Multiple false rape accuser finally jailed.

Elizabeth Jones, 22, admitted she lied about the latest rape allegation because she “did not like” the man she accused of attacking her, Southampton Crown Court was told.

Her latest victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was arrested and questioned for nine hours before being released without charge.

After a judge jailed her for 16 months, it emerged today that she made her first complaint in 2004 aged just 13 before alleging other men had attacked her over the next nine years.

Another disgusting bitch acting without impunity, mollycoddled by the misandric state who always views the female as the ‘victim’ regardless of the circumstances. And why not? Men are all evil right?

Even after all of those nasty lies, she only gets jailed for 16 months. In a comfy community centre prison. She’ll do half that. 

Do you know what the going rate is for a rape conviction for a man? Well, the sentencing guidelines suggest you begin from at least five years. (It’s on page 23).

I guess we’re not equal after all. What’s that? You’re expecting feminists to come out of the woodwork demanding equal sentencing?

LOL

chicks

One for the wenches…

WenchOver at The Guardian a lady writes about the phenomenon of ‘LADS’, as she puts it. Her complaints are regarding an online magazine where guys take the piss and call members of the opposite sex various names, like slut, wench, bitch etc. Now apart from the fact she name drops literally all of the magazines’ accounts (publicity cough) she (gently) berates these guys for being so disrespectful and laments that the site / community as she states in her byline:

sends a message to young girls that their role is clearly delineated – you’re worthless.

The irony of talking about feminism (she writes for a femrag called Vagenda) while assuming that guys are responsible for the esteem of these girls is typically insular, but the double standard of women claiming to be ‘independent / just as good as / better than‘ men when it suits them, only to expertly feign innocence, rocking one of their feet on its toe while playing with their hair when they don’t like the consequences of something is ancient man-knowledge, just like it is ancient woman-knowledge that it’ll most probably work on men. And they’re right. Grr. This takes a much darker turn when women lie about rape, but let’s keep this on a lighter note. She continues;

Those little feminist-baiting scamps are well-known for their lax grasp of the term sexual consent, not to mention their constant assertions that all women are “wenches” and “slags”.

Saying they have a lax grasp of the term implies they’re rapists, surely? I’m sure they know what sexual consent is. I would go so far to say, if they actually caught a guy raping a girl, they would probably beat the shit out of him. They’re just lads, not grooming-gang rapists, for that you’ll have to look to our imported Muslims (which funnily enough, feminists don’t seem to touch).

Also, many women are slags. Vacuous, fame worshipping talentless meat sacks. You just have to look at the billions of photos they take of themselves and their SELF imposed objectification, with their cleavage shots, gallons of makeup and bum-in-the-mirror shots. (Not that I’m complaining about that last one). This includes so-called celebrity women who are climbing over each other to act sluttier than the next publicity whore. Who are they pandering to? They’re already rich and famous. Oh right, they’re competing with EACH OTHER. Women responsible for the issues of women? Well I never!

Back to feminism. Women want to be treated equally to men do they not? If they are going to roll in men’s circles and peek into men’s communities they better toughen up and learn to give as good as they get. Not just roll over and cry, because you just encourage them as they smell blood (but not in a nasty vicious way like girls do to each other when bullying in the playground). So just take the jest like a man woman! The writer should listen to how (male) best mates talk to each other, about each other. Shit, she has no idea…

Now I would post an example but a: men already know and b: women don’t need to know. (Plus not telling them winds them up even more).

Any guy with a few notches under his belt knows that a woman is unlikely to be impressed with his ability to draw a giant knob in the sand using a supercar, let alone appreciate being called a “student slut” who he’d “do up the arse” to a chorus of “LAD!” from his mates.

Well if the guy has a supercar she will put up with it because that’s what wenches do, she’ll probably even take it up the arse if he’s rich enough. These guys are just saying what guys can think. Don’t fret, I’ve heard what women say about men and believe me they don’t slouch there!

