What new world order… No such thing, that is why they didn’t etch the phrase into the Desert Storm Commemorative Glock, which doesn’t exist either and is not on the site, The Glock Faq.
Anyone who talks about the non-existent new world order is a ‘crazy conspiracy nut’, like George Bush Senior and friends.
When Lexie Slater-Folksman was born at 23 weeks - an age at which babies can still be aborted - she weighed just 1lb 8oz.
She was put on a life support machine and her parents were warned their daughter might not pull through.
She was so premature her eyes hadn’t even developed properly. At a month old she underwent laser surgery on her eyes and then spent week after week on ventilator machines after she suffered collapsed lungs.
But Lexie defied the odds and gradually gained strength.
Now, six months after her birth, she weighs a healthy 8lb and has finally been allowed home, to the joy and relief of her parents, 20-year-old Sarah Slater and her fiance Richard Folksman, 25.
They say Lexie’s case proves that the abortion laws are outdated and should be changed. At 23 weeks, Lexie was born a week before the time limit for termination.
In May MPs voted for the upper time limit for abortions to remain at 24 weeks after rejecting proposals to reduce the limit to as little as 12 weeks.
Anti-abortion campaigners had argued the time limit for termination was too long, saying a baby’s rights should be considered at the point it had the ‘chance of life’.
It is a stance Miss Slater shares. Speaking at the family home in Wigan, she said: ‘We’re so glad to have Lexie home with us at last and it just shows how outmoded our laws on abortion are.
‘Some mothers-to-be would be able to legally terminate their pregnancy at 23 weeks - yet my Lexie is living proof babies can survive being born so prematurely.
‘I never realised a baby would be so well developed at 23 weeks and they do have a chance of life.’
So, do people still think aborting at 24 weeks isn’t killing a child then? At what point does the Right to Choose become the Right to Kill?
I have always said, a truly, honestly good product doesn’t need propaganda, it sells itself. What does this figure say for the EU?
Telegraph
Bruno Waterfield
New research by Open Europe, a think-tank that supports EU reform, has found that so-called European “information” campaigns are one-sided and boast a budget that is bigger than Coca-Cola’s total worldwide advertising account.
One publication, entitled How the European Union works, described the EU as “a remarkable success story”.
Another English-language “information” pamphlet claimed the EU “is delivering a better life for everyone” and described the single market as “a winning formula.”
The researchers also found a European Commission document that admitted: “Neutral factual information is needed of course, but it is not enough on its own. Genuine communication by the EU cannot be reduced to the mere provision of information.”
Lorraine Mullally, director of Open Europe, said: “Taxpayers should not be footing the bill for vain PR exercises to make us love the EU. The EU needs urgent and radical reform, not expensive campaigns to improve its image.”
Hundreds of schools have barred teachers from marking in red in case it upsets the children.
“Think of the children!!!!” I presume…
They are scrapping the traditional method of correcting work because they consider it ‘confrontational’ and ‘threatening’.
Pupils increasingly find that the ticks and crosses on their homework are in more soothing shades like green, blue, pink and yellow, or even in pencil.
Traditionalists have branded the ban ‘barmy’, saying that red ink makes it easier for children to spot errors and improve. There are no set government guidelines on marking and schools are free to formulate their own individual policies.
Crofton Junior School, in Orpington, Kent, whose pupils range from seven to 11, is among those to have banned red ink. Its Marking Code of Practice states: ‘Work is
generally marked in pen – not red – but on occasion it may be appropriate to indicate errors in pencil so that they may be corrected.’
Headmaster Richard Sammonds said: ‘Red pen can be quite demotivating for children. It has negative, old-school connotations of “See me” and “Not good enough”.
Well it isn’t good enough is it? That’s the bloody point.
At Hutton Cranswick Community Primary School in Driffield, East Yorkshire, the Marking and Feedback Policy reads: ‘Marking should be in a different colour or medium from the pupil’s writing but should not dominate. For this reason, red ink is inappropriate.’
Shirley Clarke, an associate of the Institute of Education, said: ‘Banning red ink is a reaction to years of children having nothing but red over their work and feeling demoralised. When children, especially young children, see every single spelling mistake covered in red, they can feel useless and give up.’
What a bunch of pussies. Why can’t children spell, the words haven’t changed have they? Or maybe it is about pandering to the lowest common denominator, giving the least deserved the most authority. How about ignoring bad spelling as policy, rewiting Shakespeare in newspeak txtspk and allowing it in exams? This is all about dumbing down society. That’s it. Whatever the excuse is from the state, the result is what is important. The result is a bunch of pussies who are incapable of pushing themselves beyond the boundaries set by the socialist nanny state and will therefore never be a threat to the ruling classes.
This is about control and this is way past the point of bullshit. 2009 is time to step up the resistance.
All hail the new female!
With her million pound record deal and record-breaking first single Alexandra Burke would surely have no problem finding a boyfriend.
But any gold-diggers hoping to impress the 20-year-old X Factor winner will find she isn’t interested – she has sworn off men for at least TEN years.
Instead Alex, who features in this week’s Grazia magazine, says she is taking the advice of her mentor Cheryl Cole, and keeping her mind firmly on her career.
‘They’re a waste of time, a waste of space! They’re only going to be good for me when I’m about 30 and thinking about kids. Music is my husband until then,’ she tells the fashion magazine.
