Comments on: Why Feminism is a Fraud…

By: Bob Collins

Bob Collins — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:10:14 +0000

This is just great. I joined a feminist website the other day — and they banned me within the span of twelve hours. For them, freedom of speech only goes one way. After they kicked me off, the moderator went back and altered — censored — my posts, then declared the thread closed. And the patriarchy is the only group interested in power? Please!

By: fmwatkins

fmwatkins — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:06:48 +0000

Thanks for the comment John, you are absolutely right about the socialism of Hitler, and the parallels with today's (New) Labour. Same thing with Obama. With have a generation or two who have grown up under state tyranny, socialism, communism. They don't actually know what freedom is. Funny how I didn't learn anything I know now from the Marxist indoctrination camps, otherwise known as schools. No Bill of Rights, Magna Carta, Monetary (fractional reserve, fiat currency etc). No truth about the banking establishment, the EEC > EU being the brainchild of Nazi's as a Plan B to destroy Britain incase the war failed. No explanation of Marxist thinking. Just lots of 'teaching' about how you are an evil polluter, creating CO2 and hurting the Earth, how you should snitch on your parents to the state and how you should worship the EU and turn your back on Britain. Embrace globalism and the new world order.

By: John Thames

John Thames — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:52:46 +0000

It strikes me that the feminist movement more closely resembles the Marxist-both are Jewish creations. The number of shrieking Jewesses has always been extraordinarily high in it since inception. Moreover, these Jewesses are completely silent about what goes on in Israel, where there is a vast sex slave trade of women kidnapped in Eastern Europe. Moreover, in Israel a state board determines whether a Jewess can have an abortion. The criteria are whether the woman has the financial resources to care for the child and the Jewish state’s need for a higher birthrate, not the convenience of the individual Jewess. There are other interesting practices as well, such as the fact that the Jewess cannot get a divorce without the husband’s permission.

Since you are anti-socialist, a position which I share, it is worth while remembering that it was precisely the British socialists, the Labour Party, who were the main sponsors of the Jewish “national home” during the days of the Mandate, 1923-1948. Indeed, this British Labour Party included a famous plank in its 1944 platform that “the Arabs should be encouraged to move out, as the Jews move in”. I assure you that I am no supporter of Adolf Hitler and his social system, although these days it is entirely forgotten that Hitler was indeed a socialist-and a genuine one. As Mr. Goldberg points out, the economics of Hitler’s Germany were entirely leftist. Corporations were heavily taxed and regulated. The Nazis had all kinds of social programs similar to those of New Deal America. Indeed, in the early years of the New Deal and the Third Reich, many Germans referred to the New Deal as “National Socialism for Americans”.

In Nazi Germany, abortion for German women was illegal (although the Nazis made an exception for Jewish women wanting abortions). The Nazis and the Italian fascists also made determined efforts to increase the birth rates of their respective countries. It is currently the practice among political leftists to equate German National Socialism with Jewish National Socialism in Palestine. But after the Second World War when the mandate was crumbling, there were a number of English conservatives who advanced the analogy as well. I think in particular of MP Beamish and Sir Edward Spears, who headed the Conservative opposition while working with the various Arab Offices in London.

Anyway, back to the feminists. They are odious creatures, Jewish or otherwise. I compliment you on your well-reasoned exposes. They are some of the best on the internet. Keep hammering on the truth. Someone has to do it. The liars of the kept media never will.

By: fmwatkins

fmwatkins — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 10:26:04 +0000

Maybe Robert, how about this:

Even the language of the [feminist] movement mirrors the mood of fascism. The apocalyptic and hate-filled rhetoric of radical feminists expresses their eagerness to inflict harm.

— Robert H. Bork (1996)
in Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline,
Regan Books/HarperCollins, NY (pp.193-225)

http://fathersforlife.org/feminism/quotes1.htm

It seems digusting and ridiculous when it the roles are reversed John, which feminism was, is and always will be.

By: john thames

john thames — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:40:28 +0000

The best way to refute feminism is to simply reverse the role of the genders. Here goes.

Let us visualize America in the 1950’s as it once was. (I live in the States.) Women work to support men who stay home and raise the children. Women give men everything in divorce court (the house, the car, all her money). Women pay massive child support and alimony to automatic custody fathers. Women die by the thousands in Korea and Vietnam while men stay home and drink tea with the boys. Women go down with the ship so that men and children can climb on the lifeboats. Women work themselves into heart attacks at work so that men can outlive women by eight years and inherit 80% of all the wealth in the country. Men have it made.

In 1963 a closet Jewish communist, Betty Friedan, publishes a book, “The Male Mystique”, arguing that the average male suburban house husband is really living in a camoflauged Auschwitz concentration camp. Men should liberate themselves from this female oppression and demand careers and high paying jobs in addition to “men and children” first. Women display the balls that men lack and call it all bullshit. They make clear to men that men have too much already and that men are not going to have all the jobs, too. Moreover, men should be paid less because they do not have to work to support the opposite sex like women do.

