Strange, that…

So, 9/11 happened.

Strangely, while the towers were still burning, propaganda news outlets began blaming Bin Laden for it. Not that they could possibly have had any idea who did it. (Did Bin Laden arrange for all the U.S. War games that day, including drills that involved commercial aircraft being hijacked and flown into major buildings in New York and others?)

From then, Afghanistan was invaded. For Bin Laden because of 9/11.

Then they claimed Saddam was helping Bin Laden, which is also hard to believe considering he couldn’t stand Bin Laden.

That didn’t stick, so they said Saddam was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction. But then the U.S. may have had a point, considering they sold some to him in the 80’s. The weapons inspectors went in, and guess what, they didn’t find a damned thing.

That’s okay, Bush and his criminal cronies invaded Iraq anyway. But now the reason was ‘the people want democracy.’

There wasn’t any evidence of this either. Unlike in Burma recently, which Bush and Blair/Brown ignored.

So this whole debacle was based around looking for Bin Laden, at least that was the cover to convince the citizens.

I suspect that having countries invaded looking for you, with armies showering vast areas with Depleted Uranium, and being responsible for the biggest act of terrorism in United States history, would probably get you on the FBI’s most wanted list, that is, if you weren’t on it already.

Now I know Bin Laden was on it from before, so I looked him up to see the list of crimes he is wanted for.

Bin Laden. From the page:

Usama Bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world.

Where is 9/11 on there?

A bit more digging finds this:

FBI says, “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”

FBI Director Robert Mueller, in a speech at the Commonwealth Club on April 19, 2002, said: “In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper – either here in the United States, or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere – that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot.” – The evidence against Bin Laden, promised by Secretary of State Colin Powell on September 23, 2001, has yet to be made available to the public. – Source

If there is no hard evidence NOW, there couldn’t have possibly been any hard evidence THEN.

‘Oh there was a video tape of him claiming responsibility.’ Was there? I know there is evidence of him denying it.

The Bushes and the Bin Ladens are quite friendly, actually.

Bush Senior Met With Bin Laden’s Brother on 9/11More here.

Also, why would the CIA have met with Bin Laden two months before 9/11 happened?

Oh, and if Bush and Co. get their way, they will outlaw free speech so articles like this one will be illegal.

Senate Bill 1959 to Criminalize Thoughts, Blogs, Books and Free Speech Across America

Strange, that…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s