In communism power is dictated one way. From the top, down. Those in power dictate to those (literally) beneath them.
To convince the ignorant public that schemes and plans are good for them, those who seek to implement these plans use basic manipulation such as semantics.
Giving something a warm and fuzzy name like European Union doesn’t actually mean it is a good thing. The EU revolves around creating one bloc of the bankers plan for the global order, with the United Nations governing it in its entirety.
Ah the United Nations! How nice is that! Nations united yay! Let’s all dance around the campfire while the heads of corporate power create this new world order (for us apparently) to protect us from
state-sponsored false flag terrorism.
“All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order” – David Rockefeller
The goal, as you should probably know by now, is a one-world super state. A corporate-communist technocracy were all power is centralised at the United Nations (an organisation drawn up by the banking cartels by the way). I mean all power. One world monetary system, religion, ‘diversity’, population control you name it.
Actually, population control will be a convenient point to explain the main thrust of this article.
You may have heard of the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights. One of the loveliest sounding scams as you are about to learn.
It speaks of wonderful things like Article 3:
“Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person” and more devious Articles like this extract from number 2:
“… Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.“
Of course the UN would see sovereignty (a country’s right to govern itself, free from outside influences) as ‘limitation’. Its goal is a world with no independent countries.
You have this strangely feminist clause (Article 25, Subsection 2): “Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.“
This clause shows the true colours of the UN social engineering programme. A26, 2. “Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.”
Who defines the ‘development of the human personality’ in this case. Why, the UN of course! In the New World Order (NWO) all schools will be run by the UN.
Two more clauses and I’m done. Article 28 states: “Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.“
Mere wordplay. ‘Entitled’ does not mean this ‘order’ would be a good thing for the human race.
Now, this Declaration has one important clause I’ve left till the end, because quite simply, it is the most important.
After all the warm and fuzzy clauses beforehand, you have this glimpse into the true evil of the United Nations.
Article 29, Subsection 3 “These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.“
That quite simply states that no one can use these rights if it goes against the principles of the UN. Who defines what the principles are? You can be sure as hell it will not be you. It will be elitists like Prince Philip who, in his book ‘If I Were An Animal’ wrote:
“In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.“
And ‘top’ ecologist Dr. Eric R. Pianka sickenly stated the “the need to exterminate 90% of the population through the airborne ebola virus.”
Like the one child policy of communist China, who is to say that under a NWO, the UN can ‘decide’ that there is overpopulation, and mandate the culling of humans who contribute ‘less’ to its world?
Technically they could, it would mean a change in principles. If it wanted to believe a world wide terrorist threat, it could suspend all of your rights and immediately enact a police state. In fact it would not need to tell the people a reason. This Declaration states that the UN has the end say on how the world is run, not the people. By that very definition one would be enslaved by it. It is a dictatorship.
The EU is just one bloc remember. They are attempting to implement North American Union now.
If you value freedom, you must get informed and resist it.