I was going to add this as an addendum to my original article, Global Warming, but I’ve decided to give it it’s own space because it is that important (to me.)
Find the original article at Infowars, I will only post a few quotes from it.
Paul Joesph Watson
The so-called scientific consensus that global warming is man-made has been shattered with the release of a major new study backed by three universities which concludes that climate change over the past thirty years is explained by natural factors and that attempts to reduce carbon dioxide emissions are irrelevant.
Climate scientists at the University of Rochester, the University of Alabama, and the University of Virginia report that temperature fluctuations over the past three decades are not consistent with greenhouse model predictions and more closely correlate with solar activity.
The report dismisses attempts to reverse global warming by reducing carbon emissions as ineffective and pointless.
“The observed pattern of warming, comparing surface and atmospheric temperature trends, does not show the characteristic fingerprint associated with greenhouse warming. The inescapable conclusion is that the human contribution is not significant and that observed increases in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases make only a negligible contribution to climate warming,” said lead author David H. Douglass.
Man-made global warming advocates have often made their case by claiming that the scientific consensus is fully behind CO2 emissions as the main driver of climate change, when in fact the UN’s own IPCC report was disputed by the very scientists that the UN claimed were behind it.
In other words, I was right. This also shows the power of a scientific dictatorship. The proliferation of ‘reports’ attempting to connect global warming with us ‘useless eaters’ begins from needing funding. Organisations (governments) put conditions on what the studies can include etc. This enables them to encourage the sort of conclusions they want.
Since Al’ the sky is falling’ Gore came out with his propaganda piece ‘An Incovenient Truth’ I have been reading interviews and reports from prominent scientists etc disputing the validity of his claims, so to me, to read this latest article doesn’t come so much as a surprise, but more of a relief, because with each extra piece of evidence, the doomsayers have less to stand on (not that they had much in the first place, which is why they would also use the psychological manipulation of trying to label man-made global warming sceptics as ‘deniers’ on a par with holocaust denial.)
It all revolves around emotional manipulation of the public. False flag terror attacks do exactly the same thing with the same goals in mind, which almost always end with governments taking more power and rights away from its employers, the citizens.
So anyway. The hysteria juggernaut rolled on, with a disproporationate amount of media coverage dedicated to blaming humans for Earth’s temperature variations.
The same technique is always used. They over-hyped global warming. Then they connected it with humans. Then they began using the ‘environmental crisis’ to attempt to dictate their goals to the public, under the guise of ‘protecting the planet.’
You create a carbon footprint. Therefore you are directly responsible for hurting Mother Earth. We think you should use as few resources as possible, and pay a ‘carbon tax’ to us. We will charge businesses, and governments, and the people will have to pay through higher taxes and costs as it is passed down the line and given nice-sounding names.
Then they start pushing their other agenda, which is population control. Too many babies hurts the planet. Controlled families like in Communist China (a country that has one numerous accolades from the UN and received glowing praise from various globalists, like the Rockefellers.)
Now it would seem the foundational myth to all of this is coming undone. Human existance isn’t to blame. I wonder what lie they will think of next. I mean, whatever it is, they are going to have to blame humans for it in order to (again) try to control our lives, movements, finances and thoughts through centralised power structures.
Keep your eyes peeled.