She goes on to ask if this misogyny is just a phase. First, a definition;

Misogyny (pron.: /mɪˈsɒdʒɪni/) is the hatred or dislike of women or girls.

And now, a question;

Would you create / join / contribute to a website dedicated to talking about / looking at pictures of / having sex with something you hate or dislike? That isn’t logical. But then she is female (feminist), even if she is a bit of a babe. I’d probably do her…

Oh sorry I’m objectifying.

She goes on to attempt to categorise this male behaviour (as if women don’t objectify men), not realising that this is a male thing full stop. It doesn’t belong to ‘middle class males’ or ‘maybe some working class’. Not all men talk about women like that but we do communicate about them in encrypted ways…

… Ever seen some hot wench in your office bending over and you catch a glance and then look around, only to see another guy look and then make eye contact at you? Then you both smile /snigger, do the man-nod and walk on?

Of course you have. If a bunch of guys outside a pub all watch some stunner strut by and afterwards you all just nod quietly to each other and sip your pint?

Indeed.

It’s normal. It’s in our DNA. What she doesn’t realise it that those ‘lads’ on that site are simply fascinated by women. So much so that they created an entire website about it. If any of these women actually tried to code a website they would begin to appreciate how much affection that actually entails. (Not the coding, which is mildly creative but mostly boring, I mean the motivation to do it).

Now, just because they aren’t fitting her and her ilks’ definition of how men should talk is utterly irrelevant. They don’t give a shit what women think, and they should they? They’re speaking with each other, they set the rules. That’s what happens when MGOTW. In a way this website is evidence of my interest in them. I do actually find women interesting, not in a study-breakthrough-in-science type of way, but in a ‘WTF how does that even make sense?’ way.

Of course, the other argument is that if women don’t like such sites, just don’t visit them. But although they won’t admit it, women are also fascinated by men, even feminists. We can’t get enough of each other.

I very much doubt those guys actually speak like that to women. You can just imagine them all cracking jokes about women to each other but as soon as a real woman talks to them they’d be on their best behaviour and she’ll probably have the dude around her little finger before he knows what hit him. But that’s what separates the LAD from the MAN.

As always, the problem with feminists is that they want women to have respect without having to earn it, but in this environment created by feminism, this new age of equaliteeeeee, men have simply put women in the same group that men put other men in and being men, the rules are simple and effective.

Earn my attention. Earn my respect. Earn my loyalty and then, and only then, will we have your back. And as long as you keep it up, we’ll have your back forever.

But seeing as you happen to be a hot chick, a few more pictures of DAT ASS wouldn’t go amiss…

x

femwar

Breaking footage! Women’s Only Vehicle Tunnel Opens…

After the mess the women made of the Women’s Only Car Park, engineers, psychologists and other experts from around the world convened to learn from that event. They isolated themselves in an underground base and worked tirelessly for a solution. A solution that enabled wimmin’s rights groups to have resources allocated purely for them, while denying the same for the men as that would be inequaliteeee.

Eventually, the worlds brightest female minds (takes one to know one right) developed the Women’s Only Traffic Tunnel. Leading from the Mall to their women’s only community (in a straight line because we all know women don’t understand angles), this tunnel would prevent evil men from being responsible for all the failures of women.

They even filmed it!

Enjoy the efficiency of women’s driving.

phoenix3

A Phoenix of Liberty Rises

I’m back. It’s been a few years. I’ve been here and there, compiled even more research and have much to put on here for you. Conclusions I have reached that I have to share. I will be going to places I maybe shouldn’t be going to, but I’ll keep pushing it until you tell me to stop.

It’s going to be a little while until I hit my stride, I have lots of comments to approve, spam to clear, templates to reset, links to gather, I need to organise.

I’ll give you more personal thoughts in coming posts.

Thanks for reading.

And as far as the system is concerned? THIS IS WAR.

