<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women&#8217;s No PAYDAY Debunked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/</link>
	<description>Repository for old End of Men blog posts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:42:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andysuth</title>
		<link>http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-2156</link>
		<dc:creator>Andysuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 15:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-2156</guid>
		<description>http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/tables/agegen2.htm

http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/tables/agegen1.htm

HSE exec moved the data tables, but still show the 97% male bias of workplace fatalities.

Harman should get more women into these carbon-monoxide/working at height/lifting heavy object/risk of explosion workplace environments as &quot;they&#039;re obviously safer people if they only account for less than 3% of workplace fatalities between 2006 and 2008&quot;!

(14:1 in cases per 100000 workers)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/tables/agegen2.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/tables/agegen2.htm</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/tables/agegen1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/tables/agegen1.htm</a></p>
<p>HSE exec moved the data tables, but still show the 97% male bias of workplace fatalities.</p>
<p>Harman should get more women into these carbon-monoxide/working at height/lifting heavy object/risk of explosion workplace environments as &#8220;they&#8217;re obviously safer people if they only account for less than 3% of workplace fatalities between 2006 and 2008&#8243;!</p>
<p>(14:1 in cases per 100000 workers)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Female students &#8216;degrade themselves&#8217; by signing up for beauty contest &#171; End of Men</title>
		<link>http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-2126</link>
		<dc:creator>Female students &#8216;degrade themselves&#8217; by signing up for beauty contest &#171; End of Men</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-2126</guid>
		<description>[...] whether it be &#8216;acting&#8217; in pornography, being a prostitute, doing lower paid jobs for less hours and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] whether it be &#8216;acting&#8217; in pornography, being a prostitute, doing lower paid jobs for less hours and the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A &#8216;feminist&#8217; email from YouTube &#171; End of Men</title>
		<link>http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1808</link>
		<dc:creator>A &#8216;feminist&#8217; email from YouTube &#171; End of Men</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1808</guid>
		<description>[...] http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/" rel="nofollow">http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyS</title>
		<link>http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1633</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 10:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1633</guid>
		<description>If Alex and Bob both work for the same place and Bob is offered work on scaffolding or oilrigs, he might resign.

Both Alex and Bob are good workers. Top workers. Charlie, the boss wnats to keep them, so Charlie matches the pay that Bob would get on the Scaffold or Oil rig. 

Alex would never work on an Oil Rig, or Scaffold: too dangerous. 

Why should Charlie give Alex a pay rise because Bob is going to leave?

It&#039;s the Reverse Darwinism at it&#039;s best. Alex can grab the tailcoats of Bob and proceed up the ranks without ever having to threaten to leave the company and work on oil rigs.

No danger, yet get paid the money for it. 

This argument works just as well whether Alex and Charlie are men or women. Sometimes you get paid for the job you don&#039;t do. It&#039;s abnout negotiation skills and free markets.

Harmon should campaign to get more women into the Offshore industries and scaffolding and building industries, then maybe the workplace fatalities would be more evenly spread across the genders?

97.3% of workplace deaths in 2007 were men.
(source: UK Health and Safety Executive of UK Government)

http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/tables/table11a.htm
http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/tables/table11b.htm

So, these are more dangerous jobs. So they deserve more pay.


-Andy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Alex and Bob both work for the same place and Bob is offered work on scaffolding or oilrigs, he might resign.</p>
<p>Both Alex and Bob are good workers. Top workers. Charlie, the boss wnats to keep them, so Charlie matches the pay that Bob would get on the Scaffold or Oil rig. </p>
<p>Alex would never work on an Oil Rig, or Scaffold: too dangerous. </p>
<p>Why should Charlie give Alex a pay rise because Bob is going to leave?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the Reverse Darwinism at it&#8217;s best. Alex can grab the tailcoats of Bob and proceed up the ranks without ever having to threaten to leave the company and work on oil rigs.</p>
<p>No danger, yet get paid the money for it. </p>
<p>This argument works just as well whether Alex and Charlie are men or women. Sometimes you get paid for the job you don&#8217;t do. It&#8217;s abnout negotiation skills and free markets.</p>
<p>Harmon should campaign to get more women into the Offshore industries and scaffolding and building industries, then maybe the workplace fatalities would be more evenly spread across the genders?</p>
<p>97.3% of workplace deaths in 2007 were men.<br />
(source: UK Health and Safety Executive of UK Government)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/tables/table11a.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/tables/table11a.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/tables/table11b.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/tables/table11b.htm</a></p>
<p>So, these are more dangerous jobs. So they deserve more pay.</p>
<p>-Andy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: British Government Works To Disenfranchise White Males &#171; Free Britain</title>
		<link>http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1516</link>
		<dc:creator>British Government Works To Disenfranchise White Males &#171; Free Britain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1516</guid>
		<description>[...] all know about the Gender Pay GapTM LIE. It does however offer a suitable Dialectic for the State to continue to expand its powers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all know about the Gender Pay GapTM LIE. It does however offer a suitable Dialectic for the State to continue to expand its powers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harriet (femscum) Harman still wants to discriminate against white men &#171; End of Men</title>
		<link>http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>Harriet (femscum) Harman still wants to discriminate against white men &#171; End of Men</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>[...] all know about the Gender Pay GapTM LIE. It does however offer a suitable Dialectic for the State to continue to expand its powers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all know about the Gender Pay GapTM LIE. It does however offer a suitable Dialectic for the State to continue to expand its powers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Families in meltdown, judge says &#171; End of Men</title>
		<link>http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1213</link>
		<dc:creator>Families in meltdown, judge says &#171; End of Men</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 22:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1213</guid>
		<description>[...] to the various myths and lies in order to benefit themselves. Whether those lies be the supposed wage gap, false rape claims or generally making society feel guilty for not pandering to female needs. (As [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to the various myths and lies in order to benefit themselves. Whether those lies be the supposed wage gap, false rape claims or generally making society feel guilty for not pandering to female needs. (As [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sexism and the City? &#171; End of Men</title>
		<link>http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>Sexism and the City? &#171; End of Men</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 13:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>[...] Really? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Really? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: International Woman’s Propaganda Day &#171; End of Men</title>
		<link>http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1001</link>
		<dc:creator>International Woman’s Propaganda Day &#171; End of Men</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 15:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-1001</guid>
		<description>[...] make men feel guilty for existing. It is also a day where feminists recycle the same old crap about women being paid less, domestic violence, rape, how great abortion is, women&#8217;s health problems, equal opportunities [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] make men feel guilty for existing. It is also a day where feminists recycle the same old crap about women being paid less, domestic violence, rape, how great abortion is, women&#8217;s health problems, equal opportunities [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Housewife &#8216;would be paid £30,000&#8242; &#171; End of Men</title>
		<link>http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-882</link>
		<dc:creator>Housewife &#8216;would be paid £30,000&#8242; &#171; End of Men</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://endofmen.wordpress.com/2007/10/30/womens-no-payday-debunked/#comment-882</guid>
		<description>[...] course, it wouldn&#8217;t be complete without a little helping of that wage-gap myth. In the year to April 2007, average earnings of full-time male employees were £498 per week, while [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course, it wouldn&#8217;t be complete without a little helping of that wage-gap myth. In the year to April 2007, average earnings of full-time male employees were £498 per week, while [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
