consequences mean. There is also another crucial factor; more men are perceiving the “strong, independent” woman as a exercise in affectation, and the huge side effect of double standards that come along with it that benefit women and harm men. And men aren’t liking it too much.

    Several American women have made particularly bad choices and skewered judgments for a decent portion of their lives. The above article is simply another illustration of that, just as with their selection of mates to sire offspring, the laws they clamor for, or any other major push they engage that ultimately serves myopic short term gain and long term pain. And society suffers because of it.

    “You seem to place all the blame for unwanted pregnancies on women. It takes two to tango. What of the responsibility of men to act with restraint and to be sure to engage in safe sex in order to minimize pregancy?” —Zakstar

    Boy, do I hear that from feminists a lot. It rests on more than one false premises; do you know what the reality is? Women still have the final say in whether or not sexual congress happens or not. It may take two to tango, but one still has more fundamental say so. So much for sexual equality (although it goes further than that, even). Or the fact when men do take responsibility for their sexuality, they are seen as no fun or has not having the bravado to take risks—men who want women to get checked for STDs possess “trust issues,” men who get vasectomies are denying women out of a child, god forbid. There are even scores of women who get a thrill out of “flirting” with the possibility getting pregnant and will lie to men about it, even though, again, that’s something we can’t bring out in the open because women wouldn’t ever be willing to take that kind of risk, right? And blame men for being so weak to be duped into it, correct?

    But back to the article . . . women wanted to party hard like men (although many men give up the party scene or tamper off), and now that the consequences are steep—acquired STDs, unwanted pregnancies, alcohol-related diseases, flattened pocketbooks,and hollow one night or brief liaisons . . . so really, who wanted the endless joy ride—sans responsibility—to begin with now?

  9. Do you believe that the breakdown of the nuclear family is the fault of women or do men play an equal role in the demise? This is something completely different from the responsibililty of unwanted pregnancies.

    The short answer is no, I don’t. This is an orchestrated attack. In my view, the majority of men and women do not want to see the nuclear family destroyed. The problem is, people see it happening but don’t really understand how, or are apathetic to it. Attacking the family is a important hurdle to jump for the global elitists, who are men I might add. These are evil scum that wish to control global society through a supra-national government, a global panoptic technocracy. These career feminists make a living from attacking men. Plenty of women don’t agree with it, but their voices aren’t heard.

    Various tiers of society seek to control others. Feminists claim to ‘represent women.’ This is bollocks. They represent their own hatred of capitalism and want communism re-introduced to ‘regulate’ society. These private interest lobby groups generate immunity for themselves by claiming to represent some arbitrary ‘victim’ group. Women’s groups, gay groups, Muslim, white, black, dog lovers, pasta eaters, the modus operandi is the same, and rarely do these lobbyists’ views actually follow those of the group it claims to represent.

    This is all part of a bigger picture. Destroy families, society becomes unstable, crime, drug abuse, broken homes, illiteracy, cheap entertainment, false flags, all excuses for big government to get even bigger and take away rights for ALL of us. Women have lost a lot of options and freedoms because of feminism, most women don’t realise that.

    Feminists speak of having babies as ‘oppressive’ and that women shouldn’t be allowed to stay home with their children. Really. Women should go out and work ‘because staying out of the boring shitty workplace is oppression, and being with your friends and kids is really bad!’ These sort of stupid ideals of feminists go on, and on and on.

    Here is some further reading if you’re interested.

    Feminism – society killer.
    Why Feminism is a Fraud…
    The Communist Plan for Women

  10. “For the last bloody time, OBVIOUSLY men are involved, but the last line is down to women. It happens in their body. The ultimate responsibility is HERS. Fucking accept that! Enough with trying to push all responsibility for everything on men. Bunch of infantile females running around screeching ‘independent woman’ one moment and ‘men should do xyz for us’ the next.”

    Well, I firmly believe that if it is a woman’s body and choice, then it should be her financial responsibility. But I’d have to ask, You stated:

    “It is no surprise that this is happening at the same time the nuclear family is being destroyed.”

    Do you believe that the breakdown of the nuclear family is the fault of women or do men play an equal role in the demise? This is something completely different from the responsibililty of unwanted pregnancies.

  11. This is an amateurish attempt by a narrow minded individual to blame all of society’s ills on one gender with out of place facts and figures using the volatile subject of abortion to mask the obvious ignorance contained within this miniscule perception of responsibility being all one sided

    Have you read the other articles in this blog? If not, I suggest you do so before you run your silly phrases off on my site.

    Let’s not forget the male’s part in this, and the fact that a “single parent” always involves one side scampering off (usually the male) into unrestrained oblivion, also burdening the “taxpayers” to finance rearing the innocent young.