Women’s Right to Choose in Full Effect

Let’s see how the wimmins revolution is coming along…

TOTAL  – Summary of Registered Abortions Worldwide, through April 2010

1922 – 2010: 863,000,000 reported abortions, estimated 950,000,000 total abortions.

Estimated current global monthly average: 1,237,000 abortions.

Wow, and there I was thinking Marxists killed a lot of people.

mmary of Registered Abortions Worldwide, through April 2010

Genocide Spectrum: Largest mass killings in History

**************** ALL TIME CHAMPION *************
258M 20th century by govt. “Death by Government”
180M Evil deaths caused by govt or religion in 20th century
120M Partial Total Karl Marx inspired killings
**************************************************

Bill Gates funds covert vaccine nanotechnology

(NaturalNews) The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is gaining a reputation for funding technologies designed to roll out mass sterilization and vaccination programs around the world. One of the programs recently funded by the foundation is a sterilization program that would use sharp blasts of ultrasound directed against a man’s scrotum to render him infertile for six months. It might accurately be called a “temporary castration” technology. Read more about it here: http://www.naturalnews.com/028853_u…

Now, the foundation has funded a new “sweat-triggered vaccine delivery” program based on nanoparticles penetrating human skin. The technology is describes as a way to “…develop nanoparticles that penetrate the skin through hair follicles and burst upon contact with human sweat to release vaccines.”

The research grant money is going to Carlos Alberto Guzman of the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research in Germany and Claus-Michael Lehr and Steffi Hansen of the Helmholtz-Institute for Pharmaceutical Research.

These are both part of the Gates Foundation’s involvement in the “Grand Challenges Explorations” program which claims to be working to “achieve major breakthroughs in global health.”

…breakthroughs like mass sterilization and nanoparticle vaccines that could be covertly administered even without your knowledge, it turns out. These nanoparticles could be used in a spray mist that’s sprayed on to every person who walks through an airport security checkpoint, for example. Or it could be unleashed through the ventilation systems of corporate office buildings or public schools to vaccinate the masses. You wouldn’t even know you were being vaccinated.

This technology is potentially very dangerous to your health freedom. Using it, governments or drug companies (which are all the same thing these days) could create a vaccine skin cream that’s handed out and described as “sunscreen.” But when you put it on, you’re actually vaccinating yourself as the nanoparticles burrow underneath your skin and burst, releasing foreign DNA inside your body.

A history of covert mass medication

But why would the government medicate people without their knowledge or consent, you ask? They already do it with water fluoridation. Fluoride is a drug, and regional and national governments all over the world are using the water supply as a way to deliver the fluoride drug to people whether they need it or not — and without any proper medical diagnosis or prescription.

So if governments are already covertly medicating people with fluoride in the water supply, they’ve set the stage mass-vaccinating people through similar channels, such as the air supply in buildings. And thanks to Bill Gates, this nanotechnology needed to pull this off is now being funded.

Is this really a “major breakthrough in global health?”

I suppose it is if you believe in covert medicine where you dose people with drugs or vaccines without their knowledge. Western medicine is so offensive to rational people that it can’t even operate out in the open. That’s why it resorts to covert contamination of the water supply in order to force the public to swallow its drugs.

Fluoride and covert medicine

Oh, by the way, to anyone who argues that fluoride is not a drug, remember this: According to the FDA, any chemical substance that has a biological effect on the human body is, by definition, a drug. Therefore fluoride is a drug, too.

Even more, fluoride is promoted with outlandish claims about “preventing cavities” by swallowing it, making it an “unapproved drug” according to the FDA. So how is it that this unapproved drug can be dripped into the water supply and forced upon hundreds of millions of people without a single diagnosis of fluoride deficiency or even a single prescription from a doctor?

