Bill Gates funds covert vaccine nanotechnology

(NaturalNews) The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is gaining a reputation for funding technologies designed to roll out mass sterilization and vaccination programs around the world. One of the programs recently funded by the foundation is a sterilization program that would use sharp blasts of ultrasound directed against a man’s scrotum to render him infertile for six months. It might accurately be called a “temporary castration” technology. Read more about it here: http://www.naturalnews.com/028853_u…

Now, the foundation has funded a new “sweat-triggered vaccine delivery” program based on nanoparticles penetrating human skin. The technology is describes as a way to “…develop nanoparticles that penetrate the skin through hair follicles and burst upon contact with human sweat to release vaccines.”

The research grant money is going to Carlos Alberto Guzman of the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research in Germany and Claus-Michael Lehr and Steffi Hansen of the Helmholtz-Institute for Pharmaceutical Research.

These are both part of the Gates Foundation’s involvement in the “Grand Challenges Explorations” program which claims to be working to “achieve major breakthroughs in global health.”

…breakthroughs like mass sterilization and nanoparticle vaccines that could be covertly administered even without your knowledge, it turns out. These nanoparticles could be used in a spray mist that’s sprayed on to every person who walks through an airport security checkpoint, for example. Or it could be unleashed through the ventilation systems of corporate office buildings or public schools to vaccinate the masses. You wouldn’t even know you were being vaccinated.

This technology is potentially very dangerous to your health freedom. Using it, governments or drug companies (which are all the same thing these days) could create a vaccine skin cream that’s handed out and described as “sunscreen.” But when you put it on, you’re actually vaccinating yourself as the nanoparticles burrow underneath your skin and burst, releasing foreign DNA inside your body.

A history of covert mass medication

But why would the government medicate people without their knowledge or consent, you ask? They already do it with water fluoridation. Fluoride is a drug, and regional and national governments all over the world are using the water supply as a way to deliver the fluoride drug to people whether they need it or not — and without any proper medical diagnosis or prescription.

So if governments are already covertly medicating people with fluoride in the water supply, they’ve set the stage mass-vaccinating people through similar channels, such as the air supply in buildings. And thanks to Bill Gates, this nanotechnology needed to pull this off is now being funded.

Is this really a “major breakthrough in global health?”

I suppose it is if you believe in covert medicine where you dose people with drugs or vaccines without their knowledge. Western medicine is so offensive to rational people that it can’t even operate out in the open. That’s why it resorts to covert contamination of the water supply in order to force the public to swallow its drugs.

Fluoride and covert medicine

Oh, by the way, to anyone who argues that fluoride is not a drug, remember this: According to the FDA, any chemical substance that has a biological effect on the human body is, by definition, a drug. Therefore fluoride is a drug, too.

Even more, fluoride is promoted with outlandish claims about “preventing cavities” by swallowing it, making it an “unapproved drug” according to the FDA. So how is it that this unapproved drug can be dripped into the water supply and forced upon hundreds of millions of people without a single diagnosis of fluoride deficiency or even a single prescription from a doctor?

The answer is that western medicine is so arrogant that it does not believe it needs to follow any rules, regulations or laws. It is a system of “bully” medicine where drugs are shoved down your throat by being covertly dripped into the water supply without your consent. So why should we believe vaccines will be any different? If mainstream medicine can find a way to force every person to unknowingly be injected with vaccines, make no mistake they will pursue it!

And such efforts will no doubt have the continued financial support of Bill Gates.

Serial false rape accuser, still protected

A woman drove a man to suicide by crying rape and forced a second innocent man to consider taking his life after falsely accusing him of a similar sex attack.

Despite being exposed in court as a serial liar, legal restrictions mean the 21-year-old woman can never be identified.

A jury took only 45 minutes to clear medical student Olumide Fadayomi, 27, of rape.

But several jurors at Sheffield Crown Court broke down in tears when the judge revealed the ‘victim’ had a history of crying rape.

This woman is a criminal. Why is she still protected? What sort of disgusting feminist nonsense is this? It is this kind of feminist nonsense.

