Children don’t need fathers, they need lesbians

The government is pushing through laws (without public vote, which Gordon Brown is refusing, dictatorship anyone?) enabling lesbians to have children, using men as sperm donors only, and striking their existence from the children’s life.

Lesbian parents are ‘last nail in coffin’ of traditional family

The Government was accused today of driving the “last nail in the coffin” of the traditional family with moves to grant gay couples equal parenting rights.

Iain Duncan Smith, a former Conservative leader, spoke out against plans to allow lesbian couples to become joint legal parents of children conceived used donated sperm or eggs. His comments, in an article for the Mail on Sunday, came as the proposals are due to come before the House of Lords in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill on Monday.

The paper claimed that the Archbishop of York Dr John Sentamu would also speak against the Bill, announced in this month’s Queen’s Speech to the dismay of family campaigners, the newspaper claimed.

Mr Duncan Smith called for Parliament to reject the Bill, saying it would remove the requirement for a father.

“Another nail will have been hammered into the coffin of the traditional family,” he wrote. “And another blow will have been struck against fatherhood.

“This move could not have come at a worse time. Just as we are beginning to appreciate the vital role fathers play in the successful upbringing of children, Labour ministers are sending out the utterly wrong signal that fathers don’t matter.”

Dr Evan Harris MP, the Liberal Democrat science spokesman said: “The research evidence is clear that children do well in lesbian households and when brought up by mature solo women who plan their motherhood, so imposing a requirement on clinics to consider the need for a father in such cases is both unjustified and unlawful discrimination.

And it isn’t unjustified to ignore the role of fathers? Typical example of political correctness being used to attack men. It’s bad if it happens to gays, but not if it happens to heterosexual men.

“To equate lesbian households with so-called ‘broken homes’, as Iain Duncan-Smith has done, is as ludicrous as his attack on all unmarried couples and the Conservatives’ bizarre wish to impose fathers on lesbian households suggests that some Tories simply don’t understand anything beyond their own traditional backgrounds.”

More like homosexuals imposing lesbians on children. The nuclear family is the blood cell of society, is responsible for creating civilisation and existed long before this ‘new lifestyle’ crap. This fits in perfectly with the homosexual-feminist-globalist agenda of redefining society by marginalising men and destroying morality. I also reject the term ‘traditional’ family. That is a semantic to subtly define the nuclear family as ‘in the past’.

Ben Summerskill, the chief executive of the gay rights group Stonewall, said the Bill would merely extend a right already available to heterosexuals.

Nonsense. We are talking about using men as sperm donors and rejecting those men having any legal and physical existence in the child’s life. Feminists must be loving this…

“At a time when three million children in this country are growing up in single-parent households, it seems odd there should be this obsession with a few hundred who have an opportunity to have a second loving parent,” he added.

This is about legal precedent. This is about the constant attack on fathers.

Dr Evan Harris MP, he Liberal Democrat science spokesman said: “The research evidence is clear that children do well in lesbian households and when brought up by mature solo women who plan their motherhood, so imposing a requirement on clinics to consider the need for a father in such cases is both unjustified and unlawful discrimination.

“To equate lesbian households with so-called ‘broken homes’, as Iain Duncan-Smith has done, is as ludicrous as his attack on all unmarried couples and the Conservatives’ bizarre wish to impose fathers on lesbian households suggests that some Tories simply don’t understand anything beyond their own traditional backgrounds.”

No, you read that right. They repeated those paragraphs for some reason…

When lesbo femcunts went on the record about destroying the nuclear family, attacking heterosexuality and communism, this is what they meant. Seems that the government too, is in the feminist pocket. All men are good for these days, is creating sperm, giving parasites money and dying in dangerous workplaces.

Not on my fucking watch.

Advertisements

25 thoughts on “Children don’t need fathers, they need lesbians

  1. The Rockefeller Foundation funded feminism in order to get women into work as they could only tax half the adult population. Conning gullible women to be chained to the workplace instead of freedom of the kitchen doesn’t just allow them to tax the gullible fools, but also indoctrinate their children earlier as they are dumped into school, nurseries or other child minders.

    If feminists had the power of intelligence and common sense, then they may be able to compare the difference between looking after the home and children ( one job ) and their current liberated position of rushing around early morning having to feed and dump the kids before fighting through rush hour traffic only to be chained to an office desk for the morning. Half hour break at lunch to rush around and shop or throw some chemicalised, microwaved junk down their throats, only to be rechained to the office desk until … the evening rush hour! By the time they get home ( to their second job! ) they are tired, irritable and have very little time to relax and enjoy themselves.

    When both parents work ( slavery ), they have three jobs per family. A day job each and looking after the home and children in their spare time instead of leisure. This leads to them being tired and irritable, usually ending in family breakdown which is child abuse. No children want their parents to separate. Divorce destroys children’s lives! ( Denying this to cover your guilt girls don’t work. You can lie to yourselves as much as you want – but it don’t change the facts! )

    How green is my divorce? Well girls … and those gullible enough to believe the global warming ( hidden tax by fear ) scam, divorce leads to two homes, two utility bills, two sets of white goods, two sets of furniture, in cases where the father is not airbrushed from the childrens lives to be replaced by the latest boyfriend ( from last nights one night stand! ), then two sets of childrens clothes and toys.