The answer is that western medicine is so arrogant that it does not believe it needs to follow any rules, regulations or laws. It is a system of “bully” medicine where drugs are shoved down your throat by being covertly dripped into the water supply without your consent. So why should we believe vaccines will be any different? If mainstream medicine can find a way to force every person to unknowingly be injected with vaccines, make no mistake they will pursue it!

And such efforts will no doubt have the continued financial support of Bill Gates.

Serial false rape accuser, still protected

A woman drove a man to suicide by crying rape and forced a second innocent man to consider taking his life after falsely accusing him of a similar sex attack.

Despite being exposed in court as a serial liar, legal restrictions mean the 21-year-old woman can never be identified.

A jury took only 45 minutes to clear medical student Olumide Fadayomi, 27, of rape.

But several jurors at Sheffield Crown Court broke down in tears when the judge revealed the ‘victim’ had a history of crying rape.

This woman is a criminal. Why is she still protected? What sort of disgusting feminist nonsense is this? It is this kind of feminist nonsense.

  • “Politically, I call it rape whenever a woman has sex and feels violated.” — Catherine MacKinnon
  • “Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometimes gain from the experience.” – Catherine Comins
  • “All men are rapists and that’s all they are.” (Marilyn French, Author; and advisor to Al Gore’s Presidential Campaign)
  • “We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men…” Elizabeth Cady Stanton, “One Woman, One Vote”

The husband beating wives…

In case you didn’t know, the reality is that domestic violence is committed equally by both sexes. The feminist organisations and government would have you think otherwise, but that is because they have their own agenda (money and power).

The first time I struck my husband was during an argument over money. He’d decided to pay off a loan without telling me and we ‘ d gone overdrawn. I was worried and tried to discuss it with him, at which point he left the room.

I felt we hadn’t talked it through properly and followed him. The next minute, I was hitting him around the head.

I remember losing control and my limbs lashing out.

Afterwards he was upset and I cried – I felt scared and ashamed of what I’d done.

I apologised and thought it was a one-off, but in fact it was a pattern that carried on for the next ten years.

I met my husband through mutual friends at Durham University. I was 19 and he was five years older, more worldly and mature. He was less serious, too, and made me laugh.

We married five years later. He had a job in IT by then and I started work as a divorce lawyer. The early days of our marriage were steady, but as the stress of my job and responsibilities grew, I took it out on him.

After that first time, it happened again about 18 months later. I felt a surge of rage I couldn’t control. My anger would escalate during arguments over household chores or my husband coming to bed late. I remember feeling I was out of my body, watching myself and telling myself to stop, but I couldn’t. I would hit him hard; hitting to hurt.

One time, I picked up a table and crashed it down so hard on the ground that it broke. I left bite marks in his arm a couple of times – it was similar to the way siblings fight, yet he never once struck back. He’d hold up his hands to shield himself, which made me feel even worse.

Yes, this happens a lot more that people realise and it is good that it is getting attention. Women aren’t angels. They’re just people.

Male defendants to be granted anonymity in rape cases

Wow, equal treatment for both parties in a rape allegation until a verdict is given.

Defendants in rape cases will now be granted anonymity under new rules set out in today’s Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition document.

The move will turn the clock back to the 1970s when the Sexual Offences Act introduced anonymity for those accused of rape, something later repealed.

Officials said details of the change were yet to be decided but it is likely the ban will be lifted once a suspect is convicted.

But it stands in the face of a report by Lady Stern that recommended independent research should first be done into the scale and nature of false rape allegations.

Which I think we all know, is a huge issue and getting larger all the time. Bog standard femskank fumes:

Ruth Hall, of Women Against Rape, said the decision was an ‘insult’ and a backlash against the rising number of rape reports.

She said: ‘More attention needs to be paid to the 94% of reported cases that do not end in conviction rather than the few that are false.

‘If men accused of rape got special rights to anonymity, it would reinforce the misconception that lots of women who report rape are lying.