    True men leave, but it’s also true a lot of men are forced out. The feminised system doesn’t like recognising men as being parents, and thus gives all the rights to child custody to the mother, even if she’s a stupid drug taking bitch. On top of that these socialist government actually reward single mothers with more tax credits/ benefits than if they were in a relationship. The reason is the destruction of the nuclear family.

    Speaking of innocent young, the taxpayers fund programs to help these children, who are by no means responsible for the situation they’re in.

    So, she an empowered woman! She can go to work and give her kid to the government to indoctrinate. As feminists say:

    “No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” — Interview with Simone de Beauvoir, “Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma,” Saturday Review, June 14, 1975, p.18

    Having worked in a public environment among alcohol consumption, I truly have witnessed more males acting like **ses than women “acting like sluts.”

    I’m sure more men act like arses. Difference is, they can’t get pregnant. Unfortunately for the equalists amongst you, men and women are DIFFERENT. Women get drunk, open their legs and can get pregnant, therefore her social responsibility isn’t equal to that of the man. She controls reproduction, he doesn’t.

    Lets say there is a bar full of horny blokes and a couple of chicks there. The girl has to have sex with that man. If those women said ‘no, unless you have a condom’. The issue wouldn’t arise would it? If she says yes, then it can arise. Either way, all the men want to get laid.

    Clear enough for you yet, serf?

    For someone who hates women, and view them as “evil,” you spend tremendous amounts of time researching and thinking about them. You really should to find something else to do.
    Peace be with you, brother.

    Actually, I spend tremendous amounts of time research much more than the bad behaviour of the modern princess. But if you had actually read any other articles you would know that. But I guess presumption is everything with the intellectually lazy isn’t it.

    You seem to place all the blame for unwanted pregnancies on women. It takes two to tango. What of the responsibility of men to act with restraint and to be sure to engage in safe sex in order to minimize pregancy?

    For the last bloody time, OBVIOUSLY men are involved, but the last line is down to women. It happens in their body. The ultimate responsibility is HERS. Fucking accept that! Enough with trying to push all responsibility for everything on men. Bunch of infantile females running around screeching ‘independent woman’ one moment and ‘men should do xyz for us’ the next.

    Fucking double standards. Those women wanted to be treated like men, so now they are, no exceptions.

  12. Pingback: Happy New Year! « The Essentia Sphere

  13. You seem to place all the blame for unwanted pregnancies on women. It takes two to tango. What of the responsibility of men to act with restraint and to be sure to engage in safe sex in order to minimize pregancy?

  14. This is an amateurish attempt by a narrow minded individual to blame all of society’s ills on one gender with out of place facts and figures using the volatile subject of abortion to mask the obvious ignorance contained within this miniscule perception of responsibility being all one sided.

    Let’s not forget the male’s part in this, and the fact that a “single parent” always involves one side scampering off (usually the male) into unrestrained oblivion, also burdening the “taxpayers” to finance rearing the innocent young.

    Speaking of innocent young, the taxpayers fund programs to help these children, who are by no means responsible for the situation they’re in.

    Having worked in a public environment among alcohol consumption, I truly have witnessed more males acting like **ses than women “acting like sluts.” For someone who hates women, and view them as “evil,” you spend tremendous amounts of time researching and thinking about them. You really should to find something else to do.
    Peace be with you, brother.

  15. Another reason I won’t date or touch alcoholics, drug addicts, or nicotine addicts.

    Isn’t it amusing how these new morals and ideals pushed by government groups claiming to improve peoples lives has done the exact opposite? Most of these people will exist in a state of poverty, disease and strife with no clue what they did wrong.

    Its interesting that most of these so called ’empowerment’ morals are contrary to our ancestors morals, and more in line with Third World morals…

    This low birth-rate is being used to justify mass immigration.
    Our government is letting us die off.

    2008 is going to be an interesting year, while the sheep watch TV and work, you better believe the depopulation efforts will be stepped up.

  16. Confused:

    I believe they are referring to the issue of how many are in the next generation. It is longer term than immediate birth and death.

    For the population to be stable, a couple must have two children to maintain the same numbers for the next generation. If for example, they had one child, the next generation would be half that of their parents’.

    That’s the way I understand it anyway. In this case replacement means when the parents die, how many will be there to take their place.

  17. There is something here I do not understand. How can there be a replacement level for births ?
    The word ‘replacement’ surely means that you remove one thing and replace it with another. So unless a mother or father drops dead the moment their child is born, it is NOT a replacement but an addition. Therefore, even though this addition level is low, it still is an addition, not a replacement.
    If my reasoning is faulty, someone please clarify this for me, I don’t understand it. Thanks

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s