• “Politically, I call it rape whenever a woman has sex and feels violated.” — Catherine MacKinnon
• “Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience.” – Catherine Comins
• “All men are rapists and that’s all they are.” (Marilyn French, Author; and advisor to Al Gore’s Presidential Campaign)
• “We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men…” Elizabeth Cady Stanton, “One Woman, One Vote”

The husband beating wives…

In case you didn’t know, the reality is that domestic violence is committed equally by both sexes. The feminist organisations and government would have you think otherwise, but that is because they have their own agenda (money and power).

The first time I struck my husband was during an argument over money. He’d decided to pay off a loan without telling me and we ‘ d gone overdrawn. I was worried and tried to discuss it with him, at which point he left the room.

I felt we hadn’t talked it through properly and followed him. The next minute, I was hitting him around the head.

I remember losing control and my limbs lashing out.

Afterwards he was upset and I cried – I felt scared and ashamed of what I’d done.

I apologised and thought it was a one-off, but in fact it was a pattern that carried on for the next ten years.

I met my husband through mutual friends at Durham University. I was 19 and he was five years older, more worldly and mature. He was less serious, too, and made me laugh.

We married five years later. He had a job in IT by then and I started work as a divorce lawyer. The early days of our marriage were steady, but as the stress of my job and responsibilities grew, I took it out on him.

After that first time, it happened again about 18 months later. I felt a surge of rage I couldn’t control. My anger would escalate during arguments over household chores or my husband coming to bed late. I remember feeling I was out of my body, watching myself and telling myself to stop, but I couldn’t. I would hit him hard; hitting to hurt.

One time, I picked up a table and crashed it down so hard on the ground that it broke. I left bite marks in his arm a couple of times – it was similar to the way siblings fight, yet he never once struck back. He’d hold up his hands to shield himself, which made me feel even worse.

Yes, this happens a lot more that people realise and it is good that it is getting attention. Women aren’t angels. They’re just people.

Male defendants to be granted anonymity in rape cases

Wow, equal treatment for both parties in a rape allegation until a verdict is given.

Defendants in rape cases will now be granted anonymity under new rules set out in today’s Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition document.

The move will turn the clock back to the 1970s when the Sexual Offences Act introduced anonymity for those accused of rape, something later repealed.

Officials said details of the change were yet to be decided but it is likely the ban will be lifted once a suspect is convicted.

But it stands in the face of a report by Lady Stern that recommended independent research should first be done into the scale and nature of false rape allegations.

Which I think we all know, is a huge issue and getting larger all the time. Bog standard femskank fumes:

Ruth Hall, of Women Against Rape, said the decision was an ‘insult’ and a backlash against the rising number of rape reports.

She said: ‘More attention needs to be paid to the 94% of reported cases that do not end in conviction rather than the few that are false.

‘If men accused of rape got special rights to anonymity, it would reinforce the misconception that lots of women who report rape are lying.

Can you believe it? Why should someone who has only been accused of a crime be identified? How is that a special right? It is a common occurance that women falsely accuse men of rape (just search on this blog for starters), it is also common that these falsely accused men have their lives ruined, even when acquitted. They get battered, bricks thrown through their windows, they lose their jobs, their friends etc.

Just because some spiteful bitch feels guilty about getting drunk and opening her legs to him? Or maybe trying to cover her own arse because she was actually cheating on her boyfriend at the time.

You know it happens.

‘False rape allegations are extremely rare, but receive disproportionate publicity.

‘Of course, being wrongly accused is a terrible ordeal but the same can be said of being wrongly accused of murder, theft, fraud or any other serious offence.

So?

‘We are against a special case where men accused of rape are singled out for special protection.’

Rape law campaigner Jill Saward said she is ‘horrified’ by the news and accused politicians of turning their backs on victims of sexual violence.

Ms Saward, who has spoken out on tackling rape since being attacked at her Ealing vicarage home in 1986, said she completely opposes anonymity for defendants.

She said the changes may discourage genuine victims from coming forward and ‘send a damaging message’.