And that is the crock-of-s— called male feminism.

By: Robert

Robert — Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:58:03 +0000

“All men are rapists and that’s all they are” — Marilyn French, Authoress.

Nonsense. This is quoted wrongly. It was a character in one of French’s novels that said it and this does in no way reflect French’s personal opinion.

By: Hidden

Hidden — Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:32:17 +0000

I am a woman and I was lied too. My mother left my father and raised us with neglect. She has the highest degree but the family is a wreck. I sold my soul for ‘love’, I didn’t know what it was! I have always been submissive and craved my husbands arms, but that branded me as weak so I entered the world unarmed. My INSTINCTS to submit were used against me while I feigned emotional detachment. I was never allowed too say I needed a man. But at the same time my educated mother envied the ‘weak’ women who had to listen to a man. I was raised to marry for money, but that men were useless. I married a sexy blue collar worker who has me and dinner and thank god he loves my kids ( who are in bed) when he comes home. I love the structure, I love the focus he gives me. When I was single, I was always terrified and constantly felt used . I cannot admit this to my friends ( who are jealous of the softness of my life but would never let a man rule over them). It isn’t always easy for me, he is controlling but patience usually works best for me to get what I want. I mean want as in extra things that I end up getting because I am a “good wife”.
Feminism ruined my life. I grew up believing I could do anything a man could do. I did leave my childrens father because he is and alcoholic beat us and would not work. But if I had been cared for as a young women I would have realized how important a partner is in the first place, especially a suitable one. I was strong but worn out and depressed. I hated men but needed one…and other women LOOKED DOWN on me. I was scared to get an apartment alone with my kids, there was no safety for me and I didn’t realize I needed it until after I was a mother. The 250 dollar check the state gave me was useless! I was forced into doing ugly things…It was a mess. I do believe that matriarchy is changing things for the worse, but I won’t admit that to a woman. Just the other day a single woman looked on as I got a cool new phone from my Hubby, hers was cheap and she was sucking on a coffee demanding correct prices after taxes. She looked at me with contempt, I don’t know why…I earned it with all the work I do at home for my family. How could she be mad when she earned every bit of what she bought as well??

By: Families in meltdown, judge says « End of Men

Families in meltdown, judge says « End of Men — Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:35:33 +0000

[...] Not state ‘discipline’, family discipline. Bankers didn’t like that, so they conspired to fund feminism to undermine everyone else’s [...]

By: Dave

Dave — Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:53:16 +0000

I see the last comment was made almost two months ago, so this may not get a lot of viewership. Be that as it may, I disagree. Men are not emasculated and afraid to criticize women, they have merely been bludgeoned into not expressing their views. We at this site have officially declared political correctness dead and buried.

By: fmwatkins

fmwatkins — Fri, 01 Feb 2008 22:33:35 +0000

Steven. You make a lot of good points. I have thought about falling into the hate trap frequently, sometimes I just let rip and get ‘emotional’ about it. Imagine that!

I try to stay balanced though. This isn’t just about women mind you, men have a lot to answer for, for allowing it to perpetuate also. Societies policy makers are riddled with self-interested social engineering scum. The problem is the corporate government’s reach into society. I’m not claiming to have all the answers, but keeping the statists out of peoples’ lives is a good start.

One of the reasons societies of old were so strong is precisely because of the freedom society had. Government stood the hell out of the way, like it should, and people organised themselves into the units that were best for them. The nuclear family being an essential part.

I have no lenience with women’s bad behaviour though, (and men’s) and will pull them up on it if I have the time on this blog. On top of everything else, these women do have to take responsibility for their actions, because in the end of the day, they are the ones acting in that way down here, in the real world.

Men are now emasculated too, scared to criticise women, along with everyone else. Part of the feminist ideologies’ creation of the female immunity.

Men and women do naturally complement each other, it’s no surprise, we’ve been together evolving on Earth for a very long time. That was the goal of the bankers. To break that bond so they could control the women (and therefore the next generation) while marginalising the men.

This has now been going on for generations. This isn’t the beginning, this is almost at the end.

Feminism encourages women’s narcissism. This alienates men who loathe women for it. Women believe that their selfishness is actually ‘girl power’ so they refuse to see it otherwise. Men get even more pissed off. Etc.

The problem is women are being protected from the consequences of their actions by the government.

If it stayed limited and cancelled all of these bullshit laws and allow people the freedom to think and speak, these things would quickly repair themselves.

That’s what I think, none of this will make any difference while the governments do what they do.

I started out blogging about feminism, but quickly moved beyond it when my research went deeper. Still, I’ll keep calling people on their bullshit.

Thanks for the comment Steven