Yeah, by that age all the men that may have been interested will either be married, happy bachelors or dating younger, more fertile women. Female fertility drops like a lead ballon after 25 anyway, and I wonder who invented and built all of the technology responsible for her to even be on a TV show?
Seriously, women like her love handbags, not men. She will only want a man at that age to give her babies and help her look after HER children. This type of totally self-centered, egotisical woman is growing like a fucking virus, especially in densely populated cities like London, where they not only have the illusion of choice but also have the compliant media looking to sell silly women silly shit they don’t need with funny money they don’t have. Why is it that these companies market to women by attacking men? They must have obviously discovered some trend while doing their research, some deep underlying femshit inherent in a large enough proportion of females. Just appeal to their narcissism, and you can sell them anything…
And let us not forget, if the shit ever hits the fan this female will be calling out of some man to take the bullet for her, you know, be chivalrous. That is the only time when women like her think men are not a waste of space, when they are doing something for HER. I’m sure if she was working in some job, (part time probably) and some rich bloke wanted to take her out, he wouldn’t be a waste of space. Not because of who he is, but because of WHAT HE HAS THAT SHE CAN TAKE.
The comments on the original article says it all. Nice to see the tide is turning.
NOTE: WordPress is getting on my nerves, I spend half my time on it waiting for shit to load. I’m thinking of switching to Blogger.
This is a reply from the author of the excellent article, The Effect of Eugenics Propaganda, which I posted from Infowars a short while back. As she has kindly given me permission, here is her email to me, in full.
Dear M. Watkins,
I just wanted to thank you for posting my article. I do not have a WordPress account so I cannot comment directly, or I would (on many of your posts). There are so many that I support and completely agree with. I support you and what you are doing to alert other males how about they are under attack from many sides. You have my permission to post this comment of loving support to you and to all men.
As you can probably tell from my article, I am not a femi-nazi and agree that the institution of marriage is sacred and that family is paramount to the preservation of a free society. I completely agree that feminism is absolutely toxic and is part of the globalists’ plan to “soften us up for slavery.” Men ARE important and absolutely vital. I love men and appreciate the natural differences between the genders; I love what makes us different.
Your blog is wonderful and I, like many of your readers, absolutely deplore the androgyny that is promoted by feminists and the sidelining of men and fathers. I hate the feminization of men, it disgusts me. We women NEED you men!! We need you to be men as you were created to be. We need you and your testosterone and your natural protective instincts for us women and children; we need you to protect us and our families; we need you to fight for and protect our lands and countries. We need you to stand up and fight for us, and for yourselves.
You may or may not be aware of this, but Western men have been targeted in particular, for feminisation. This is because you are the biggest stumbling block to the plan of globalisation and the New World Order. Your protective instincts and natural inclination to fight for what you belive in (freedom, family, country and God) are a true threat. If you watch the CBC documentary “The Disappearing Male” you will see how males are being sterilized by the pthalates in the plastics that are ubiquitous in our world. I do not think this is an accident. There are hormones in milk that adversely affect you, and in personal care products there are common ingredients (lavender and others) that affect the testosterone levels of males. It is sick, sick, sick! And men need to fight back by taking very good care not to eat processed food, exercise and educating yourselves.
There was a recent article about how now most men in the UK can’t even change a lightbulb or rewire a circuit. This is deplorable! Men need to be able to make and fix things, shoot straight and be active in their family. Teach your children how to make and fix things, to shoot and be a good role model for both your daughters and sons. Your daughters will marry someone like you, so be active in whom you allow her to date. Go back to the age-old practice of intimidating her date, interrogate him and make whomever wants to marry her to ask your permission, and exercise your rights as a Dad, no matter how she objects. She will thank you later and respect you even more. You must lead your families, and be the head of them. This is vital to keeping society civilized.
Women are absolutely rudderless and unhappy in this horrible, feminized culture. We women naturally look to you and your leadership. We depend on your intinct to invent and charge ahead. There is nothing wrong with being treated well, in fact it is necessary for us to respect each other. But though it is being surpressed, the fact is we respect you more when you stand up for your position as the head of the family and the leader in community and business. We women cannot respect feminized males, just as men cannot respect masculinized females. This is why women are more unhappy than any time in history, and there are record numbers of women who are depressed, have panic attacks and other mental disorders. It is because women aren’t meant to lead, we aren’t meant to boss men around. Being in an unnatural position naturally causes an internal dissonance and inner confusion.
If you do not become educated, stay healthy and fit, and fight back we are all doomed. All patriotic and self-respecting men must band together and resist this attack on you, and thereby all of us. We need you; we are depending on you, and no matter what the femi-nazis say, we love you for being the real men that you are.
Kindest regards,
Carolyn Harris
Saw this on my travels and thought it was worth a picture.
There will be no surprises for Coleen Rooney under the Christmas tree.
The 22-year-old WAG has revealed that her footballer husband Wayne is buying her a Bentley for Christmas.
The couple, who are worth an estimated £35million, will add the new wheels to their already-impressive car collection.
‘He’s getting me a car – the new Bentley,’ Coleen told OK magazine.
‘It’s such a lovely present. It’s the updated version of the one I have now, but in a different colour.
He should just take the old one when she isn’t looking and get it re-sprayed. Like a girl would know the difference lol.
‘I’m so excited. I love the smell of new cars.’
I like the smell of new electronics myself. But each to their own.
The Manchester United ace owns more than £750,000 worth of motors including a Lamborghini Gallardo, a BMW M6, a Bentley Continental GT and an Aston Martin Vanquish – which was a good luck gift from Coleen before the 2006 World Cup.