Right, to anything to encourage more women to accuse more men of rape. Why, so these bitches can claim there is ‘such a problem’ ‘men are all rapists’ and then go running to the government for more funding?

Go fuck yourselves. I’m not holding my breath, but it would be good if this actually goes through.

Draw Mohammed Day is TOMORROW!

Don’t forget, if you have blogs, websites etc, or you just want to join in the fun, tomorrow is Draw Mohammed Day (links to Facebook group).

As you know, it is essentially based on a reaction to people who believe they are so superior and perfect to the rest of us, that their beliefs (not facts) should be protected from analysis and critisism, forever. Hence their eternal outrage at things ‘offending Islam’.

This is something of a boggle, seeing as Islam isn’t a person that can be offended, but merely an ideology. I guess it’s okay for Muslims to depict non-Muslim faiths and beliefs as pigs, demons and the like, so long as it’s one way. Like I said, they believe they are superior. You have no ‘right’ to draw a picture of their so called ‘prophet’, even if this person actually received his ‘revelations’ not from God, but from a Demon.

No matter. What is important is that you FOLLOW ISLAMIC RULES and do not do what millions in the West will be doing tomorrow. Depicting this warmongering, paedophile fuck face.

It is going to ‘offend’ Muslims. Well who gives a fuck. I’m more offended by Muslims actually going out and KILLING PEOPLE.

By the way, now is a good time to post this excellent video, a speech by Bat Ye’or, a scholor of Islam.

Remember. Whether you want it or not. This is war. ‘Islam’ believes that the world was always Islamic, and the 15,000 acts of violence since 9/11 in the name of Islam are merely good Muslims trying to bring the world back to where it belongs.

Well I say fuck that.

In the West, everyone and everything is open to criticism. It’s the basis for separating fact from fiction. If Muslims want to threaten lives on this issue, then they are merely seeking to impose islamic rule on non-muslims, as part of their holy war.

Tomorrow I’ll have a pic up. You can count on it.

Man swindles over £100,000 from lonely women

First, he charmed his way into their hearts. Then he charmed himself into their beds.

But John Keady didn’t seduce women for sex or companionship. He wanted to get into their bank accounts.

For 20 years, the conman wooed a succession of women all over Britain, Europe and America.

As one of the comments states;

Amazing that when women get fleeced by a man they date it makes the news, when it goes the other way it’s called marriage.

Funny that.

Law firm scared to fire pregnant woman, fires man instead

A male lawyer was wrongfully sacked because his bosses feared they would be sued if they fired his female colleague while she was on maternity leave.

In a rare instance of a man claiming sex discrimination, John de Belin won £123,000 in damages after one of Britain’s biggest law firms ‘deprived him of his livelihood’.

Mr de Belin, 45, was one of two associates facing redundancy from Eversheds’ property division in Leeds. The other was Angela Reinholz, 40.

To decide who would be sacked, the firm undertook an assessment of both Mr de Belin’s and Mrs Reinholz’s abilities, including financial performance, discipline history and absence records.

Mr de Belin was fired in February 2009 after losing by just half a point, scoring 27 out of 39 in the exercise against Mrs Reinholz’s 27.5.

But he later learned that the test score had been ‘unfairly inflated’ to the advantage of his female colleague.

He also discovered that Mrs Reinholz was given the maximum possible score for her ability to swiftly secure ‘lock-up’ payments from clients – even though she was at home on maternity leave during the period of time she was being assessed.

The Leeds employment tribunal ruled that this effectively tipped the balance in her favour and Mr de Belin lost out.

In the judgment, Judge Jeremy Shulman said: ‘If any other score had been given to Ms Reinholz… she would have been at risk and not him.

‘Eversheds elected to give the maximum notional score for lock-up to Ms Reinholz because it regarded this as the fairest approach, while also trying to avoid a claim against Eversheds by Ms Reinholz. But this clearly worked less favourably to Mr de Belin, who was then put at risk and ultimately dismissed for redundancy.’

