UP to half of all single mothers do not want to work and simply will not take jobs, a report has found.
The analysis said Labour will never achieve its goal of persuading large numbers of lone parents to abandon a life on benefits because a huge proportion of them simply refuse to do so.
And why should they bother to? They are already employed by the government via the taxpayer (the majority of which are men). Plus they can be with their children.
The study, produced by the Department for Work and Pensions, suggests much of the £3.4billion spent on attempts to encourage lone mothers to find jobs over the past ten years has been wasted.
Four out of ten lone mothers, the report added, say they do want to take jobs ‘but only at some point in the future’.
New Labour’s efforts to reduce poverty have centred on single parents since Tony Blair won the 1997 election.
What that means is, Communist Labour has encouraged benefits for single parents, which frequently outweigh benefits for couples, essentially bribing parents (mainly women) to become single for the additional tax credits.
As Chancellor, Gordon Brown devised the tax credits benefit system which currently pumps £16billion a year into the pockets of lower-paid working people and which is heavily biased towards helping single mothers.
Of course it is. The majority of single parents are single mothers, mainly because the law favours passing the children to the mother, regardless of whether the father is more suitable or not. Which studies suggest he probably would be.
But remember the corporate government is interested in breaking up the family, not promoting it. Families represent social power centers, and communism abhors any form of people power.
Some £3.4billion has gone on the New Deal for Lone Parents, a welfare-to-work scheme meant to help single mothers into jobs.
However, recent figures showed that only around a fifth of those joining the New Deal find work that lasts more than a few weeks.
The new analysis, carried out for the DWP by Andrew Thomas of Insite Research and Consulting, examined ‘work focused interviews’ which are a key part of the New Deal package.
Mothers must attend an interview if they wish to continue claiming the main benefit for the workless, income support.
Freedom eh? You are a slave to the State if you are wholly dependent on benefits. And yes, this is the way the government wants it. Remember what I keep on saying. Feminism helps to destroy the family by turning women against men, men are ostracised from their children, the corporate government steps in with benefits, and with female friendly laws (Equal Opportunies/ Affirmative Action anyone?) and the females ally themselves with the government, as they are now the provider.
Men no longer have their families to protect and care for. Their work ethic drops, crime and drug taking go up, single mother children grow up never knowing a strong family and the problems are compounded. You get social chaos, a weak society is one that is easy to control and manipulate.
The report said that although some mothers who are looking or willing to look for work derive some benefit from the interviews, most see going to one as a routine part of claiming benefits.
In spite of ‘additional support premiums, incentives, transitional benefits, information on childcare and other elements that have been added piecemeal to the programme over the past five years,’ the report found little progress had been made.
Interviews ‘still appear to be unable to make significant headway against the firm decision of many to choose not to work’.
They’re just jumping through the hoops necessary to claim benefits.
Ministers are understood to have discussed over the summer a system which would withdraw benefits from lone mothers who refuse to work.
But Mr Brown told the TUC conference earlier this month that the main change in Government policy would be to offer single parents even more incentives and extra benefits.
These will include £40 a week in taxpayer-subsidised pay – £60 a week in London – for the first year in work, £400 in training allowances, and a rule to allow single mothers to continue receiving state out-of-work benefits for their first six weeks in a job.
Yay, more benefits for single mothers!
Robert Whelan of the Civitas think tank said: “If people know they have the option of not working, they won’t work. The only way is the Clinton way, in which you make it clear to people that they will lose their benefits if they don’t work.
“In 1997 there was talk that the Government was going to do this as part of a wholesale reform of the welfare state. Instead what they have done is to produce the largest client group of the benefit-dependent in history.”
Exactly. Thought experiment time. Imagine the whole country on benefits. Who’s your Daddy? Communism must take control of everything in society in order to ‘equalise’ it. They then become the employers of whole vilages and towns. Some towns in the North of England have situations where the government is the single largest employer.
I think you can see where this is headed.
To talk about any one issue with this collapsing society is difficult without referring to other parts of it. But I’ll do it anyway.