It is not the first time Wayne has bought his wife a car as a present. He previously splashed out £60,000 on a Porche 911 for her 19th birthday.
Translation: She bought the Vanquish for him, with his money. And what is the lovely Coleen getting her hubby this Christmas?
Coleen also revealed that she will be buying Wayne ‘pyjamas and smellies’ for Christmas. ‘I get carried away,’ she said.
Rooney 0 – Coleen 1
Translation: Nothing can be allowed to get in the way of global carbon taxation and massive reductions of individual liberty and quality of life for us peasants.
Paul Joseph Watson & Steve Watson
An Associated Press article has stunned some readers by suggesting that an ongoing global cooling trend is actually indicative of how quickly the planet is succumbing to man-made global warming.
The bizarre statement appeared in a panic-inducing article that emphasizes man-made warming fears and highlights how president elect Obama must tackle them with new laws including a carbon tax “cap-and-trade” system.
“Mother Nature, of course, is oblivious to the federal government’s machinations.” writes Seth Borenstein.
“Ironically, 2008 is on pace to be a slightly cooler year in a steadily rising temperature trend line. Experts say it’s thanks to a La Nina weather variation. While skeptics are already using it as evidence of some kind of cooling trend, it actually illustrates how fast the world is warming.”
The article goes on to state:
“Since Clinton’s inauguration, summer Arctic sea ice has lost the equivalent of Alaska, California and Texas. The 10 hottest years on record have occurred since Clinton’s second inauguration. Global warming is accelerating. Time is close to running out, and Obama knows it.”
Chief global warming propagandists the World Wildlife Fund released a report earlier this year claiming that Arctic ice was shrinking at an alarming rate, leading to forecasts that the “North Pole may be ice-free for first time this summer”.
Such predictions were debunked after it emerged that Arctic ice had actually expanded 30 per cent, an area the size of Germany, a fact conveniently overlooked by the WWF.
Meanwhile temperatures have hit record lows in Denver and Montana as the Northeast United States experiences some of the worst snow and ice storms for a generation.
2008 is the coldest year of the decade and record low temperatures have hit areas all over America.
This has little to do with a “weather variation” and everything to do with the fact that the chief climate driver throughout eons of natural climate change – the sun – has exhibited a record barren spell of sunspots, which is causing the global cooling we are now witnessing all over the world. Conversely, throughout the 1990’s and in the early years of this decade, during which global warming reached its peak, the sun was more active than it had been at anytime in the previous 1,000 years.
The most recent period during which solar activity massively decreased was between 1645 and 1715, known as the Maunder Minimum, which also coincided with the geological period known as the Little Ice Age, when temperatures plummeted all over the world and the Thames in London was frozen solid.
The fact that the corporate media has openly abandoned any pretense of balance and fully thrown its weight behind the religious fervor of global warming – an orthodoxy that refuses to allow anyone to question its supreme and absolute dogma – again highlights how desperate the climate change PR assault has become in the face of over 650 scientists signing their names to a US Senate Minority report that challenges the contention of the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change that there is a scientific “consensus” on the causes of global warming.
Now that the real catalyst behind climate change, the sun, has dealt a blow to the global warming propagandists by daring to produce less sunspots, the climate change lobby will now merely claim that global cooling is a part of global warming, and that we must still lower our living standards and pay carbon taxes, while all the real environmental problems are ignored or actively made worse by the same power brokers demanding that we make sacrifices in the name of fighting a non-existent threat.
Let me get this straight. Although carbon dioxide emissions have been rising, the global temperature has not. It has either stayed static or fallen, and this is since at least 1998. You can’t state that quantity 1 is proportionate to temp 2 if temp 2 falls while quantity 1 rises. If there was any real connection between the two, the FACTS indicate that the relationship is inversely proportionate. Two factors that does match global temperatures is solar output and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, which has recently shifted into its cool mode.
Addressing the Washington Policymakers in Seattle, WA, Dr. Don Easterbrook said that shifting of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) from its warm mode to its cool mode virtually assures global cooling for the next 25-30 years and means that the global warming of the past 30 years is over. The announcement by NASA that the (PDO) had shifted from its warm mode to its cool mode (Fig. 1) is right on schedule as predicted by past climate and PDO changes (Easterbrook, 2001, 2006, 2007) and is not an oddity superimposed upon and masking the predicted severe warming by the IPCC. This has significant implications for the future and indicates that the IPCC climate models were wrong in their prediction of global temperatures soaring 1°F per decade for the rest of the century.
For fun one can actually look at the proportion of atmospheric co2 that is ‘made by man‘.
Joseph D’Aleo, the first Director of Meteorology at The Weather Channel and former chief of the American Meteorological Society’s Committee on Weather Analysis and Forecast, says that “carbon dioxide (CO2) is 0.000383 of our atmosphere by volume. . . Only 0.0275 of atmospheric CO2 is [man-made] in origin. . . We are responsible for 0.00001 of this atmosphere. If the atmosphere were a 100-story building, our [man-made] CO2 contribution today would be equivalent to the linoleum on the first floor.” Do we really want to spend a trillion dollars on linoleum?