Can you believe it? Why should someone who has only been accused of a crime be identified? How is that a special right? It is a common occurance that women falsely accuse men of rape (just search on this blog for starters), it is also common that these falsely accused men have their lives ruined, even when acquitted. They get battered, bricks thrown through their windows, they lose their jobs, their friends etc.

Just because some spiteful bitch feels guilty about getting drunk and opening her legs to him? Or maybe trying to cover her own arse because she was actually cheating on her boyfriend at the time.

You know it happens.

‘False rape allegations are extremely rare, but receive disproportionate publicity.

‘Of course, being wrongly accused is a terrible ordeal but the same can be said of being wrongly accused of murder, theft, fraud or any other serious offence.

So?

‘We are against a special case where men accused of rape are singled out for special protection.’

Rape law campaigner Jill Saward said she is ‘horrified’ by the news and accused politicians of turning their backs on victims of sexual violence.

Ms Saward, who has spoken out on tackling rape since being attacked at her Ealing vicarage home in 1986, said she completely opposes anonymity for defendants.

She said the changes may discourage genuine victims from coming forward and ‘send a damaging message’.

Right, to anything to encourage more women to accuse more men of rape. Why, so these bitches can claim there is ‘such a problem’ ‘men are all rapists’ and then go running to the government for more funding?

Go fuck yourselves. I’m not holding my breath, but it would be good if this actually goes through.

Draw Mohammed Day is TOMORROW!

Don’t forget, if you have blogs, websites etc, or you just want to join in the fun, tomorrow is Draw Mohammed Day (links to Facebook group).

As you know, it is essentially based on a reaction to people who believe they are so superior and perfect to the rest of us, that their beliefs (not facts) should be protected from analysis and critisism, forever. Hence their eternal outrage at things ‘offending Islam’.

This is something of a boggle, seeing as Islam isn’t a person that can be offended, but merely an ideology. I guess it’s okay for Muslims to depict non-Muslim faiths and beliefs as pigs, demons and the like, so long as it’s one way. Like I said, they believe they are superior. You have no ‘right’ to draw a picture of their so called ‘prophet’, even if this person actually received his ‘revelations’ not from God, but from a Demon.

No matter. What is important is that you FOLLOW ISLAMIC RULES and do not do what millions in the West will be doing tomorrow. Depicting this warmongering, paedophile fuck face.

It is going to ‘offend’ Muslims. Well who gives a fuck. I’m more offended by Muslims actually going out and KILLING PEOPLE.

By the way, now is a good time to post this excellent video, a speech by Bat Ye’or, a scholor of Islam.

Remember. Whether you want it or not. This is war. ‘Islam’ believes that the world was always Islamic, and the 15,000 acts of violence since 9/11 in the name of Islam are merely good Muslims trying to bring the world back to where it belongs.

Well I say fuck that.

In the West, everyone and everything is open to criticism. It’s the basis for separating fact from fiction. If Muslims want to threaten lives on this issue, then they are merely seeking to impose islamic rule on non-muslims, as part of their holy war.

Tomorrow I’ll have a pic up. You can count on it.

Man swindles over £100,000 from lonely women

First, he charmed his way into their hearts. Then he charmed himself into their beds.

But John Keady didn’t seduce women for sex or companionship. He wanted to get into their bank accounts.

For 20 years, the conman wooed a succession of women all over Britain, Europe and America.

As one of the comments states;

Amazing that when women get fleeced by a man they date it makes the news, when it goes the other way it’s called marriage.

Funny that.

Law firm scared to fire pregnant woman, fires man instead

A male lawyer was wrongfully sacked because his bosses feared they would be sued if they fired his female colleague while she was on maternity leave.

In a rare instance of a man claiming sex discrimination, John de Belin won £123,000 in damages after one of Britain’s biggest law firms ‘deprived him of his livelihood’.

Mr de Belin, 45, was one of two associates facing redundancy from Eversheds’ property division in Leeds. The other was Angela Reinholz, 40.