So the firm has to make someone redundant and they obviously thought the chances of them being sued would be smaller if they fired the guy. Because guys are just supposed to ‘deal with it’ right?

Wrong.

There is obviously a culture of women suing the shit out of anything that moves, especially in the legal profession.  You know, they’d worry about losing their job, then suddenly claim they were sexually harassed for the past 10 million years. Or they commit fraud, get found out and sacked, and then sue for discrimination. Even better, female employee can steal from her bank, gets caught and just blames it all on her boyfriend! Weak vunerable woman when she needs to be eh.

I’ve got an idea. How about we scrap all these regulations and just let companies do their bloody job?

Independent thoughts to be considered mental illness

From Al Jahom’s Final Word.

As in the Soviet Union, categorising dissenting thoughts and non-(state and corporate) sanctioned behaviour would be enough to get to carted off to the psy-camp for chemical re-education.

They can go screw themselves, how’s that for a dissenting opinion. Fucking shrinks, always were a bunch of dodgy bastards.

‘Women’s group’ loses state funding

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

An organisation which represents women’s groups in Wales says it will close after being refused funding from the assembly government.

Excuse me while I sip this water (I’m hungover).

Ahhh.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.

Seriously, enough of this bloody funding for these special interest groups. I say shut them all down. Every single organisation pushing for womens/ gay/ black/ muslim/ green/ transgender/ psychic/ whatever/ rights should be shut down. I don’t want to pay for any of them. Nobody is special, get over yourselves.

Guess those women will have to go and get REAL JOBS, how’s that for equality.

Now that’s Change You Can Believe In.

Google ‘accidentally’ hoovers up 600GB of private Wi-Fi data

The internet giant’s Street View cars, which were launched last year to take photographs for its Google Maps service, have mistakenly collected information sent over unencrypted Wi-Fi networks.

Information gathered by the cars’ antennae could include parts of an email, text or photograph or even the website someone may be viewing.

Why on Earth people still don’t password protect (and MAC address lock) their networks is beyond me. Still, this data is still private.

About 600 gigabytes of data was taken off Wi-Fi networks in more than 30 countries. Google said it plans to delete all the information as soon as it gains clearance from government authorities.

Clearance to delete something they shouldn’t have had in the first place? Dodgy as fuck.

Mother beats 21 month old baby to death, jailed for ‘life’

A mother who punched and kicked her 21-month-old son to death was jailed for life today.

Collette Harris, 30, must serve at least 16 years behind bars for the murder of Bobby Louch.

He had more than 80 bruises and injuries on his tiny body and head, as well as a burn to his right hand, when he died four days after Christmas in 2008.

He had fatal damage to his brain and abdomen and his injuries were so severe they would normally be seen in a car crash, the Old Bailey was told.

But Bobby had been treated for a broken leg three weeks earlier and was kept in for a scan when bruises were seen on his forehead.

The toddler’s mother, Collette Harris, complained she was being ‘victimised’ and said the bruises were the result of Bobby banging his head on his cot.

Victim? Of what! Victimised by a baby?

She screamed ‘Oh my God’ and collapsed in tears as the jury found her guilty of murder.

Harris whispered ‘I did not touch my son’.

She had tried to blame her new boyfriend, James Phillips, who denied killing Bobby or causing the injuries.

Drug taker Phillips, 25, of Erith, Kent, was found not guilty of murder and alternate charges of manslaughter and causing or allowing the death.

After ‘boyfriends’ and ‘step-fathers’ the biggest group of child abusers are biological mothers. I wonder how they knew this guy didn’t have anything to do with it?

I left out further details of the injuries the baby sustained, it’s hard enough reading it, if you want to know, read the full article. Another symptom of the breakdown of the nuclear family, one of the foundations of feminism.

8 Year old girls emulating female pop videos

I would never let my children wear something like that, not even indoors in private. I guess this is what happens when you let the television bring up your kids? I dunno.

The pretty girl from The Wonder Years grew up!

And so did all of us.

As Kevin Arnold’s childhood sweetheart Winnie in The Wonder Years, Danica McKeller was the object of many teenage boys’ crushes.