And that is just for the United States. Also, one would think that these green fingered fascists would like co2, being an essential part of plant food. One would think that an increase in co2 would equal an increase in the amount of vegetation, which is has. From Watts Up With That:
Why the increase? Their 2004 study, and other more recent ones, point to the warming of the planet and the presence of CO2, a gas indispensable to plant life. CO2 is nature’s fertilizer, bathing the biota with its life-giving nutrients. Plants take the carbon from CO2 to bulk themselves up — carbon is the building block of life — and release the oxygen, which along with the plants, then sustain animal life. As summarized in a report last month, released along with a petition signed by 32,000 U. S. scientists who vouched for the benefits of CO2: “Higher CO2 enables plants to grow faster and larger and to live in drier climates. Plants provide food for animals, which are thereby also enhanced. The extent and diversity of plant and animal life have both increased substantially during the past half-century.”
The truth is though, that these so-called environmentalists are actually pushing the AGW agenda for their world government sponsors. This is not about saving the planet. This is about suppressing and controlling the human race, using various international agreements (none of which you agreed to) such as Agenda 21.
AGW is merely a selling point, as with all Hegelian dialectics, a problem must be sold to the masses for the controllers to be able to then sell a solution. That there is a ‘problem’ is more important than a true scientific investigation of it. They use just enough pseudo-science to convince the throng of idiots out there that it exists.
It’s like a chemical company releasing termites into a neighbourhood and then sending one of their subsidiaries in to offer the residents the solution to get rid of them. In theory it would be the same with viruses and so called ‘security software’. Same thing with smoke and a bee hive.
You get populations to follow your agenda by convincing them that your plan is the solution to their problem (which you created without their knowledge). Problem, reaction, solution.
This isn’t even complicated, all you need is logic and some time away from the television. Sit there in the dark with a beer and just think about things. You will be surprised at how many things in government and life don’t actually make sense.
By the way, there are plenty of scientists disputing the IPCC AGW dialectic.
Names of over 30,000 Scientists Rejecting Global Warming Hypothesis
UN Blowback: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
OFFICAL: IPCC computer model is WRONG
Global Cooling is Here! Evidence for Predicting Global Cooling for the Next Three Decades
Disproof of Global Warming Hype Published
Top Rocket Scientist: No Evidence CO2 Causes Global Warming
Two Peer-Reviewed Scientific Papers Debunk CO2 Myth
Comment from Old-Thinker News: Dr. Phyllis Mullenix became well known in the field of neruotoxicology when she developed a new, more accurate system of analyzing chemicals effects on the brain and central nervous system. The new technology was called the Computer Pattern Recognition System. She received funding from a variety of high profile sources, and consulted with Exxon, Mobil, 3M, DuPont and others in her early career. She was very well received until she began to investigate the effects of fluoride on the central nervous system. Ultimately, her career was destroyed because of her investigation. This presentation by Mullenix at Clark University in 1996 was done two years after she was fired from her toxicology position at Forsyth Dental Center. Mullenix covers vital information regarding secrecy surrounding Fluoride and the Manhattan Project and much more. For more information be sure to check out Christopher Bryson’s book The Fluoride Deception.
A vital piece of information that Mullenix covers is a communication that took place between Harold Hodge (head toxicologist for the Manhattan Project) and Lt. Col. Rhodes on May 1, 1946. Hodge writes in the letter, in which he uses “F” to abbreviate Fluoride,
“Would there be any use at making attempts to counter-act the local fear on part of the residents of Salem and Gloucester counties through lectures on F toxicology and perhaps the usefulness of F in tooth health?”
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
This contains additional information and quotes added by yours truly to give the article wider context.
From almost the first moment of recorded history, one set of relationships has been at the heart of the human experience and the basis of civilisation itself: a mother and father who depend on each other; the children who rely on them both; a supportive network of grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins.
Without the loyalties and obligations of the committed family, our ancestors would certainly have struggled to survive in a dangerous and frightening world.
How else but with the help of kin could they have coped with the critical moments in life: birth, sickness, old age, the need to educate and train their young? Without such help from the very beginning, it may be asked whether humankind would ever have developed the capacity to build an advanced civilisation.
That is because it probably wouldn’t have. Matriarchal societies move males to the periphery. They are at the bottom of the social ladder and are therefore not motivated to take the risks to advance the society with technology, as is evidenced by Daniel Amneus in his book, The Garbage Generation. A must read.
This week a report from Unicef, the UN’s child welfare agency, warned that working mothers take a massive risk when they put their offspring into low quality childcare.
This is in regards to the state deciding to force women into work once their child is one years old. No doubt to not only pay for the disgusting debt these socialists have put Britain in with the bankers, but also to control the next generation.
“No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” – Interview with Simone de Beauvoir, “Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma,” Saturday Review, June 14, 1975, p.18
Until very recently, in fact, the importance of the family was taken for granted, not only as the basis of society, but as the foundation of our human identity.
Today? In western societies - and especially in the English-speaking world - we think we know better. Forget the wisdom of the ages. Forget our deep-rooted instincts.
Forget precepts that have governed every society in every era of history.
The importance of the ‘traditional’ family is being challenged as never before.
The idea has taken root that human families can be constructed in any way people want. The message is that biology counts for nothing.
Biological mothers don’t matter to their children. Biological fathers don’t matter either.
All that matters is what adults want - and children must adapt to it, whether they like it or not.
The sheer speed of what is happening is quite astonishing. In less than 50 years, the old values have been stood on their head.
Today, legislators don’t hesitate to plunge into ‘reforms’ that tear up the rights, duties and obligations that have underpinned the family for millennia.