    I really can’t believe the incredible number of gullible women who fell for the big lie “Chained to the kitchen sink”! I mean to say, it’s not rocket science to realise how they have been conned from the freedom of the home – no rush hour travel, no boss looking over your shoulder, time to shop, time to prepare healthy meals, time to spend as a family, coffee mornings, no guilt feelings if you feel under the weather and lay on the settee if you don’t feel well enough to do the housework.

    … but above all, NOT dumping your children to imprint on substitute parental strangers!

    Girls doing better in education = easier to brainwash and indoctrinate! :o)

    Sorry girls – you’ve been well and truly conned!

    http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/290107rockefellergoal.htm

    [quote] Rockefeller told Russo of two primary reasons why the elite bankrolled women’s lib, one because before women’s lib the bankers couldn’t tax half the population and two because it allowed them to get children in school at an earlier age, enabling them to be indoctrinated into accepting the state as the primary family, breaking up the traditional family model. [/quote]

  2. Thanks Anon. It is an obvious position to take. The nuclear family has always been a primary point of attack for those wishing to undermine and control society.

    1) Turn churches into ideology-driven political clubs.

    2) Replace genuine education with a dumbed down and politically correct curriculum.

    3) Fashion the mass media into instruments for mass manipulation and for harassing and discrediting traditional institutions and their spokesman.

    4) Ridicule morality, decency, and age old virtues without respite.

    5) Present the youth, not with heroic examples, but with aggressively degenerate behavioral models.

    6) Attack the very building blocks of a moral society: attack marriage and family in order to subvert the social order

    – Antonio Gramsci

    northgacactus: I will not be silenced by your spineless remarks. Feminism was borne from communism/ socialism. Those who funded Women’s Lib did not do it to ‘help’ women, they did it to help themselves, women were the tool.

    As to its connections with lesbianism…

    “Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice.” — Ti-Grace Atkinson

    I haven’t had time to read those studies, links I have checked want it bought from them. Fuck that. It seems that ‘study’ you spoke of only consists of 100 gay families compared an an equal number of hetero families.

    Such arbitrary groups leave it wide open to distortion or selection.

    It reminds me of a ‘study’ talking about how wonderful successful single mothers are, by speaking to a small number of rich single mothers who just happen to (kind of) have their shit together. The larger truth however is the complete opposite. Nevermind though, I’m sure the researchers got paid nicely by some Grant for Political Correctess.

    So, 200 families, hardly indicative is it?

    The larger truth can be seen around us. The moral and intellectual degradation of society can largely be traced to the breakdown of the nuclear family.

    Families in meltdown, judge says

    That family unit enabled the creation of the modern world. The breakdown of society is a result of millions of broken families. Not 200.

    Finally:

    I find it interesting that you use misogyny to remind the world why society needs men. Hate speech only serves to convince us that people like you are obsolete.

    As usual, out come the ‘labels’. Life must be so simple for those who throw everything in labels, especially when it helps you to justify the world to yourself.

    I don’t need to remind the world that society needs men. Men built it. I’m reminded every second I’ve got my eyes open, and trying to classify what I say as hate speech is hilarious.

    You’re weak attempts to ‘guilt’ me into silence while trying to label me ‘hate speech’ have failed.

    Better luck next time eh?

  3. fmwatkins – I take my hat off to you. You are fighting an incoming tide of brainwashed and braindead lemmingists, all bent on self destruction through ignorance and misguided stupidity and standing your ground!

    A family made up of a mother and father raising children is the only natural family and one that generally produces the best results in childrens standards of education, morality etc..

    The perversion away from the nuclear family is one of the main root causes in the destruction of society which is rapidly spiraling down the pan.

    Mum + dad + children = FAMILY
    Nothing else comes close!

  4. Your assertion that gays and feminists are out to marginalize men and fathers is ridiculous, perhaps delusional. Feminists demand only equal rights for everyone (including men) and gays are struggling to win the rights that have long been denied them. I find it disturbing that you see those two goals as being at odds with your own life and rights. As to your comments about the effect of gay and lesbian parenting on children, take a closer look at the current psychological research. The newest studies suggest that lesbians are actually better parents than heterosexuals (see studies:Wainwright and Patterson, 2008; Bos, van Balen, and van den Boom, 2007).

    I find it interesting that you use misogyny to remind the world why society needs men. Hate speech only serves to convince us that people like you are obsolete.

  5. honestly. this website is bullshit. the end of men? not going to happen bushies. why would a kid be messed up by being raised by a lesbian couple? and whoever said its wrong for women to “just use our sperm like that” no one is making you. no shit. sperm banks pay you, and to be honest, Ill take 100 bucks for some sperm.

  6. Take a look at American Negro families, 70% of which have no father figure at home and try to convince yourself that fathers are needed only to donate sperm.

  7. Stalinist? Making things up again are we. Actually, I couldn’t care less what you are, you have never presented any facts, just opinions and beliefs, and they mean nothing to me.

