You can read the article through the link. I’ll only post certain quotes.
The three appeal judges agreed “the ultimate veto” over who is told about the birth lay with the mother.
The father has nothing to do with it. He is just a mere ‘man’ afterall.
Lady Justice Arden said the father’s rights had not been violated because he did not have any to violate.
Now it’s admitted. Fathers have no rights. Except when it comes to forcing him to pay for the child of course, whether it is his or not. Just look up paternity fraud…
John Baker, chairman of Families Need Fathers, said “It treats the child as the property of the mother, to be disposed of as she sees fit.”
He said the ruling, taken in conjunction with the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill which could remove the requirement for IVF clinics to recognise the need of a father, was “intensely worrying”.
He said: “A strong message seems to be sent that makes fathers redundant in the upbringing of children.”
F*ck the govenment. It is obvious now that they are at war with men. As in any totalitarian regime, you want to attack those who will pose the biggest threat to your complete power. They disenfranchise men and who will be left?
Fathers 4 Justice barrister Michael Cox said: “This father is the victim of a wicked deceit in which the State has been complicit.
Yes, nothing new with the State backing women in taking rights away from men and fathers, and also children. Denying the child the right to its father.. oh I just remembered, fathers don’t have any rights. I guess also since it isn’t unethical to deny the child a father, the man must be a non-entity in the eyes of human rights?
“It is now clear that the Government believes children have no entitlement to a relationship with their fathers and that children are the property of their mothers and of the State.”
Lord Justice Thorpe said: “The law improves the opportunity of the child of anonymous birth to search out its biological origin.
Child of anonymous birth? Who the f*ck is this? The Virgin Mary? Last time I checked, conception is when sperm fertilises an egg. That sperm didn’t come from ‘anonymous’. It came from a man. Unless men are not even entitled to an identity now.
The government is on a mission to disenfranchise men. Period. Removing men means removing their competition to the regulation of society. Countless studies prove the connection between fatherlessness and crime, drug abuse, low self-esteem etc. All of these things lead to social chaos. That is EXACTLY what the government wants.
Coupled with that recent attack on men, fathers, and child rights, I think it is pretty obvious to me who the government views the enemy as…