They rush into new ‘ postmodernist’ concepts of family, partnering and parenthood. Indeed, they are even attempting to banish the word ‘marriage’ from the statute books.
Everywhere in the West, the liberal consensus is on the march. In Britain, for example, a Labour Government has discouraged the use of the ‘m’ word in official documents, while in the U.S., the American Law Institute recommends that marriage should be ‘ deprivileged’ and not be given a status above any other relationship.
Yet on any rational analysis, this reckless embrace of a brave new world is simply perverse, since there is no doubt whatever that the traditional family, underpinned by marriage, is the best way of bringing up secure, happy children and maintaining social stability.
Which is precisely why the liberal-fascists/ socialists/ feminists are so keen on destroying it. This is not news, this is historical fact.
“[The nuclear family is] a cornerstone of woman’s oppression: it enforces women’s dependence on men, it enforces heterosexuality and it imposes the prevailing masculine and feminine character structures on the next generation.” – Alison Jaggar, Feminist Politics and Human Nature
“We can’t destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage.” – Robin Morgan (ed), Sisterhood is Powerful, 1970, p.537
Feminism plays a very important role in destroying the family (softening up society for enslavement). The socialist state can not tolerate competition to its control over the population. It is an ideology of social engineering. The nuclear family represents a unit stronger than the bond between individual and state. It also gives men and women much to lose, which makes all the more difficult to enslave. This is no accident.
You don’t have to be a religious believer or a Victorian moralist to take this view. The evidence speaks for itself (despite the strenuous efforts of the liberal establishment to ignore it).
Fact: one in two unmarried couples splits up before their first child is five years old. The figure for married couples is just one in 12.
Fact: children from broken homes are 75 per cent more likely than their classmates to fail at school, 70 per cent more likely to be involved with drugs and 50 per cent more likely to have alcohol problems.
They are also more likely to run away from home, find themselves in the care system and end up in jail.
At the very least, those bleak statistics should give us pause. The truth is that some of the most intractable problems facing Britain today - from our tragically high rate of teenage pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases to petty crime, gang membership and welfare dependency - have their roots in family breakdown.
Harriet Harman MP, the socialist/ feminist fasicst is recorded as saying:
marriage was ‘irrelevant’ to public policy and described high rates of separation as a ‘positive development’, as it reflected ‘greater choice’ for couples - never mind the children.
Take the shabby way successive governments have treated marriage in this country, even though they know perfectly well that it is one of the great foundations of society.
It was a Tory Chancellor, Kenneth Clarke, who dismissed the married couples’ tax allowance as ‘an anomaly’. And it was former Home Secretary Jack Straw who proclaimed: ‘This Government will not preach about marriage.’
The result? In Britain today it just doesn’t pay to get married. Our tax and benefits system is so arranged that if lower-income couples who are living together get married, they will significantly increase their tax payments and lower their benefits.
Perhaps it’s no wonder that this country has a higher percentage of lone-parent families than any other country in Europe, apart from Sweden.
The system is designed to create family instability. And the costs, both social and financial, are huge.
How to explain this bizarre discouragement of an institution so important to the happiness, stability and financial health of the country?
Politicians are terrified of being thought ‘judgmental’ about the way citizens live. And they obviously take the defeatist view that nothing can be done to improve matters anyway.
Nonsense, they are only in power because they subscribe to the Marxist school of thought, whether that be socialism or its logical extension, communism. Both are collectivist totalitarian regimes that place the State as the all important construct and reduce the individual citizens to the position of slaves to its function creep and ever growing power. Reminds me of how the matriarchal society treats men. No wonder women subscribe to it.
The same aversion to moralising applies increasingly to the laws on marriage and divorce.
Not only are we witnessing ever easier divorce - whatever the children may need or want - and same-sex marriages, but there is also growing pressure to remove the words ‘father’ and ‘mother’ from birth certificates and replace them by ‘Progenitor A’ and ‘Progenitor B’ (as is already happening in Spain).
Whatever the motivation behind such trends, the ‘ traditional’ family structure is being badly eroded.
All this reminds me of the grim ideas floated in ancient Athens 2,500 years ago. In the vision sketched out in Plato’s Republic - a philosophical treatise on the most fundamental principles of the conduct of human society - mating would be random.
Children would be raised by the state. Neither mothers nor fathers could claim their biological offspring as their own. Nor could they raise their children.
And yet the family in its traditional form is crucial to us all - not simply because it underpins social stability or because it connects us to the past and the future, but because it’s also a bulwark of freedom itself.
Why? Because the invisible bonds it creates between its members generate loyalties and affections capable of resisting any tyranny.
Exactly. Why would these agents of the elite do this? Maybe it is because their plan for the global socialist dictatorship depends on it. They must destroy the institutions that make a strong society so it can then be taken over with ease, using lots of small changes over time, changing the structure of society to one which will be more susceptible to the type of tyranny they wish for us all. This is Fabian Socialism and it is happening to Britain NOW.
“To achieve One World Government it is necessary to remove from the minds of men their individualism, their loyalty to family traditions and national identification.” – Brock Chisholm, while director of UN World Health Organization.