The welfare state should be scrapped. I think there should be a small, time-limited benefits system available to those who have fallen on hard times. But nothing to the extent it is now. When you get someone who travels through the whole of Europe and refuses ‘asylum’ in any place except the Welfare State, you know something must be done.
On the other side, is the taxpayer. Working their arse off and getting taxed into poverty to subsidise this nonsense. Whatever happened to taxpayers having a say what THEIR wealth is spent on?
But like I say, this isn’t a democracy, it is corporatism/ communism.
On the subject of single mothers, (a demographic I am not a fan of) I have a few things to say. I can understand them not wanting to work, they have children and would probably rather be with them. They’re mothers, their allegiance is with their children, not companies.
Which is fair enough. What I don’t like is how quickly they are willing to ‘discard’ the father if he doesn’t serve her every whim. To explain this I would have to mention the female-friendly no-fault divorce laws (over 60% of divorces are initiated by women), the anti-male child support/ custody laws (90% of prison, the misandric ‘parental intervention’ groups (how fucking communist is that!) and obviously the benefits system.
Now men aren’t innocent either. Sometimes the mothers have a reason to leave him. But a lot of the time, they don’t. In the past marriage was a binding agreement, couples had to work through their ups and downs. Now (women especially) love the ‘ups’ but refuse to tolerate any ‘downs’. So they leave. Take the kids and the majority of the wealth.
This has now been going on for generations. Men who grew up in single mothers households having issues with women and commitment, issues with disciple, low work ethic, low self-esteem etc. These are all consequences of fatherless homes.
And it’s exactly what the government wants. Social chaos = Weak society = Easily manipulated = Loss of personal identity/ loyalty = Loss of rights = Loss of sovereignty = End of Britain.
Of course, as we all know, the best environment for a child is a strong family, with a loving father and mother who both understand their role and the sacrifices they must make to protect it.
Thanks for reading.
Further information regarding this subject.http://www.betterdads.net/articles.htmI know this is from the States, but it’s revealing and as the U.S. has the highest number of fathers less homes, quite relevant.The rate of fatherlessness has increased dramatically in our culture in recent years. The United States is now the world leader in fatherless families. Here are some of the sobering statistics regarding the impact of fatherlessness on children:
* Children from fatherless homes are five times more likely to be poor, and ten times more likely to be extremely poor.
* Seventy percent of juveniles in reform school and long term prison inmates come from fatherless homes.
* Children from fatherless homes are twice as likely to be high school drop outs.
* Fatherless children have more emotional and behavioral problems.
* Girls from fatherless homes are three times as likely to be unwed teenage mothers. Adolescents in mother-only families are more likely to be sexually active, and daughters are more likely to become single-parent mothers.
* Boys from fatherless homes have a higher incidence of unemployment, incarceration, and noninvolvement with their own children.
* Ninety percent of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes.
* Seventy-one percent of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes.
* Seventy-five percent of all adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes.
* Eighty percent of rapists come from fatherless homes.
Civitas, Role of Fathers
Literary Trust, Fathers’ involvement.
No, we don’t believe that any woman should have this choice. No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make it.
– Simone de Beauvoir A Femcunt.
“The nuclear family must be destroyed… Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process.” — Linda Gordon
“Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation, and destroy the male sex.” – Valerie Solanas, SCUM founder
“Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women’s movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage.” – Sheila Cronin, the leader of the feminist organization NOW
Under patriarchy, every woman’s son is her potential betrayer and also the inevitable rapist or exploiter of another woman.” – Andrea Dworkin
“Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice.” – Ti-Grace Atkinson
“The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men.” — Sharon Stone; Actress
“All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman.” — Catherine MacKinnon
“The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” — Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future – If There Is One – Is Female.
“Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience.” – Catherine Comins
“I believe that women have a capacity for understanding and compassion which man structurally does not have, does not have it because he cannot have it. He’s just incapable of it.” — Barbara Jordan, former congresswoman
And on and on, and on…