Remember in Why Feminism is a Fraud I mentioned how feminists get into government and start influencing policy? Well here you have it.
It’s quite long, so I’ll just post quotes. My emphasis.
Conservative leader David Cameron is expected to call for the law to be tightened to ensure that more men who commit rape are convicted in court.
In a speech in London, he will say too many rapists “think they can get away with it”, as just one reported case in 20 ends with a man being found guilty.
Immediately you can see the agenda here. They would rather assume a man guilty than innocent (Magna Carta anyone?) in order to cater to feminists.
Speaking at the Conservative Women’s Organisation conference, Mr Cameron is expected to say: “Studies have shown that as many as one in two young men believe there are some circumstances when it’s okay to force a woman to have sex.
What studies? Who did they ask? More importantly, this means they assume that one in two men are potential rapists. They have created the monster that they wish terrorise women with…
And feminists like to say women are hard done by…
“To my mind, this is an example of moral collapse.”
The instigation of feminism creates social collapse you mangina as is documented here.
He will call for “widespread cultural change” and warn that society has become increasingly “sexualised” over the past decade, during which time treating women as sex objects has become viewed as “cool”.
Women sexualise themselves because of feminism (girl power) and corporate advertising, which is frequently designed by women. That has nothing to do with the bloke on the street, as I have also written about, here.
He is also set to call for compulsory sex education in schools to drive home the message that sex without consent is a criminal offence.
Well I think boys know what rape is, I don’t believe that is the agenda. What this is going to do is scare boys away from having relationships with girls. This DOES push the feminist plan of destroying relationships between men and women however, which is a direct attack on potential future nuclear families. Get them while they’re young eh.
Shadow Minister Theresa May told the BBC the Conservatives would carry out a review of sentences for rape – which she said had been falling over the past three years.
So? That would usually be considered a good thing, but with any well developed abuse industry subsidiary, they must continue to inflate convict rates/ victim statistics to justify their ever increasing budgets, among other things.
And she said the Conservatives would put funding for rape victims on a more “secure footing” and work to change attitudes towards rape.
This entire article revolves around assuming men have a encouraging attitude to rape. It is astonishing how obvious this attack on men is.
Less than 6% of reported rapes in England and Wales end in a conviction.
So what. Maybe 94% of reported rapes aren’t actually rapes. Well what’s the difference? They plant that statistic in this article as a leading statement. What about all the false allegations? No word on increasing the conviction rate for them I take it…
Juries tend to be more likely to convict in so-called “stranger rape” cases where there is often semen, blood or saliva from the suspect at the crime scene, injuries and marks on the victim and CCTV or eye-witness evidence.
But in eight out of 10 rape cases, victim and suspect are known to each other.
Ah. Rape cases means convictions or allegations? Judging by that statistic, probably allegations otherwise they would make it known it was convictions.
Fortunately there is a more balanced view here:
Paul Gilbert, a criminal lawyer with Finers Stephens Innocent, told the BBC in most rape cases juries had to decide whether there was consent and “it’s one person’s word against another”.
“That is a very difficult situation and therefore to say the conviction rate is low is looking at it in a far too simplistic way,” he said.
Unfortunately that’s it. Back to the assumptions of all men being rapists.
Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s spokesman said the government had taken action to help rape victims and increase the conviction rate.
“We now have specially trained police officers in virtually all forces. We have special rape prosecutors and we have established sexual assault referral centres,” he said.
Specially trained? To what, assume the man is guilty and work with training the ‘victim’ on how to better present her story, or what? This reflects on an earlier story where feminists were complaining that they need to ‘retrain’ the judges and police to be more ‘sympathetic’ to the ‘needs’ of women.
As always, men’s issues are ignored as if they never existed.
Katherine Rake, director of the Fawcett Society campaign group, said the rape conviction rate was “a national disgrace” and rape crisis centres were at risk of closure, because of a lack of funding.
Ah, increase conviction rates (ruin countless innocent men’s lives no doubt) then, like the independent princesses they are, they run to the government asking for more tax payers (from men) money to fund their centers. It’s about making money by attacking men.
“Women have been let down for years as politicians have failed to prioritise tackling rape,” she said.
Fuck off. Women women fucking women. When was the last time the government prioritised anything to do with men, including all of the injustices experienced by men as a direct result of these pro-feminist policies? I went so far into this article without swearing too…
Alan Gordon, vice-chairman of the Police Federation of England and Wales, said forces had “invested a considerable amount in training and are now investing in rape investigation suites so that people will feel comfortable about coming forward and talking to the police.”
Rape investigation suites? What the hell are they? This just smacks of the usual Marxist methodology.
Invent (or inflate) a problem to epic proportions, blame a group (men) for the false problem, propose a solution (throw more men in prison, make money.)
This is a concerted effort to take the burden of yet more responsibility away from women, encourage more false allegations and further undermine the basic building blocks of a free society (the family.) It is also interesting how this article completely ignores homosexual rape. I wonder why…
Remarkable. As an addendum, I was just listening to the radio as I write this, and there was a discussion on the case of a man who is 95% down the line of having sex (you know about to cum), and the woman says stop. If he doesn’t stop immediately. It’s rape.
How about he does stop. He gets pissed of with the mind games this woman is playing, cusses her and leaves.
She might get upset, and accuse him of rape anyway.
Come on people, this is complete communism! Government controlling sex between men and women! Fuck the government! And most of all, fuck femcunts!