“We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.” — Statement made before the United States Senate on Feb. 7, 1950 by James Paul Warburg
“National Socialism will use its own revolution for establishing of a new world order.” — Adolph Hitler during World War II
“Mankind’s problems can no longer be solved by national government. What is needed is a world government. This can best be achieved by strengthening the United Nations system.” – Human Development Report, published by the UN Development Program, 1994
“The creation of a United Europe must be regarded as an essential step towards the creation of a United World.” – Jean Monnet, founder of the European Economic Community, 1948
“We are moving toward a new world order, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road.” – Mikhail Gorbachev, 1987
“Our culture, including all that we are taught in schools and universities, is so infused with patriarchal thinking that it must be torn up root and branch if genuine change is to occur. Everything must go – even the allegedly universal disciplines of logic, mathematics, and science, and the intellectual values of objectivity, clarity, and precision on which the former depend.” – A quote from Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge, “Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women’s Studies” (New York, Basic Books, 1994), p. 116
Global one world dictatorship – Financial Times
Families in meltdown, judge says
The Labour government’s anti-family tax system
The Effect of Eugenics Propaganda: Decline of Civilization
Family Being Replaced with Feral Gangs In Socialist Britain
1,300 women have had at least FIVE abortions
Girls + Alcohol + Feminism = Record number of Abortions
Children don’t need fathers, they need lesbians
David Cameron in the feminists pocket
Carolyn Harris
Infowars
December 12, 2008
According to a study led by David Schmitt, a professor of psychology at Bradley University, Illinois, Britons lead the western world in casual sex. The number of ‘one-night stands’ by both men and women are up and they are “the most promiscuous in the world.” While some praise this behavior as being “sexually free” it does have devastating consequences for human civilization. Consider the recent headline, “Drunken one-night stands over New Year will bring a record number of abortions” among teenagers.
While many “liberated” women say that they can separate sex and emotional attachment like men can and that casual sex is no big deal, testimonials do not bear this out. Besides the physical consequences of sexually-transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies, the emotional toll is not something that is casual – it may be consciously ignored, but it is deep and long-lasting The elite know that the more sexual partners one has, the less able they are to maintain a long-term monogamous relationship like marriage. This is an insidious way to undermine the natural bonds that form marriages and create children.
And the ubiquitous sexual messages we encounter are no accident. Contained in television, movies, music, general advertisements and even now in virtual worlds, to which the public is retreating from this increasingly upsetting real-life world, these ever-present reminders of the cult of youth, beauty and sex are targeted at the young.
And the youth are absorbing those messages and putting them into practice as the results of this study show:
“Twenty-one percent of girls and 18% of boys said they have posted nude or partially nude pictures of themselves online. Forty-nine percent of teens and young adults have sent sexually suggestive text messages or e-mails of themselves. Fifteen percent of teens who sent sexually suggestive content said they have done so with someone they only know online.”
With more and more children being raised online, and coupled with the intensive mandatory sex education at public schools, they are subjected to more degrading influences and less direct family input than ever before. The deleterious effects of utilizing their unprecedented freedom online, participating in virtual worlds where anything is acceptable with no consequences, these children are literally becoming unable to form and maintain even simple friendships with actual peers they encounter in their real lives.
All of these contribute to the planned decline of civilization and the institution of . The social engineers have cleverly devised a top-down approach to tearing apart the nuclear family due to its threat to their plans for their New World Order. It is imperative to achieving their plans that the youth and young adults are inculcated with the ideas that procreating is selfish, greedy and inconvenient. They are taught from a very young age by teachers cum “change agents” to believe that human life is not as valuable as flora and fauna, that cultural morés and morals are “outdated and outmoded” and therefore should be discarded in favor of new “liberated” thinking of secular humanism, which espouses the belief that there is no concrete “right and wrong” therefore anything is justifiable with enough rationalization.
Marie Stopes, friend of fellow eugenicist Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, created the first birth control clinic in Britain and advocated “’sterilization of those totally unfit for parenthood be made an immediate possibility, indeed made compulsory.’ And in The Control of Parenthood, (1920)… wrote that were she in charge, she would ‘legislate compulsory sterilization of the insane, feebleminded… revolutionaries… half castes.’ She opposed the marriage of her own son merely because his bride-to-be wore glasses. And upon her death a large portion of her fortune was bequeathed to the Eugenics Society.” Marie Stopes International carries out one out of every three abortions in the UK, and promotes “voluntary sterilization.”
Most people instinctively recoil at the prospect of either voluntary or state-imposed sterilization, but sadly there are many who have been so brainwashed that they have aborted their pregnancies because having children is not “eco-friendly” and many others who have been voluntarily sterilized because of outright selfishness (”it would hamper my lifestyle and I wouldn’t be able to do the things I want to do”), others being “repulsed by… the idea of being pregnant and having a child” or just total lack of any maternal instinct.
This is a source of joy to the eugenicists and population control/reduction proponents because their mildly coercive population control via “education” and constant propaganda is working so well in the western world. The rampant promiscuity and resultant high divorce rate, astronomically increased infanticide, children’s lack of ability to form even the most basic relationship – friendship, legions of children being raised less by parents and more by teachers (e.g., the State) all accomplish the population reduction plan quite nicely without having to resort to bloodshed, except of course for the infants that are aborted.
But, as Bertrand Russell stated, “I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others, which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full… The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s.”
We who value Freedom must resist the New World Order by educating ourselves and others, and refusing to participate in eugenics and voluntary population control.
Oh yes, the fascist scum in Brussels have set their Eye of Sauron on Ireland again.
Hopefully comes complete with mute button and off switch.
If blind dates, speed dating or websites haven’t led you to the love of your life, you could always take a leaf out of inventor Le Trung’s book – and build your perfect partner.