    You still haven’t refuted anything I say. Falling back into the politically correct mantra doesn’t win people brownie points on my blog. The hate speech slur won’t work here. Women will continue to be called on their bad behaviour until they change it.

    But you keep pandering and being a good serf.

  8. ˙”fmwatkins Says:
    December 23, 2007 at 10:00 am

    That statement itself is irrational, seeing as that is nothing more than an assumption on your part and not something I’ve never actually said.”

    How ironic that you would say that, as each of the messages you wrote me was about me being a feminist or attending feminist studies or being a stalinist, all things YOU made up on now solid ground at all.

    Oh, and irrational? The constant use of slur against women IN GENERAL makes your blog pretty close to hate speech. I’m just glad people like have no power at all in the world, so you’re not that much of a threat, luckily.

  9. Irrational hate of women? That statement itself is irrational, seeing as that is nothing more than an assumption on your part and not something I’ve never actually said.

    It is an indication of people’s brainwashing and fear of offending women how they love to try and categorise anyone who is critical of women/ feminists or whatever as an immediate ‘Women hater’. Indeed, the same attempt at silencing any dissent spreads to other protected groups like Jews, whereupon the slightest criticism of one leads to calls of ‘Anti-Semite!’

    It’s pathetic.

    And not women, feminists. Stop getting the two mixed up. It shows your lack of effort in understanding what is going on.

    On top of that, they did not work ‘hand in hand’. Feminists have their own agenda, which was used by globalists to push their own agenda. It’s called hijacking. They have done the same with the environmental movement.

    And I take it you didn’t know that they Rockefeller family funded Women’s Lib.
    Aaron Russo

    It is no surprise that all of these movements end up with governments taking more control away from people, with the end result being global organisations regulating entire societies.

    “Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism.” – Catharine A. MacKinnon, Toward a Feminist Theory of the State

    Feminism is a hate movement. But you just believe whatever you like. It’s simpler that way.

  10. “Mangina”.

    Is trying to make “clever” insults based on the female genital organ just immature? Or a much more troubling sign of your irrational hate of women? Where does that come from? It’s very troubling.

    But coming from someone who pictures women and bankers plotting hand in hand to destroy the earth, I guess it just makes no sense at all.

  11. Jasmincormier. You are obviously a mangina. Quite an ignorant one at that (and that’s saying something). Feminism isn’t dead. It has integrated itself with the help of globalism, into governments and corporations. This can OBVIOUSLY be seen by the misandric laws being passed, the desire to re-engineer society around gays and lesbians for various means like population control and centralisation of power within government, which just happens to always be the end goal of banker-funded movements like feminism, communism, environmentalism etc.

    This can be seen all over the place by anyone with eyes and a brain. I’m not going to waste my time re-explaining everything I’ve already said on this blog. Use the search engine and try and refute it, or stop trolling.

  12. Oh my god, you guys are so close minded.

    Yeah, “feminists” are out there to get you all, BLUARGGGHH! Be affraid!
    Seriously, the feminist movement is for all purposes dead now, quit being so backwards.

  13. I also think that is one highly inappropriate picture, in my hetrosexual life with my spouse and son we have never just all layed around naked that is not rigth whether your gay or straight yes you should be comfortable with you body and yes my son has seen me naked but not in such an inappropriate manner. also thinking of men as purely sperm donors is silly, would we really like a mens movement that takes the value of the mothe raway as being only a carrying device for the child until birth. we need to remember how we all got here!

  14. Of couurse children need fathers their needs to be family stability not just adults doing what feels good to them lets’ start focusing on what counts and that is our children it has been proven that children grow up better in a two paretnhome, there has not been enough research to support the claim that gay couples provide the same benifits.

  15. Pingback: Fathers have no rights to children, children have no rights to father. « End of Men

  16. Pingback: Fathers have NO rights at conception : November 2007 : Field Marshall Watkins : My Telegraph

  17. That’d be quite the defense in court for a one night stand that resulted in a baby.
    Well Judge, we aren’t in a relationship, I was just a sperm donor.

    Thats a hard call, just for donating some sperm you could technically have a responsibility to pay for the kid, as you are a parent.

    Here is one that makes you think.
    Why is it OK for women to use men for Sperm, like some sort of machine.
    Yet its Wrong for a man to use a women for a baby.
    Could you imagine the screeching if some guy said women are only good for making babies?
    These dykes say men are only good for sperm all the time.

    Bah, no way men can win, all we can do is lose a little less each time.

  18. I know HL, I’ve wondered about that myself, only time will tell if the ‘parents’ decide that the man also needs to donate a proportion of his lifetime earnings to the lesbian gang

  19. Egads…that is one UGGGLLLLLLYYYYYY picture.

    The thing about this story is that it is the kids who are going to be screwed up the most over this disaster of a law.

    But what i find most fascinating is how issues of child support are going to be handled…will the sperm donor be absolved of all financial responsibility? Although I don’t think I would have too much sympathy for any man dumb enough to give his sperm to lesbians to raise a bastard child without a father, the semi-centric family courts of the West are notorious for finding ways to make men pay for the choices made by women.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s