But 17 years after the show ended, it appears the cute girl-next-door has grown up into a good-looking woman.

Now a 35-year-old and married, McKeller shows she’s all grown up as she poses for a sexy photoshoot with men’s magazine Maxim.

Pretty and clever, what more can a man want in a woman?

She took time out of her acting career to study mathematics at UCLA and found such an affinity with the subject, she went on to write two New York Times best-sellers called Math Doesn’t Suck: How to Survive Middle-School Math without Losing Your Mind or Breaking a Nail and Kiss My Math: Showing Pre-Algebra Who’s Boss.

How hot is that!

Who says women aren’t competitive

I have been following the ever falling standards of female ‘artists’ closely over the years. The way they seem to have gotten more and more slutty, sexualised and pathetic in their attempts to 1. get media coverage for themselves and 2. get media coverage away from their ‘competition’.

That is what this boils down to. Attention. In this case, attention equals money. I mean, Grace Jones was outrageous in her way, but she was never slutty. How many male performers do you see cavorting on stage wearing just a jockstrap and top hat?

Why do women feel the need to sprinkle sex on everything they do? Well, now it’s more like whack dollops of that stuff on, to the point that you can’t even recognise what is supposed to be underneath it.

Instead of ‘would you like a little ketchup with that hot dog’, it is now, ‘would you like a little hotdog with that ketchup?’

Femscum go into a ‘totalitarian paradox’ when women start showing their true colours. It goes like this;

There is a resource, could be money, sperm, protection, homes, whatever.

Woman wants resource. Someone else controls resource. If that someone is a man, the easiest way to acquire it is to use sex (or the hint of it).

This is nature. Every year in England, a bunch of gorgeous brainboxes get together and do a beauty pageant thing. They smile, they’re fit, their smart, they’re having a bit of fun etc. But before you could say ‘can I solve your equation honey bunny.’ the local femscum (and mangina) always kick up a fuss. These women are being exploited apparently. Although their choosing to do it. You know, that ‘choice’ thing feminists keep banging on about.

I guess what feminists really meant all along was ‘women should be free to choose to do what we want them to do’. Which isn’t very free at all. But they can’t directly attack the women, that would show their true totalitarian colours, so they continue to perpetrate the myth of the victim. The person organising it is exploiting them! The hall they booked is exploiting them! The paper that reported it on it are exploiting them!

Even the bloody girls themselves say ‘piss off and leave us alone, we’re just having some fun’.

But no, the INDUSTRY OF VICTIMHOOD commands that for these feminists to continue to feel like they are doing something worthwhile (they’re not) they must continue to try and convince everyone they are needed, by convincing everyone that all women are victims of something. Anything, long as they can point a finger at a man in the end (and demand resources to continue to fund their pathetic hateful lives).

Can you imagine this mentality with black people, women, or Jews?

Feminsts, get a fucking clue. You’re about as useful as a fart in a spacesuit. You care about individual freedom about as much as Stalin and you are actually the enemy of men and women.

Buy a dildo or something, just leave us the fuck alone.

Youngest female false rape accuser?

Girl, eight, says 10-year-old boys ‘did not rape her’

An eight-year-old girl alleged to have been sexually assaulted by two 10-year-olds has told the Old Bailey that the boys did not rape her.

She said neither had raped her and that she had lied to her mother because she had been “naughty” and was worried she would not get any sweets.

The girl was allegedly attacked in a field in west London in October 2009.

The boys, now aged 10 and 11, each deny two charges of rape and two charges of attempted rape of a child under 13.

The two boys cannot be identified for legal reasons.

The trial continues.

No comment.

This blog is being resurrected

Yeah. That’s how it is.

Over the coming weeks, I’ll be cleaning up the links, adding updates and clarifying some shit. Won’t just be about femscum either. I’m still angry, just older and wiser at the same time.

If you have blogs, websites on the subjects of feminism, communism, environmentalism and socialism, fiat currencies, central banks, global governments, that sort of shit, drop me a comment.

I wonder how many of the Old Guard are still around….