The 33-year-old has created Aiko – a ‘twenty-something’ robot who not only looks feminine and sexy but also does household chores and his accounts.
But despite her shiny hair and 32-23-33 figure, Aiko – whose name means love child – is no trophy partner.
She is accomplished too with a talent for maths and a 13,000-sentence vocabulary – in English and Japanese. She can also recognise faces, read aloud from a newspaper and give directions.
Aiko, a fembot made from silicone and A.I. technology, is a genuine labour of love for Mr Trung.
He has taken out credit cards and loans, sold his car and spent his life savings on perfecting the machine – at a cost so far of £14,000.
Pretty cheap considering he built it from scratch. Clever sonofoagun.
Mr Trung said: ‘I want to make her look, feel and act as human as possible so she can be the perfect companion.
‘Like a real female she will react to being touched in certain ways. If you grab or squeeze too hard she will try to slap you. She has all senses except for smell.
‘She doesn’t need holidays, food or rest and she will work almost 24-hours a day. She is the perfect woman.’
Mr Trung, who dresses Aiko in different outfits and takes her for drives in the countryside, was a child genius and made his first robot when he was eight years old.
Who needs Tony Stark? You don’t need to pay her either.
‘Women are generally impressed and try to talk to her. But the men always want to touch her, and if they do it in the wrong way they get a slap.’
LOL.
Mr Trung will spend the next few years perfecting Aiko’s software and increasing her range of skills – but not just for his own amusement.
‘I suffered a heart attack and I thought that one day I might need 24-hour care in the future,’ he said.
‘I may need to have Aiko look after me one day.’
Following on from the earlier article. The feminist-fascists continue to try and impose their morals onto other women. Now, to get their feminist idols to claim that a world government dictatorship would guarantee ‘equality‘ …
The contest was condemned as misogynistic and degrading – not to mention thoroughly old-fashioned – but that did not stop students from King’s College flocking to last night’s final heat of the Miss University London.
Contestants and their supporters had to walk past a picket line of placard-waving protesters at the Crystal Club, Marylebone, where the heat was being held.
While demonstrators outside waved banners with slogans such as ‘Every woman at King’s is a queen’ and ‘Our bodies are not for sale,’ inside the club, the contestants donned glamorous gowns and applied their make-up generously before parading in front of the judges.
Every woman is a queen? Talk about delusions of entitlement. I tend to see women as normal people, like men. You know, equal.
Hundreds of female students from the University of London have applied to take part in the competition, which is organised by the events company, 121 Entertainment.
Students can enter online, although some scouts from the organisers have trawled campuses inviting others to sign up.
The competition has divided students, with contestants arguing that it is just a bit of glamorous fun while the National Union of Useful Idiots Students say it distorts the aim of being judged on academic abilities, rather than looks.
Why don’t they mind their own fucking business. These girls taking part aren’t hurting anyone and they’re doing it of their own free will. These girls are probably happy taking part and people are happy watching it, so who gives a shit?
121 Entertainment say women find it ‘empowering’ and that the protests come from a minority of feminists.
Similar demonstrations have greeted the earlier heats, for the London School of Economics, School of Oriental and African Studies, Queen Mary College and Regents College, which have been held at West End clubs over the past few weeks.
Protesters have created an anti-beauty competition page on Facebook, entitled Miss-Ogynist University of London and passed angry motions at student unions.
Winners of the heats go to the final in February, where they will be joined by applicants from other colleges which have not held individual heats.
The competition, now in its second year, is sponsored by drink and cosmetic companies, but also by Cancer Research. Keelin Gavaghan, 19, an accountancy student who was named Miss LSE, is reported as saying: ‘It was so much fun. It was more about having a great time and raising money for breast cancer.
‘I fail to see what is wrong with feeling glamorous for one night. We hardly sold our souls.’
Ah, but you haven’t bowed to feminist pressure my dear, although there I was thinking that feminism was all about ‘women’s rights’ and ‘sexual freedom’ yadda yadda.
How ironic, these girls are actually choosing to do this, and are refusing to be ‘oppressed’ by this group of feminists. I thought the femmies would be proud lol.
What have we been saying eh?
Jaw-dropping report concedes that “global governance” is a euphemism for anti-democratic global government
Paul Joseph Watson
The Financial Times, one of the most respected and widely read newspapers on the planet, features an editorial today that openly admits the agenda to create a world government based on anti-democratic principles and concedes that the term “global governance” is merely a euphemism for the move towards a centralized global government.
For years we were called paranoid nutcases for warning about the elite’s plans to centralize global power and destroy American sovereignty. Throughout the 1990’s people who talked about the alarming move towards global government were smeared as right-wing lunatics by popular culture and the media.
Now the agenda is out in the open and in our faces, the debunkers have no more ammunition with which to deride us.
A jaw-dropping editorial written by the Financial Times’ chief foreign affairs commentator Gideon Rachman entitled ‘And now for a world government’ lays out the plan for global government and how it is being pushed with deceptive language and euphemisms in order to prevent people from becoming alarmed.
“For the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible,” writes Rachman, citing the financial crisis, “global warming” and the “global war on terror” as three major pretexts through which it is being introduced.
Rachman writes that “global governance” could be introduced much sooner than many expect and that President elect Barack Obama has already expressed his desire to achieve that goal, making reference to Obama’s circle of advisors which includes Strobe Talbott, who in 1992 stated, “In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”
Rachman then concedes that the more abstract term “global governance,” which is often used by top globalists like David Rockefeller as a veil to offset accusations that a centralized global government is the real agenda, is merely a trick of “soothing language” that is used to prevent “people reaching for their rifles in America’s talk-radio heartland”.