To decide who would be sacked, the firm undertook an assessment of both Mr de Belin’s and Mrs Reinholz’s abilities, including financial performance, discipline history and absence records.

Mr de Belin was fired in February 2009 after losing by just half a point, scoring 27 out of 39 in the exercise against Mrs Reinholz’s 27.5.

But he later learned that the test score had been ‘unfairly inflated’ to the advantage of his female colleague.

He also discovered that Mrs Reinholz was given the maximum possible score for her ability to swiftly secure ‘lock-up’ payments from clients – even though she was at home on maternity leave during the period of time she was being assessed.

The Leeds employment tribunal ruled that this effectively tipped the balance in her favour and Mr de Belin lost out.

In the judgment, Judge Jeremy Shulman said: ‘If any other score had been given to Ms Reinholz… she would have been at risk and not him.

‘Eversheds elected to give the maximum notional score for lock-up to Ms Reinholz because it regarded this as the fairest approach, while also trying to avoid a claim against Eversheds by Ms Reinholz. But this clearly worked less favourably to Mr de Belin, who was then put at risk and ultimately dismissed for redundancy.’

So the firm has to make someone redundant and they obviously thought the chances of them being sued would be smaller if they fired the guy. Because guys are just supposed to ‘deal with it’ right?

Wrong.

There is obviously a culture of women suing the shit out of anything that moves, especially in the legal profession.  You know, they’d worry about losing their job, then suddenly claim they were sexually harassed for the past 10 million years. Or they commit fraud, get found out and sacked, and then sue for discrimination. Even better, female employee can steal from her bank, gets caught and just blames it all on her boyfriend! Weak vunerable woman when she needs to be eh.

I’ve got an idea. How about we scrap all these regulations and just let companies do their bloody job?

‘Women’s group’ loses state funding

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

An organisation which represents women’s groups in Wales says it will close after being refused funding from the assembly government.

Excuse me while I sip this water (I’m hungover).

Ahhh.

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.

Seriously, enough of this bloody funding for these special interest groups. I say shut them all down. Every single organisation pushing for womens/ gay/ black/ muslim/ green/ transgender/ psychic/ whatever/ rights should be shut down. I don’t want to pay for any of them. Nobody is special, get over yourselves.

Guess those women will have to go and get REAL JOBS, how’s that for equality.

Now that’s Change You Can Believe In. :-)

Google ‘accidentally’ hoovers up 600GB of private Wi-Fi data

The internet giant’s Street View cars, which were launched last year to take photographs for its Google Maps service, have mistakenly collected information sent over unencrypted Wi-Fi networks.

Information gathered by the cars’ antennae could include parts of an email, text or photograph or even the website someone may be viewing.

Why on Earth people still don’t password protect (and MAC address lock) their networks is beyond me. Still, this data is still private.

About 600 gigabytes of data was taken off Wi-Fi networks in more than 30 countries. Google said it plans to delete all the information as soon as it gains clearance from government authorities.

Clearance to delete something they shouldn’t have had in the first place? Dodgy as fuck.

Mother beats 21 month old baby to death, jailed for ‘life’

A mother who punched and kicked her 21-month-old son to death was jailed for life today.

Collette Harris, 30, must serve at least 16 years behind bars for the murder of Bobby Louch.

He had more than 80 bruises and injuries on his tiny body and head, as well as a burn to his right hand, when he died four days after Christmas in 2008.

He had fatal damage to his brain and abdomen and his injuries were so severe they would normally be seen in a car crash, the Old Bailey was told.

But Bobby had been treated for a broken leg three weeks earlier and was kept in for a scan when bruises were seen on his forehead.

The toddler’s mother, Collette Harris, complained she was being ‘victimised’ and said the bruises were the result of Bobby banging his head on his cot.

Victim? Of what! Victimised by a baby?

She screamed ‘Oh my God’ and collapsed in tears as the jury found her guilty of murder.