“But some European thinkers think that they recognise what is going on,” says Rachman. “Jacques Attali, an adviser to President Nicolas Sarkozy of France, argues that: “Global governance is just a euphemism for global government.” As far as he is concerned, some form of global government cannot come too soon. Mr Attali believes that the “core of the international financial crisis is that we have global financial markets and no global rule of law”.
Rachman proceeds to outline what the first steps to an official world government would look like, including the creation of “A legally binding climate-change agreement negotiated under the auspices of the UN and the creation of a 50,000-strong UN peacekeeping force”.
“A “world government” would involve much more than co-operation between nations,” writes Rachman. “It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.”
“So, it seems, everything is in place. For the first time since homo sapiens began to doodle on cave walls, there is an argument, an opportunity and a means to make serious steps towards a world government,” concludes Rachman, before acknowledging that the path to global government will be “slow and painful”.
Tellingly, Rachman concedes that “International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic,” citing the continual rejection of EU expansion when the question is put to a vote. “In general, the Union has progressed fastest when far-reaching deals have been agreed by technocrats and politicians – and then pushed through without direct reference to the voters,” writes Rachman.
So there you have it – one of the world’s top newspapers, editorially led by chief economics commentator Martin Wolf, a top Bilderberg luminary, openly proclaiming that not only is world government the agenda, but that world government will only be achieved through dictatorial measures because the majority of the people are dead against it.
Will we still be called paranoid conspiracy theorists for warning that a system of dictatorial world government is being set up, even as one of the world’s most influential newspapers admits to the fact? Or will people finally wake up and accept that there is a globalist agenda to destroy sovereignty, any form of real democracy, and freedom itself in the pursuit of an all-powerful, self-interested, centralized, unrepresentative and dictatorial world government?
Go to Prisonplanet
Hundreds of undergraduates in London have applied to take part in a beauty contest to be named Miss University London.
The students will participate in heats in the hope of being one of only 15 who will reach the contest’s grand final in February.
However, the event has opened a split in London University’s student body. Protesters say it is misogynistic and degrading, and should be banned. Participants and organisers have fiercely defended the competition.
So people that aren’t taking part are calling for it to be banned, preventing those who are taking part (of their own free will) from being able to exercise their personal choice. This is what happens in a socialist culture of imposing morals of one group upon another.
Demonstrators picketed London’s West End nightspots Maddox and the Crystal Club during heats for the London School of Economics, School of Oriental and African Studies, Queen Mary College and Regent’s College.
Last night, entrants from University College London went on stage at the Crystal Club, while students from King’s College will do battle next Tuesday. Ruby Buckley, women’s officer at LSE students’ union, said the contest should be “eradicated for good”. She added: “We come to university to be judged on academic ability and not on external characteristics.
“LSE is an academic institution and should not have its name tarnished by an event with a single function of the objectification of women.”
Well that depends on the point of view doesn’t it. One could argue this actually promotes Universities and celebrates intelligent, attractive girls as opposed to stupid airheads.
Elly James, women’s officer at SOAS students’ union, said: “It is like a cattle market. One of the things was that the contestants had to have their waists and breasts measured. I come from quite a rural area and that’s what they do to animals.”
Right, so according to her personal opinion, it’s wrong. That’s fine, she’s free to voice her opinion, just like the participants are free to ignore her and her miserable ilk. The point is the feminists don’t want women to have such choices. Where have I heard that before? Ah yes:
“No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one.” – Simone de Beauvoir, “Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma” Saturday Review, June 14, 1975, p.18- No Ma’am
I thought ‘women’s rights’ were about women having the ‘right’ to make their own choices and be their own person? Instead of attacking the women, the feminists attack the subject the women are interested in, whether it be ‘acting’ in pornography, being a prostitute, doing lower paid jobs for less hours and the like.
Feminism isn’t about choice, it’s about control, as are all Marxist ideologies.
One of those taking part in last night’s UCL event was geography student Zoe Chambers, a 20-year-old from Hampstead who modelled at London Fashion Week this year.
She said: “The horrible truth is everyone is objectified in a number of ways. You can tell just by looking at posters for some club nights and things like that.”
Mary Honeyball, a Labour MEP for London who sits on the European Parliament’s women’s rights committee, claimed the event stereotyped women. She said: “It does not seem right on many levels. It is dividing students, which is unfortunate, and it will exclude women who do not conform to a Nuts magazine idea of what is pretty.”
Women’s rights committee? What about the rights of men? And why doesn’t this socialist twit just mind her own bloody business. Nobody is being hurt by this event.
A spokesman for LSE said: “It is up to students what they do in their private lives.”
And that is where it should stop. Unfortunately, through never ending ‘change’ and political correctness, the state enforces its own opinion of what is ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ upon the people. As a consequence of this climate of social engineering, people begin to think in the same way. ‘I think, therefore you do’ is the mantra of a tyrant, not a free society. How much chaos will there be if everyone is allowed to impose their version of morality on everyone else? Where does it end?
It doesn’t, and it isn’t supposed to. The more chaos, the better, keeps the plebs distracted from the Fabian’s gameplan, which is dismantling Britain as we speak…
Mandelson admits Government has long-term plan to join the Euro
Daily Mail
Daily Mail