Harris whispered ‘I did not touch my son’.

She had tried to blame her new boyfriend, James Phillips, who denied killing Bobby or causing the injuries.

Drug taker Phillips, 25, of Erith, Kent, was found not guilty of murder and alternate charges of manslaughter and causing or allowing the death.

After ‘boyfriends’ and ‘step-fathers’ the biggest group of child abusers are biological mothers. I wonder how they knew this guy didn’t have anything to do with it?

I left out further details of the injuries the baby sustained, it’s hard enough reading it, if you want to know, read the full article. Another symptom of the breakdown of the nuclear family, one of the foundations of feminism.

The pretty girl from The Wonder Years grew up!

And so did all of us.

As Kevin Arnold’s childhood sweetheart Winnie in The Wonder Years, Danica McKeller was the object of many teenage boys’ crushes.

But 17 years after the show ended, it appears the cute girl-next-door has grown up into a good-looking woman.

Now a 35-year-old and married, McKeller shows she’s all grown up as she poses for a sexy photoshoot with men’s magazine Maxim.

Pretty and clever, what more can a man want in a woman?

She took time out of her acting career to study mathematics at UCLA and found such an affinity with the subject, she went on to write two New York Times best-sellers called Math Doesn’t Suck: How to Survive Middle-School Math without Losing Your Mind or Breaking a Nail and Kiss My Math: Showing Pre-Algebra Who’s Boss.

How hot is that!

Who says women aren’t competitive

I have been following the ever falling standards of female ‘artists’ closely over the years. The way they seem to have gotten more and more slutty, sexualised and pathetic in their attempts to 1. get media coverage for themselves and 2. get media coverage away from their ‘competition’.

That is what this boils down to. Attention. In this case, attention equals money. I mean, Grace Jones was outrageous in her way, but she was never slutty. How many male performers do you see cavorting on stage wearing just a jockstrap and top hat?

Why do women feel the need to sprinkle sex on everything they do? Well, now it’s more like whack dollops of that stuff on, to the point that you can’t even recognise what is supposed to be underneath it.

Instead of ‘would you like a little ketchup with that hot dog’, it is now, ‘would you like a little hotdog with that ketchup?’

Femscum go into a ‘totalitarian paradox’ when women start showing their true colours. It goes like this;

There is a resource, could be money, sperm, protection, homes, whatever.

Woman wants resource. Someone else controls resource. If that someone is a man, the easiest way to acquire it is to use sex (or the hint of it).

This is nature. Every year in England, a bunch of gorgeous brainboxes get together and do a beauty pageant thing. They smile, they’re fit, their smart, they’re having a bit of fun etc. But before you could say ‘can I solve your equation honey bunny.’ the local femscum (and mangina) always kick up a fuss. These women are being exploited apparently. Although their choosing to do it. You know, that ‘choice’ thing feminists keep banging on about.

I guess what feminists really meant all along was ‘women should be free to choose to do what we want them to do’. Which isn’t very free at all. But they can’t directly attack the women, that would show their true totalitarian colours, so they continue to perpetrate the myth of the victim. The person organising it is exploiting them! The hall they booked is exploiting them! The paper that reported it on it are exploiting them!

Even the bloody girls themselves say ‘piss off and leave us alone, we’re just having some fun’.

But no, the INDUSTRY OF VICTIMHOOD commands that for these feminists to continue to feel like they are doing something worthwhile (they’re not) they must continue to try and convince everyone they are needed, by convincing everyone that all women are victims of something. Anything, long as they can point a finger at a man in the end (and demand resources to continue to fund their pathetic hateful lives).

Can you imagine this mentality with black people, women, or Jews?

Feminsts, get a fucking clue. You’re about as useful as a fart in a spacesuit. You care about individual freedom about as much as Stalin and you are actually the enemy of men and women.

Buy a dildo or something, just leave us the fuck alone.